4/27 In workouts, why are free weights better than machines even if I'm
using the same weight?
\_ More muscle groups are brought into play controlling the weights,
and you have MUCH more control which muscles get worked. With
machines, since the movement is completely static, you have to get
really creative to hit some of the more obscure muscles. Also,
if you're a muscle-bound moose, you can generally get higher
weights on free weights, whereas most machines run out at around
250-300 pounds. -mice
\_ Because free weights give you the widest range of motion possible;
that you are not limited only by the mechanics of the machines.
Which is why folks using free weights are more prone to injury, if
they're not careful in picking the correct weight. They often
forget to take into account gravity, free weights going anywhere
they please while in your hands, etc. Most novice are encouraged
to start with machines first beore graduating into free weights
starting out light. - jthoms
\_ But don't machines offer more variations in resistsnce?
Resistance from free weights only goes one direction (downward)
and is constant. Resistance from a machine can follow
a curved path like on a chest machine which you bring two handles
from left and right together at the front. And the amount of
resistance can vary according to the shape of the pulley guiding
the wires, e.g. eclipse shape. I'm new to weight training BTW.
resistance can vary along the path according to the shape of the
pulleys guiding the wires, e.g. eclipse shape. I'm new to weight
training BTW.
\_ You're correct that machines offer more var. in resistance.
I personally use both machines and free weights as I am
slowly graduating to free weights myself. What people
mean by free weights are "better" is because not only they
bulk up your muscles, but also they train your muscles to
be more alert and flexible. Free weights are closer to
everyday application than machines. I don't know the exact
scientific expl. but that's the closest I can think of.
Also, what avid gym-freaks usually do is use free weights
to "puff up"/sculpt their muscles with slow repetitions on
one day and use the machines to define/tone their newly
build muscles with fast repetitions. Those men with ripped
muscles can't get what they have by using machines alone.
But if you're just doing weights to tone yourself, machines
should do the trick. Have a great workout. - jthoms
\_ So do you mean machines alone can't bulk up my muscles?
Gee, I think I've wasted all that time I spent on those
machines.
\_ I have seen some very big people who use only machines, so
those men with ripped muscles _can_ get what they have with
just machines. Machines and LOTS of steroids...
That said, a good reason to use free weights is to work
all of the little stabilizer muscles that aren't used as
much with machines. Another is that machines usually
add friction to the exercise, usually making the positive
(contracting) part harder and the negative part easier,
which is the opposite of what you want. There are many
other reasons that you can come up with (free weights
allow you to cheat a little more, for example), but I think
it's mostly a matter of personal preference
\_ I'd go with free weights. I was using this bench press machine
(like a standard bench press machine except with a harness), but
never really gained any strength (ie, never moved up in resistence).
Then I switched to dumbbells. I've increased the weights I can do by
20 pounds (each arm) in just over a month, exceeding what I could
do on the machine.
\_ I agree with the recommendation. I don't think that machines
prevent you from getting stronger, but I think that it's easier
to push yourself with free weights. However, I think that the
comparison above is faulty. There is not a simple linear
relationship between the weight you can use on a machine and
what you can use with free weights. Also, when you switch
exercises (from machine to dumbells) you tend to gain strength
more quickly than normal as your body and mind adjust to the
new exercise. |