Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 51324
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
2021/06/19 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular

2008/9/29-10/1 [Politics] UID:51324 Activity:nil
9/29    Good bye capitalism, HELLO BARAK COMMUNISM!!!
        \_ You are so cute when you are an idiot.
           \_ hey man, he still supports the bailout. i don't like it one
              bit. -Dem
2021/06/19 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/8/26-11/21 [Politics/Domestic/California, Consumer/Camera] UID:54733 Activity:nil
8/26    "Pastafarian student allowed to wear pasta strainer on head for
        driver's license photo" (
           With photos.
2013/6/6-7/31 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China, Computer/SW/Security] UID:54690 Activity:nil
6/6     Wow, NSA rocks. Who would have thought they had access to major
        data exchangers? I have much more respect for government workers,
        crypto experts, mathematicans now than ever.
        \_ flea to Hong Kong --> best dim-sum in the world
           \_ "flee"
        \_ The dumb ones work for DMV, the smart ones for the NSA. If you
2013/3/22-5/18 [Politics/Domestic/SocialSecurity] UID:54635 Activity:nil
3/21    Suppose your parents move all of their asset to the child, can they
        qualify for SSI (additional income)? Will the transfer of asset
        trigger some sort of audit, questioning, and such? Has anyone
        done this?
        \_ You are headed for prison.
           \_ i doubt it, i know people who live in million dollar
2013/3/29-5/18 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Foreign/Asia/Korea] UID:54644 Activity:nil
3/29    Indiana, racist?
        \_ Everyone is racist. Even you, I bet.
           \_ heil hitler!
2013/3/16-5/10 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:54629 Activity:nil
3/16    Obama has lowered overall per-capita government spending:
2013/2/18-3/26 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/SIG] UID:54608 Activity:nil
2/18    F U NRA: (Sandy Hook Truthers)
           This shit makes me weep for America.
        \_ I didn't see any mention of the NRA on that page.  Did you mean "FU
           Crazy Conspiracy Theorists?"  Or do you have this really great
2013/2/7-3/19 [Politics/Domestic/SIG] UID:54601 Activity:nil
2/7     This is how NRA can claim that it represents 4.5 million members. (
        \_ Lots of local clubs (for all sorts of activities) require their
           members to join a national organization for legal and insurance
           purposes.  There's nothing sinister here.
2013/2/5-3/4 [Politics/Domestic/Immigration] UID:54598 Activity:nil
2/5 (
        "I hope no one uses the term 'illegal immigrants' here today," said
        Committee Ranking Member John Conyers of Michigan. "Our citizens are
        not illeg -- the people in this country are not illegal. They are out
        of status."
        How did this guy get himself on the House Judiciary Committee?  Is it
2013/1/11-2/17 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/Crime, Politics/Domestic/SIG] UID:54578 Activity:nil
1/10    Yet another campus shooting incident:
        Thank you NRA.
           \_ I would thank them; it's a tough spot to be in: defending civil
        liberties in the wake of an event that has all the sheeple begging
        the government to take them away. (Not to mention the large number of
        morons vilifying you and those others who dissent).
2012/12/18-2013/1/9 [Politics/Domestic/SIG] UID:54562 Activity:nil
12/18   "NRA member Sen. Manchin says Newtown shooting should open assault
        weapons debate"
        '"The massacre of so many innocent children has changed -- has changed
        America. We've never seen this happen,"'  Was this guy in a cave during
        the Columbine High massacre?
        \_ Don't keep your hopes high, though.  It'll just be same-o same-o.
Cache (3824 bytes)
Barack Obama joins President Bush and other officials to discuss the bailout on Thursday. OPINION By Howard Fineman MSNBC contributor WASHINGTON - The Obama Administration began at midnight Sunday. Barack Obama loses the presidential election -- and of course he may -- the playing field of our politics now has shifted seismically in his philosophical direction. The era of cowboy capitalism has died, largely of self-inflicted wounds. I do: A new era of tight business regulation and government intervention in the markets. For now, and perhaps for many years, there will be no going back. The Rubicon was crossed this weekend, when the deal was struck for a $700 billion federal takeover of the carcass of Wall Street. At that moment, the conservative era in America, which began with Ronald Reagan's election in 1980, ended. It did so not with a bang, but with a whimper -- a cry of help from erstwhile Masters of the Universe who suddenly feared for their platinum-level lives. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson could hear those cries because, until two years ago, he was a Master himself. For decades, conservatives had fought -- in very good conscience -- to unshackle free enterprise from the grip of statist thinking, the kind of thinking represented at its most suffocating by communism. Hayek was right: the "road to serfdom" lies in the idea that The State is the answer to everything. But Wall Street and Washington (especially the hacks at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) produced, in addition to colossal profits, a farrago of greed unseen since the Roaring Twenties, which was the last time, by the way, that the gulf between the rich and poor was as wide as it is today. If Obama does win, it will be because of the economic crisis now upon us, of which the bailout is the capstone and political symbol. For one, it yanked the national consciousness away from security and terrorism, Sen. John McCain's two strongest areas of expertise and appeal. Second, the crisis underscored and amplified the yearning in the country for something -- and someone -- new. Voters have been saying for more than a year that they want change. Suddenly, "experience" and purported expertise mean next to nothing. After all, Dick Cheney was "experienced," and what did that get us? If that is the case, why not go for a fellow who by virtue of his very being represents change: a new generation, a new demographic, a new outlook? And Obama does represent something new -- or, rather, something old that is new again. He believes it is the role of government to help people and regulate the markets. He is a lawyer by training, and believes in the use of the law (and the courts) for the common good. He doesn't, frankly, know much about economics or the profits -- those were not his specialties in law or life. Those are two categories it has been fashionable for conservatives to revile for decades. It's no coincidence that Obama now has his biggest lead in the Gallup Daily Tracking Poll. In fairness, Democrats (the "soft money" hedge-fund crowd of the Clinton 90s and the party hacks who got rich at Fannie and Freddie) are as guilty as the Bush-era Republicans (who argued against ANY regulation of anything). But, as the Kennedys liked to say, life isn't fair -- and neither is politics. McCain is desperately trying to show that he, too, is willing to blame Republicans, but the more he does so the deeper he digs himself into a hole. The senator was right when he labeled Chris Cox, the chairman of the SEC, one of the culprits. But the fact that McCain was right about Cox just proves the point. It was Bush, who nominated all three horsemen of the apocalypse -- Cox, Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. If your team loses, you remember who struck out in the ninth inning, not who struck out in the fourth.