|
2003/11/2 [Recreation/Celebrity, Computer/SW/Apps/Media] UID:10900 Activity:nil |
11/1 The Hunt for Iraq's Weapons (David Kay corrects Post Writers for misrepresentation). Note this is on A21, Gellmans lead story on front page. http://csua.org/u/4v8 \_ OWNED! \_ Yawn. "I'm sticking by what I wrote in my report! Much work to be done! Can't draw conclusions yet! Needle is still in haystack!" \_ It's important that the lying media be corrected at every turn. The problem is that it's the same media who lied on the front page in an above the fold headline that buries the correction way back on A21. \_ Sure, sure, Jason Blair, yadda yadda yadda. Got it. It's important for Kay's credibility, but it doesn't advance the search for WMD. \_ Jason Blair? Who said anything about Jason Blair? We're talking media bias, not incompetence. And it does advance the search to correct the media lies because without the support and correct understanding of the American people we'll pull out before the job is done. Exactly what your leftist media would like to see happen. |
2003/11/2 [Reference/Military, Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:10901 Activity:moderate |
11/1 http://tinyurl.com/taph "US Considering Recaling Units of Old Iraq Army" Like I said, it's a huge mistake to disband the Iraqi army. Our brilliant leaders are finally realizing it. Disbanding the army unnecessarily creates many enemies from those who can cause the most problems. \_ That's very doubtful. It creates problems by leaving a huge pool of unemployed people, though I suspect that very few of those are are actually being recruited by terrorists in the way you seem to be implying. \_ You don't need many. Just 10% will give you a 50000 strong guerilla army. \_ But in context, even 1% is an obscenely unrealistic number. \_ why? is it that hard to believe that some iraqis don't think we should be occupying their country? \_ I'm sure many more than that don't want us there. However, that dislike is not going to 100% translate into the desire to drive a truck bomb into the Red Cross HQ. If there was a 50000 or even 5000 strong guerilla army running around there'd be a lot more killing going on. Nothing that's happened so far requires more than 100-200 people around the entire country. \_ There are 25-35 attacks A DAY on our troops in Iraq. \_ Yes. Everytime a soldier stubs his toe it's counted as an attack. Do you really want a Vietnam style body count? \_ You're being ridiculous and in the process \_ I think most of the attacks are non-suicidal, belittling the real attacks that are taking place. \_ There are plenty of real attacks. However, I don't think every toe stubbing counts. \_ Most of the attacks are non-suicidal, just road side bombs that can be triggered, rocket propelled grenades and a few mortars, precisely the things people with military training would be good at, and most are targetted directly at the occupational forces. The rest are targetted at "collaborators". \_ Few militaries are trained to set road side bombs, rest are targetted at "collaborators". and if they were ex-army and using army weapons such as mortars they weren't trained very well because their success rate with standard military weapons is hovering just above the "got lucky" level. These are random fucks, not ex-army. \_ If there were only 100-200 people, they would've been wiped out by now from attrition, or we can just capture one or two and get them to lead us to the rest. The reason we have not been able to do that shows that the "100-200" is just the tip of a huge iceberg from which acitve ones can be drawn from. \_ Maybe. Maybe not. How many of these attackers have been caught? Zero according to US media. \_ WTF why haven't you been appointed Supreme Allied Commander a long time ago!!! next bath house 'date'. \_ It is almost impossible to be more arrogant than Bush \_ This is basic common sense. Arrogance makes our leaders out of touch with reality until it splatters all over their face. \_ I nominate you for Secretary of Defense and five star general!!! \_ I don't know about five star general, but yea, I will take Secretary of Defense, or better yet, Commander in Chief. \_ Those are positions that must be earned. You're more arrogant than anyone in the administration. We'd all be seriously fucked for years to come if some ninny like you had any say in anything more than which of last week's dirty underwear you'll be wearing on your next bath house 'date'. \_ It is almost impossible to be more arrogant than Bush \_ So do you think Bush is more arrogant or more eeevveeeillll!!!!? \_ Yea, we all should learn from you and prostrate in front of our supreme leaders Donald and Bush and say everything they did were wonderful. I think you will do well as a court jester or eunuch. \_ *laugh* Nice attempt but no dice. *I* was not the topic here. Idiot head above saying he could do better was. I merely observe facts. \_ The media is biaaaaasssed against the right! \_ Yeah and if they had left it in place and the people revolted because this very same army was directly responsible for murdering tens of thousands of Iraqis then you'd be here screaming how the arrogant American leadership didn't listen to you when you said to disband the evil marauders. It must be great to always be right, at least on the motd, eh? [restored] \_ Wrong, I said it was a mistake right after they announced they are disbanding the Iraqi army wholesale. The view that that there is a murderous Iraqi army distinct and seperate from the Iraqi people who were its victims is a naive view. The Iraqi army is a huge conscript army of 500000 which Saddam himself doesn't fully trust. That means almost everyone (all the Sunnis at least) should have a family member, relative, good friend in the army. \_ WTF does have a family member have to do with anything?!? How exactly do you figure that the average post-Saddam citizen is going to be thrilled to see the Iraqi army stomping around again? |
2003/11/2-3 [Computer/SW/SpamAssassin] UID:10902 Activity:nil |
