Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 41714
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2024/11/22 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
11/22   

2006/2/6-7 [Science/Space, Science/GlobalWarming] UID:41714 Activity:nil
2/6     http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/04/science/04climate.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
        "In October, for example, George Deutsch, a presidential appointee in
        NASA headquarters, told a Web designer working for the agency to add
        the word "theory" after every mention of the Big Bang..."
        \_ You're saying the big bang thing isn't a theory?  A lot of *very*
           smart people in the field would disagree with you.
           \_ You're ignoring the context of the order.  It's very clear that
              he meant it not as scientists define "theory" but in the "it's
              just a theory" ID-crazed-uninformed-nutjob manner
           \_ Perhaps.  But Deutsch is a Dubya appointee, so obviously the
              edit is motivated by politics and not science.
2024/11/22 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
11/22   

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/2/5-3/4 [Science/Space] UID:54597 Activity:nil
2/5     "Asteroid 2012 DA14 to sweep close on February 15, 2013"
        http://www.csua.org/u/z5p (earthsky.org)
        "It'll pass within the moon's distance from Earth - closer than the
        orbits of geosynchronous satellites."  What a close call!
        \_ (2/15) The meteor in Russia beated it.
        \_ (2/15) The meteor in Russia trumps it.
	...
2012/9/3-11/7 [Science/Space, Politics/Domestic/Crime] UID:54471 Activity:nil
9/3     While most of America is committing more and more resources to fight
        obesity by promoting healthy diets, NASA was spending tax dollars
        looking for sugar in space ......
        http://www.csua.org/u/xjv
        :-)
	...
2012/9/18-11/7 [Science/Space] UID:54478 Activity:nil
9/18    The Space Shuttle Endeavour is doing a fly over of Nasa Ames on Friday:
        http://tinyurl.com/8ffrx5j [nasa.gov]
        \_ They have reached their cap on car passes!  Ahh!  I wish I heard
           about this earlier! :-(
        \_ I saw it above HW 101 in San Mateo this morning.  I wonder how many
           people in the Bay Area watched it (the real thing, not a broadcast.)
	...
2011/3/6-4/20 [Science/Space, Science/Physics] UID:54055 Activity:nil
3/5     "NASA scientist finds evidence of alien life"
        http://www.csua.org/u/sov (news.yahoo.com)
        WOW!
        \_ This was published in the Journal of Cosmology.  Here's a
           description of the very first paper they published, in 2009:
           http://csua.org/u/sp1
	...
2009/9/15-24 [Consumer/Camera, Science/Space] UID:53370 Activity:kinda low
9/15    "The $150 Space Camera: MIT Students Beat NASA On Beer-Money Budget"
        http://www.csua.org/u/p2i (http://www.wired.com
        I just hope that copycats won't pop up everywhere and cause airline
        crashes.
        \_ How did they beat NASA?  This is cool, but comparing it to
           NASA is just stupid.
	...
2009/7/17-24 [Science/Space] UID:53151 Activity:nil
7/17    NASA lost original video footage of the first manned moon landing!
        http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090716/ap_on_sc/us_sci_moon_video
        "How did NASA end up looking like a bumbling husband taping over his
        wedding video with the Super Bowl?"
        Unbelievable.
        \_ For what it's worth, all known TV broadcast footage of Super Bowl I
	...
2013/1/28-2/19 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54591 Activity:nil
1/28    "'Charities' Funnel Millions to Climate-Change Denial"
        http://www.csua.org/u/z2w (news.yahoo.com)
        And they're getting tax-deduction out of it!
        \_ Climate denialism should quality for the religious exemption.
        \_ Koch, yes, Koch and his ilk give "millions" to this kind of thing.
           How much is spent on the other side of the issue?
	...
2012/6/22-7/20 [Politics/Domestic/California, Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54420 Activity:nil
6/22    "Study: The U.S. could be powered by 80% green energy in 2050"
        http://www.csua.org/u/wtz  (news.yahoo.com)
        \_ How many Republicans does it take to make green energy?
           -150,000,000! Ding ding ding!
           \_ Because having control of the White House and both houses of
              Congress wasn't enough (ie, the do nothing and blame the
	...
2010/8/3-25 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:53908 Activity:nil
8/3     http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599200808100
        'Russia's largest circulation newspaper, Komsomolskaya Pravda, ran a
        headline on July 31 that asked, "Is the Russian heat wave the result
        of the USA testing its climate weapon?" The daily's answer was "Yes,
        probably."'
