|
11/22 |
2013/8/1-10/28 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54722 Activity:nil |
8/1 Suppose your house is already paid off and you retire at 65. How much expense does one expect to spend a year, in the Bay Area? Property tax will be about $10K/year for a modest $850K home. What about other stuff? \_ I think at age 65, health insurance is the next biggest expense. \_ I am thinking that we can have a nice middle class lifestyle for the two of us on $40k/yr. Maximum Social Security is about that, but I intend to have enough saved that I will be fine even without SS. |
2013/7/31-9/16 [Reference/RealEstate, Finance/Investment] UID:54720 Activity:nil |
7[31 Suppose you have a few hundred thousand dollars in the bank earning minimum interest rate and you're not sure whether you're going to buy a house in 1-5 years. Should one put that money in a more risky place like Vanguard ETFs and index funds, given that the horizon is only 1-5 years? \_ I have a very similar problem, in that I have a bunch of cash I need to use for a remodel in the next 1-3 years. I don't know for sure what to do with it, but I think that the stock market is too risky for something that you really want. I am probably going to put it into CSJ. Let me know if you come up with a better plan. \_ why are you waiting for remodeling? It's not like the cost of remodeling will fluctuate wildly like stock or even real estate. \_ It takes a while to get the architect to write the plans, get it through planning, etc. We got the money by taking a second out on our house and wanted to lock in interest rates now. |
2013/7/29-8/23 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54716 Activity:nil |
7/28 Mountain View, the not so pretty side: http://mv-voice.com/news/show_story.php?id=7189 |
2013/6/3-7/23 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54685 Activity:nil |
6/3 Why are "real estate" and "real property" called so? Does the part "real" mean something like "not fake"? \- without going into a long discourse into common law, it is to distinguish land/fixed property from intangible property [like a patent] and movable, personal property, like your car. Real property has historically had special rules, like needed written contract to sell/xfer. Somewhat curiously, tangible/"movable" property is also called "chattels", however you may get some odd looks if you use that word ... but that word doesnt just apply to cows. There is a lot of detail in this book, ... like "what is the difference between disseisin and novel disseisin" ... however it may be OOP: http://www.amazon.com/Law-Land-Evolution-Legal-System/dp/0671243225 See also "actual malice". --psb \- BTW, one of the primary reason for the distinction between real/personal property, is that until the mid-16th cent, real property *could not be handed down in a will*, while personal property could be. This was partially solved by something called "livery of seisin", which had it's own problems, until eventually addressed by the Statue of Wills under Henry VIII ... something you probably didnt learn watching THE TUDORS. (again, I'm speaking of england, which is most relevant to the US. And the only area I am familiar with). \_ Is your wife still considered chattel property? \_ Not in California. \_ How about in Texas? |
2013/3/21-5/18 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54634 Activity:nil |
3/21 Holy crap is Bay Area real estate on fire right now. I keep getting outbid by hundreds of thousands of dollars on places. \_ does more home-owners mean fewer people will be renting, driving the demand for rental down? -poor renter \_ I am kind of doubting that, but it might work. \_ what is the zip code that you're bidding on? \_ 94114, 94131 |
2013/3/11-4/16 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54622 Activity:nil |
3/10 I'm trying to help my parents, in their mortgage there's an "escrow" amount. What exactly is this? From reading Google, the loan company uses the escrow account to pay for home insurance, but they've been paying home insurance themselves. I'm really confused on what this fee is. \_ Without an escrow account, you write checks to your insurance company and the County yourself to pay for the insurance and property tax. Your (usually) monthly mortgage payment stay fixed property tax. Your (usually) monthly mortgage payment stays fixed for the duration of the loan. With an escrow account, your mortgage bank sends money to your insurance company and the County at the right time to make those payments. Your (usually) monthly mortgage payment is increased by approximately 1/12 of the annual insurance premium and property tax. You receive interest for the money that is sitting in your escrow account and hasn't been applied to those payments. At the end of each 12-month period, you'll need to make extra payment to the escrow account if the mortgage bank under-estimated your insurance or property tax amounts by too much, or you'll receive a refund if the bank over-estimated by too much. The bank will also re-estimate the amounts for the subsequent year, and adjust your monthly mortgage payment accordingly. |
2013/2/19-3/26 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54610 Activity:nil |
2/19 I just realized that my real estate broker has a PhD in plant molecular cell biology from an Ivy League school in the mid 70s. Now she has to deal with a bunch of young dot-comers, and they're pain in the ass. -Only a BS in EEC$ \_ My agent used to be a hardware engineer. He switched to real estate when he got laid off during the 80's. Now he's doing very well. \_ Are you trying to buy a house too? I am trying to buy in Noe and I keep getting outbid by 200-300k. Insane. \_ Here in the suburbs, homes are cheap and plentiful for all! |
2012/12/21-2013/1/24 [Transportation/Car, Reference/RealEstate] UID:54567 Activity:nil |
12/21 Is it possible to use my Fastrak on a rental car? \_ Don't know if you're supposed to, but I think it works under normal situation (i.e. you're not speeding, your windshield doesn't block the signal, etc.) The problem is that if the reception is bad and the toll tag doesn't beep, the booth will take a picture of your rental's license plate and fine the rental company because the vehicle is in violation. Then the rental company will make you pay. pay the toll plus the penalty. \_ I have done it plenty of times. -ausman |
11/22 |
2012/8/21-11/7 [Reference/Law, Reference/RealEstate] UID:54462 Activity:nil |
8/21 I'm trying to negotiate rent renewal and my manager came back saying she can't do that due to Fair Housing Laws that states that if they adjust price for one person they need to adjust price for everyone else. Is this an actual law or some bullshit she just made up? \_ Probably bullshit. \_ LOL, BS. You can negotiate rental once the lease is up, unless wherever you live has some weird housing laws. \_ LOL, BS. You can negotiate rental once the lease is up, unless wherever you live has some weird housing laws. \_ http://www.echofairhousing.org/images/FairHsgLaw.pdf The law prohibits setting different terms, conditions, etc... \_ I am a real estate broker. You can set different rents for different tenants. She is full of shit. The Fair Housing Law is about race, color, religion, sex, and so on. For example, you can't charge more to an Asian tenant than a white tenant based on race. However, you sure as hell can charge different rents to tenants if there is no discrimination. |
2012/5/25-30 [Transportation/Car/RoadHogs, Reference/RealEstate] UID:54400 Activity:nil |
5/25 Sorry suburban hicks, properties in walkable cities retain better values: http://dc.streetsblog.org/2012/05/18/study-resilient-walkables-lead-the-housing-recovery |
2012/3/1-26 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54324 Activity:nil |
3/1 So much for George Bush's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ownership_society http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/25/business/homes-arent-selling-but-its-an-apartment-landlords-market.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all |
2011/12/15-2012/2/6 [Reference/RealEstate, Industry/Jobs] UID:54260 Activity:nil |
12/15 Does anyone have experience investing in apartment buildings I'm not really looking to invest, but I want an apartment to live in, and I'm not happy with the leases I'm encountering for instance one requires 2 years of tax returns with the application. I'm in a position to buy a building, but I've got no experience with this, and I don't want to learn that it was a bad by losing a lot of money. --jwm. \_ I bought a two unit building and live in the top. It has worked out pretty well for me. Email me if you want more info. -ausman \_ jsl and I run a small 4-unit, and have for a while. Property management can be a lot of work. You could hire property managers to do it for you but it cuts into income. -mehlhaff |
2010/7/12-23 [Politics/Domestic/Gay, Reference/RealEstate] UID:53881 Activity:nil |
7/12 Y.M.C.A. is renaming to Y.? Why? (Pun intended.) http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/12/us/12Y.html?no_interstitial \_ because M is oppressive patriarchy in action, and C is a bad word. Probably they will get rid of Y as ppl live longer. \_ it will turn into http://AFGNCAAP.org \_ They should go back to their old name, U.S. Soc for Eugenics. \_ Gay club and eugenics don't mix. They don't reproduce. |
2010/1/12-25 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:53626 Activity:nil |
1/12 http://economicsofcontempt.blogspot.com/2008/07/official-list-of-punditsexperts-who.html Who got the housing bubble wrong. \_ This post is good enough to be a news article on Yahoo Finance. |
2009/11/29-12/8 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:53549 Activity:high |
11/29 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091129/ap_on_sp_go_ne/glf_woods_accident "Police first went to his $2.4 million house ......" For a world's top athlete making hundreds of millions of dollars, isn't it strange that Tiger Woods lives in a mere $2.4m house? \_ No. \_ what's so weird about it? what makes you think that's the only house, residential property, or simply property he has? and even if he has 1 billion, why would it be weird to live in a mere 2mil house? what can you get with a 20mil house that you can't with a 2mil house, in Florida? \_ seconded. Go look at some FL real estate listings guys \_ Bill Gates drove a Toyota (then later a Lexus), Andy Grove drove a Saab, and Ikea founder drove a Volvo. Is that weird? \_ You're ignoring the not-street-legal 1/2 mil Porsche he kept at home. \_ I wonder if that's because the GPS on Toyotas and Lexuses runs Windows CE or XP Embedded or something. \_ I'd have thought that as the richest man on the planet, Gates always goes around in a convoy of bodyguards. \_ I heard he's afraid of pie attacks. \_ When I met him in the hallway at Wired Magazine, he only had some woman and Steve Ballmer with him. I have heard that he know travels with at least some security these days though. he now travels with at least some security these days though. \_ and you didn't take the opportunity to sucker-punch him? \_ I stared at him for a while and considered spitting on him, but then incorrectly decided that he was just some poor SOB who had the misfortune to look like Bill Gates. Afterall, what was the probability that I might actually bump into him? Turns out that he was there for a photo shoot. \_ Good thing you didn't. Bill Gates curse is even more effective than Soda blacklisting you from Silicon Valley. \_ what the hell are you talking about? what blacklist? \_ Talking to people from Sun, I am pertty sure they would have hired me just for that. Ellison probably also. \_ if you have to work at Sun or Oracle, you're probably desperate for a paycheck, or is an indentured^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H H1B visa holder who wants a greencard. \_ I met a limo driver who insists who drove Gates and his wife to his house in Rancho Santa Fe (or thereabouts). They hadn't eaten so they wanted to stop on the way. They went through the drive through at Burger King. He claims Bill's wife pulled BK coupons out of her purse which they used. \_ as silly and improbable as this story sounds, it is in fact consistent with what people say about Bill Gates for many years. \_ What's improbable about it? The things that are interesting about fast food remain interesting when you have a ton of money. Chez Panisse doesn't have a drive-through. And the coupon thing is about personal pleasure in getting a perceived deal, it's not about saving 25 cents. -tom \_ Can a limo actually negotiate the tight turns at a BK drive-thru? \_ ding ding ding, thanks for pointing out the inconsistencies in this bozo's statements. he is a suspect now -monk \_ not all limos are stretch limos. \_ I'm not sure it was a limo. I should have used the word 'chauffeur'. It could have been a town car or even an SUV for all I know. I didn't ask. I doubt it was an actual limousine. \_ I have to say that I am pretty surprised. You'd think he'd have more property (=privacy). I am sure he owns a lot of other properties, but that's not the point. \_ A story about the world's richest man and his wife using coupons is funny. Guess what, the world's richest man's time is more valuable than yours. Why would he waste time cutting and redeeming coupons? That's stupid. I don't know why Sergei doesn't travel with an elite squad of hot blond Russian Spetnatz assassins. Eric travels with some security. Who the hell let him go to Iraq? |
