| ||||||
| 5/16 |
| 2009/11/4-17 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/Networking, Computer/SW/Security] UID:53495 Activity:nil |
11/4 Holy cow, I got a warning from my ISP that they were notified
by BSA/baytsp.com that I was copying music/video/software.
Do they do port scan or something? That's a first for me.
\_ They hang out on P2P networks and track IP addresses. -tom
\_ I believe they are paid by content providers to perform this
monitoring service, so you should only run this risk with content
from certain sources (such as Fox movies)
\_ That's probably true. -tom |
| 2009/1/14-22 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/HW/Drives] UID:52384 Activity:nil |
1/14 http://www.amazon.com/Appetite-Self-Destruction-Spectacular-Industry-Digital/dp/1416552154 \_ where's that gonna go after http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10133425-38.html |
| 2007/10/24-25 [Computer/SW/Mail, Computer/SW/P2P] UID:48429 Activity:kinda low |
10/24 is there a command line bittorrent client that lets me download
selective files out of a torrent, instead of the entire torrent?
I have this torrent "Busty Conquests of Wendy Whoppers" that contains
10+ hardcore clips of Wendy Whoppers and her 32GGG breasts, but I
think I have 3 of these already. I don't want to destroy my ratio
downloading gigantic breast porn I already have. thanks.
\_ ratio? what's the point of doing ratios using bittorrent to
download? wouldn't they want as many as possible downloaders?
btw, 32ggg sounds like a medical condition, not hot.
\_ My website of 32GGG TIT PORN depends on ratios. So if I download
3 gigs, I have to leave my computer on until I upload 3 gigs.
but if I only want 100 megs out of the torrent, like 2 movies
of 32GGG TITS BEING POUNDED OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER,
I can use a graphical bittorrent client to choose which files
I want. Is there a command line bittorrent client that does
this?
\_ I wasn't asking about your fetish. I was asking why a
torrent site would implement ratios.
\_ It's so people dont kill off their torrents immediately
after getting their data. This helps people who come
along in the future and join the torrent.
\_ So if you d/l 1 gig, is re-upping that same file to
others good for your ratio or you need to u/l a new
file to the network?
\_ I need to keep my ratio of uploading
OH MY GOD ENORMOUS UNHOLY TITS SO BIG THEY HAVE
BACK PROBLEMS JESUS CHRIST THOSE SUCKERS MUST BE 15
POUNDS EACH WHERE DO YOU EVEN FIND A BRA THAT
BIG???? at a 1.0 ratio, or i can't download
new torrents handled by this tracker. |
| 5/16 |
| 2007/9/20 [Computer/SW/Apps/Media, Science/GlobalWarming, Computer/SW/P2P] UID:48139 Activity:nil |
9/20 http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3812960/MediaDefender.Source.TrapperKeeper-MDD | ^ tools mediadefender uses to browse p2p | Update: A list of leaked utilities is now available: | AresDataCollector, AresLauncher, AresProtector, AresSupernode, AresUDPDataCollector, AutoUpdater, AutoUpdaterSource, BTClient, BTDataCollector, BTDecoyClient, BTInflationDest, BTInterdictor, BTIPGatherer, BTPoster, BTRemover, BTScraper, BTScraperDLL, BTSearcher, BTSeedInflator, BTTorrentGenerator, BTTorrentSource, BTTracker, BTTrackerChecker, CVS, DCMaster, DCScanner, DCSupply, DistributedKazaaCollector, DllLoader, ED2KSupplyProcessor, ... | ... EdonkeyIpBanner, FastTrackGift, FastTrackGiftDecoyer, GnutellaDecoyer, GnutellaFileDownloader, GnutellaProtector, GnutellaSupply, KademliaProtector, KazaaDBManager, KazaaLauncher, KazaaSupplyProcessor, KazaaSupplyTaker, KazaaSwarmerDest, KazaaSwarmerDistributedSource, KazaaSwarmerDownloader, KazaaSwarmerSource, MediaMaker, MediaSwarmerDest, MediaSwarmerSource, MetaMachine, MetaMachineHashSetCollector, MetaMachineSpoofer, ... | ... MI-GnutellaSupply, MovieMaker, NameServer, NetworkMonitor, OverNetLauncher, OvernetProtector, OvernetSpoofer, P2PFileIndexer, PioletDC, PioletPoisoner, PioletSpoofer, SamplePlugIn, SLSKSpooferDLL, SoulSeekClient, StatusDest, StatusSource, SupernodeCollector, SupernodeController, SupernodeDistributer, SupplyProcessor, TKCom, TKFileTransfer, TKLauncher, TKProjectManager, TKSyncher, UsenetPoster, UsenetSearcher, ... | ... WatchDogControllerDestination, WatchDogControllerSource, WinMxDC, WinMxLauncher, WinMxProtector, wma generator |
| 2007/9/3 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/Security, Computer/SW/Unix] UID:47877 Activity:nil |
9/3 So I was watching the Today Show this morning and in the crowd of
jackasses trying to get on TV, some dude kept emphatically showing a
home made sign that simply said, "lemonparty.org." None the wiser, I
fired up my laptop, curious as to what could possibly be at
http://lemonparty.org. I wondered why he was smiling so mischievously,
shaking his sign in the air each time the camera had him in the frame.
Could it be some family reunion site? A wedding announcement? A site
devoted to lovers of lemons? Oh no, I would not be so lucky.
No sir -- or ma'am -- it was a photograph of three geriatric men
engaged in very passionate adult loving. And by loving, I mean a good
old fashioned three-way.
Of course, I couldn't let it go at this. I had to find out more about
http://lemonparty.org, as it seemed like an inside joke to which I was not
privy. A friendly google search yielded several results, all informing
me that http://lemonparty.org is supposedly a shock site, in the ranks of
loopback.jpg, http://tubgirl.com and goatse.cx. Now, I'm not sure if the
shock value or http://lemonparty.org packs the same punch as the
aforementioned peers, but I can only imagine a suburban housewife or
lonely grandpa typing the web site in as I did, because, well, they
too had nothing better to do.
