| ||||||
| 5/24 |
| 1999/11/15-16 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:16886 Activity:high |
11/14 What is the "zero emission rule"? That all car makers need to produce
electric cars by year 20XX? I don't get why e-cars are considered
zero emission. If many drive a electric cars, wouldn't there be a
bigger demand on power plants that also pollute?
\_ Electric cars are all about making you dependant on the Government
and attacking your manhood.
\_ 1) Power plants tend to have more effecient generators
2) Power plants are one location and therefore it is easier to
reduce emmisions at that one point with strict enforcement
of pollution laws.
3) There is clean power (but then again we are using it already...)
4) Power plants tend not to be in high polution areas. One of the
major problems with pollution is the concentration in one area.
Spread the pollution around some and it can b ehandled by
natural means.
\_ also there is the fact that it's alot easier logistically
to convert centralized power generation to new sources
than individual energy sources from cars; If fusion
became practical in the near future, say with those big
tokomak reactors, there'sno way you could use that for cars
unless they were electric and the energy was generated
in a cetral location. this means that people working on
alternative energy like fusion can wroy less about
scaling problems, and be assured that they can make billions
and help the environment quickly, rather than having to deal
with auto manufacturers and their ilk.
\_ Ah I see. Zero emission simply means "pollute somewhere
else"... and that reduces the amount of pollution which
will slow down global warming. Sure, that makes sense now.
\_ What parts of 1, 2 and 3 didn't you understand? Also
many forms of pollution can be disposed of by the
ecosystem in limited amounts. The problem is places
have gone way above those amounts. |
| 5/24 |
|