2009/11/23-12/2 [Transportation/Car/RoadHogs, Reference/RealEstate] UID:53540 Activity:moderate |
11/23 "Warming's impacts sped up, worsened since Kyoto" http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/sci_climate_09_post_kyoto \_ what do you propose we average Joes do about climate warning? Oh really? Yeah, exactly. \_ Make life choices which reduce your carbon impact. Communicate with your representatives that you consider this an important and urgent issue. What else would average Joes do about anything? -tom \_ the average Joe will not give up his/her SUV and living in suburbs and ex-urbs (which are the reasons that increase our needs for energy). \_ Some average Joe/Jane won't give up loving in suburbs while willing to give up his/her SUV; Some average Joe/Jane won't give his/her SUVs while willing to telecommunte twice a week; some average Joe/Jane won't telecommute while willing to become vegetarian; etc. And, like you said, some average Joe/Jane won't give up anything. Ideally, the problem can be very easily solved by everyone giving up N things. But very few people in the free world would be willing to do that. So we'll have to rely on most people giving up 1 or 2 things out of their own list of N things. (For me, I didn't give up living in suburbs. But I wear a jacket at home in winter instead of turning on the heat, use a fan in summer instead of AC, line-dry my laundary in the backyard instead of using the gas dryer, skip the plastic or paper bags when grocery- shopping, gave up my SUV and got a Prius, and literally dig through the household trash to find recyclable and compostable items that my wife and in-laws fail to separate out.) --- OP \_ The average Joe will do whatever is effectively marketed to him. SUVs and suburbs have been effectively marketed to average Joes. We are starting to see better marketing of environmental and quality-of-life issues, but we need more. Also, we need to stop subsidizing carbon production, which is where legislative action is needed; if the suburb dwellers were paying the true cost of their lifestyle, it would be much less attractive. -tom \_ I get what you are saying, but this could be said about any group. "Bike riders will do whatever is effectively marketed to them". Otherwise the marketing wouldn't have been effective. -- jwm \_ That's a bit tautalogical, sure. But my point is that the idea that everyone should live in a big house in a faceless suburb with two SUVs (or now, an SUV and a Prius) is the result of 60 years of corporate marketing, and corporations are really the only beneficiaries. Just as corporate marketing changed what the average Joe wanted, marketing of social responsibility can change what the average Joe wants. -tom \_ I agree. The way we as a society have used marketing has been damaging. --jwm \_ I'm sorry, but I cannot agree that "corporations are really the only beneficiaries." I really like having land around my house. I use it to grow food, for recreation, and for privacy. I went to my coworkers ultra-chic condo which cost over $1M and had koi and Italian fountains everywhere, but I wouldn't care for living in close quarters like he does. He even told me he is looking for a single family home for various reasons all related to the density of the housing. You may think there's no benefit to a SFR, but millions of Americans disagree and that is how most Americans lived 200 years ago. I think that mixed-use/loft/high density housing is something pushed on us by corporations and SFR more closely reflects the rural areas most Americans lived in prior to the Industrial Revolution. \_ Who said anything about condos? I live in a house in a city (Oakland). -tom \_ Plus the Richmond and Sunset Districts in SF are also primarily houses. -- !PP \_ So are Hancock Park and Beverly Hills in LA, but most people can't afford to live there. If they want a nice house with land they have to leave the city. \_ The complaint was against a "big house in a faceless suburb." How can you possibly argue that a big house in Oakland is somehow superior to a big house in a suburb like Lafayette? Same damn thing. \_ 1) The house in Oakland is smaller. 2) The house in Oakland requires less driving. Pretty simple, really. -tom \_ Neither of these are necessarily true. \_ They are both true as averages. -tom \_ They don't _have_ to be. These are external to the idea of suburbs. You can build smaller houses in the suburbs. You can take BART to SF from Lafayette as surely as you can from Oakland. One thing you _cannot_ do is build affordable SFR in a city, which takes us back to condos. \_ You're right, if reality were completely different than it is, houses would be smaller in Lafayette and people in suburbs would drive less than people in cities. But on this planet, houses are larger in suburbs and people drive more. -tom \_ I think you need to focus on the problems you are trying to address and "suburbs" and "housing density" are not them. You can live in the city and drive a lot (reverse commute, which some people do) and you can build a huge energy sucking house in the city, too, if you are rich. \_ I said "make life choices that reduce your carbon impact"; someone else asserted that "average Joes" would not give up their SUVs in the suburbs. I'm pointing out that that assertion is unfounded. -tom \_ I think that most people want both the advantages of density (short commutes, walkable neighborhoods, more community) as well as lots of space for themselves personally. Most people just want more of everything, but the planet cannot support this kind of lifestyle for 6 billion people. This is just a simple fact of physics, not something that has anything to do with corporations. The earth is probably already past its carrying capacity, according to many scientists. \_ The idea that people should live in identical large houses with large yards and large fences, a long drive away from the places they want to go, was basically invented in the 50s by and for corporations. Before that virtually all development was mixed-use, and our population was denser despite being much smaller. From 1950 to 1990, Bay Area population more than doubled, while density actually decreased. Most of that change was due to the construction of freeways and related destruction of urban neighborhoods, with housing moving from urban, mixed-use to suburban and isolated. Now things are starting to swing back the other way, which is a good thing. Very little of this has much to do with what the average Joe wants, except insofar as he's susceptible to marketing. -tom \_ This is a lie. Like I said, before the Industrial Revolution more people than not lived in large houses with large yards a long drive away from \_ There was driving before the Ind. Rev.?? \_ certainly not autos but I would guess PP means horse and buggy drives town. The population was not denser at all. This era you wax nostalgic for was an artifact of the Industrial Revolution where workers moved to slums in large cities in order to work in factories. It's laughable that you think that corporations in the 1950s invented the suburban lifestyle. What corporations invented was *DENSE CITIES*. From 1950 to 1990 what we saw was _AN IMPROVED STANDARD OF LIVING_ and now that our standard of living is eroding we are seeing more people living like cockroaches. Not only that, _ALL_ of this has to do with choices people make. You give marketers _WAY_ too much credit. I live in a house built at the turn of the century and it's not hard to see why people wanted to move to their own brand new box in a new suburb. (Example: one bathroom). That's not an artifact of marketing, buddy. \_ Overpopulation and resource depletion leads to a declining standard standard of living. Why is that surprising to you? People have lived in large crowded cities since at least the Roman Empire, you are nuts to think that this is a modern invention. Sure, subsidence farmers lived spread Sure, subsistence farmers lived spread out, but cities were denser before the automobile. Have you been to any of Europe? I prefer my solidly built turn of the century house to the ticky tacky crap that passes for "luxury" these days. And btw, people used to live in much smaller houses, so you are wrong about the "large houses" part, too. -!tom http://www.moyak.com/papers/house-sizes.html \_ 1. I prefer my old house, too, but that's because I like the character. You can realize, though, why post-WW II families thought that moving to a new, modern house with a yard and 2 bathrooms was appealing. 2. By "large houses" I mean a large footprint (less dense). Houses have gotten larger over time, but the lots they are built on has not. \_ So "large house with large yards" really means "small house with large yard" in your language? Could you please clarify which defn of "large" you are using next time, so I don't get confused? Thanks in advance. 3. Large crowded cities were not a very common way of life. This is a modern innovation. From Scientific American, September 2005: "From the beginning of the Christian era to about 1850, the urban population of the world never exceeded 7 percent. The Industrial Revolution quickly changed that--today 75 percent of people in the U.S. and other developed countries live in cities, according to the United Nations." You tell me which is more recent. \_ Prior to the industrial revolution, people outside of cities were organized in family units; multiple generations would live densely within the same house or on the same land. The land provided most of the daily needs of the group, requiring little travel relative to current practice. The concept of "commuting" is a modern invention (and a carbon- expensive one). -tom |
2009/9/15-24 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:53371 Activity:nil |
9/15 Phillip Garrido's home is worth about $179K, according to Zillow. Anyone want to buy properties in Antioch? http://www.zillow.com/homes/map/1554-Walnut-Ave-Antioch-CA_rb |
2009/8/20-9/1 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:53293 Activity:moderate |
8/20 I'm researching into properties around San Jose. They say that the only desirable areas in San Jose are Almaden and Evergreen. I did some research and property values for these two are prohibitively high (one in the 800K, and the other one over 1M). Is there anything else in San Jose that's not dumpy? \_ How about Willow Glen? Depends on what you find desirable. \_ What's your price range and what are you looking for (big house versus small condo)? Just because the median is $800K doesn't mean you can't find something for less or, alternately, that the $800K house is big enough. \_ Who says that those are the only desirable areas? Are you looking for a well built house in a safe neighbhorhood or are you trying to impress people with your zip code? I bet you can even find \_ I just bought a 600K condo in the 212. that impresses some people. \_ What does that get you these days, a studio? \_ 1bdr, 1ba, hells kitchen aka "midtown west" now as it's called, Buyers market right now. Granted the monthly is about $4k/mo but that's peanuts if you are a sw architect. \_ I guess the guy's point is: What's impressive about a $600K condo in NYC? At that price it's probably 750 square feet and in a marginal area. The average New York condo is $644K and in Manhattan it is $1.1M. So you bought a smaller and cheaper than average place in a fringe neighborhood. I am happy for you. NYC is great. Impressed? Not so much. houses in those areas for less, if you go for something smaller. How much house do you feel that you need? \_ Rose Garden is a nice district. -sj hater |
2009/7/28-8/6 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:53212 Activity:nil |