So why am I sharing this? I honestly don't know, other than I needed
to purge my conscience. I think this was either one of the most
wonderfully subversive things I've seen on TV in a long time, or one
of the more disturbing ones (although I doubt there are many young
kids watching the Today show on Labor Day). But, hey, old guys need to
get it on, too, I suppose; so lemonparty indeed!
\_ Yucks! It's amazing enough that that guy can get it up. |
| 2007/7/11-12 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:47263 Activity:low |
7/11 So what p2p systems are there besides bittorrent and soulseek?
\_ Lots. I like eMule for when I'm looking for something random
and hard to find. BitTorrent for everything else.
\_ Lots. eMule is best for things that are random and hard to
find. BitTorrent for everything else. |
| 2006/11/12 [Computer/SW/P2P, Politics/Domestic/Immigration, Politics/Foreign/Europe] UID:45332 Activity:nil |
11/12 Anyone know of a way to watch the rights restricted content on the
BBC' s Torchwood website. (UK only). The episodes that area already on
BitTorrent are HIGHLY reccomended but definitely not for the kiddies.
Think of X-files and CSI crossed with a healthy dose of Sopranos and
you will get my drift. With lots and lots of DR Who tie-ins along with
some really really good eye candy. |
| 2006/3/15-17 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/Editors/Emacs] UID:42260 Activity:nil |
3/15 dans, would you like to explain your accessing patterns? Why you've
become really active all of a sudden? -anonymous coward, dans #1 fan
http://csua.com/?q=dans&type=hist&sort=d
\_ Sure. I'm writing lots of code. The motd serves as an amusing
distraction that gives my mind a chance to recharge and helps my
subconcious chew on the problems I'm hacking on. -dans
\_ Alright thanks. May I add that you've been very entertaining,
especially the dans vs. tom cat fight. And thanks for sharing
your emacs know hows, it's quite educational -dans #1 fan |
| 2006/3/8-10 [Computer/SW/P2P, Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:42150 Activity:kinda low |
3/8 Dude, chill out dans. Go out to the beach or something, it's really
nice out there.
\_ Dude, I just spent the last week on the beach in Santa Cruz. The
\_ Dude, I just spent the last weak on the beach in Santa Cruz. The
motd is what I do when I'm waiting for code to compile, tests to
run etc. -dans
\_ I suspect you didn't actually spend a week on the beach. Or
were you camping on it?
\_ Okay, let me rephrase, I spent a week in a house that looks
out on the beach. As in literally walk 10 feet across the
street and you're on the beach. -dans
\_ Well, ok then. Good for you. What did you do in SC, coding?
You seem pretty angry on motd for some reason. Anyways, how
does one go about living near the beach for a week? Craigslist?
\_ Spent quality time with my girlfriend, hacked on a project
\_ wait what??? I thought you're gay
I'm really into, caroused with friends, and cooked and ate
lots of tasty, fresh food. In my case, I'm fortunate to be
part of a circle of friends that values sharing our resources
\_ http://www.polyamory.org/SF/poly-folks
\_ Wow. That's a leap. -dans
with each other. A number of us are successful geeks who are
always happy to take in guests. No, I'm not angry. To me,
the motd is like fight club without the stitches. It's a
nice place to spar with written arguments. Sometimes its
informative, and I learn about my fellow CSUAers or change my
point of view. Sometimes it's like beating the crap out of
Jared Leto, i.e. picking apart weak arguments until the other
person gives up and nukes the thread. -dans
\_ You just violated the first two rules of fight club. |
| 2006/1/27-29 [Transportation, Computer/SW/P2P] UID:41576 Activity:nil |
1/27 Anyone know of a effective way to block all BitTorrent traffic?
I'm using pf on OpenBSD and I've tried STFW but as near as I can
tell, blocking the default ports is useless b/c most BT clients
are using non-standard high number ports (and I can't block all
of these for other reasons).
\_ packet payload inspection.
According to a recently published paper by AT&T Labs
1, inspection of the data packets that are transmitting
between clients is a good way to detect BitTorrent
traffic. The communication between BitTorrent clients
starts with a handshake followed by a never-ending
stream of length-prefixed messages. The header of the
BitTorrent handshake message uses the following format:
<a character (1 byte)><a string (19 byte)>
The first byte is a fixed character with value '19',
and the string value is 'BitTorrent protocol'. Based
on this common header, you can use the following
signatures to identify BitTorrent traffic:
* The first byte in the TCP payload is the character 19 (0x13)
* The next 19 bytes match the string 'BitTorrent protocol'
http://www.f5.com/solutions/technology/rateshaping_wp.html
brought to you by google and "bittorrent traffic signature"
\- i'm a little busy to go into depth right now [generic
p2p detection and killing off the sessions is something we
are trying to do at industrial strength levels] but the
approach that makes the most sense sort of depends on your
relationship with the other users, number of users [can you
respond via a phone call and telling them to stop, or by
quashing the traffic [batch vs. realtime detection], will
you have 0 tolerance or allow some legitmate use], whether
you want to kill off "most" of the traffic [low hanging
fruit] or trying to aim for 100%, and related to that,
your data volume sizes and how crafty the people you are
trying to catch are ... like say you are ignoring http
due to data volume and they use http port for the traffic].
there was a reasonable presentation on this at the "hot-p2p"
event last year. how c and the above advice is good too.
SNORT may be simpler for you to use than BRO and i would be
surprised if there wasnt a BT sig for SNORT. |
| 2005/9/21-23 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus, Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/Security] UID:39809 Activity:nil |
9/21 http://tinyurl.com/7swro It's the dawn of the age of uninhibited file sharing! LionShare is creates a neat, private sheltered place where people could shop music and movies to their heart's content without entertainment companies ever knowing. |
| 2005/6/27-28 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:38309 Activity:nil |
6/27 Supreme court rules against Grokster and Streamcast in Grokster vs. MGM
Discuss.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/27/technology/27cnd-grokster.html
\_ All your torrents are belong to us. Unanimously.
