|
11/23 |
1999/11/15-16 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:16886 Activity:high |
11/14 What is the "zero emission rule"? That all car makers need to produce electric cars by year 20XX? I don't get why e-cars are considered zero emission. If many drive a electric cars, wouldn't there be a bigger demand on power plants that also pollute? \_ Electric cars are all about making you dependant on the Government and attacking your manhood. \_ 1) Power plants tend to have more effecient generators 2) Power plants are one location and therefore it is easier to reduce emmisions at that one point with strict enforcement of pollution laws. 3) There is clean power (but then again we are using it already...) 4) Power plants tend not to be in high polution areas. One of the major problems with pollution is the concentration in one area. Spread the pollution around some and it can b ehandled by natural means. \_ also there is the fact that it's alot easier logistically to convert centralized power generation to new sources than individual energy sources from cars; If fusion became practical in the near future, say with those big tokomak reactors, there'sno way you could use that for cars unless they were electric and the energy was generated in a cetral location. this means that people working on alternative energy like fusion can wroy less about scaling problems, and be assured that they can make billions and help the environment quickly, rather than having to deal with auto manufacturers and their ilk. \_ Ah I see. Zero emission simply means "pollute somewhere else"... and that reduces the amount of pollution which will slow down global warming. Sure, that makes sense now. \_ What parts of 1, 2 and 3 didn't you understand? Also many forms of pollution can be disposed of by the ecosystem in limited amounts. The problem is places have gone way above those amounts. |
11/23 |
|