7/28 My girlfriend and I took care of my girlfriend's nephew for 3 weeks while his mom was off working for the Air Force (she is a reservist and a single mom). As part of that my girlfriend stayed at her apartment a lot, watching him and the cats. Occasionally he stayed at our house. It was a lot of responsibility. The weekend before she got back we spent a lot of time cleaning her place. In fact, I would say it is a lot cleaner than the way she left it. She got back Sunday and came to our house to get her son before going back to her place. She was off Monday to recuperate before going back to work today. We are a little miffed that she hasn't called to say thanks or ask how things went. We thought she'd be pleasantly surprised that everything was clean and straightened up. We don't want a medal or anything, but a call saying "Wow. Thanks for taking care of the place. It looks great. Cats are fine." would have been nice. Are we right to be a little (a lot) pissed at this point? \_ Yes, she should be fawning over you and your gf. That said, she is probably tired, there is only one of here. Also, I hate it when people clean up my stuff. (did you thrown anything out?) \_ I absolutely did not throw anything out. I hate that, too. We just did all the laundry, including things like bath mats, vacuumed, mopped, cleaned the toilets and tub, did all the dishes, made the beds, arranged the furniture (not *re*arranged but made sure things like pillows were in place), emptied the trash, dusted, sorted the mail, and all the typical stuff. I know certain things (like dusting and vacuuming) hadn't been done in a while based on the condition, which is why i say we left it cleaner than she did. \_ Do you mean Monday as in yesterday? Yes, I think you should give her a couple of days at least. I am sure she is overwhelmed. At least you got a taste of what being a parent is like. Are you going to have any of your own? \_ Chill, give it a week. You're tired from all of this? Imagine doing it every single day. \_ Not really tired by it. Did I say that? However, how much trouble is it to pick up the phone, if even just to ask if we had any problems or issues while she was away? I know I would definitely want to know what happened while I was gone and I think it's polite to call and say "I noticed you guys cleaned the place up. Thanks." \_ Did you make sure to thank her for the sacrifices she has made to help defend you and your country? Maybe now would be a good time! \_ She may not have even noticed. 3 weeks of training would certainly wipe my cache about the state of cleanliness in my house. Why don't you just feel good about having done service for a loved one? |
2009/4/23-28 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:52896 Activity:low |
4/22 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/23/garden/23sanfran.html How did a 26 y.o. and a 29 y.o. buy a $1M house (and then spend another $1/2M on a remodel)? \_ dot com money? \_ Bank of Mom and Dad + leverage. \_Bank of Sugar-Dad + cleavage. \_ You don't need mom&dad when you got a bunch of stupid creditors. \_ What the (*@&$@# does a 33 year old x-skater board dude do for a living-- a bass player for Space Vacation, a heavy metal band. What the fuck? If you're over 25 and still not successful, give it up! What a (*@#$@# loser. \_ People don't come right out and say "trust fund baby". |
2009/4/5-13 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:52802 Activity:kinda low |
4/5 In the Exurbs, the American Dream Is Up for Rent: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123845433832571407.html \_ "As land values rose, the couple's combined mortgage and property tax payment soared, to $2,900 from $1,500." Uhh, for some reason I don't think the wsj is being totally honest here. Property taxes doubled the mortgage? Really? \_ Could happen in places without Prop 13, which the anti-Prop 13 people ignore. My mother-in-law bought a house back East for a lot less than it probably should have sold for. She then spent some money fixing it up. Then the real estate bubble hit. At the height her property tax was $8K/year and her mortgage was $9K/year. It started at $14K/year for the mortgage and $4K for tax, but she refinanced the mortgage when rates fell and the tax doubled. So in this case her expense was about the same ($18K vs. $17K) but her tax bill almost overtook her mortgage. That's ridiculous to happen in 7 years. 7 years. BTW, the article says: "No one in the history of the world ever washed a rented car." Well, I rented a truck once and went offroad in the mud and snow with it. I did take it to the car wash before I returned it because it was a mess. |
2009/3/19-23 [Reference/RealEstate, Reference/Tax] UID:52732 Activity:high |
3/19 Communist/Socialist House reps pass bill taxing bonuses at 90% for that portion of the bonus that pushes you over, for individuals, total AGI > $125K ($250K married) working at an entity which took >= $5B in TARP money. A disgrace to meritocracy. Cost of living in Manhattan is expensive you know?? It's a good thing it only starts for the 2009 tax year! \_ ha ha you're stupid \_ I think it's not fair to be based on household income. I think it should be based on the income of the person (married or not) getting the bonus. \_ It's an unconstitutional bill of attainder. \_ That's not obvious. \_ corrected again after reading the bill \_ It should have been 99%. Seriously, the people owed bonuses should become third- or fourth-tier creditors; if there's anything left to pay them after paying back the govt., fine. If not, tough. \_ "While the House legislation calls for a 90 percent tax, Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, said he expected local and state governments to take the remaining 10 percent of the bonuses." http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/aig_outrage \_ what is your suggestion? continue to let those free-market guys run the banks and continue their practice of leveraging 35:1 ? let me know. \_ Rent a cheap condo in Brooklyn and take a train to work. $250K is plenty to live in Manhattan too. Just find a cheaper place to live take the kids out of $30K/year private school. is plenty to live in Manhattan too. Just find a cheaper place to live take the kids out of $30K/year private school. \_ If 250K/year isn't enough for you to live in a nice condo in Manhattan you need to stop doing 10k of coke a month. \_ A 3 BR apartment is about $5-7K/month. $12K/month doesn't seem like much with those prices. I think the guy who \_ A 3 BR apartment is about $5-7K/month. $12K/month (after tax) seem like much with those prices. I think the guy who said Brooklyn or Jersey was more on the money. \_ And really, who can live on just 7k a month? \_ Slippery slope. I bet you can live on a lot less than you make, too. Most people can. Once you start trying to define a "minimum livable wage" you have already lost and might as well embrace communism. \_ You are really bad at this reading comprehension aren't you. Are you the same person who was mad because those dirty poor people don't live on potatoes and milk? |
2009/3/17-23 [Reference/Law/Court, Reference/RealEstate] UID:52724 Activity:moderate |
3/17 I posted on 2/10 about a landlord that stiffed me $600 on my deposit. I wrote him a "strongly worded letter" and followed it up with a "Pay up or I'm going to file a small claims court in 10 days" template. He didn't respond so I filed a claim, but the day I filed a claim, he wrote me back and added $250 to the deposit. If I hadn't already spent the $60 on the filing, I would have been happy and taken the money and gave up. As is, I think I should probably still do that, but I'm interested in learning about the whole legal process. Anyone have any experience with Small Claims Court? Is it as fun/fascinating as it sounds? The worst part is that I'm guessing that the judge won't give me the 2X deposit that I'm suing for because he's no longer acting in "bad faith"... \_ Unless you can claim your costs are greater than $250, the judge will probably get annoyed at you for wasting time and public resources. What are you going to ask for ... you cant say they reason your pursued the case was to see how the system would work. If you proceed, you definitely want to have on record an explanation to the former landlord why the current settlement still leaves you short and what it would take to resolve it [i.e. "I spent $X in costs and time T, which is worth about $Y ...]. What did your landlord's letter say? [Also, I am not sure if your cashing the check has any legan bearing ... if a landlord tried to evict you but takes legal bearing ... if a landlord tried to evict you but takes money from you, it alters the situation for him]. \_ I appreciate your advice, but I don't understand "costs >$250"? He's still deducting $250 from my deposit for things like paint, but I lived there for 3 years, longer than the typical life of cheap apartment paint. Can you not sue in small claims for $250? I don't want to waste the judge's time, but I thought small claims was for exactly that... small claims. \_ I thought you meant the landlord sent you a $250 "bribe" on top of what he owned you to drop the case for double/punitive damages/costs. I didnt realize he still left you short. I think you need to clear up the accounting if you want motd.advice. By the way, there are a lot of obligations in CA for landlord w.r.t. to deposits, especually if he doesnt return the whole amount. You might look at the Nolo Press book for renters. \_ Small claims is, technically, for anything up to $1,000; after that, you jump up to regular court. That said, the trend in modern justice is toward mediation and, well, breaking even, so since you're already getting what you wanted (minus $60), a judge is likely to tell you to get lost. -!pp, IANAL \_ limit is now $7,500 in CA for small claims \_ See? More evidence that IANAL. \_ I don't understand, did he deduct $250 from the money he owed you (and therefore still owes $250) or did he add $250 to the money he returned? If it is the former, you can still reasonably sue, if it is the latter, I can't see what your claim would be. \_ If he gave you back $600-$250 then hell yes you can take him to small claims (and may even be able to ask to add your filing fee to the judgement if you win). If he gave you $600+$250 then shut up and take your money. \_ He owed me $1060 and gave me $600+$250=$850. So he still owes me $310 (+filing fee?). Are you suggesting I shut up? owes me $310 (+filing fee?). Should I sue or shut up? \_ He owed me $1060 and gave me $460+$250=$710. So he still owes me $350 (+filing fee?). Should I sue or shut up? \_ up to you, but I would at least write him a letter or e-mail saying you got his extra $250 and he is still short $x, and you still feel stiffed and will still sue unless he pays up. Judges like to see this follow up since if it works, it saves them time. \_ Seconded. Make copies of everything you send so you can show it to the Judge. Oh, and buy a book on how to collect your judgement if you win; it's not just a matter of having the Judge make the landlord hand you the money. \_ 1060 - 850 != 310 \_ Derr, at least the math in my letters to him was correct. Here's the real accounting: Deposit: $1060 First Check: $460 Second Check: $250 I'm going to cash the check today and have someone serve him papers tomorrow. I will also write him a letter saying that I received his second check but that he is still short $350 and that he should pay me the $350 or contact me if he wants to settle this out of court. Thanks for the tips. Also, Nolo Press is awesome. \- Nolo >> Texas \_ Inflamed hemorrhoids >> Texas. |
2009/3/10-17 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:52692 Activity:moderate |
3/10 Sure glad I didn't take suburban guys advice and buy a big place in the outer suburbs: http://tinyurl.com/b68rty \_ My house just got appraised for 2x what I paid for it in 2001, which is down from 2.5x in 2007. I'm really upset about it, especially since the appraisal was because I refinanced at 4.5% and my payment now is lower than it was when I bought. \_ Are you perchance a LANDLORD WITH A YACHT?!?!!?!?!!!!! \_ What is the N Cal equivalent to Riverside? Castro Valley? San Leandro? Dublin? Tracy? Antioch? Just trying to get a sense what it is like since I've never been to Riverside. \_ Riverside County is relatively similar to Contra Costa County. But downtown Riverside is relatively dense and almost urban. There's a UC there and a lot of the sprawl cities (e.g. Moreno Valley, Beaumont) are built around Riverside, not LA. I just checked Wikipedia and Riverside (city) has almost the same density of Castro Valley (~3,900/sq mi), but Riverside County is much less dense than Contra Costa. \_ professions? crime rates? demograph? \_ Riverside isn't much like Contra Costa County. I'd compare it to Modesto. it to Modesto or Stockton. Contra Costa is more like Orange County. Riverside does not have very many wealthy enclaves like Contra Costa County does. Maybe you can compare Riverside to Davis, too. \_ Nah, Davis >>> Riverside. \_ Davis is maybe 1/10th the size of Riverside. \_ Riverside is much wealthier than Modesto. A better comparison would be Vacaville. Maybe Vacaville plus Vallejo. \_ And a 10x better place to live. Which says something about how shitty Riverside is. \_ Perhaps, but all the other cities in the "Inland Empire" are worse. \_ I was going to say that Riverside was nicer than Modesto and then I looked at the demographics and I have to admit you nailed it. Concord is actually pretty close to Riverside, in most ways. \_ Concord is not similar to Riverside in my mind. Concord has a BART stop that gets you to SF quickly. Concord is a bedroom community for SF. Riverside is too far from LA and San Diego to really be influenced by them, so it (and San Bernardino) are more like Stockton. I'd live in Concord area but I'd never (again) live in Riverside area. \_ Riverside has terrible air quality and the "909" (area code) is ridiculed as being a meth capital. Moreno Valley passed up Fresno and was the murder capital of the US a short while ago. I think that Beaumont was the fastest growing "small city" in California in 2006 and 2007. The IE has a lot of bad things about it. Upside is proximity to Palm Springs, maybe Temecula (wineries)? \_ Gotta agree, Riverside smells like cow-ass \_ You are confusing Riverside with Chino here. Chino smells like cow-ass, Riverside like car-ass. |
