www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4955212n
CNET TV need to add title here More Than Junk Science When first presented in 1989 cold fusion was quickly dismissed as junk science. But, as Scott Pelley reports, there's renewed buzz among scientists that cold fusion could lead to monumental breakthroughs in energy production.
We also managed to ignore a totally valid theory of light propagation along helical paths not straight lines and this could yet be the missing-link to a successful repeatable cold fusion. I also propose that prime numbers maybe used in cold fusion technology. Six months ago I found in chapter THE KEY of the Quran the following prime numbers 7 verses, 29 words, and 139 letters and the sum of their digits (7=7, 2+9=11, 1+3+9=13) also primes and even the sum of the sums 7+11+13=31 is prime too just to confirm their special status. I then arranged these three numbers (7, 29, 139) from left-to-right (729139) and right-to-left (139297) and also found the new numbers to be primes and digit sums already shown above to be 31, a prime. So I decided to develop a new numerology system based on prime numbers not log numbers and called it "Primalogy" and calculated the sum of the primalogy values of all the139 letters of THE KEY chapter and ended up with 8317 which is also prime with a digit sum of 19 yet another prime. WHAT OTHER PROOF DOES MAN NEED TO WAKE UP FROM HIBERNATION? Few days later I realize that we are in the Islamic year 1430 AH (Hijri Calendar), and we are only 3 years away from a a great if not the greatest bounty God will shower upon us in the year 1433AH or 2012AD.
Even you could do it with your unrecognized consciousness. Your satire ignores the bending that goes up, against gravity, which is well known and not a trick. Of course, in your narrow little world, there is no telepathy, no precognition, no telekinesis, no UFO's, no crop circles, no out of body experience, no zero point field, no faster-than-light motion, oh wait, except for the hyper-inflation of the big bang, no hyper-space, oh wait, except for the eleven dimensions of string theory, no "magical" invisibles, oh wait, except for dark matter - 95% of the universe - and oh wait, dark energy, causing acceleration of expansion against all reason. Ken Shoulders, perhaps the greatest experimentalist of our time, equivalent to Rutherford in his day, has discovered and extensively proven the properties of what was first called charge clusters, highly energetic circulating toroids of electrons, moving like smoke rings, but with densities and force enough to disintegrate any matter and cause nuclear fusion when carrying protons. Now called Exotic Vacuum Objects (EVOs), they can exist as fully material or as insubstantial trans-dimensionals, with their centers acting as quantum mechanical black holes / white holes, bringing energy/matter into and out of our reality. They are likely the mechanism of irregularly repeatable cold fusion. They themselves, however, are fairly easily repeatable phenomena by any who choose to try. Because you respond to any idea that threatens your brainwashing the same way as the Spanish Inquisitors, you operate on prejudice and condemnation, masquerading as reason. You listen to political hacks and magicians acting as pseudo-scientists, like Michael Squirmer and Jane's Randi. Mockery and ridicule are the easiest and most lethal weapons of the manipulative and dishonest, of the pathologically skeptical, who sacrifice the most fundamental purpose of science, which is to know, and betray its most fundamental ideal, which is to abandon preconceived bias in favor of honest observation and testing of phenomena. To attack, to jeer, so similar to Jerry Falwell's approach to truths such as climate change and evolution, is beneath you, is a waste of your talents and intellect, of your one best chance to make a difference with your robotic life. A dimension is the most powerful and overwhelming aspect of reality; the difference between Flatland and our 3D universe is just one dimension. There are eight extra dimensions in string theory, and they represent far more than abstractions on paper. But for you and your ilk, there's really nothing special there, just repetitive extensions of endless Wal-Marts. Like addled monkeys in a row, see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. As you well know and will not dare to deny, the cores of two of the most successful theories in the history of science, the wave function of QM and the time dilation of special relativity, could not exist without the fundamental use of the imaginary number, i, the square root of negative one, a logical impossibility. Yet it revealed to us that what is impossible is more real than all other mathematics, judging by its overwhelming success in describing reality. You will argue the pat answer, that i is just a symbology and no more real than three or pi. Yet to say that mathematics has no relation to reality makes string theory utter foolishness, which it is not. And to say that the square root of negative one is not impossible by the same rules that describe all "ordinary" nature and technology so powerfully is pure hypocrisy, and simply false. That you know nothing of Shoulders' work does not inspire confidence that you have any clue what you're talking about.
Spontaneous radioactive decay causes transmutation, and happens all the time at room temperature. And fission of large nuclei is induced by neutrons at very low energies. This doesn't affect your point that _fusion_ at an appreciable rate does require high temperatures, but making a blatant error in the preamble to your explanation does not inspire confidence that you have any idea what you're talking about.
The mechanism of metallic bonding, a kind of collective covalent bond, is well-characterized and consistent in essentially all of the thousands of experimental situations explored. However, when Uri Geller looks at a spoon in a certain way, the bonds transform into a kind of rubber bonding (Mother nature sometimes pulls weird tricks) and the spoon will bend under the stress of gravity alone. This is sometimes called Geller bonding, and the transformed domains have been named exotic crystalline objects (ECOs). It's true that not everyone has been able to reproduce the effect, but that is probably because of some details that are not the same. For example, recently it's been determined that the eyes must be squinted to at least 90% closed, and in most of the attempts, the experimenters only squinted to 80%. It's also true that these Geller bonds have not been observed in any other type of experiment, and the theory is not able to make quantitative predictions of any behavior at all. However, there is incontrovertible evidence that something is happening. And if Geller's rubber theory turns out to be right, he is a shoo-in for a Nobel prize.
A neutron is a combination of an electron and a proton with zero net electrostatic charge. s number of protons and its equal number of electrons determine its type of element. s nucleus does the atomic nucleus become another element (or another isotope of the same element) or becomes unstable and splits (fissions) into two or more elements. For decades, physicists have assumed that changing (transmuting) elements always requires high energies. Cold fusion is only one of several types of physical phenomena which indicate the existence of a mechanism by which elements could be changed to other elements without seemingly requiring very high energies. s excess heat had remained a mystery until September 13, 1996 when Kenneth Shoulders explained how the fracturing of palladium loaded with hydrogen (deuterons) could produce high-density charge clusters and cause nuclear reactions. Based on this evidence and on the pioneering work of Rod Neal and Stan Gleeson, a trio of physicists, Hal Fox, Robert W Bass, and Shang-Xian Jin, finally deduced a more complete theory of the nature of the mechanism which extends beyond the discovery of cold fusion. What follows is a simplified explanation of their remarkable concept using an analogy of electrons as ping pong balls and protons as bowling balls. Each ping pong ball is negatively charged a...
|
http://csua.com/feed/