|
7/9 |
2004/1/20 [Consumer/CellPhone] UID:11845 Activity:low |
1/19 T-Mobile coverage in the bay area. Good? No? \_ T-Mobile uses GSM, so they have the exact same coverage as Cingular(SBC/PacBell), and share the same towers. \_ I wish SprintPCS will have same coverage as Verizon by virtue of both of them using CDMA. \_ They each can roam onto each others networks, but I don't think Verizon has any need. There's very few extra places they would gain reach to, they'd be taking on a bunch of extra traffic at a lower (to them) price per minute, and they'd nix their single biggest competitive advantage, which is that their network is better than everyone else's. \_ tmobile piggybacks on cingular in some areas, but have been deploying their own network on their own towers or their own antennas on someone elses towers \_ I'm clueless about cellphones. What provider and what type (GSM vs CDMA) should I go for to have the best coverage (south bay, SF and Berkeley) and not have a lot of roaming charges? \_ Coverage is less dependent on technology and based more on how much your provider is willing to spend on building dense networks. Sprint sucks. Verizon and AT&T are relatively good and Cingular tends to oversubscribe. I personally like GSM because of the removable SIM card which allows you to take your phone overseas and use a local calling card. But just to summarize the local providers: Sprint: CDMA Verizon: CDMA AT&T: GSM, non-GSM TDMA TMobile: GSM Cingular: GSM Nextel: iDEN? \_ What about Japan? \_ Cingular, DIE DIE DIE!!! Dropped calls (oversubscribe) in densely populated place, and no signal in some suburbs. DIE DIE DIE!!!!! I've tried AT&T (GSM) and it's the same shit. I've also tried AT&T (TDMA) and it's pretty decent. Right now I'm using Verizon. Costs a lot but it's worth it. |
7/9 |
|