Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 42211
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/07/08 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
7/8     

2006/3/13-14 [Recreation/Media] UID:42211 Activity:moderate
3/13    Why I love Walmart.  http://www.slate.com/id/2137955
        \_ That sounds great.  I could actually buy movies I want to see.
        \_ Sounds great.  This is only one step removed from legalized
           download on demand.
        \_ Hey, if Wal-Mart can pay a licensing fee per movie, why can't the
           guy who sells them out of the back of his van?
           \_ Welcome to the 21st century:
              rights of individual / rights of corporations = 0
           \_ Ability to police Walmart >> ability to police white van guy.
              Not to mention, scale of Walmart >> scale of white van guy, so
              ROI on Walmart >> ROI on white van guy.
        \_ FYI, movie ticket cost about $11-$12 USD on some of the nice
           theatres in Beijing.  Consider how much people make there, you
           can do the math.  *FURTHER*  the bigger problem is that the titles
           which is allowed to be shown in mainland is VERY limited.  People
           would much rather go to see an uncensored version on a much cheaper
           price.
           \_ I paid a quarter to see Waterworld in a crappy home theater in
              Xiamen about ten years ago. Despite that being about what the
              movie was worth, we split after fifteen minutes. --erikred
              \_ To apreciate Waterworld, you have to be living and working
                 at sea when you see it.  We used to watch this when I worked
                 on a boat, and it ruled.  "Dry land is not a myth!!!"
                 \- Is this the "have you served" form of movie
                    critic "vetting"?
2025/07/08 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
7/8     

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/1/25-2/19 [Recreation/Computer] UID:54587 Activity:nil
1/25    Seymour Cray's UCB Lecture on the Cray-1:
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtOA1vuoDgQ
        \_ this is VERY BORING. Why should we care? UCB is dead.
	...
2013/1/26-2/19 [Politics, Recreation/Media] UID:54590 Activity:nil
1/26    Wozniak says the the Steve Jobs movie clip is historically inaccurate,
        that Jobs was not so much a visionaire that Jobs claimed to be, as Jobs
        was just looking to make a few quick bucks. Why should we trust
        Woz's words over Jobs'?
        \_ Seriously? Read both the Steve Jobs biography and Woz's autobiography.
           Nobody contests that Jobs was a scumbag. Also: the lounge in Soda Hall.
	...
2013/1/3-2/13 [Recreation/Activities] UID:54573 Activity:nil
1/3     I declare LG LED is amazing. I switched.
             -long time Sony owner, no longer have any faith in Sony
        \_ How does sports look on it? -Old Skool Plasma Screen Guy
           \_ I don't watch sports. Dumb people with a lot of loyalty
              watch sports. You drink beer too?
              \_ Loyalty is a good thing. Do you cheat on your g/f too?
	...
2012/12/6-18 [Recreation/Dating, Recreation/Media] UID:54549 Activity:nil
12/6    Lesson learned: don't talk about Monty Python on a date. Women just
        don't seem to get it.
        \_ You are dating the wrong women (for you) then. My sister-in-law
           loves it and yet I don't find it all that funny. It's not a
           gender thing.
           \_ is she a nerd? does she laugh funny? is she actually decent looking?
	...
2012/10/17-12/4 [Recreation/Media] UID:54504 Activity:nil
10/17   Cloud Atlas Shrugged.
        \_ How is this movie? Did you see it?
           \_ Cloud Atlas is a movie. Atlas Shrugged is a movie.
              Cloud Atlas Shrugged is a made-up name.
              \_ How was Cloud Atlas?
	...
2012/8/2-10/17 [Recreation/Dating] UID:54452 Activity:nil
8/2     Where's the closest Chick-Fil-A to San Francisco? I need to
        go there and make out with my boyfriend.        -gay
        \_ Chick-Fil-A is a place for people who want to Fil(l)-A-Chick. :-)
        \_ Why do you want to watch a bunch of fat White Trash eating
           greasy food?
           \_ http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/03/us/chick-fil-a-kiss-day/index.html
	...
Cache (4409 bytes)
www.slate.com/id/2137955
A street vendor in China selling pirated discs Click image to expand. A street vendor in China selling pirated discs The video pirates of Shanghai, China, have developed an amazingly successful business model for exploiting the home market. In the back rooms of video stores, shoppers fill their baskets while choosing from an almost endless inventory of DVDs that includes all of the new movies playing in America, Europe, and Japan, as well as a full complement of Oscar screeners. You can also buy current television series--even the latest episodes of Lost, 24, and Desperate Housewives. In addition, these stores stock a huge number of older movies and provide boxed sets of the complete works of noted directors. Finally, in a modified form of video on demand, if a title is not on the shelves, the store gets it from some other location in a matter of minutes. With these pirated editions, there are no "windows" or artificial delays before a new movie is released on DVD and no zone restrictions that can prevent DVDs from being playable. Most are professionally burned from digital masters, with 5-channel sound, multi-language menus, and high picture quality. As a result of this aggressive pricing, people in China rarely go to movie theaters--ticket sales amounted to only 17 cents per capita in 2005. Retailers--including street hawkers--pay about 50 cents apiece for DVDs from the well-organized pirate manufacturers, whose only expenses are the blank discs (of which China is the world's largest manufacturer), the cheap boxes in which they are packaged, and the enterprise cost of stealing the digital masters. The success of the video pirates demonstrates the economic principal that the demand for entertainment is exquisitely elastic: DVDs priced at $15--the official, nonpirated retail price--hardly sell in China; This economic lesson has not always played well in Hollywood. Up until the 1990s, the studios placed a wholesale price of $60 or more on most videos because they assumed that they would make more profit selling a few expensive copies to video stores than a lot of inexpensive copies to retail consumers. After the DVD was launched in the late 1990s, most of the studios wanted to price them at over $30 to protect the video rental business. Home Entertainment, decided to bypass Blockbuster and offered Wal-Mart lower-priced videos as traffic builders. Under relentless pressure from Wal-Mart, which accounted for 40 percent of the studios' "bin sales," the price for older DVDs was cut to $6 a copy. These reduced prices turned DVDs into a retail juggernaut and only increased the studios' video revenue, which reached an all-time high of $21 billion in 2005. Wal-Mart, which recognizes the same virtue in price elasticity as the Shanghai pirates do, is moving to further reduce the price of DVDs with a plan to burn its own copies of DVDs in kiosks in its stores. Like the Shanghai pirates, the retail giant would buy huge quantities of blanks discs and cheap boxes (probably made in China) at a cost of pennies, but, unlike the pirates, pay a licensing fee to the studios for each copy it burns. The advantage to the customer would be that he could choose a title from among the tens of thousands of movies in the studios' libraries, and also possibly have it in the language and rated-version (G, PG, R, or NC-17) he prefers, while the studios would save the cost of manufacturing, packaging warehousing, and returns. From the point of view of Wal-Mart, the DVD need not make money itself, as long as it serves to draw--and keep--potential customers in its stores. The remaining issue is the amount of the licensing fee per copy that the studios will charge. The current proposal under discussion of $3 to $4 for older movies is not much below what the studios are now getting (after manufacturing costs) for the DVDs they sell to Wal-Mart. But once the studios agree to the scheme, they would be hard-pressed to resist pressure from Wal-Mart to reduce the licensing fee, since this costless stream of revenue could not be easily replaced. As one savvy Paramount executive points out, "There would be nothing to stop Wal-Mart from playing studios off against each other and drive the license fee down and down on titles until it's just pocket change." If Wal-Mart succeeds in this enterprise--and it rarely fails--it will close much of the gap with the Shanghai pirates.