2009/2/27-3/6 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:52656 Activity:nil |
2/27 Woah, check out inflation-adjusted home prices over the years http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/1/30/saupload_case_shiller_chart_updated.png \_ Yeah, during the top of the bubble people kept saying prices needed to drop 50%, looks about right. |
2009/2/26-3/5 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:52641 Activity:kinda low |
2/26 REAL ESTATE, IT ONLY GOES UP! LANDLORD - WITH A YACHT!!!!!!!!one \_ I use to be boat person, now I own boat. -John Vu \_ you call now, make money in real estare wit no money down, i come here make money wit no money down, look at these women! \_ Nice thing about being a landlord is that some schmuck pays the mortgage for you whether the property is going up or down in value and after 15-30 years you own it free and clear, whatever it ends up being worth. \_ I hope you have a gun for when the mob zeros in on you. \_ I used to subscribe to this kind of wishful thinking too... but look around. What would have to happen before angry mobs actually revolt against landlords? Additionally, there is nothing unethical about renting out real estate. It's just money management. Time to grow up, kids. \_ For your first question: food shortages, fuel rationing, rolling brown/blackouts on a regular basis (not just your occasional hot summer), runs on multiple banks, and a significantly greater lack of law enforcement and/or National Guard. In short, not a chance. It's why there's not even a dozen miles between Harlem and the highrise luxury apartments yet said luxury apartments don't ever get burned down. \_ The nice thing about renting is that someone else takes care of mantience, I can move whenever I want, and someone else takes the risk. It's not like there aren't ups and downs to both sides. \_ True. Most of the advantages to renting have to do with mobility, but there are others. For instance, you might be able to rent in a nicer neighborhood than you can buy in which could lead to perks like better schools. However, in terms of accumulating wealth and in other ways, too, (for instance political) the system is skewed towards landowners. |
2009/2/20-22 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:52612 Activity:nil |
2/21 anyone go to school with Kip Macy? He's back in jail http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/02/19/BATV161A1R.DTL&tsp=1 \_ This is REALLY funny: http://daemonflux.blogspot.com/2008/09/day-one.html \_ Whatever you disgruntled anonymous tenant advocate. \_ Drilling holes in the floor to get your tenants to go away doesn't work. kipmacy was a dumbass. and greedy. all he had to do was wait a year and he would have gotten his condos \_ Gee, ya' think? |
2009/2/10-17 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:52550 Activity:nil |
2/10 I've mailed my landlord about excess withholdings from my deposit (certified mail), quoting legal code and all that. I'm going to write him a followup letter saying he never responded. Is the next step to go to some free legal clinic and then take him to small claims? Any advise? (I've actually been looking forward to this for a while... when I moved in, I knew this would happen so I've tried to keep good documentation). \_ It depends on where you live. Do you live in a city with a strong Rent Control board? You might be able to just go to them. \_ IANAL, but as I recall you can get triple damages on unjustified deposit withholding. \_ IANAL, but as I recall you can get triple damages on unlawfully withheld deposit money. \_ In CA, It's twice deposit + damages. I lived in LA and now am in SF. I ACCESS for free legal help but my landlord is in LA. --op in SF. I ACCESS for free legal help but my landlord is in LA. --op http://law.onecle.com/california/civil/1950.5.html \_ Send the letter, but are you willing to go down to LA to go to court? \_ Yes. I go down there about once a month. He owes me $600 and double the deposit would be an additional $2K. Plus, I've never been to non-traffic court, so I'm kind of looking forward to the experience of sticking up for the little guy (that's me). \_ The ex-landlord lives in LA? |
2009/2/4-8 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:52507 Activity:nil |
2/3 There's a glut of apartments out there. Three units on my floor (of a 80 unit apartment) are now vacant, in less than a month. The weird thing is my landlord is increasing the rent by $200 a month, bumping it to $2200. I'm told her about the rate out there, and she only budged $100. WTF, is this common? Oh well, time to look for another place. I hate corporate managed apartments. \_ Where? Berkeley? SF? LA? |
2009/1/29-2/6 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:52485 Activity:kinda low |
1/29 S&P Case-Shiller 20-city home price index shows San Francisco 1 year home value change: 30.8%. \_ + or -? \_ http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/27/real_estate/home_price_losses_continue \_ SF MSA... includes Oakland, Bay View, Novato, etc. \_ Bay View is SF \_ Yes, but including it in SF numbers doesn't really give a picture of someone who wants to buy in SF and not get shot. I've been waiting and waiting for prices to fall and only in the past 6 months have I see a decline in areas that I'd be interested in, like the Mission, Hayes Valley, Alamo Sq, Duboce Triangle, Noe, etc. \_ Tell me about it, I'm in the same boat. I just know that when prices go down x% most of that is in the shittier areas. And from what I've seen prices have hardly dropped in the places you are looking. It's frustrating. \_ The less desirable areas are first down and last up. That doesn't mean prices in nice areas haven't dropped, because they have. It will take interest rate hikes to bring prices down. As long as you can get a mortgage for 4.5% prices will remain pretty high. \_ TIC rates are well above 6% so 4.5% is not relevant... although the TIC auction ideas are promising. \_ If TIC = APR (which I think it would be) then nope. Under 5%. \_ You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. If P=NP=Bananas=Sputnik, then under 5%. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/01/31/BUM615JQNS.DTL \_ How much have prices dropped in the areas you are interested in? |
2009/1/22-26 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:52438 Activity:high |
1/21 One datapoint on rental prices, please post yours if applicable. Please don't give me this "this is why I buy a home" crap. Not everyone has money: -S Cal, $2055/month with 9 month contract expired. Signing one more year=$2055/month, month-to-month=$2255. Bunch of empty parking spots and people moving out, but according to the manager the economy hasn't diminished rental demand. \_ Oakland, Grand Lake District: 2.5 BR, large living room, large kitchen, $1125/month. \_ Thanks for the data! Is the trend going up or down in this weird economy? I expected rent to go down because of all the empty spots but nothing changed. -op \_ People still have to live somewhere. If anything, it might go up because of all the people who can't afford to own a home and have to rent again. \_ That is true, but when I survived the dot-com, a bunch of people moved OUT of Silicon Valley back to their homes. I know a bunch of 2nd class engineers went back to LA and Orange County, and a bunch of marketing people went back to Nebraska, Arizona, Ohio, etc. \_ Well, that is certainly happening now too (people moving back to cheaper locations). \_ Why do you say that? SF population seems stable, perhaps even growing. \_ Nevermind, what I meant is practically a truism (it's always happening somewhere in the Bay Area). I don't have any special knowledge on current rates of occurrence. \_ Between 1950 and 2000 SF gained about 1,000 people in population with a big dip in between. Since 2000 it has declined: http://www.usbeacon.com/California/San-Francisco.html \_ http://tinyurl.com/am39ft San Francisco has attained the highest population on record with a population of 824,525 on January 1, 2008. This continues the significant upward trend in growth that began in 2006. The city grew by 1.5 percent this year. http://tinyurl.com/dmklko The U.S. Census Bureau admitted underestimating the city's 2007 population and raised it to 799,183, according to a statement from the mayor's office. Where does usbeacon get its numbers from? \_ I rented out my house in Fremont via the Housing Authority. The rent, determined by the Housing Authority, hasn't gone down. BTW it's 4-bed 2-bath 1444sqft, 10-min walk from bus stop, not walkable to BART, $2165/mo. \_ Livermore (Far East Bay), 3Bed 2Bath 1200 sq ft, duet $1600 a month. In Livemore rent prices have increased significantly since the housing crash. All the foreclosed people need to rent now. That said, my rent is pretty low. \_ Why are you renting in Livermore when housing is dirt cheap relative to the real Bay Area? \_ Basically we're just biding our time a bit. When it starts going back up, I don't think it's going to go very fast, so we're just waiting for a house we like at a price we like. You're correct that we could afford to buy right now. \_ Why don't you buy? I pay less mortgage than that at 4.875%. You can borrow about $400K for that rent (without even considering tax deductions). With your $40K down that means maybe a $500K place once considering taxes. You can find something for that. \_ I'm looking for a job. Will you find me a job? Then maybe I'll consider buying. Thanks for your thoughtful response asswipe \_ I know of a couple of job possiblities in interesting startups. One with languages in Menlo Park, and one with Social networks or scientific computing in Viriginia. -jrleek \_ Sorry to hear that, but with no income *all* rent is expensive. However, if I lose my job at least I can live on my home equity and, like I said, my payment is less than that guy's $2K rent. \_ Most likely, you bought the home when the price was lower than it is today. If you buy the same home today, will your mortgage still be less than $2K? \_ I just told you that you can borrow $400K for $2100 per month. My house is worth more than $450K according to the recent appraisal, but I have seen houses in my neighborhood for sale for $450K. For \_ I don't know anywhere in California desirable where you can actually buy a non-condo, non-townhome, real single family HOUSE for lower than $450K. Maybe in Valencia and or San Dimas and Compton, but not Pasadena or Santa Monica where 2nd tier tech jobs are located. -1st tier techie in LA \_ 1. Nothing wrong with San Dimas or Valencia. Lots of people live there. They are no worse than Fremont or Sunnyvale. \_ Sorry but average income and education is WAAAAY higher in Sunnyvale than these dumpy places in LA. Also, if I buy in San Dimas, how many good tech companies will I be able to work at with a Masters degree in EECS? \_ Lots of aerospace companies in the area. From Valencia you can work in Palmdale. From San Dimas you can work in Orange County. I don't understand your point. We're working under the assumption that you HAVE a job, not that you are trying to relocate. What does "average income and education" get me? Do you want a nice house in a safe suburban area or do you want to find a mate? Make up your mind. 2. $450K or less gets you a condo in WeHo, a house in Pasadena ($550K median in the "not bad" ZIPs), Monrovia, Northridge, slums of Encino, or Simi Valley. None of these places are luxurious like Malibu, but you can't have champagne taste and beer budget. \_ Monrovia not exactly cheap due to the average large lot size. Northridge? What jobs do they offer in San Fernando again? \_ The SF Valley has Yahoo! in Burbank and lots of entertainment jobs like Dreamworks, Disney, etc. It's also not a bad commute to the Westside if you can work offhours. You seem to be under the mistaken impression that all the good jobs are on the Westside, but there are a lot of highpaying jobs other places. Downtown, for instance, has the highest paying jobs in the city, Westside included. From pharmies like to Amgen, cool startups like the one I interviewed at which made fingerprint-based safeties for guns (lots of EE jobs there), prototyping companies like Applied Minds (http://www.appliedminds.com and animation companies like Dreamworks, lots of companies need engineers and are not based on the Westside. I think you are too narrow-minded, like a lot of Westsiders are. Life doesn't exist east of the 405, I know. Get over it. I'm not in medicine, law or porn industry. Anyone having to commute on the 405 to get to "save rent and get real city jobs" is a moron or has a high threshold for pain. \_ Redfin shows me 48 homes >$450k in Monrovia. \_ Redfin doesn't talk about the Monrovia gangster. They're blacks feuding with the Mexicans btw. \_ In the bad area of Monrovia by the freeway, but the northern part is nice and not too expensive. 