6/21 http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/21/international/middleeast/21SUIC.html?pagewanted=2
"The bottleneck on the Palestinian side is not the suicide attacker,"
said a senior Israeli security official. "It's the bomb."
\_ It will end only when Palestinian mothers love their children more
than they hate the Israelis.
\_ It seems to me that if Israel tried to make life better for
the Palestinian's not as many would be willing to die in
suicide attacks. For example, if Israel built decent public
schools, health care, etc. and took steps to make help
Palestinians find decent jobs some of them might decide that
rebuilding their country and moving forward is better than
terrorism. Then again, if one of my friends or family members
was killed by a terrorist I might have a hard time taking
such steps.
\_ This is all UN controlled territory and the UN, EU, and others
pump many millions a month into the PA. Where is all the
money going? Not schools, jobs, or healthcare.... You're
looking to the wrong folks for these things. Oh yeah, this
is also all supposed to be demilitarised land. Why is the UN
sitting on it's ass while weapons pour into the area? It'll
end when the Palestinians love their children. As a side
note, this was all Jordanian territory untl 1967 and they ran
it even worse than the Israelis. Why were mass Jordanian
executions ok but the Israelis are somehow supposed to be
lifting up the people who are specifically targetting their
children in a self-proclaimed "war of the buses"?
\_ because people have short memories.
\_ I'm not saying that what the Palestinians are doing is
good. What they should be doing is massive non-violent
protests a la Gandi or MLK, but they aren't. My point
was only that Palestinian parents won't start encouraging
their children to be peaceful unless they feel that
they can have happy, productive lives. As long as life
sucks, their will be no shortage of martyrs.
\_ But Gandi and MLK both did it under severe adversity
and oppression. I don't understand why Palestinians
refuse to take the non-violent approach.
\_ Those activists that have tried non-violence
have been shot and beaten. They also tend to
get pushed aside for attention by the violent
types. In India, the independence movement had
both violent and non-violent elements and even
in the civil rights struggle, MLK was one of
the more moderate elements. Isreal is also far
more willing and able to use violence against the
Palestinians than Southern Sheriffs were against
King (sad but true). So, the short answer is,
many Palestinians have tried non-violence. The
longer answer is that non-violence is probably
only ever effective as one part of a multi-pronged
approach. Unfortunately, the Palestinians seem to
have lost sight of this as well, and are increasingly
dominated by the violent and desperate factions
such as Hamas, leaving the Isrealis with no one
reasonable to negotiate with.
\_ Wow. Both of your arguments are basically clearly
stated, respectful of others' points of view and
earn sympathy from the reader. Maybe the football games
have the normal crowd still asleep. In any case, I'm
afraid this thread is too decent for politics on the
motd. You're going to have to leave now.
\_ YOU ESS EH! YOU ESS EH! YOU ESS.. oh damn it...
\_ Try again in 2006.
\_ Maybe the Palestinians wouldn't be so violent if their
territority wasn't being littered with Israeli "Settlements"? |