\_ Better tack an extra 1% onto Federal income tax, because, who
knows, everyone could download illegal shit.
http://thepiratebay.org/legal.php -John
\_ The reason SCOTUS ruled unanimously against Grokster was because of
internal e-mails, business-to-business e-mails, and interviews where
Grokster reps clearly wrote that a core purpose of their software
Grokster reps clearly said that a core purpose of their software
was to take over the Napster user base, which was losing users
rapidly because they put in controls on copyrighted media -- right?
If this is the case, then for Grokster specifically, this is open
and shut boys and girls. I don't believe there was any fundamental
change in any policy.
change in any law. If Comcast wrote in internal e-mails, "We want
to improve bandwidth so all the people trading the z3r0-d4y will
keep their subscriptions with us!" then they'd be fucked too.
If, on the other hand, the creator of BitTorrent is on-record as
saying he's never used the software he created to download a single
pirated file (he beta'd the software with pr0n) ... well, maybe you
can go after businesses trying to make money off BitTorrent.
The only things interesting IMO are that: lower courts were so
farking stupid to write that Grokster was covered under Betamax;
and that media is covering this as if SCOTUS ruled against P2P
software in general.
\_ "The record is replete with evidence that from the moment Grokster
and StreamCast began to distribute their free software, each one
clearly voiced the objective that recipients use it to download
copyrighted works, and each took active steps to encourage
infringement" -Souter |
| 2005/5/15-16 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:37687 Activity:nil |
5/14 'The sites which have been closed, such as LokiTorrent, UK Torrent
and s0nicfreak, now carry warning messages from the MPAA that read:
"You Can Click But You Cannot Hide."'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4545519.stm
\- Well it appears you can hide. See paper "Is p2p dying or hiding".
--psb |
| 2005/3/29-31 [Reference/Law/Court, Computer/SW/P2P] UID:36949 Activity:nil |
3/29 http://csua.org/u/bim (cnn.com) For some reason I think the Supreme Court would have let the decision from the appeals court stand, since the law on this is so obvious -- but the Court is just hearing the case to help them research the latest iPods they could buy for themselves or something similarly stupid. \_ anyone have a Rio Karma? Recommended? \_ "There's never the intent to break the law when the guy is in the garage inventing the iPod," added Justice David Souter. Haha, that's funny, I don't think the ipod was invented in the garage, hahahaha. \_ The law is not obvious. It is not clear that Sony directly applies to this case for several reasons: (1) Sony dealt w/ an actual product that could be used to violate copyrights, but could not be used for distribution, (2) Sony's revenue did not depend mostly on copyright infringment, while arguably Grokster's revenue does (they get there money from ads in the pgm), (3) Sony did not intend that the VCR be mostly used for infringing uses as Grokster arguably did, (4) the "substantial non-infrining uses" was borrowed from patent law by the Sony decision (which actually was the dissent after the 1st argument, and became the opinion after re-argument) and there isn't any clear direction from the USSC re this standard (given that only about 90% of Grokster's users use it for infringing uses, is it enough that 10% of the users are legit?) My understanding is that most of the questioning today was about aiding and abetting copyright infringing which would take this completely out of Sony territory. |
| 2005/3/11-14 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/Security] UID:36651 Activity:high |
3/11 What do I need to do to make sure I don't get sued when I use
bittorrent? I am still a newbie. Thx.
\_ Azureus bittorrent client w/ safepeer plug-in supposedly
blacklists evil MPAA spy machines...
\_ Don't download copyrighted materials, or run it on someone else's
machine.
\_ How about a real answer? I don't care much for music/movie,
only apps/games.
\_ It is a real answer. Bittorrent was not conceived to
provide any sort of anonymity; Bram Cohen states as much
somewhere on http://bittorrent.com. The fact that you have a
tracker file hosted somewhere makes your IP show up. -John
\_ That's illegal and you can never fully "make sure" you don't
get sued.
\_ Under bittorrent, how would they trace me? Just give me
the technical info, if they were to do so? does the .torrent
file contains my info? ip?
\_ If you don't know enough to figure this out yourself,
you really shouldn't attempt it.
\_ In other words "I don't know".
\_ In other words, "You're a dumbass, and I'll laugh
my ass the fuck off if you get prosecuted"
\_ Sniff. Please sir, don't call me names.
\_ AFAIK, the underlying d/l stream in BT is not
encrypted. Someone w/ a pkt sniffer can tell
tell that you are using BT and what you are
d/l'ing. If they record the pkts, (which may
not be protected under 4 amd) the recorded
stream may be used as evid of your copyright
violation.
The best way to avoid this is to not become
an attractive target by d/l'ing high value
items frequently. The ONLY 100% safe way is
to not d/l copyrighted material.
\_ Isn't it easier than that to track someone?
I mean, if you're downloading Revenge of the Sith,
that means you're also serving it.
If I'm the Feds, and I turn on my bittorrent
client and start grabbing the movie, I should get
a list of IP addresses of everyone I'm getting
packets from. I just tell the movie companies to
ask the ISPs to match IP addresses to people's
names for those people sending the most packets.
It doesn't matter if the data are encrypted, since
the IP addresses in the IP headers are in cleartext.
(although I feel stupid putting it this way)
\_ ISPs do not have to disclose the names of
people for a particular IP addr unless the
cops get a warrant by showing prob. cause.
To show prob. cause, the cops need to prove
that the IP addr actually served or d/l'ed
copyrighted content thus violating the
copyright. (simply having copyrighted
content on your computer that you own may
be covered under fair use and does not
show that you have likely violated the law).
If the content is encrypted, then the cops
can't really prove to the judge issuing
the warrant that you served or d/l'ed
copyrighted content and may not be able
to meet the prob cause requirement.
(Some judges might say that having the
files there was enough to est. prob
cause so you have to be careful)
If you use authentication, and the feds
lie to you to get a valid passwd, then
you may have all sorts of other legal
protections.
\_ Maybe that's why there are so few torrent
users being sued. Anyways, since I don't
think the torrent data are encrypted anyway,
maybe it's not worth arguing about.
From a "I might get sued!" standpoint, I
personally would take the assumption that
encryption won't help for the Revenge of
the Sith example, but, YMMV.