3. In the Bay Area you could buy in Albany, Santa Clara, Dublin, Concord, Pleasant Hill, Novato, San Rafael, Pacifica, or Milpitas - among others. These are ordinary towns just their LA counterparts, \_ Any of these are commutable to Silicon Valley fortune 500 jobs or startups. When I live in Northridge or Valencia, what jobs will I get there? \_ Tangent. Someone asked where in CA you can buy a house for $450K. I told you where. Sounds like you agree that these are reasonable locations so buy there. \_ Santa Clara is in the heart of the Silicon Valley. Milpitas is not too far away. There are also now many cheap homes in San Jose. \_ I thought GOOGLE is the heart of Silicon Valley considering they store, process, and output more information than any company. ordinary towns just like their LA counterparts, but it beats renting and you are never going to get that house in a wealthy area by renting and saving. Buy a starter home, pay some down, wait for equity to build, and move up. In 15 years when my house is paid I can sell it and buy in Santa Monica if I want to have another mortgage, whereas if you rent it will be much harder to get there - unless you rent very cheaply and dump every last cent into the stock market. I prefer to live in my own house in the interim, but that's me. $3K/month you can borrow $600K and have even more choices. Makes more sense to me than $2400/month for a 2 BR in SF (which is a steal BTW and not common), but that's me. If you are going to rent to save money then rent a cheap place with a roommate. Luxury apartments (and their associated high rents) are a waste of $$$. I guess some people like to live in an apartment and drive a Porsche (I see this all the time in luxury buildings) but to me it seems retarded and I love nice cars. Plus, when I bought my house I only had a beaten up Nissan and a just-paid-off Honda. Now, some years later, I have two luxury cars because my salary has risen while my rent has not. In another 15 years I won't have any rent at all except property tax. \_ I own a 8 unit apartment building next to Downtown Oakland, all singles and studios. I've had to rent 3 units within the last 2 months and haven't had to drop my prices. Although, I already rent low, studio ~650 and 1brdroom ~900. My buddies who have 2 bedroom/ 1 bath houses say that the competition is pretty fierce these days, probably because there are so many foreclosures going on the market as rentals lately. There is an article in the SF Chronicle talking about the current Bay Area rental\ situation. -scottyg article in the SF Chronicle talking about the current Bay Area rental situation. -scottyg \_ I just moved in to a new place in SF a few weeks ago. 2bdrm $2400. I negoitated the rent down at this place and also several others in the city. I did this after someone who was listing a 1bdrm for $1800 told me that the price was flexible. \_ http://mullinslab2.ucsf.edu/SFrentstats Rents are pretty stable in SF. |
2009/1/14-22 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:52379 Activity:nil |
1/14 How is it that an APR can be lower than the interest rate? \_ if it's an ARM, initial rate(s) are higher than future adjusted rate(s). I believe the quoted "interest rate" is for the year(s) before it starts adjusting. APR is calculated over the life of the loan. rates, based on the reference index + spread. I believe the quoted rates, based on the reference rate + spread. I believe the quoted "interest rate" is for the year(s) before it starts adjusting. APR is calculated over the life of the loan. \_ So if the rate is 6% but if the ref rate + spread = 5%, the APR is based on 5%+fees? Sounds like the APR is not very helpful wrt ARMs. \_ I agree. Especially if you consider the ref rate is insanely low today and can be something else in 1 to x years. If the ref rate goes insane in 2 years, you can re-fi yes, but you just lost on all the fees, and the opportunity to get the insanely low fixed rate. Mr. Market loves you, then fucks you in the ass. \_ I know a few people whose ARMs are going flex but bc LIBOR is so low, they get to keep their low rates. My old roommate is about to refi to a 30 year fixed w/ Wells for about 5%. Mortgage=$417k. \_ Another way: the mortgage company pays you points. For instance, if I want a 30 year fixed loan at 6.5% right now I am probably going to get points which will lower the APR to maybe 6.25%. |
2008/12/17-28 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:52263 Activity:nil |
12/16 CalPERS borrowed heavily to get into real estate deals at the peak of the housing bubble (guess that shouldn't come as a surprise) http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122947172015212225.html \_ It is funny, I warned the chair of the CalSTRS board about the housing bubble back in 2005, I wonder if that had anything to do with them not investing as heavily as CalPERS. -GS |
2008/11/24-29 [Consumer/Camera, Reference/RealEstate] UID:52085 Activity:nil |
11/23 Is there any photo rental place near the Fremont or Hayward area where I can rent backdrops and a stand for shooting family portraits? I see that Looking Glass has such rental, but I now live in Fremont. Thx. \_ Can't help you there, but I'm wondering what kind of camera equipments you have? Do you already have the strobes? \_ I don't have strobes, but I have two electronic flashes and two Photogenic Eclipse 45" umbrellas (I wish I had got the 60"). All I need is a backdrop. \_ if you know exactly what you are doing is one thing. If you don't have a clue what kind of strobe \_ ??? |
2008/11/17-20 [Finance/Banking, Reference/RealEstate] UID:52029 Activity:nil |
11/17 sub prime loans doesn't automatically mean total crap loans http://www.slate.com/id/2204583 \_ LOL |
2008/11/17 [Reference/BayArea, Reference/RealEstate] UID:52008 Activity:nil |
11/18 I wish SF housing values went down to the same when this was made http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mY2JR2_0QI |
2008/11/4-5 [Reference/RealEstate, Industry/Jobs] UID:51819 Activity:nil |
11/4 A different kind of detention: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081104/ap_on_re_us/bay_spill "Living rent-free in apartments and hotels, they are permitted to roam San Francisco and the surrounding area. They continue to draw their salaries, and each also receives $1,200 per month in witness fees, more than the monthly salary of at least one detained seaman." "Some of them are going to school to learn English." Life under detention is good, man. |
2008/10/29-31 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:51726 Activity:nil |
10/29 Huge housing bubble! http://csua.com/?entry=26148 \_ ObSwami |
2008/10/28-29 [Reference/RealEstate, Finance/Investment] UID:51712 Activity:nil |
10/28 http://tinyurl.com/6l3kpr (wsj.com) http://tinyurl.com/364bdv (boston.com) Oldies but goodies, Greenspan sez: - More H-1Bs -> Buy more overpriced homes -> Home prices stabilize -> Overpaid engineers/professionals make less -> PROFIT! |
2008/10/27-29 [Reference/RealEstate, Politics/Foreign/Europe] UID:51692 Activity:kinda low |
10/27 Sales of new homes up 2.7%. Really disappointed. I really wanted a doomsday scenario. Still pissed about how home prices rose 50% in less than 4 years. Life is so fucking unfair. I want SOCIALISM NOW!!! Fuck Capitalism. \_ What do you think got us here? \_ France? Socialism? \_ Poorly regulated markets and an easy money policy promulgated by an Ayn Rand flunky. What do you think got us here? \_ They need a 1-year chart of this overlaying 2006 to 2008. The "no jumbo" crash happened September 2007 I think. The "no jumbo" crash happened September 2007 I think, which would make 2007/2008 Sep yoy easily positive. make 2007/2008 Sep yoy easily positive, which is what happened with the existing home sales numbers. |
2008/10/13-16 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:51498 Activity:nil |
10/13 It bypasses appropriations, bypasses the congress, it's in your closing documents. This from day forward we will all be paying 4.2% basis fee of $420 for every $100,000 mortgage in your closing paper will have papers. You'll have a new little line in there, a new fee that we're going to all pay to go straight to these affordable housing funds which the states then hard wire to La Raza, ACORN, groups like that. \_ THOSE BROWN PEOPLE ARE STEALING YOUR MONEY! \_ We are becoming France and in Texas we done want to be France. \_ It's hillarious how quickly ACORN become the 25%ers new Hitler. |
2008/10/12-15 [Finance/Banking, Reference/RealEstate] UID:51485 Activity:nil |
10/12 Fannie and Freddie originated only 15% of subprime loans in 2006 Private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/53802.html \_ But those horrid dark skinned people ruined our economy by letting the Democrats force them to take home loans they knew they couldn't afford. I think it was terrorist plot by all those muslim sleeper agents that have been infiltrating our elected government for a generation now. |
2008/10/9 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:51448 Activity:high |
10/8 Thinking of going back to Silicon Valley. How's the job market right now in the middle of the housing crisis? Are companies hiring or laying off in general? Are rent + home prices stable? \_ 1 hiring freezes at many large companies 2 layoffs of bottom 5-10% common \_ my company NEVER does big layoffs. Always letting people go every few weeks or so \_ YHOO, MRVL, EBAY, HPQ 3 home prices downward slope \_ how much downward? 5%? or 10-15% like nationwide? \_ all right, seasonally we may be okay. my impression is that we've entered the "stare-off" part of the cycle. also, cheaper houses are selling in volume, which is driving down the median home price. \_ Home prices are down in less desirable areas and have been flat for about three years in more desirable areas. \_ What is less desirable? San Jose? Milpitas? Sunnyvale? Places like Saratoga and San Mateo keep going up up up. \_ Desirable: Cupertino, Saratoga, Los Altos, Los Gatos \_ No, San Mateo has come down in price: http://www.redfin.com/city/17490/CA/San-Mateo Looks like about 12% down from Oct 06 to today. San Jose (most of it), Santa Clara and Milpitas all qualify as less desirable. How about "less expensive" and "more expensive" then, is that clear enough to you? \_ Cool chart. Why is there a big gap starting Jan 08 between house and condo? |
2008/10/8-9 [Reference/RealEstate, Finance/Investment] UID:51438 Activity:nil |
10/8 Fed cuts interest rate by 1.5%. It's going to save the housing market! Yeah baby! Good job! Make America an ownership society! http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/fed/main-surprise.asp http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/fed/winners-losers_surprise.asp |
2008/9/29-10/4 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:51330 Activity:nil |
9/29 Angry 401(k) holders are calling politicians asking them why the bailout didn't go through. Australia pressuring Congress to pass the bill to prevent the global economy from imploding. Real estate and financial lobbyists massing for DC. ... Predictions? IMO, I don't see why we can't have a blue ribbon panel examine the issue and figure out how to inject the money. \_ i lost around $40,000 off my 401k..but i prefer preserving \_ I lost around $40,000 off my 401k..but I prefer preserving freedom instead of passing this commie bill \_ I agree. \_ We need a much more commie bill than this, one that partially nationalizes the banks and lowers everyone's mortgage. And for $700B, we could get it. \_ i can has a free haus? \_ More like, you can get a 10% coupon on the house you overpaid for in 2006 and stay in it and pay the mortgage, instead of dumping yet another Notice of Default on an overstressed financial system. \_ http://www.ihasabucket.com \_ Huh? \_ I'd be curious how many people actually want to keep the mortages. House flippers probably don't want to. I also met a couple that bought a house pretty cheap 15 years ago, but pulled out tons of equity, and have now been foreclosed. Do they actually want the house? I don't know. |
2008/9/25-10/1 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:51308 Activity:nil |
9/25 How the Bush Administration forced Fannie to lend money to sub-prime borrowers and feed the housing crises: http://preview.tinyurl.com/3l4enj |
2008/9/23-29 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:51269 Activity:low |