        Yeah, let us use our climate weapon on the California climate so that
	...
2010/4/20-5/10 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:53792 Activity:nil
4/20    "Spring comes 10 days earlier in changed U.S. climate"
        http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100420/us_nm/us_climate_spring_usa
	...
2009/11/26-12/6 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:53545 Activity:nil
11/26   "New climate targets may not change daily life much"
        http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_climate_costs
        \_ Glenn Beck says that trying to meet these climate targets will
           lead to a worldwide socialist regime.
	...
2009/11/23-30 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:53539 Activity:high
11/22   What no chatter about the Climate Hack?  MOTD, I'm so diappointed
        \_ What is impressive about breaking onto an academic server? I
           broke onto the Astronomy machines when I was a sophmore.
           \_ Way to miss the point. The hack itself was not impressive.
              The information that was exposed, however, make the above
              thread kind of moot.
	...
2008/8/8-13 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:50821 Activity:nil
8/8     http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080808/sc_afp/usenvironmentclimatewarming
        "WASHINGTON (AFP) - US and British researchers have *confirmed* the
        link between warmer climate and an increase in powerful rainstorms,
        according to a study released Thursday that underscores one of the
        challenges of global warming."
	...
Cache (3998 bytes)
www.nytimes.com/2006/02/04/science/04climate.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
ANDREW C REVKIN Published: February 4, 2006 A week after NASA's top climate scientist complained that the space agency's public-affairs office was trying to silence his statements on global warming, the agency's administrator, Michael D Griffin, issued a sharply worded statement yesterday calling for "scientific openness" throughout the agency. Access His Podcasts "It is not the job of public-affairs officers," Dr. Griffin wrote in an e-mail message to the agency's 19,000 employees, "to alter, filter or adjust engineering or scientific material produced by NASA's technical staff." The statement came six days after The New York Times quoted the scientist, James E Hansen, as saying he was threatened with "dire consequences" if he continued to call for prompt action to limit emissions of heat-trapping gases linked to global warming. He and intermediaries in the agency's 350-member public-affairs staff said the warnings came from White House appointees in NASA headquarters. Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration scientists and public-affairs employees came forward this week to say that beyond Dr. Hansen's case, there were several other instances in which political appointees had sought to control the flow of scientific information from the agency. They called or e-mailed The Times and sent documents showing that news releases were delayed or altered to mesh with Bush administration policies. In October, for example, George Deutsch, a presidential appointee in NASA headquarters, told a Web designer working for the agency to add the word "theory" after every mention of the Big Bang, according to an e-mail message from Mr Deutsch that another NASA employee forwarded to The Times. And in December 2004, a scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory complained to the agency that he had been pressured to say in a news release that his oceanic research would help advance the administration's goal of space exploration. On Thursday night and Friday, The Times sent some of the documents to Dr. Griffin and senior public-affairs officials requesting a response. Griffin did not respond directly, he issued the "statement of scientific openness" to agency employees, saying, "NASA has always been, is and will continue to be committed to open scientific and technical inquiry and dialogue with the public." Because NASA encompasses a nationwide network of research centers on everything from cosmology to climate, Dr. But he added that changes in the public-affairs office's procedures "can and will be made," and that a revised policy would "be disseminated throughout the agency." Asked if the statement came in response to the new documents and the furor over Dr. Griffin's press secretary, Dean Acosta, replied by e-mail: "From time to time, the administrator communicates with NASA employees on policy and issues. Climate science has been a thorny issue for the administration since 2001, when Mr Bush abandoned a campaign pledge to restrict power plant emissions of carbon dioxide, the main heat-trapping gas linked to global warming, and said the United States would not join the Kyoto Protocol, the first climate treaty requiring reductions. But the accusations of political interference with the language of news releases and other public information on science go beyond climate change. In interviews this week, more than a dozen public-affairs officials, along with half a dozen agency scientists, spoke of growing efforts by political appointees to control the flow of scientific information. In the months before the 2004 election, according to interviews and some documents, these appointees sought to review news releases and to approve or deny news media requests to interview NASA scientists. Repeatedly that year, public-affairs directors at all of NASA's science centers were admonished by White House appointees at headquarters to focus all attention on Mr Bush's January 2004 "vision" for returning to the Moon and eventually traveling to Mars.