| 2010/9/28-30 [Consumer/Camera] UID:53969 Activity:high | 9/28 A lot of photos I take come out blurry. A lot of them are clear,
too, but the proportion of blurry photos is high. This has led me
to take more photos than I otherwise would in hopes of getting a
clear one. I took some photos of the Rio grande and they
were all awesome, but the next day I took photos of landscapes
and almost all of them were blurry. Could it be the camera or is
...
|
| 2010/4/8-5/10 [Consumer/Camera] UID:53778 Activity:nil | 4/8 I want to by my mom a point and shoot camera for about $150 because
she's running around with this 1 megapixel camera from back in the
day. I looked at Canon and Nikon, but I am not as into this stuff as
some people on MOTD are. I take photos with my Blackberry. What's
a good choice in that price range? Definitely not more than $200.
\_ Canon has the best point and shoot cameras. The A1100 or A495
...
|
| 2009/7/21-24 [Consumer/Camera] UID:53172 Activity:moderate | 7/21 NASA uses Nikon cameras. NASA prefers Nikon cameras. There are more
Nikon cameras that went to outer space than any other brand. I love
Nikon cameras. They're built to be abused, built to last.
\_ When is Apple going to make cameras or partner with a good one?
\_ Canon cameras are just as good, and I think in the US Canon is more
popular than Nikon. -- yuen, owner 3 Nikon SLRs and 0 Canon.
...
|
| 2009/5/28-6/5 [Consumer/Camera] UID:53053 Activity:nil | 5/28 Reading camera posts got me curious about rangefinder cameras. In an
era of DSLR, full automation, and instant digital imaging, why would
anyone want to use a rangefinder camera? Why are Voitglander and
Leica even making modern rangefinders when DSLRs are clearly superior
in terms of lens selection and features? -DSLR guy
\_ Rangefinders are still more quiet, have less vibration, and are
...
|
| 2009/5/28-6/4 [Consumer/Camera] UID:53052 Activity:nil | 5/28 Hey kngharv, you said "it's *IMPOSSIBLE* to make a good 6x zoom."
http://csua.com/2002/06/16/#25111
But Nikon and Canon came out with a 11X zoom. The 18-200mm.
Ironic how times have changed eh?
\_ You haven't justified that they are "good", only that they exist.
\_ Tamron also has a 28-300mm. Don't know if it's good though.
...
|
| 2009/5/18-20 [Consumer/Camera] UID:53006 Activity:nil | 5/18 While my nemesis was putting on the green I had a chance to show
off my newly acquired Leica M6 and Leitz 5cm Summicron, in almost
mint condition. It turns out he's a rangefinder enthusiast himself,
except that it's behind the glass because the fucker doesn't want to
put a single scratch on his collection. That's why he only brings his
D-Lux 4 "the son of M8" and occassionalyl 1Ds mk 3. Later on
...
|
| 2009/5/4-6 [Consumer/Camera] UID:52944 Activity:high | 5/4 Which Canon dSLR should I buy?
\_ The cheapest one you can get away with, and the most expensive
glass you can afford. Camera body depreciates 1/2 every 18-24
months. Plastic kit lenses depreciate at about 15-20% each
year till they're worthless in about 3-5 years. Good glass
(constant f/2.8 and below) hardly ever depreciate, and some
...
|
|
http://csua.com/feed/