4/10 So, I'm hearing all this crap about social security becoming insolvent
because we won't have enough taxpayers to support the baby boomers.
What I haven't heard anything about is, why not allow more *skilled*
immigrants into the country? Why not allow people educated here to
stay in the country? We spend all this money on educating these
foreign nationals, and then make them leave, even if they'd like to
stay. Allowing them to stay would obviously make for more taxpayers,
more consumer demand, etc. And it's not really like we don't have
the land; Japan can cram well over half the population of the US into
a space smaller than California. The drawback is of course national
security "concerns", and the notion that foreigners will be competing
for our jobs. What do you people think?
\_ The US's prosperity was built largely on brain drain from
foreign countries with poorer conditions than here. Hindering
the brain drain in the name of national security is going to
bite us in the ass bigtime. Having poor schools in this country
is going to bite us in the ass bigtime too. It's a pity we
have to suffer through cowardly leaders who only care about
short term gain.
\_ Nice sentiment, but where did the obsession with ass-biting
get mixed into this?
\_ The US's ability to brain drain will probably be more
impacted by effective competition from foreign schools.
We'll probably still have the top schools, but the top 100
schools won't be 90% in the US.
\_ The U.S. taxpayer just finished spending a quarter of a million
dollars to pay for my Mainland Chinese friend's phd in solid state
physics. Due
to laws that almost redefine the phrase "government idiocy" she
may be unable to work in this country where we can benefit from
her education because all of "nanotechnology" has been declared
sensitive, and everyone in solid state physics wants to call their
work nanotech to get on the funding gravy train. Dumb dumb dumb.
I don't know the details of the ban, but it extends to the private
sector. "Sorry, you can't contribute to our economy. We're just
going to spend a quarter of a million dollars training you, then
force you to go back home and compete with us economically."
\_ you should consult a mental health professional
\_ Well, thanks for that ad hominem attack. BTW, I'm actually
born in the states, and this is not a troll. It is
practically a certainty at this point that our population will
not grow fast enough to support the boomers. It seems like the
obvious way to grow the population is to bring in other people,
very preferably ones who can contribute to our economy instead
of ending up on welfare.
\_ I have an idea that will help: ban abortion.
\_ See the welfare argument.
\_ It is my opinion that lots of skilled immigrants are already
ending up here. They are indeed taking jobs from Americans,
because they are willing to work for less. I fail to see how
this benefits the country. Do you really want to import doctors
from former Soviet Republics, like Spain is doing?
\_ Well, it is not clear if their presence here creates more jobs
than they take. Do dumb hicks contribute much to our economy?
In one sense, yes, since they fuel consumer demand by living
beyond their means. In another sense, no, because they're stupid
and don't increase our competitiveness. I'm not saying it should
be a free-for-all, or that foreign nationals should be allowed
in all fields, especially when we are not sure what their
education is relative to the standards in this country. But
especially for foreigners who got college or graduate degrees
in this country, not allowing them to stay seems rather silly.
After all, you can say that they deprived some US citizen of a
spot at whatever school they went to, so what's the big deal now?
\_ Is there evidence that lots of people who earned graduate
degrees here are not able to stay? Observationally, I
don't see that problem in the fields I am familiar with
(aerospace engineering, software engineering, hard
science, and entertainment).
\_ Yes. Please read my post about Chinese physicists in the
U.S. above. Admittedly, my evidence is also anecdotal, but
since most of the people I know are physics grad students,
and since about half of them are foreign, I think my
anecdotal evidence is relevant. What I see is unthinking
visa policy directly harming American science. It's not
that the *numbers* of foreign scientists wanting to be
in the U.S. will go down any time soon, it's that the
*quality* is going to start going down as the top people
pass up U.S. offers. -!pp
\_ Why does quality matter in terms of Social Security?
The reality is that there are more PhDs being graduated
than there are jobs to employ them.
\_ Fuck social security. The republicans are going
to destroy it anyway. I was just talking about
issues affecting American science in general.
\_ It might not per se, but the point is we would
probably rather have immigrants quality enough to
stay off welfare, and better yet, contribute to
innovation.
\_ It's difficult to stay these days. You need a H-1B to
work in the US, and these get used up in less than
a day everytime new quotas become available (in April
and October). From a company's standpoint, that's
a lot of uncertainty and cost for hiring a foreign
student graduate from US universities. The whole
PR process is also a huge pain and takes forever.
\_ It's difficult to hire foreign nationals. On the
other hand, plenty of them seem to be getting jobs.
Some of them marry Americans, but I have seen no
shortage of PhDs from India, China, and Europe working
here in the US. In fact, I see more than ever before.
Some real statistics and less anecdotal evidence would
be nice.
\_ It's not just difficult to hire, it's also a
pain to stay, so might as well go home,
especially given the opportunities abroad.
\_ There are no opportunities abroad. Maybe in
China. Definitely not in Europe, for
instance. I'd like to see some statistics.
\_ actually there are lots of opportunities
abroad. china, india, hongkong, singapore,
taiwan, korea, japan, ...
\_ Japan is okay, but are there really
that many opportunities for, say,
physicists in India or Singapore?
\_ I grow tired of seeing these posts about how we, as a US
economy keep getting hurt by offshore jobs, brain drain, etc.
All the posts seem very Nationalistic and people fail to take into
account the big picture, we are a global economy. That person
who leaves with a Physics degree eventually may invent
something in China that benefits someone in the US and
globally. You can always go micro and say "Contra Costa is losing
jobs to San Fran", but eventually we all benefit from knowledgeable
people no matter what tax bucket their income falls in.
\_ Are you the "Little Chinese"? |