6/25 Grade distributions for LSCS and EECS undergrads:
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~hilfingr/report/index.html
\_ Looks like L&S CS kick EECS big time.
\_ I would believe the report had it been done by a CS and EECS
professor. Since it is done by a CS professor, I do not trust
it.
\_ THAT IS NOT TRUE, EECS people take more classes and
are sexier than you soda-drinking high-school
drop out hackers!!! EECS REWLS, HKN REWLS, CS STUPID!
\_ Name: HILFINGER, Paul
Title: Assoc Prof
Dept 1: EECS/Cmptr Sci
\_ EECS can be more rigorous, depending on the option. There are
a lot more requirements. That said, I don't see a big
difference between the two except in lower division CS
courses. A larger percentage of EECS students got A's in
upper division CS courses than L&S CS students did. --dim
\_ There are more L&S CS with A's in upper EE courses
than EECS students.
\_ A larger percentage of EECS students flunked in upper
division CS coures than L&S CS students did.
\_ EECS people need to take more classes, so obviously they have
less time to concentrate on all the technical classes.
the average EECS GPA.
\_ What? Did you fail your basic logic and analysis class?
\_ We all take 120-130 units you dweeb. Stop complaining.
I took CS 61ABC, EE42, EE 43, Math 1AB/54/55, Physics 7,
EE 122, EE 141, EECS 150, EECS 152, CS 162, CS 164 w/
Hillfinger, CS 170, CS 184 and yet my GPA is higher than
the average EECS GPA. And I'm sure there are other LSCS
majors who have more rigorous classes and a higher GPA
than I do.
\_ Funny. I always gave my list of courses as "X, Y, Z,
A, B, C, 60c with Hilfinger, D, E, F". :-)
\_ excuses excuses. just admit it, CS rewls, EE sucks |
http://csua.com/feed/