\_ Uhm, it is a real answer. You want to use it for illegal
purposes, so you risk getting sued.
\_ From what I've heard they've only sued 7 bittorrent users
(non-ISPs). It's not as bad as MP3 sharing ... yet.
Basically, you are a target if you have fat upstream, you leave your
computer on all the time so you have the double whammy of always
serving files and your IP address never changing, and you serve a
lot of new movies.
You're probably not a juicy target, but for the average user, I
would just avoid grabbing new mainstream movies, lots of recent
movies, or serving lots of ISOs like WinXP or Office 2003.
\_ Thanks! And to the guy above, f*** off!
\_ Uhm, so you basically posted to get someone to pat you on the
back and say "Oh no, baby, it's okay. No one's going to sue
you!" That's pretty retarded. I mean, honestly, if you're
going to trade in copyrighted materials, you become vulnerable
to a variety of legal actions. Period. If you can't accept
that, the just buy the fucking thing and quite wringing your
that, then just buy the fucking thing and quite wringing your
hands.
\_ Every piece of software on your computer is legally
obtained?
\_ No clue...but I know the risks and am willing to
accept them. *shrug*
\_ I see, so all that no stealing lecture does not
apply to yourself. I am speachless.
\_ You do realize that more than two people can post
right? I haven't campaigned for or against the
morality of the issue, only the OP's retardation
about playing games with legality and essentially
entering a state of denial. You're an idiot,
by the way, just in case that wasn't clear in your
post.
\_ He didn't ask for a lecture, just how to avoid the law.
\_ So if op had asked you how to shoplift, you would
have told him w/o informing him that (1) it was
wrong to steal and (2) he may be subject to criminal
liability?
What I find more disturbing is the fact that op
feels entitled to download games (and whatever
else he wants) w/o paying for it. Regardless of
the civil/criminal liability associated w/ this
sort of activity, op OUGHT to realize that actual
people worked on the games that he is stealing
and if everyone acted like him and stole these
games there would be no incentive for people to
work on future games. If the hard work of others
brings you benefit, PAY FOR IT or we all lose in
the long run.
\_ I'm not going to disagree with you about games, but
I don't agree that stealing software always costs
companies money in lost business. I've used stolen
copies of very expensive software to get the feel
for them and figure out how to use them and then
spent huge amounts of Other People's Money to buy
the real thing based on having tried it for free.
In some cases I would probably not have made that
purchasing decision had I not been able to try it out.
So in the end, the company made *more* money than
they would had I not stolen a copy while I was a poor
student who couldn't afford it anyway.
\_ I can see your rationale. If you end up
buying a copy of the software or deleting
it b/c you don't want to buy it, there is
no violation of the principle that one ought
pay for things from one which one derives a
benfit. Unfortunately the law does not (and
probably cannot ever) allow for this.
The general principle could be applied to
games/music/books/movies/&c. if there were
no public library or private rental systems,
however, it is so easy and affordable to
rent things it doesn't really make sense to
steal.
\_ Well, the way for this to be legal is for the
company to have the foresight to give away
a version that's good enough to learn the
commands and get a feel for it so poeple like
me don't *have* to break the law to try their
damn product. Wasn't there a free version of
Doom in the begining to get people hooked?
After that, I was more than happy to shell
out the money for the real thing which I
probably wouldn't have done otherwise.
\_ right...I'm sure companies which provide
demo versions never get their software
stolen. -tom
\_ Join a private forum. No, really.
\_ Would decentralization, using SSL encryption, and only using
centralized servers to randomly connect people, and always
use another node as a middle-man when xferring data make it
really hard to track? Sort of a cross between filetopia and
bittorrent...
\_ onion routing, so nobody's sure what data is going through them,
taht would be more like it. See 'freenet' |
| 2005/3/10 [Computer/SW/P2P, Recreation/Media] UID:36627 Activity:low |
3/10 Is there a tutorial on how to use bittorrent? I downloaded Azureus
but now what? Where do I find the torrents?
\_ Depends on what you want. A good place for legal(ish) anime
is http://www.animesuki.com There are also site for bollywood movies
and such.
\_ It's really pretty straightforward. Download a .torrent file, open
it with your bittorrent client. Some things of interest:
The Grey Album (mashup of Jay-Z's The Black Album and The Beatles'
The White Album):
http://www.illegal-art.org/audio/grey.html
The Harry Potter Remix:
http://www.illegal-art.org/video/wizard.html
http://www.btefnet.net posts torrents of recently aired TV shows.
Otherwise, try googling for 'torrents'.
-dans
\_ dans, I'm reporting you to the FBI for illegal distribution
of copyrighted TV shows.
P.S. you might want to check out the official BitTorrent 4.0
client just released for Windows and Linux. I'd comment on it, but
I mostly use a Mac these days.
\_ http://www.piratebay.org
\_ARRRRRRRR! |
| 2005/2/25 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:36410 Activity:low |
2/25 No more bittorrent for me :(
http://money.cnn.com/2005/02/24/technology/hollywood_lawsuits.reut
\_ eek. how does that work though? let's say someone puts up a web
page with his "free e-book". But it's really an illegal copy.
Clearly he's liable for the illegal distribution but what about
users who downloaded it? Granted this isn't plausible in all
cases.
\_ just don't use bittorrent for those blockbuster movies, it seems |
| 2005/2/11 [Computer/SW/P2P, Recreation/Media] UID:36136 Activity:high |
2/10 Motd poll: have you used bittorrent or another P2P for an illegal
download within the last 2 months?
Yes: ..
No : .....
For a movie (if yes)?
Yes: ..
No : .
\_ BT as a means for widespread piracy is pretty dead in the long run-
it was never meant for it and only ended up being put to use for
"illegal" downloads because it was available, worked well, and was
pretty much under the radar. The basic BT architecture isn't
suited to the kind of untraceability you need for downloads. There
are more appropriate ideas for this sort of use out there. -John
\_ With a 'private' tracker and .torrent download site scheme it's
a bit safer. You need it to be truly private though.
\_ Does d/l'ing eps of Atlantis/MI-5 that I missed count as illegal?