9/23 wtf. Wells Fargo w/9.14% APR jumbo (non-conforming) 30-year fixed in CA. \_ Welcome to a shitty shitty economy. \_ My parents had a loan at 13% in the early 1980s. You do realize that this 5-6% stuff is at or near all-time lows, right? \_ Yeah, I feel really sorry for those poor SOBs who have been trying to time the housing market and missed out on a once in a lifetime opportunity to borrow at 5.25%. \_ Yeah, sure now that $600,000 house is $350,000, but at 5.25% it totally would have been worth it. \_ Prices in my neighborhood have not gone down at all. I guess they have gone down in places like Antioch and Gilroy, so if you were shopping there, I guess you are right. Gilroy, so if you were shopping there, you are right. \_ If rates go up, prices go down, and the market stagnates. Not a good time to own OR buy. \_ I'd disagree, now is a great time to buy if you are willing to sit on a place for a minimum of 5-7 years. Prices are great and cash is king. I've been finding great deals in rental property. \_ Where are you that prices are great? They just aren't suck. \_ It's a great time to own. The only better time to own was before I did. I don't think people who bought in 1958 are too worried about it being a bad time "to own". Bad time to buy? Maybe. Bad time to own? Never. \_ Sorry, bad time to have recently bought. \_ Or to sell. \_ Put another way, I would hate to be someone who wanted to sell a property. As someone interested in the highest sale price, I would want the easiest loan terms possible (no down, no doc, stated income, option ARM, low interest rates). bank gives me the purchase money, i've converted the property to cash--my hands are clean. |
2008/9/8-14 [Reference/RealEstate, Reference/Tax] UID:51107 Activity:nil |
9/8 Dear landlord question. If my net flow is negative (e.g. rent - operation cost < 0), can I write off my loss for tax purpose? Say I work a 9-5 job and make $100,000K/year, and my total rent - operation cost is $20,000 loss, is my taxable income $80,000K? In addition, can I write off HOA+repair+advertising+etc in addition to my net loss, meaning a taxable income of $80,000K - (operating costs)? \_ Yes and yes, but you can only deduct $25k/yr. Losses roll over though. Depreciation reduces your basis though, so some of this is recovered when you sell. In some situations (AMT) you cannot use this deduction and there is a phaseout over $100k, so if you make over $150k you don't get to use it at all. Talk to a tax advisor. |
2008/8/25-31 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50962 Activity:nil |
8/25 I don't understand this subprime thing. Why can't people just refi to get a new teaser rate? It's still historically low. \_ you probably don't have negative equity, e.g., bought at $500K with zero down, the place is now worth $350K and you paid interest-only for two years? \_ Why can't you just do interest-only until home prices go back up? Why is there a "Oh shit I need to declare bankruptcy" \_ interest-only lasts for only 2-3 years \_ My parents have interest-only rental properties, and they last for 5 years. They keep extending for decades and decades. Nothing bad has ever happened. \_ Which is fine until the property appraises for less than the loan amount. At that point you can't get a new loan because there isn't enough collateral. \_ they probably have equity, and they're probably not subprime loans. subprime means no doc, low/no down. if you can prove sufficient income, have equity / reasonable down, it's not subprime, and you can refi like your parents. \_ Yes you're right they have "leverage", a term my mom uses a lot, and yes they bought properties long long long time ago so it's not such a big deal when the market goes down for only 5 years. -pp \_ fyi, "leverage" in real estate means when you buy one house, mortgage it to get cash out, use that cash as down for one or more other houses, etc. You multiply your gains as long as the growth in value of your homes exceeds interest payments. if home prices fall across the board, yer fucked. people also use leverage for stock market trading and currency trading in addition to real estate. investment banks and hedge funds are almost always highly levered. fundamentally, leverage is borrowing money to multiply a gain (or loss). \_ No, the loan isn't subprime, the borrower is. \_ it can be both http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subprime_lending |
2008/8/25-31 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50960 Activity:kinda low |
8/25 You too can have 250 sq feet for only $280K http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2008/08/24/BUTM12GQMI.DTL \_ Totally, utterly ridiculous. It didn't work for the tiny little Japanese many years ago, it's not going to work for Amerikanjins. \_ What do you mean it didn't work for the Japanese? I thought that this was a normal size for a Tokyo studio. \_ They tried in 1970-1972. Look up the Nakagin capsule. It's a tiny little studio capsule project that failed miserably: http://www.flickr.com/photos/esthet/3753156 http://ereview.com/pix/places/Japan_Nakagin \_ Those rooms are less than half of the size of the SF project. -tom \_ Yes but 1970 Japanese men were less than 1/2 the size of 2008 American men. \_ Your information is interesting but irrelevant to the apartments being listed above. There are tons of these 1DKs in Japan. I have friends who live in them. They're the only apartments that starving students can afford. \_ It's called a 1DK (one bedroom, one dining room/kitchen), and there are plenty of them in Tokyo and Osaka, not to mention many other smaller cities. They're generally meant to be apartments, not condos, but hey, to each their own. You can get a bigger condo in Oakland for ~$300k according to http://Zillow.com. \_ They aren't supposed to be full time residences. \_ rabu hoteru! \_ Ever seen a Parisian apartment? That is on the big side. \_ Totally, utterly ridiculous. It didn't work for the tiny little Japanese many years ago, it's not going to work for Amerikanjins. |
2008/8/25-31 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50959 Activity:nil |
8/25 My family has been using a particular real estate agent for everything, including home purchases, rental home purchases, and rental home leasing services. She's a very sweet old lady, a close family friend (well, more of my mom's friend) and only takes 1/2 of the commission that all the other agents take. She has been trying to help me sell my home for a while but with the current down-market I'm thinking of turning it into a rental property. My place is at an area that she's not familiar with and that she's too far (+50 miles) to show to prospective clients. I'm thinking of switch to a more local agent. I feel awfully bad for "ditching" her since she's a family friend. What can I do to minimize any potential misunderstanding while keeping our family relationship good? \_ so you're kicking a sweet old lady to the curb? good job. survival of the fittest. Stop by at the Salvation Army and pick up a used copy of Atlas Shrugged for her. \_ Ignore troll above and just tell her why. \_ #f, above advice promotes free market competition which is good for everyone in the long run \_ Actually, you might even ask her for a recommendation. \_ Not a bad idea, because she can still collect a referral fee from the other broker. free from the other broker. |
2008/8/22-29 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50944 Activity:nil |
8/22 I'd like to rent out my condo. What's a good place besides craigslist to post my listing? I don't want to go through craigslist anymore after a bunch of bozos didn't show up, or were people with bad credit rating, etc. I don't mind paying a little (5%) for listing, credit check, etc. Thanks. \_ You can hire a property management firm to do all the dirty work for you. I think they charge one months rent/year plus something like a half month rent everytime it turns over. YMMV. \_ Seconded -- I have a property manager for my townhouse, she's great, found me a perfect tenant in under a month, and only charged me $800 up front plus $75/mo for a place that rents for $2200. I don't deal with anything, except ok on things like approving the replacement of a major appliance. \_ How did you find her? More info please? Thanks! \_ It was a referral from my ex-neighbor who is a realtor. That might be the place to check -- realtors. \_ In CA professional property managers *must* be licensed real estate brokers with a couple of exceptions. \_ I thought you just needed to work under a broker. I know someone who is just starting out (read: cheap) that I can refer you to in the east bay. -scottyg \_ There are a lot of things a person working under a broker can do (e.g. collect rent) but they can't do everything. They are just working as an assistant to the broker. |
2008/8/20-26 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50910 Activity:nil |
8/19 Quick landlord question. If I'm paying X interest per year to a rental property, does that mean I can write off X from my income? Or do I do a (home-value)/27.5 depreciation for Schedule D? Can I do both? \_ You can do both, but you add the rent as income. I think you know this, but it's the value of the improvement (less land) depreciated over 27.5 years and then you have more profit when you sell because your cost basis is lower. \_ So if I didn't make any improvement (it came as is and I spent $0 on improvement), then I can't do depreciation? Damn! \_ No, you can still depreciate the value of the building over 27 and 1/2 years. Whacky, I know, but this is how the tax law works. You probably need an accountant. \_ "Improvement" means improvement to the vacant land, the best example of which is a building. If you buy an investment property to rent out for $300K and the land value is $200K then you can only depreciate the value of the building itself ($100K). You cannot depreciate the entire $300K. \_ Funny the government defines "improvement" as anything better than the baren land \_ Why is that funny? If you bring power and sewer to the lot you've also improved it. You can spend a lot of money on these improvements. \_ I will convert a land to dumpster where people dump shit into it. Will that increase the value of the land since I spent money digging and putting up infrastructures for it? \_ Yes, because that's an investment setup, where the payoff is people paying you to dump there. If you don't charge, that's your problem. \_ That makes complete sense. For a condo, MOST of the value is in the building and not the land. \_ الله أَكْ! |
2008/8/8-13 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50826 Activity:low |
8/8 Interest rates have risen over the past several years, but for now are still at historically low levels. Favorable interest rates, combined with the new first-time homebuyer tax credit of 10% of the price of a home (up to a maximum of $7,500, applicable to certain home buyers) might add up to a good time for you to start searching for your new home. \_ if I wait, I can collect more cash, wait for interest rates to go up, which will cause house values to go down. Then I can buy: - a cheaper house - with higher interest rates - and a smaller mortgage (on account of a cheaper house and having more cash) - and I can refi if the interest rate drops - and live like a renter for the next 3 years while the other guy is 3 years into his $800K mortgage already is 3 years into his $800K mortgage already \_ What if it's not 3 years? What if rates rise but prices don't fall enough to offset them? If you can comfortably afford to buy now then just buy now. If you can't then don't. PS. Is there some reason you keep deleting this? \_ it's not me that's deleting it. if I can comfortably rent, why not rent? I can always buy later with more down payment. \_ How do you know that home prices are going to go down? Which area are you interested in? \_ how do you know home prices are going up? \_ I don't know which way they are going to go. Neither do you, actually, you are taking a chance. \_ I agree. \_ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qt_GhcQ5EtU |
2008/8/4-8 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50772 Activity:nil |
8/3 Bombings Target Animal Researchers http://csua.org/u/m09 I gotta say, it takes a special kind of crazy to target a neuroscientist for working with mice. |
2008/8/2-8 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50764 Activity:nil |
8/1 America's Most Overpriced ZIP Codes (SF #6) http://preview.tinyurl.com/6y7264 \_ I am curious, are you predicting that SF real estate is going to fall more than the median for the next few years? Cause I sure don't think that will happen. \_ Me? I don't know. I'm posting a Forbes article. Maybe it won't grow as much as the median? An investment's worth is usually considered for its growth potential. Do you think housing "P/E" is irrelevant? \_ I think in the long run, housing in SF is a better than average real estate investment. I am not so sure about that specific zip code listed (The Sunset). Rents are shooting up right now, so it should improve the P/E situation, but I think that different regions of the country have different P/E's and will continue to do so, for very good reasons. \_ San Jose is 10th. I should have bought a property in Sunnyvale and San Jose 10 years ago. Every one of my city friends says it's a dump but the suburban loving ones bought it long time ago and never looked back. ARGHHHHH FUCK my city friends. \_ Well, 1998 isn't now. I doubt SJ was in the same price vs. rent class then. (to be fair, "SJ" and "SF" are too broad when this article is referring to specific zip codes) \_ Why didn't you buy a house in the city 10 years ago then? |
2008/7/29-8/5 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50724 Activity:nil |