11/1 Um, my spamassassin rules don't filter out spam mails that solicit anti-spam software. What to do now? \_ IFILE! \_ Oh yeah? Can IFILE! figure out my taxes? \_ DEAN! \_ RIDE IFILE! LIGHT DEAN! \_ LOVE MAC! \_ I love you guys! You make the motd great. \_ ifile? |
2003/11/2 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:10903 Activity:nil |
11/2 My question is, who else, aside from USA, Russia, and China that makes shoulder-launch missile? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3234543.stm |
2003/11/2 [Politics/Domestic/Election, ERROR, uid:10904, category id '18005#5.8925' has no name! , ] UID:10904 Activity:low |
11/1 Poor Dean. Too liberal. Too elite. Too special for the rest of us poor dumb shlobs to understand your greatness. We hardly knew you but you sure as hell knew nothing about anyone else: http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?id=1&display=rednews/2003/11/01/build/nation/67-deancomments.inc \_ Do you seriously think Bush is doing a good job? \_ Yes. On most things. I wouldn't be 100% happy with anyone but myself but I don't have time to run the country so I'll settle for the current administration. \_ It's Bill Bradley all over again, minus the progressive attitude. \_ You're just bringing him down cuz you're scared of him. \_ No, I'm showing you ultra leftists you're backing a loser. He understands he's too far left but has no fucking clue how to appeal to the very people he's insulting. Bring on this dog and we'll have 4 more years! \_ Do you think guys with confederate flags in the back of their pickups find this insulting? Do you even know anyone like that? \_ Do you even understand who he's bashing? You don't. |
2003/11/2 [Uncategorized] UID:10905 Activity:nil |
11/2 Learn English and try again. I realize that there are graduates of my alma matter who have third grade level writing skills, but I don't need to be reminded of it every day on the motd. |
2003/11/2-3 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:10906 Activity:very high |
11/2 So you all read this right? http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact and here Seymore Hersh gives an interview on it: http://www.newyorker.com/online/content/?031027on_onlineonly01 - danh \_ Read what? Maybe you'd like to give a short summary before we all rush off to read the link? Your name on the URL is not enough. \_ Look, deleting a post because your response was overwritten by some jackass not using motdedit is not helpful. |
2003/11/2-3 [Computer/SW/OS/FreeBSD] UID:10907 Activity:nil |
11/2 Is there a good reason to run FreeBSD 5.x instead of 4? - danh \_ Yeah--a lot of cool apps and features, like OpenBSD pf, and 32-bit pccard support. It runs rock-solid on a P120, and won't budge on a brand new Thinkpad, so your mileage may vary. -John \_ it dies a lot on my laptop and I was wondering if others have the same experience, I guess so! - danh \_ 5.1 has major problems with ACPI support. That may have something to do with it. A lot of code for core system components (cardbus, usb bridge, etc.) has been heavily rewritten and isn't mature yet. -John \_ 5.x is cool. 4.8 is stable. Your choice. |
2003/11/2 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:10908 Activity:moderate |
11/2 What are liberals and conservatives thinking is the best approach in Iraq right now? If we get out, we admit defeat but save billions, but also leave Iraq w/ no security... \_ Hand over power to an Iraqi governing council, withdraw; when "resistance fighters" start attacking again (and this time it will be Iraq and not the US they're attacking), back Iraqi plea for International Peacekeepers, re-enter country as such, with full UN/World support. A more moral plan would include the liberation of Kurdistan, but hey, one step at a time. \_ Fence. Nukes. Pave. Hand over massive smoldering parking lot to Iranians as gesture of goodwill. Make nasty faces at Syrians and Palestinians. -John \_ Nah, just send them all to Switzerland. \_ No room; the Yugoslavs and Tamils (don't ask) are all here already \_ nuke it first then. \_ "Admit defeat"? To whom? Bush claims he is planning to hand Iraq back over to the Iraqis in any case. How would doing this quickly mean admitting defeat? \_ Because it is obvious we'd be retreating. The country is not ready to run itself yet and everyone on the planet except you knows that. \_ 38 percent of Americans say it is time to get out of Iraq. I am all by myself, 38% of Americans? Wow, wish I had known that earlier. Let me guess: you are the same moron that said "everyone knows Saddam Hussein has WMD" right? \_ Cool, let's do math wars! 62 percent of Americans do not say it is time to get out of Iraq. 38 percent huh? That's remarkably close to the percent of BC voters. Odd, that? It couldn't possibly be that these same people who are opposed to our current policy are simply opposed to *anything* this administration does, could it? As far as the _appointed by Americans_ council running Iraq, the council members themselves say they're not ready so it would definitely look like we're fleeing and you'd hear the phrase "paper tiger" a lot just like when Carter was in office. You *do* remember Carter being in office? That nasty little hostage crisis bit? Us doing nothing? \_ Lock down entire cities, search every building, check point at every block. Open it up section by section as it's cleaned out. And give the Kurds their own land for God's sake. They're treated almost as badly as the Jews, the Irish, or Tibetans have been. |
2003/11/2-3 [Computer/SW/Unix] UID:10914 Activity:nil |
11/2 Stupid question--nfs mount as root, between 2 FreeBSD boxes. How do I allow root on the client to chown files in the mounted directory? -John \_ nfs mount option...there is some default option that maps root. disable it. --aaron \_ actually its a NFS export option from the NFS server. Old-school exports format is the -root=(hosts) directive, for hosts that get to mount the file system without root being mapped. -ERic |