3/7 http://csua.org/u/f5w (telegraph.co.uk)
"The man who for two years led Iran's nuclear negotiations has laid out
in unprecedented detail how the regime took advantage of talks with
Britain, France and Germany to forge ahead with its secret atomic
programme."
\_ All options are on the table and we will be greeted as liberators.
Oh, the country is oil rich so they can pay for their own
reconstruction, the American taxpayer is off the hook again!
\_ We are sort of greeted as liberators. Most of the fighting
is fuckhead Sunnis who can't handle only getting 20 percent
of the political power since they are only 20 percent
of the population, vs the dominant Shiite population
who are viewed as infidels by the Saudis, Al-Queda,
and that Zaqardi Jordanian fellow. I think the only
solution is to wall the entire area in and let them
kill each other over which of Mohammeds cronies should
have led Islam 2000 years ago. What a bunch of
retards.
\- it's a little tough to take you as a serious commentator
when you write about islam 2000yrs ago. --that indian fellow
\_ to use a forest fire term, we need a "controlled burn"
\_ Think of it as evolution in action. Of cource, CSUAers
not breeding is also evolution in action.
\_ So it will cost only 500 billion dollars in 3 years, just
like Iraq. Hehehehe.
\_ It makes sense. We can combine Iraq, Iran and the Kurds
into one giant OhFuckIstan.
\_ Why the Kurds? They're doing pretty OK on their own.
It's a Sunni/Shiite thing. Haven't the Kurds had it
bad enough already?
\_ that is because they are pratically independent from
Iraq right now. I can totally see couple years
down the road USA will invade Kurd-controlled
territory along with Turkish troops.
\_ I can't wait to see US invade Iran. It would be a lot of
run to watch. Too bad it won't happen, cause with Iraq,
US is already like a girl with jeans and panties bundled
around the ankle, butt naked and hobbled.
fun to watch. Too bad it won't happen, cause with Iraq,
US is already like a sissy with jeans and panties bundled
around the ankles, butt naked and hobbled.
\_ And you made this determination of American military
capacity based on your vast wealth of military knowledge
and deep understanding of history, logistics and military
psychology? I don't think there will be an invasion, but
not because the US military couldn't flatten the Iranians.
\_ I think it has more to do with American forces being
stretched really thin, continuous inability to
suppress resistance in Iraq, and Iran being several times
larger in size and population (several times larger
than the entire population of Iraq, not the Sunnis
population of Iraq). Also, an invasion would likely
turn the Shiites in Iraq against US. Then there is
the difficulty for the US military to recruit new
soldiers, soldiers complaining about length of stays
in Iraq, a weak US economy with huge budget and trade
deficits, lack of international support, etc., etc.
Iran also doesn't have internal religious and
ethnic divisions like in Iraq, and hasn't been under
a decade of sanctions. Note: pop of Iraq 26 million.
pop of Sunnis in Iraq ~5 million. pop of Iran
68 million.
\_ Also don't forget, the Iranians have this fun tendency,
all the wanting to hold hands and listen to rock & roll
aside, to strap on bomb vests and send hordes of
fanatical 8 year olds to do things like clear mine
fields and gnaw off invaders' feet while they sleep
when you attack their country. So unless you're really
when you attack their country, so unless you're really
really sure of what you're doing, don't have any, oh I
dunno, "other current engagements that may be requiring
some of your attention and military resources", and
have a whole buttload of allies in the area who're
actually willing and able to send in their own brute
squads (or even publicly prepared to say that they
support what you're doing), not to mention not having
any several big, mean countries that are sort of
counting on Iranian gas and oil and money for nuclear
reactor bits expressing "doubts" about what you're up
to, I don't really know if it's such a fantastic idea to
go invade them. -John
\_ When your trigger happy President is also a
fanatic, it's not such a crazy idea to attack
others fanatically.
\_ Nobody's attacking anyone fanatically, just
dishonestly and incompetently. If we can't even
run a war/occupation/counterinsurgency right,
then given all the above crap, I think starting
another war is knid of silly. -John
another war is kind of silly. -John
\_ John, you just won the longest sentence
of the year award. |