If so, I have used bt to illegally d/l eps. Otherwise no. BTW,
why would you want to d/l a movie when you can just netflix it?
\_ I dunno. I never downloaded movies but I recently did get a
few things off of torrents (SW "original laserdisc" DVDs, a
couple of subtitled anime flicks, and hellboy of all things.
I don't even really care about that stuff but now I'm probably
on some FBI list since I got it from lokitorrent. The chances
are slim but they could probably bust my ass to kingdom come
based on the stuff I read lately. And yeah I've used it for a
few missed TV shows and apparently that's just as illegal. But
it's the movie guys seem the most interested in making a big
hoopla about this right now. |
| 2005/2/10-11 [Reference/Law/Court, Computer/SW/P2P] UID:36131 Activity:kinda low |
2/10 Lokitorrent is dead. Long live lokitorrent!
\_ Do you have more info about the outcome of the lawsuit? Did the
court force them to put up the index.html page they now have at
http://www.lokitorrent.com ?
\_ I wonder when they'll go after bittorrent downloaders instead of
sites.
\_ http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=661 |
| 2005/2/9-10 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:36120 Activity:high |
2/9 A lot of movies I get from Kazaa or Bittorrent are in AVI format, and
I end up having to convert them back to MPG to burn to DVD or VCD
which is a big drag. Is there any reason why people prefer AVI instead
of the good 'ol MPG format? Is it the size, compression ratio,
quality, or other factors?
\_ http://www.videohelp.com has enormous amounts of information on
formats and converters. It's a bit dense with information, but if
you can figure out the very basics it's a huge help. -John
\_ Um, DivX?
\_ Yeah, basically. AVI is really (like MOV) just a container file
format. Lots of different codecs are often used inside the AVI
container: MPEG4, MSMPEG4v2 (which i think is like Divx), etc.
MPG files are usually only MPEG1 (VCD) or MPEG2 (DVD), and
compared to MPEG4 variants, they're much crappier for a given
bitrate. --dbushong
\_ VCD sucks. Get a player that can play Xvids.
\_ Mainly, it's the quality/size ratio. I use DIKO to convert my avis
to DVDs. It can convert to VCDs as well, I believe.
\_ Don't forget, Kazaa logs all of your downloads.
\_ Anyone tried eXeem? the "distributed bittorrent" thing?
\_ Size, compression ratio, and quality are all the same factor.
\_ Anyone here use Limewire? I really like it.
\_ So what're suggested p2p or bittorrent client for music only? Looking
for obscure world fusion bands, mostly.
\_ "They mostly come out at night, mostly"
\_ Your brain has been classified as: filled with too much pop-
culture crap.
\_ Aliens is pop culture crap?! I challenge you to
thunderdome, biotch!
\_ Soulseek |
| 2005/1/24-26 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/Unix] UID:35877 Activity:kinda low |
1/24 Of all the p2p software, which is the fastest at transferring large
(>1GB) files from one person to another? Some are premised on
multiple concurrent uploads to speed up the download (e.g.,
BitTorrent), which is great for popular files, but I have a large
set of data that would only be interesting to one other person. Is
FTP still the best way to go?
\_ Split up the file and use multiple FTP connections. The improvement
over single FTP connection is large if the distance is great (e.g.
between California and Japan).
between California and Japan), where the bottleneck is the roundtrip
time instead of bandwidth.
\_ p2p isn't about moving files from one user to the next. In your
example above, justputting the files on a website would be as fast
ast.
\_ One caveat with just putting files on a website, most Apache
builds can't send files larger than 2 gigs. -dans
\_ Also, how much data are you talking about? Tens of gigs, or
terabytes? Once you get into the terabyte range you're probably
better off just yanking the hard disks, and fedexing them.
Sneakernet is still the bandwidth king. -dans
\_ "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of
tapes." -some guy in the fortune file
\_ I have files around 2-5GB in size, so FTP sounds like the way to go.
Any reccommendations for free, secure FTP servers for Windows XP?
Going back to the p2p model, at what point does it become efficient?
That is, how many people does it take to share a file such that it
gets distributed fairly quickly? --op. (ps - these are VMWare
images)
\_ If you can initiate the transfer you might consider scp or rsync
with the appropriate flag to compress on the fly. As to your
p2p question, I think your understanding is a little flawed.
What p2p lets you do is aggregate bandwidth from more than one
source. Simplifying a lot and ignoring overhead, it's going to
take the same amount of time to transfer a file from a single
server connected via a T1 (1.5 megabits per second) as it would
to transfer a file via a p2p network where six sites with
256 kilobit per second connections are hosting the file. Add
more users and you add more bandwidth.
-dans |
| 2004/12/20 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:35362 Activity:high |
12/19 http://suprnova.org is down again, I guess the corporations are winning... \_ This time you're actually right. It has (apparently) gone down permenently. permanently. \_ what's the best replacement out there atm? \_ I don't know, but http://lokitorrent.com seems pretty good, 1.5 million active peers according to the site. Registration req'd. active peers according to the site. (free) registration req'd. \_ I've never liked bittorrent, it always stalls on me. I also find it difficult to find anything with it. The only thing I found it good was was dling some anime. \_ This makes you ... a loser. good was dling some anime. \_ BT is the suck for illegal content, as it's always going to rely on the tracker being available. For legit downloads, like OS .isos and such, it rocks. -John \_ I use it exclusively for TV shows I've missed. It seems to do the trick. \_ where do you find sources? \_ Up until last week, http://suprnova.org \_ "Google"? -John \_ It's great for "popular" illegal content. I see tons of stuff out there, almost all recent stuff appears on there and will be fast for a time. Within those parameters it's the best. It does rely on having popular listing sites like suprnova. \_ so are there any good suprnova replacement sites? \_ I suspect they simply paid the site owners off. \_ Check the http://slashdot.org thread about it. Several other sites are mentioned as alternatives. \_ If you know good ones can you name a couple? I hate slashdot threads. \_ empornium.us. 3 guesses what kind of torrents *they* host. |
| 2004/12/1-2 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:35137 Activity:low |
12/1 any rec's for a free/open web-based document management/sharing
system? thanks.