7/29 Turns out that putting people in housing actually reduces homelessness, who could have guessed that? http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/us/30homeless.html?hp \_ And we care because... ? \_ Does that include a nurse maid to wipe their ass? I thought it was "teach a man to fish", not "give him a fish." \_ Because the govt wastes time and money to create reports on such obvious matters? -- !OP |
2008/7/29 [Reference/BayArea, Reference/RealEstate] UID:50716 Activity:high 90%like:50720 |
7/29 Swami! Your prediction is off by 6 months!!! You SUCK http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/28/real_estate/another_home_price_dip/index.htm?cnn=yes \_ Wow San Francisco went UP by 22%. How about San Jose, Sunnyvale, Mountain View, Santa Clara, etc? \_ Fuck SF. Let them pay for their own stupid bridges. |
2008/7/23-28 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50666 Activity:low |
7/23 San Diego wants to be a sanctuary city, a foreclosure sanctuary, that is: http://preview.tinyurl.com/5f9lpv \_ Wow, that's an interesting idea. I think I'll go buy 10 houses in San Diego! \- "Bang Fax", one step beyind JingleMail http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/23/national/main4287473.shtml \_ Does life insurance cover suicide? Doh!? And will the house be haunted now? \_ I just don't get this, why shoot yourself? Why not go down, guns blazing, defending your property? \_ Because not everyone is a violent psychopath? \_ Better to shoot yourself? |
2008/7/16-23 [Reference/RealEstate, Politics/Domestic/California/Prop] UID:50601 Activity:kinda low |
7/16 Support air-drying laundry. Save energy. http://www.laundrylist.org \_ I just learned that a friend's home owner's association has a rule against drying laundry outside, even in your backyard. I'm still flabbergasted by this. \_ Why? Some won't even let you keep your garage door open longer than it takes to put your car in. \_ Most HOA's do. This is one of many activities associated with poor folks, that are perceieved as lowering property values. \_ Banning this in front yards I can understand. But backyards? \_ Banning this in frontyards I can understand. But backyards? \_ Some HOAs don't even let you keep your garage door open for longer than it takes to park your car. \_ Is this for lowering auto theft rate? If not, I'd think leaving doors open on garages with Porsches and Mercedes inside would raise property values. \_ No, it's because the inside of garages is usually cluttered with junk. BTW, my old neighbor used to park his new Porsche on his lawn. Talk about conflicting statements. \_ So, I figure a lack of HOA add $20,000 or so to the value of the house. Any opinions? \_ I don't know, but a lack of HOA fees probably adds value. \_ depends on HOA amount... but do some math \_ Rule #632 why you should never buy a condo - stuffy HOAs telling you what to do. \_ HOA is not limited to condos. \_ Don't most new suburban developments these days have HOAs? \_ Yes it is very true. Take a look at the Rosedale Community in Azusa. You have 2 HOAs. One is the North HOA at $150, and the other one is the South HOA at about $150. Then there is Mello-Roos that jacks your property tax to about 1.75%, because the state of CA no longer can pay for new schools in that new area. We're talking about "cheap" homes between $450K to $750K. http://www.rosedaleazusa.com/community New SFH today have HOAs in addition to Mello-Roos. I'm talking about S Cal. N Cal doesn't seem to have that type of shit, presumably because it's regulated growth so no need to rebuild schools/pipes/wires. \_ ^regulated growth^farther from Mexico^ \_ what does Mehico have anything to do with this? \_ Rub your two brain cells together and you will figure it out. \_ I get it, you think IMMIGRANTS cause all the problems that S Cal has. Yes immigrants are bad GO BACK HOME IMMIGRANTS! \_ ILLEGAL immigrants are hard to plan for and regulate. |
2008/7/15-23 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50584 Activity:nil |
7/15 Nouriel Roubini feels a great disturbance in the Force: This is by far the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Hundreds of small banks with massive exposure to real estate (the average small bank has 67% of its assets in real estate) will go bust. Dozens of large regional/national banks (a la IndyMac) are also bankrupt given their extreme exposure to real estate and will also go bust. Some major money center banks are also semi-insolvent and while they are deemed too big to fail their rescue with FDIC money will be extremely costly. In a few years time there will be no major independent broker dealers as their business model (securitization, slice & dice and transfer of toxic credit risk and piling fees upon fees rather than earning income from holding credit risk) is bust ... \_ Young Padawan, you have obviously never lived through a real recession. My WFC is up 25% today, BAC up 10%, KRE and KBE up recession. My WFC is up 33% today, BAC up 22%, KRE and KBE up almost as much... |
2008/7/14-16 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50569 Activity:kinda low |
7/14 Ahem, in case you've all forgotten... HOUSING ONLY GOES UP! BUY NOW BEFORE YOU'RE PRICED OUT! \_ Hold on, is this in response to the banking industry, where you believe that owning a home is a good hedge against a collapsing banking, or... that you are being sarcastic and waiting for the banking industry to drag down the housing market and laughing at people who are tied up to their homes? \_ you're doing a great job scoring points against your imaginary friends. \_ tom is imaginary? Dang, that explains a lot. \_ Please provide a reference where I suggested to anyone that housing only goes up, or that they should buy before they're priced out. Idiot. -tom \_ I agree. Now is a great time to get a good deal. Unfortunately it is much harder to get a loan. I've found quite a few cash flow positive investment properties lately. Also, all of the big investment groups are gathering cash to buy up all of the available properties while everyone else shies away. \_ Why didn't the Great Swami warn us this was going to happen? |
2008/7/11-13 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50533 Activity:nil |
7/11 The Failure Of Neoliberalism Charlie Rangel and his 4 rent-controlled apartments in NY, including one he uses as an office. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/nyregion/11rangel.html \_ Is this a sarcastic joke about the previous post on neoliberalism, or am I missing something? \_ I didn't post the 'neolib' comment. Some dumbass keeps adding it. -op |
2008/7/1-14 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Reference/RealEstate] UID:50432 Activity:nil |
6/30 Grim proving ground for Obama's housing policy The Boston Globe: http://csua.org/u/lu6 \_ I hate to sound like a partisan defender, but what do the failures cited in this article actually have to do with Obama or his proposed policies? Many of the failures began before he became a State Senator. \_ This is actually Bill Clinton's fault. |
2008/6/25-7/14 [Reference/RealEstate, Politics/Domestic/SocialSecurity] UID:50373 Activity:nil |
6/25 Home owning Baby Boomers generally screwed http://csua.org/u/lsr \_ This describes my parents to a T. We are all screwed, actually, but the Boomers are screwed more. |
2008/6/18-24 [Reference/BayArea, Reference/RealEstate] UID:50290 Activity:nil |
6/18 Slowest May in 20 years for Bay Area housing http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/18/BUBP11B99U.DTL "The median price paid was $517,000, down 21.7 percent from a year ago." "Sales of all home types in San Francisco dipped 3.7 percent, as prices declined 5.4 percent to $790,000." Ok this is good, but I need MORE! \_ _ _ _ _ ____ _ ___ ____ ____ __ _____ _____ _ _ | | / \ | \ | | _ \| | / _ \| _ \| _ \ \ \ / /_ _|_ _| | | | | | / _ \ | \| | | | | | | | | | |_) | | | | \ \ /\ / / | | | | | |_| | | |___ / ___ \| |\ | |_| | |__| |_| | _ <| |_| | \ V V / | | | | | _ | |_____/_/ \_\_| \_|____/|_____\___/|_| \_\____/ \_/\_/ |___| |_| |_| |_| _ __ __ _ ____ _ _ _____ / \ \ \ / // \ / ___| | | |_ _| / _ \ \ V // _ \| | | |_| | | | / ___ \ | |/ ___ \ |___| _ | | | /_/ \_\ |_/_/ \_\____|_| |_| |_| \_ Your a fag. \_ And you're (== you are) an embarrassment to all English speakers. \_ Housing prices go up and down but if they go down enough there will be a huge ripple effect through the rest of the economy. You may find you don't have a job after housing drops another x% |
2008/6/11-13 [Politics/Foreign, Reference/RealEstate] UID:50221 Activity:moderate |
6/11 http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/easternsuburbs/story/365899.html Family finds backyard is off-limits because of conservation easement. "Kevin King and his wife, Donna, dream of installing a backyard pool But the young couple got a rude awakening when their pool contractor drove to Lancaster Town Hall to get the construction permit this spring. "That's when the Kings learned for the first time since buying their home in 2003 that they legally have only a 3-footdeep yard in which to build their pool. "Or to enjoy a swing set with their kids, ages 3 and 5. "Or to do much of anything else, it seems. "Turns out the Kings technically aren.t even supposed to mow the grass in their 60-footdeep backyard because of a conservation easement." \_ Gotta love reporters that don't ask questions. Why the hell didn't these people have due diligence done on their property when they bought it? This sort of thing should be in any contract. \_ Yeah, I'm sure the easment was there before they bought the property. \_ Yeah, the easement was there before they bought the property. \_ Srsly. Why is this news? My neighbor when I was growing up had a large easement on his property. It was part of the reason why his lot was bigger than the others for the same price. I forgot why it was there but eventually he got it removed and now his property is worth more. \_ The question was asked in the article. The couple claims they don't recall the paralegal who sold them the house mentioning the easement. They admit to not doing their due diligence in the article. I think the interesting thing here is that the the easement. They admit to not doing their due diligence in the article. I think the interesting thing here is that the easement is completely pointless in this case. \- As associate of an associate of mine bought a house in Los Gatos. It would later turn out the seller paid a nearby autobody shop to close up shop during the buyer's visit. The sale was reversed later on on those grounds. Interesting to note the remedy was an action, not money damages. \_ Totally different case unless you are arguing that the easement was not disclosed which is possible but seems unlikely. |
2008/5/30-6/2 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50097 Activity:low |
5/30 http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=11465476 Graph shows fall in Case-Shiller national home price index indicates worst year-over-year numbers than the Great Depression \_ yet I still can't afford a decent home in Silicon Valley even with my near 6 digit salary. \_ I graduated from BERKELEY yet I'm still debugging other people's code. Some CAL English maj graduates still work at McD's. So what??? \_ Name one. \_ yeah, it blows doesn't it? \_ Sounds like you are underpaid relative to the others who live in your area. Move somewhere else or make more money. \_ Define "decent"? Are you looking on one income or two? |
2008/5/28-6/1 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:50078 Activity:moderate |
5/28 I've ruled out the possibility of getting a gun when I collect rent in shady neighborhoods. Instead, I may get a Taser. What's a good Taser to get that I can conceal well? Taser C2 seems a bit whimpy, but Taser M18-L is a bit bulky. \_ I tell the landlady I got a job, I'm gonna pay the rent. She said 'Yeah'? I said 'Oh yeah'. And then she was so nice. Lord she was lovey-dovey. So I go in my room, pack up my things and go. I slip on out the back door and down the streets I go. She a-howlin' about the front rent, she'll be luck to get any She a-howlin' about the front rent, she'll be lucky to get any back rent. OW OW OW THEN SHE TAZED ME OW OW OW OW OW OW OW \_ that is illegal. taser should only be used for SELF DEFENSE. ditto with guns. baseball bat, golf clubs, fists are ok in any situation. at any rate, your land lady can't kick you out. it takes like a whole year before they can really evict you, physically. \_ Not even. The unlawful detainer action can be completed in 30 days and it's not more than another 30 before the sheriff comes to kick you out, depending on the schedule of the court. \_ Non-payment of rent is a 3 Day or Quit kind of eviction. It can go pretty fast, even in a place like San Francisco. \_ Also depends on whether tenant files an Answer; if so, welcome to extended court action. \_ No one got my joke. sad. \_ Why not pepper spray? \_ Ever heard of a property manager? My godfather is a slumlord and he ended up selling certain properties when the tenants didn't pay rent because he was afraid to go collect it. He should've used a property manager also. It's worth a 10% fee to not get a bullet. \_ a 10% decrease in revenue for me is 20% loss a year. -op \_ Sounds like a crappy property to own. Why did you buy it? \_ loooooong story. I lived in it till I moved out -op \_ explain why you haul around your wife draped in expensive jewelry while you collect rent? or is that another guy? \_ expensive jewelry = relative. iPod and Nike shoes are considered fancy in ghettovilles \_ We sure have a lot of ambidextrous landlords with concealed carry permits on the motd. \_ I'm pretty certain this is the same troll. \_ I am a LA Sodan (Toluca Lake). My wife shot a Home Invader two years ago (before we were married!) and it was a huge legal hassle. In fact it might have bankrupted her if she wasn't friends with the cops (she was an Assistant DA then). According to her lawyer, "it was a good thing you killed him, because if he was just injured and around for the trial you probably would have lost the suit." By the way, I learned about this the day before we were married. Bay Area Sodans: Do NOT judge people from LA. LA is Different! There are dangerous people here. -mossberg590@gmail.com \_ Whoaaa!!! MOST ENTERTAINING RESPOND EVER. Thanks! \- ^EVER^EVAR |
