preview.tinyurl.com/5hxzlv -> space.newscientist.com/article/dn14200-galaxy-map-hints-at-fractal-universe.html?feedId=online-news_rss20
Advertising Is the matter in the universe arranged in a fractal pattern? A new study of nearly a million galaxies suggests it is though there are no well-accepted theories to explain why that would be so. Cosmologists trying to reconstruct the entire history of the universe have precious few clues from which to work. One key clue is the distribution of matter throughout space, which has been sculpted for nearly 14 billion years by the competing forces of gravity and cosmic expansion. If there is a pattern in the sky, it encodes the secrets of the universe. A lot is at stake, and the matter distribution has become a source of impassioned debate between those who say the distribution is smooth and homogeneous and those who say it is hierarchically structured and clumpy, like a fractal. Nearly all physicists agree that on relatively small scales the distribution is fractal-like: hundreds of billions of stars group together to form galaxies, galaxies clump together to form clusters, and clusters amass into superclusters. The point of contention, however, is what happens at even larger scales. According to most physicists, this Russian doll-style clustering comes to an end and the universe, on large scales, becomes homogeneous.
Francesco Sylos Labini of the Enrico Fermi Centre in Rome and Luciano Pietronero of the University of Rome argue that the data shows the opposite: the universe continues to look fractal as far out as our telescopes can see. When completed, it will map the positions of about a million galaxies and quasars.
analysis of 55,000 luminous red galaxies suggesting that the fractal pattern smoothed out at scales over 200 million light years. They believed that the apparent smoothing was an illusion caused by weak statistics the smoothing seemed to occur at the largest scales the survey was capable of studying, where there were too few large regions to be able to reliably compare their densities, they said. Now, SDSS has released its sixth round of data, which plots the locations of roughly 800,000 galaxies and 100,000 quasars, bright objects powered by violent supermassive black holes.
Nature Physics, Sylos Labini and Pietronero, along with physicists Nikolay Vasilyev and Yurij Baryshev of St Petersburg State University in Russia, argue that the new data shows that the galaxies exhibit an explicitly fractal pattern up to a scale of about 100 million light years. And they say if the universe does become homogeneous at some point, it has to be on a scale larger than a staggering 300 million light years across. That's because even at that scale, they still observe large fluctuations a cluster here, a void there in the matter distribution. Most cosmologists interpret such fluctuations as being no more significant than small waves on the surface of the sea, but Sylos Labini and colleagues say that these are more like tsunamis. No model Many cosmologists find fault with their analysis, largely because a fractal matter distribution out to such huge scales undermines the standard model of cosmology. According to the accepted story of cosmic evolution, there simply hasn't been enough time since the big bang nearly 14 billion years ago for gravity to build up such large structures. What's more, the assumption that the distribution is homogeneous has allowed cosmologists to model the universe fairly simply using Einstein's theory of general relativity which relates the shape of space to the distribution of matter. Modelling a fractal universe with general relativity is possible in theory, but in reality it would be devilishly complicated. That would leave cosmologists without a working model, like acrobats without a net. Relic radiation To support the homogeneity assumption, cosmologists point to the smoothness of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), relic radiation from the nascent universe. The CMB is perfectly uniform up to one part in 100,000, suggesting the early universe was nearly homogeneous.
"If the observations of galaxies in optical surveys don't agree, there may be a number of possible explanations, without resorting to an extremely inhomogeneous, fractal universe," he told New Scientist. But inferring the matter distribution from the CMB is not always simple. CMB maps show a 3D distribution projected onto a 2D surface, and it is possible for a clumpy 3D distribution to appear smooth when projected in 2D. The same is true of the X-ray background, which appears homogeneous in two dimensions.
difficult to measure their distances accurately enough to pinpoint their positions in 3D. So what could produce such a fractal pattern in galaxy surveys like Sloan? Some of the clumpiness may be a sort of optical illusion known as the Bull's-eye effect, says Adrian Melott of the University of Kansas in the US. That's because nearby galaxies fall towards each other due to their mutual gravitational attraction even as space itself expands. That movement can enhance the apparent clumpiness of matter in surveys like Sloan, since those surveys rely on measurements of the galaxies' velocities to determine their distance from Earth. The wager But according to their paper, Sylos Labini's team says the Bull's-eye effect is only relevant on very small scales, about 16 million light years and below, and has no influence on the clumpiness at the large scales in question. Melott disagrees, saying it should magnify clumpiness at any scale.
What's at stake if the universe is indeed a fractal on the largest scales? Besides a radical rethink of the laws and history of the cosmos, researchers have placed something more down-to-Earth on the line. More than a decade ago, Sylos Labini and Pietronero wagered a bet with physicist Marc Davis of the University of California, Berkeley, US. The bet, refereed by Turok, held that if the galaxy distribution turned out to be fractal beyond scales of approximately 50 million light years, Davis would owe Sylos Labini and Pietronero a case of California wine. Should the fractal pattern begin to disintegrate at scales less than 50 million light years, Davis would receive a case of Italian wine which some would say is a better deal.
Comment subject Comment No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please: <i> or <b> Your name Your email We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment.
VIEW THREAD >> Plasma Cosmology By Bob Wed Jun 25 00:40:15 BST 2008 How long are cosmologists going to stick their head in the sand and deny the fact that magneto/electric forces are at work on the largest of scales?
VIEW THREAD >> Interesting By Anon Wed Jun 25 02:02:53 BST 2008 Nearly homogeneous is not homogeneous! An analogy: zoom out from an object, from such a distance it would look smooth like butter, but upon closer inspection it reveals a whole host of variations. Face it kiddies, the generic, homogeneous view is increasingly less credible. It is too bad that such a model has to be at the basis of modern Einsteinian physics, but surely we can do better. Don't shirk the opportunity for fundamental re-evaluations.
REPLY Interesting By Windy Wed Jun 25 06:12:35 BST 2008 Indeed, I don't think the "standard model" or the bland homogeneous picture of the universe will hold up. The "fractal" nature of the universe makes intuitive sense, given that fractals are present throughout nature as we know it here on earth ... It would be almost unseemly if the same fractal patterns that are so abundant here on earth were not present in the larger universe beyond the earth. It could be related way the universe comes into being in the first place ... If there was a starting-point mathematical construct or pattern, then it would make sense that it would grow from that pattern. Stephen Wolfram has some intriguing ideas about fractal patterns in his book, "A New Kind of Science."
VIEW THREAD >> Another Beautiful Theory Slain By An Ugly Fact? By Charles Wed Jun 25 05:12:00 BST 2008 "Many cosmologists find fault with their analysis, largely because a fractal matter distribution out to such huge scales undermines the standard model of cosmology."
|
http://csua.com/feed/