\_ PHProjekt. http://www.phprojekt.com Or PHPGroupware. There
was a recent slashdot thread on web-based collaboration tools,
which may have some pointers to what you want. -John
\_ thanks... I couldnt seem to find the slashdot thread... is
this what you had in mind? - rory
On Collaborative Weblogs
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/31/1112234&tid=95&tid=146
\_ Nope sorry, my mistake, it was about calendaring tools:
http://tinyurl.com/6oxae
some good links, though. -John
\_ Mambo
\_ Mambo seemed pretty good when I looked into it. If you don't
need something light and fast, my co-worker is setting up
Plone, which is Zope-based. I'm not involved in the project,
so I don't know why Plone was chosen.
\_ please let me know which one you've decided. I tried ZOPE and
others, never find one that I really like. -kngharv |
| 2004/11/27 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/Unix] UID:35083 Activity:moderate |
11/26 I am new to file sharing, so here is a dumb question. Does the use
of p2p program protects the client more than direct http/ftp download?
\_ Depends on what you mean by "protect"--your security against
exploits/trojans? Anonymity? -John |
| 2004/11/20-21 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:34994 Activity:high |
11/19 Looks like suprnova is down. I guess they've been hit by the corp.
\_ looks fine. try www.suprnovra, not suprnova
\_ Nope. http://suprnova.org is the real one; http://suprnova.com and net are
look-alike ripoffs
\_ Yes, and http://suprnova.org works for me.
\_ Down for me.
\_ Try http://torrentreactor.net--they're OK. -John |
| 2004/11/15-16 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:34890 Activity:high |
11/14 What's the largest single torrent you've ever completed a download of?
>10GB:.
2-10GB:.....
<2GB:
Torrent?: ..
\_ I read there was a study which said 35% of all internet traffic is
BitTorrent. Why haven't we seen BitTorrent lawsuits?
\- do you have a ptr to this study? my numbers are pretty much
pre-BT ... ~psb/MOTD/InternetFlows. this would suggest a big
increase in traffic, not just a shift in composition. --psb
\_ http://in.tech.yahoo.com/041103/137/2ho4i.html
Google, Partha. -John |
| 2004/10/21 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:34269 Activity:very high |
10/21 http://bitflood.org:8080/?file=791b2f5d95a54d1381b85f271b51f71e73964185 Get the 96MB video for a high-quality clip of the Crossfire Jon Stewart interview. This is required viewing, especially if you want to stop watching cable TV political analysis shows. (For the newbs: Save the .torrent file, then open it in BitTorrent) \_ What is up with this? Stewart was an ass and the other guy was no better. BTW, Stewart's own ratings have plunged since then. \_ Stewart was hilarious, but he had a point: without being partisan on the matter, he pointed out that CNN puts entertainment value before relevance in its programming decisions. He's right in saying that Crossfire is poor parody of a debate show, but I don't think a real debate show would do well on CNN- the ones on PBS don't seem to attract viewers. \_ If you ask me, Stewart was also talking about the problem of Begala coming "from the left" and Tucker "from the right", and there not being an honest attempt to reach a correct answer (regardless of political leanings), implying that there is none or one is not considered important. By doing this, you entertain liberals and conservatives and help them think the other side is full of idiots (encouraging the polarization of America), but you don't help them come to a correct, intelligent answer. E.g., part of the correct answer is if Tucker would say Dubya is a fucking moron to still say he would have invaded Iraq if he had known everything we know today. \_ are you sure? or are you believing drudgereport again? the daily show has been on a total of one time since friday's crossfire segment - danh \_ What have they been doing for the last week? \_ the crossfire segment everyone keeps talking about was last friday. the daily show just ran reruns all last week. i hope matt drudge gets eye syphilis. - danh \_ So, what you're saying is that Drudge's ratings info is based on last week, _before_ the Crossfire interview and during a week of re-runs. Gotcha. 'Cos this week has been awesome. \_ right. do you hate drudge as much as i do yet? - danh \_ DRUDGE HAS NEVER GOTTEN ANYTHING WRONG!!!!!1 --motd \_ What? You prefer Dan Rather and CBS for their highly accurate and well researched and unbiased reporting? \_ In the dictionary under "straw man" it says, "see this post." \_ Huh? Are you sure you don't mean "false dichotomy" or maybe "red herring?" \_ No, you're looking for "false, but accurate"! \_ I'm not sure that's possible, but I get your point. |
| 2004/9/28 [Computer/SW/P2P, Recreation/Media] UID:33804 Activity:low |
9/28 I wanna buy the complete 4 seasons of Southpark but Amazon is kind of
pricy. What are other places that sell Southpark DvDs cheap? ok thx
\_ http://www.deepdiscountdvd.com looks ~$30 cheaper
\_ bittorrent + time = free
\_ you know I've never used Kazaa/Napster (fear), is bittorrent
easy to use and is it legal?
\_ bittorent is free, easy to use, small, and spyware-free.
You can use it to obtain materials legally and not.
Re South Park, the easy step is getting the episodes; the
takes-time-but-otherwise-easy step is finding/burning the
DVD ISOs or figuring out how to burn non DVD ISOs.
\_ Free or legal, choose one. That being said, bittorrent hasn't
had any lawsuits filed to my knowledge, and the only 'takedown'
letters I've heard of are for the people running the trackers
and torrent dump sites (which would not be you). |
| 2004/6/28-30 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:31051 Activity:moderate |
6/28 Looking for Macross Do You Remember Love, 0 on Kazaa. Where else
can you download it from?
\_ emule
\_ What does the ", 0" on the end mean? Are you looking for both
MDYRL and Macross Zero?
\_ Sigh. Read the "0" as "zero" and parse as describing the number
of results from Kazaa.
\_ If you want Macross Zero it's probably easiest to goto
http://www.animesuki.com and download it with bittorrent. |
| 2004/6/23 [Computer/SW/P2P, Uncategorized/Profanity] UID:30972 Activity:high |
6/23 http://bugmenot.com \_ shit, stop sharing this stuff. the more you advertise something the this the faster it becomes completely useless. |
| 2004/2/8-9 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:12160 Activity:nil |
2/8 give a fake email address, go to jail for 7 years:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/35376.html
\_ Give a fake address *when registering a domain*. Sounds reasonable
to me. Like buying property, you're entering a oontract with Gov't
and society--we should be able to contact the real you.
