3/31 From slashdot: "Neal Stephenson, author of greats like Snow Crash and
Cryptonomicon..." So, I hated Cryptonomicon. I thought it was boring
and generally kinda stupid. I only read it all the way through because
I got it as a gift. The same guy who gave me Cryptonomicon also
highly recommends Snow Crash. Is Snow Crash also crap? Everything
people say is 'cool' about it sounds like it was made up by a 9th
grader. 'Hiro Protagonist', 'Guy who rides a motorcycle with a nuke'
Sounds like crap.
\_ Stephenson used to be juvenile and boring, now he's just boring.
-- ilyas
\_ When I was 18 it was awesome. I bet it isn't so awesome anymore.
It does, however, have a pretty amusing opening chapter.
\_ I bought snowcrash again last week with the intent of reading
it as cheap geek pr0n on the plane but ended up reading
"Light" by M. John Harrison instead.
-sky
\_ Is it any good?
\- like much Science Fiction, Snow Crash is more of an
"ideas" book than a prose book ... not that it is Plato
or anything. I thought Cryptonomicon was ok ... what are
you comparing it to. With lightweight stuff I think the
question is more "was it amusing" [which might be more a
statement about you than the book], as opposed to "is it
good/deep/profound/a classic" [which is a statement
about the object, not subject].
\_ Yeah, and the ideas didn't age very well. I'm not sure if
that is because I got older and realized how trite they were
or if it just because they were ideas that got dated quickly.
I suspect it is a bit of both.
\_ I actually think it is because Snow Crash so influenced
what people thought was possible with technology, that
many of his ideas became realized. So now it seems obvious.
But in truth, it was seminal.
\_ What? If anything age has made it look laughably bad.
What ideas are realized?
\_ MMORPGs along with Half Life are both pretty much
entirely based riff on his idea of what cyberspace
entirely based on his idea of what cyberspace
would look like.
\_ No. No they aren't. Not to mention that
avatars existed long before Snow Crash.
\_ Where, other than in Hindu mythology?
\_ Video games, in the 70's.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maze_War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitat_%28video_game%29
Even pac-man is basically an avatar.
\_ Or, say, faces.
\_ Not even close to what was envisioned
in Snow Crash and then realized finally
in Half Life. Have you even used Half
Life?
\_ Uh, do you mean Second Life? Half-Life
is a first person shooter. Anyway,
you asked about avatars, I answered.
That habitat game has some aspects of
Second Life also. The tech was too
primitive to have 3D first person back
then, but MazeWar sort of had it.
Second Life may be based on Snow
Crash but the basic idea is still
just controlling a character in a
virtual world, which has been around
for a long time in video games. Maybe
the virtual economy idea was new, I
have no idea, but it's a basic
extension of a multiplayer RPG
system. Remember, TRON was developed
in 1982.
\_ Did anyone make it through the Baroque Cycle? I keep
trying to finish Quicksilver every year or so.
-sky
\_ I read the entire thing and loved it, but I happen to
enjoy his gonzo journalism style of economic/science
historical fiction. Quicksilver is hard to get through
unless the history of 17th century mercantile banks
turns you on. Yes, I'm weird, I get it. --erikred
\_ Snow Crash seems to have entered the cultural landscape enough
that I felt obligated to read it. I haven't gotten any must-read
vibes about any of his other stuff. Overall I did enjoy Snow
Crash but I was younger. It's a great book for a young male.
I didn't think it was the best sci-fi ever. But honestly there
just aren't many great books of that particular genre. It's
a tough audience and at this point the whole hacker culture
thing is kind of ruined by the Matrix etc. At least SC did not
take itself seriously.
\_ I have been told that Snow Crash is great by people who loved
Cryptonomicon. I did not particularly like Cryptonomicon and
could not finish it b/c I found it dry, boring and poorly
edited. I have tried to read Snow Crash more than once, and
I have never been able to finish it b/c I found it boring and
poorly edited as well. Note: By poor editing, I mean that no
one seems to have told the author to streamline the narrative
and exclude unnecessary exposition. Or if the author was told,
he wasn't smart enough to follow the editor's advice.
\- i think NS became a better writer between SC and C ... SC
kind of unreaveled in terms of technical execution,and while
i wouldnt say C was "polished", i think you could tell
NS had learned to managed a large book better.
\_ According to coworkers of mine who knew him, the original
C ran to 1600 pages... and that's when his editor told him
to stop and publish. Those of you who didn't like C might
instead enjoy The Big U or Zodiac, his much, much earlier
works. |