2008/4/24-5/2 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:49826 Activity:low |
4/24 Landlord with a ... Yacht??? No, with landlord rage. http://www.csua.org/u/lce (sfgate) \_ More: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/27/MN0R10CDQC.DTL \_ Is he a Libertarian? \_ No, but he is a CSUA'er. \_ can't finger macy \_ 'finger kip' \_ That's awesome, we should go visit him in prison. It's Allumnus outreach. Did anyone here know him? \_ Man, they must have some awesome rent to put up with that. \_ Once they sue him for everything he owns they will be doing even better. Also how the hell do you buy a 6 unit place for 1 million in sf? \_ http://www.csua.org/u/lci (5 units, okay) Rental property in The City is valued mostly on the basis of the CapEx, so a building with very low rent isn't worth much. \_ That's not the property. \_ At 20% down that will pay for itself from day one That seems more than reasonable in SF in this market. \_ Yeah, but you have to put up with crappy tenants who won't leave even after you saw a hole in their floor! Selfish tenants. \_ PITI + maintenance (1% of cost) per year comes out about even in my book, which isn't too bad, but still not exactly a great investment. What are you counting on here to make a profit, capital gains? \_ Deductions + gains + rents will go up (a lot once someone moves) someone moves). And, if you hold on to the property for long enough some of that money is going to come back to you when you sell. \_ Why would you do that in SF when you can do the same thing in another city that doesn't have a draconian rent control board? \_ Tahkisis will triumph! \_ Sometimes the motd is awesome. -- ilyas \_ If you invest $200k in the stock market and hold it long enough, you are bound to eventually make some money that way, too. Though I have been thinking more about retirement lately and realize that some rental property is about as close as us private sector slobs are going to get to a pension. At least rental income will tend to increase with inflation. \_ Our Heros are in the paper again: http://www.csua.org/u/lcy |
2008/4/23-5/2 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:49816 Activity:nil |
4/22 My company is relocating me for a while (2 years probably) and I'm thinking of renting out my condo since it's really not a seller's market. I'm hoping to break even or lose just a few hundred dollars a month by renting it out. How does one calculate depreciation on a rental property? I've heard about the Form 46XX amortized depreciation form, and without having to do really weird calculations that only accountants understand, how much deduction can I expect to get from a $500,000 condo that was built in 2003? \_ $(Value of improvements)/27.5 per year for 27.5 years. With a house you have to deduct the value of the land as it is not an improvement (obviously). I am not sure how it works for a condo since there is no real land value. Maybe you can depreciate on the full $500,000. Remember you have to report the rent as income, but you can report the mortgage as an expense. When you sell the property you may owe more tax as you have to deduct the depreciation from the cost basis. I would get an accountant, because it will be worth your while at that point as far as finding out which maintenance expenses you can deduct or not and which are deductible in the year paid versus depreciated over their useful lives. Built in 2003 is not relevant. It could have been built in 1803 and you can still depreciate over 27.5 years if you just bought it. (It's 39 years for commercial property.) \_ most useful, THANKS. BTW is HOA considered expense? How about property tax? \_ Yes and yes. \_ 1. Property Tax is operating expense 2. Utilites are operating expense if you pay them. 3. any trips you take there to check out the property is expense 4. Mgmt fees if you have a property manager 5. Mortgage expense is only the interest portion. 6. Closing Costs for buying the property is an operating expense 7. Max is 25k per year you can write off and the rest carries. \_ I've never heard about this. Is this amount a) rent MINUS sum of expense? b) sum of expense? If it's a) then great, but if b) then a lot of landlords are screwed since operating costs almost always exceed that amount (just put in interest mortgage and tax for a cheap $500,000 home) PS I just found out I will have a bunch of deductions and end up GAINING more than I loss ($3000/year) AND I may gain even more if I sell my property. It's really great to be a landlord. I love cheap condos. \_ #7 was confusing. He means you can write off 25k of losses vs. your regular income. But this actually has a phaseout at higher income levels. Making $3k/yr isn't really that great, since you will have to pay taxes on it, at your marginal rate. \_ Don't forget rental property insurance premium and maintenance/repair cost. -- !PP \_ Don't enter the rental business if your condo is in SF. See the "Landlord" thread above. |
2008/4/22-5/2 [Politics/Domestic/California, Reference/RealEstate] UID:49797 Activity:nil |
4/22 Yes, they are illiterate peasants. http://www.wltx.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=61193 \_ "Back in January, he became the first Colorado lawmaker censured by the House, after he kicked a newspaper photographer for taking his picture during a prayer." Sounds like a classy guy. \_ He was in prayer, and someone was at his feet clicking away. He nudged him away with his foot. And what does that have to do with the correct statement that most (if not all?) illegals from south of the border are indeed illiterate peasants? \_ Do you have a link for that? Just curious. \_ http://cbs4denver.com/politics/bruce.photographer.kick.2.636572.html "Bruce told the committee that the photographer goaded him and was responsible for creating a disruption. Bruce also denied that what he did was a kick, saying he gently pushed the photographer away with his foot." \_ Colorado house votes 63-1 to censure him. Did all those Republicans who voted for the motion fear Political correctness? \_ Colorado house votes 62-1 to censure him. Did all those GOP members who voted for the motion fear PC? http://www.csua.org/u/lbz \_ so he calls it like he sees it, and gets in hot water. This is classic stifling effect of 'political correctness' \_ THE MAN IS KEEPING HIM DOWN! \_ being a jerk has always been impolitic |
2008/4/15-23 [Reference/RealEstate, Finance/Investment] UID:49754 Activity:nil |
4/15 Massive numbers of homes with negative equity http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2008/04/15/BULE105CR4.DTL&o=0 and the associated article: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/15/BULE105CR4.DTL I had no idea the negative equity problem was as widespread as the first link would suggest. \_ It's "Number of homes purchased in 2006"! \_ It's "homes ***purchased in 2006*** with negative equity"! \_ well taht certainly lowers the scale of the problem, but its still pretty big. \_ "most affected are those who bought recently with little or no money down". hahah, damn fools. \_ I'd rather be negative equity with no money down than in the same situation but 20% commited. \_ Well, with 20% down and the same price they would be in a better situation with the mortgage. The example woman seemed to still want to live in the house she bought. She bought more house than she could afford, relying on unreasonable price increases. \_ ObSuburbsSuck |
2008/4/8-12 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:49687 Activity:low |
4/8 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23997412 Short sale rules the market! Auswami was right!!! \_ Swami predicted a nadir in 2007. \_ Meh, 2 out of 3 ain't bad. \_ Swami did no such thing. Swami was making fun of the request. -GS \_ at least twice? \_ http://csua.com/2005/03/22/#36812 http://csua.com/2005/06/06/#37986 false false (sarcasm is hard to detect over ascii, I admit) \_ What's the sarcasm? Swami really didn't think the housing market would go down? Swami thought it was OK to predict doom but not to make any specific predictions? \_ Your brain has been classified as: small \- you must pay me 5cents |
2008/4/7-12 [Finance/Banking, Reference/RealEstate] UID:49678 Activity:nil |
4/6 Famed Venice eatery offering discount to 'poor' U.S. tourists http://www.csua.org/u/l8c 'A sign posted outside the restaurant at the weekend reads: "Harry's Bar of Venice, in an effort to make the American victims of subprime loans happier, has decided to give them a special 20 percent discount on all items of the menu during the short term of their recovery."' |
2008/4/6-12 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:49674 Activity:kinda low |
4/6 Boy, you thought the suburbs sucked? Try the exurbs. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/06/realestate/keymagazine/406ariz-t.html \_ What are you getting at? This article seems to be mostly about being the 'sucker' in the housing shell game. \_ What I learned from this article that this is yet another example of a dumb blond. How about you? -Asian \_ The bits I found most interesting: "They happily left space in subdivisions for playgrounds and five new elementary schools, which they thought would help bring in the young families they were targeting, but they did not leave space for parks for older kids or for a high school." "In 2005, the local school district appointed a superintendent, John Flores, who began pleading with the developers for space for a high school (for a while, Maricopa schools were admitting 300 new students every month). But it was to no avail. Amy Haberbosch, Maricopa's former director of planning, told me that developers believed high schools lowered property values; she said one developer told her he'd rather build a jail on his property than a high school." \_ Well, I think they're right about the high schools, from their own narrow perspecitve. It is evidence of their narrow focus on building homes they think people will buy rather than building a community. \_ I've lived near Berkeley High. I'd much prefer that to living next to a jail. But more importantly it made it clear just how fucked people who moved to the boonies because "it's better for the kids" are going to be in 5 years. Especially when they can't afford to move because the market has melted. \_ Berkeley High isn't much better than a jail. \_ Wait, let me guess... because there are black people there? \_ No, because there are criminals there. My gf worked at a store on Shattuck and a Berkeley High student worked with her. He would tell her which guys were packing, which people were stealing, which people could be confronted and which were dangerous, and so on. Yes, they were all black, but I think that's an issue you raised first. \_ Guess what, there are criminals in the world. Even in suburban high schools. \_ There are more criminals concentrated in urban high schools than just about anywhere else except maybe jail, which is why they lower property values. \_ Any evidence for this statement? \_ Other than college campuses (which self-select a sample) where else do you find a few thousand adolescent males (most likely to commit crimes) in one place? \_ So, the answer is no, I take it? There are probably many more criminals at Vallejo High than Lowell, for example. \_ Provide a counterexample of a place other than prison that has a higher concentration of criminals than our high schools: Just one. Lowell vs. Vallejo is a tangent. \_ No, it is not a tangent because you said "urban" high schools. The counter-example is easy: any public housing project anywhere in the country. \_ Okay, I'll accept that example. So we have jail, public housing, and high schools. Anything else? \_ I am having a tough time coming up with anything. \_ So, how does it feel to be an idiot racist? |
2008/4/2-6 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:49640 Activity:nil |
4/2 Time to just start using taxpayer money to tear down excess housing? http://www.csua.org/u/l6d |
11/22 |