\_ Good call. The article is stupid. BTW, can someone explain
what they mean by "the intention ... is clearly p2p networks"?
AFAICT this doesn't affect anyone using some p2p software from
their home dsl. Though the harley analogy is really fucking
stupid and scary... --scotsman
\_ It's much more fun to scream about civil liberties, the patriot
act, and the evil bushco. Who asked you to bring any common
sense to a motd issue? |
| 2004/2/6 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:12117 Activity:kinda low |
2/5 So I've been trying to download stuff on Kazaa and I'm very impressed
at how the record industry is fighting back by uploading fake music
files. 95% of the stuff I download now are bogus. I'm very very
impressed. At any rate, what are some other non-sucking p2p programs
I could use? Thanks.
\_ IRC
\_ my friend swears by suprnova (w/o the e). it's bittorrent
\_ suprnova is great, but only if you're looking for something
either incredibly popular or very recent. I use suprnova as my
Tivo.
\_ if there's some version of a song that has 50 sources, don't believe
it. Download a different version.
\_ you should sue. you have the right to download non-bogus files.
the information wants to be free!
\_ I like Ares alot... just started using it, no ads, good
selection of music.
\_ Someone asked about earthstation5 recently, but no replies.
Has anyone used this at all yet?
\_ It had a bug or backdoor (which one is a matter of controversy)
which gave a remote attacker complete RW control of your drives.
I won't touch it anytime soon. |
| 2004/1/5 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:11659 Activity:nil |
1/4 Ares is the new P2P client. Kazaa-like interface, no ad-ware,
good selection with good bitrates based on my initial searching.
\_ How does it compare to Kazaa-lite? |
| 2003/12/7-8 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:11352 Activity:nil |
12/7 Recommendations for a good file-sharing client? I'm mainly
interested in shamelessly subverting copyright law (ie, downloading
music MP3's). Kazaa seems to be sucking as of late.
\_ What's your login, I ll email you what I use.
\_ phillip@csua
\_ If you're looking for mainstream, there are few good bittorrent
sites.
\_Really? From my experience bittorrent sucked...all you can
find is phish and it took all day to download. Lemme know if
I'm missing something. The program is cool. -scottyg
\_ i will now have to listen to anthrax at top volume
for an hour to get that horrible audio image out of my
mind.
\_ Bittorrent is really good for "0-day" stuff and new TV/movies.
It's hard to find good .torrent files though. It's not a good
general-purpose P2P; it's good for spreading a few files really
fast.
\_ I use emule and winmx. winmx for music, emule for everything else.
\_ dc++
\_ I second that, especially Scandinavian hubs.
\_ soulseek is good (http://www.slsknet.org |
| 2003/11/28-12/1 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:11261 Activity:nil |
11/28 I have Verizon and I noticed that whenever I run Kazaa, my ISP
disconnects me and reconnecws me every few minutes or so. How
to prevent that?
\_ stop pirating software, music, books and pr0n.
\_ shut the fuck up. Current IP laws is so fucking twisted
\_ try emule, it's better than kazaa. and the above poster forgot
about divx movie pirating...
\_ Call Verizon customer service to verify, but you might be able
to initialize the new phone (and disable the old) by calling
*228 and following the instructions. (The number also has an
option for updating the Preferred Roaming List, PRL.)
\_ *** Did you mean to post this above? *** |
| 2003/10/16-17 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:10662 Activity:high |
10/16 Are there any p2p applications that use port 80?
\_ I know there're some that use HTTP, though I'm not sure which ones |
| 2003/10/1 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:10400 Activity:nil |
10/1 http://wired.com/news/mp3/0,1285,60650,00.html Chuck D and LL Cool J face off about file sharing. Guess the shil, win a teddy bear! \_ they both sound like utter morons \_ this is some sort of surprise coming from guys who call themselves "Chuck D" and "LL Cool J"? think about it. |
| 2003/9/10 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/HW/Drives] UID:10131 Activity:nil |
9/9 RIAA Rocks! They got $2,000 off of the girl who liked "nursery
rhymes"!
\_ urlP
\_ http://csua.org/u/48n
\_ A 12-year-old living in the projects who misunderstood
copyrights, and they got $2000. I think I start file
swapping just on principle for that one....
\_ Lets boycott the mainstream music industry. Stop buying
albums.
\_ I think not. That felon shared over 1,000 copyrighted
songs. And you tell me she didn't have an idea it
was wrong.
\_ Anyone knows how many song she downloaded or stored on her PC?
\_ I read it was over 1200.
\_ i threw out all my Metallica albums cuz they were at the
forefront of this wussiness.
\_ of course, it's very convenient that metallica had already
started to suck by the time napster happened.
And Justice For All was their last decent album.
\_ Started to suck? They *always* sucked. All that changed
is you got old enough and your taste improved enough to
see it.
\_ That's probably one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.
\_ albums you already paid for? yeah that'll hurt them.
\_ why don't the go after the $29.99 guys instead?
\_ duh, they've got lawyers
\_ So, motd oracles, explain this to me: if I rip CDs that I own
and share them on my hard-drive, will the RIAA have a case? Or
does it have to be a case of mp3s I've obviously dl'd from another
user? And if I can't share mp3s I've ripped myself, is it even
legal for me to be making mixed tapes/CDs for friends? For my
own use? And does any of this hold any legal water or is it all
a case of "comply or we'll bankrupt you with legal fees"?
\_ Look, cut the semantics, just turn yourself in.
Criminal. -John
\_ Ah, I see. I'll just report to the nearest security
booth for termination, shall I, friend Computer? ;-)
\_ Yes, no, maybe, yes, yes.
\_ you want to stop the RIAA, help develop a celestial file sharing
program. broadcast/relayed queries, distributed archiving in an
encryped partial format (so nobody knows what they've really
cached), and swarm file downloading via UDP, ICMP, or other
connectionless protocols with obfuscated and/or FORGED or SOURCE
IP ADDRESSES. It'd be nigh-unto-impossible to track where a file
came from. They'd have to find a way to sue the entire internet.
Good luck RIAA.
\_ Fight the Power. Music yearns to be Free.
\_ Not while it's in the vested interests of the big labels to
keep it in chains:
http://www.taxi.com/transmitter0307/tips0307.html |
| 2003/9/6 [Computer/SW/Virus, Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/Mail] UID:10100 Activity:nil |
9/5 What's the best p2p client to use nowadays (for music)? I liked
soulseek but it stopped working. I'd really prefer spyware-free.
\_ telnet to port 80. |
| 2003/8/21-22 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:29432 Activity:kinda low |
8/21 Is http://earthstation5.com for real? Anyone tried it? \_ http://download.com.com/3302-2196_4-10210370.html \_ Their homepage is pretty worthless http://www.es5.com \_ the RIAA is going to start funding settlers now |
| 2003/5/31-6/1 [Computer/SW/Apps/Media, Computer/SW/P2P] UID:28594 Activity:moderate |
5/31 Anybody know where to find old version of programs like Kazaa and
Real Player? Their respective web sites only have the latest version
but the latest version always have bloatware or spyware. I just want
to be able to play some .rm files and d/l some music without some
100 meg monster program. Yes, I've searched google, but it has too
many results to sift through. There must be a site that archives
some of this stuff somewhere. Thanks.
\_ STFW http://www.oldversion.com/program.php?n=real
\_ STFW for Kazaa Lite
\_ real has old version on the web.
\_ For Kazaa, does anyone tried giFT ?
\_ No, I prefer outright thEFT. |
| 2003/4/9 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:28043 Activity:high |
4/8 alright, it seems to be time again:
audiogalaxy ruled but is gone, kazaa worked great but is now
sucking... what's the next mp3 d/l'ing software I should try?
\_ what's wrong with Kazaa?
\_ spyware?
\_ Kazaalite?
\_ eMule --aaron |
| 2003/2/28 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:27562 Activity:very high |
2/27 Anyone found a non-preorder copy of moo3 in a store anywhere in
the SF BA? If so, please post what store and location. Thanks!
\_ frys (in palo alto dunno about elsewhere)
\_ ObKazaa
\_ what is that "Ob" means when people say "ObKazaa" or
"ObGoogle?"
\_ Obligatory. As in "Obligatory STFW response" or
"Obligatory suggestion to try Kazaa, dumabass" (the
'dumbass' is sort of implied)
\_ No. Wrong. I'm not a thief. I want to *buy* the game as odd
from http://bitconjurer.org/BitTorrent ... or mail me. -dwc
as this may seem to those of you with no ethics. -OP
\_ http://www.donkax.com/bittorrent/index.php?dir=Games get bittorrent
from http://bitconjurer.org/BitTorrent ... or mail me.
\_ signature purged for your safety.
\_ Gamestop will have it. |
| 2002/12/21 [Computer/Networking, Computer/SW/P2P] UID:26880 Activity:insanely high |
12/20 If one is snarfing porn and one has used a secure erasing program
to erase the incriminating files from one's own drive. How many
other locations likely have records of the transaction and how long
will those records persist? This was via kazaalite, a spyware-free
p2p client.
\- just out of curiousity, is this a shared work computer, hide
from spouse or is it child p0rn or something like that? --psb
\_ The server, in its log files, forever. Your browser cache,
until you clear it. Your browser history file, for however
long you have your browser set to retain files.
\_ You forgot about the logs for all of the transparent
proxies (most of them will have copies of the content
in their caches as well).
\_ The server as in the server from whence I downloaded the porn?
A bummer about Windows Media Player is that I have know idea how
to clear its buffer. Anyway, thanks. This is pretty much as I
figured. I was worried about things like whether our router or
our DSL modem keeps transaction logs.
\_ link:www.techtv.com has a howto for being able to clear WMP's
history.
\_ It depends on the router. Some routers have the ability to
replicate all packets coming in from a certain port or IP
address and redirect it to a workstation with analysis
software running. This is standard practice in the heavily
loaded POPs. ISPs analyze traffic patterns to better plan out
network buildouts. |
| 2002/11/15-17 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/Security] UID:26558 Activity:nil |
11/15 http://journalism.berkeley.edu/projects/biplog Coming soon, a real hostname. -dans |
| 2002/10/26-28 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/RevisionControl] UID:26330 Activity:nil |
10/25 is there some sourceforge project that integrates
a mailing list, file sharing capabilities, member
profiles, etc... basically i'm looking for a replacement
for a yahoogroups type mailing list.
\- gnu mailman is somewhat extensible. --psb
\_ Emacs has this, M-x set yahoo-replacement mode on |
| 2002/10/26-28 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/Networking] UID:26329 Activity:nil |
10/25 When I hit <DEAD>localhost:1214<DEAD> (Kazaa port) it works ok. But when I go to <DEAD> |
| 2002/8/23-24 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:25660 Activity:very high |
8/23 Will network performance suck again, now that the semester is
starting? Or has something been done about it?
\_ it sucked before?
\_ you didn't notice?
\_ guess not :)
\_ yes.
\_ If you can't beat them, join 'em. dl kazaa.
\_ Make sure to get the fully spyware enabled trjoan horse version.
\_ Some things have been done. SETI@@@@@@@@Home now has its own ISP
connection. The cost of bandwidth has come down, so our
bandwidth cap is now 90 megabits/sec instead of 70 megabits/sec.
Within the next week or two, it will be raised to 100 megabits/sec
once some new hardware is installed.
My guess is that there will still be performance issues, if not
at the beginning of the semester, then at least by the end of the
calendar year. I'm currently writing up a report requesting
immediate emergency funding for bandwidth charges, with longer-
term plans to do more with managing KaZaa, and managing or
charging high-bandwidth users in general. -tom
\_ That's how it starts. Next you'll be putting KaZaa users
into camps. And people using KaZaa _and_ SETI@Home will be
put to death. