1/19 The L.A. Times has a long article on CA's energy problems:
http://www.latimes.com/business/reports/power/lat_dereg001209.htm
\_ wow 600% profit. It looks like energy stocks are very profitable.
What are their stock symbols?
\_ Er, they're gonna get their asses sued off in the next couple
months.. I wouldn't want to be caught holding their stock.
\_ For what?
\_ For nothing. They haven't broken any laws or contracts.
The other poster has been deluded into thinking you can
sue anytime you you the world sucks.
\_ for illegal price fixing of the CA wholesale energy
market. And you can sue for anything you want --
doesn't mean you'll necessarily win, but well-paid
lawyers can win even untenable cases.
\_ There wasn't any price fixing anyone can prove. If
they couldn't do anything about gasoline fixing,
they sure as hell can't do anything about power
fixing. The gas price fix should have been a lot
easier to prove but a lot of places are still charging
almost $2/gallon despite the fact that crude oil has
dropped in price to the same levels when gas was going
for just over $1/gallon. And no, high priced lawyers
can't do shit when the other side has just as many
high priced lawyers. You took away the wrong lesson
from the OJ murder trial.
\_ They can do something about it, they just won't.
It is all a matter of political will. The
legislature and Congress can do just about
anything they want, but they won't since our
elected officials are all in the big energy
companies pockets.
\_ And you would have them do what? Deny the laws
of supply and demand? Econ 1.
\_ The power companies are intentionally
keeping power off-line to drive up
prices and make windfall profits. 25%
of our power plants are offline for
maintanence? I don't think so. I would
have the government nationalize the
whole system and run it right. Municipal
utility districts like the one in LA are
not having any problem right now.
\_ Yes and can you _prove_ your
alt.conspiracy? Exactly.
\_ Why is proof required? Deregulation
was tried and it failed. Let's go back
to what works.
\_ Ok, I can agree with that but I'm
not ready to wave the conspiracy
stick. |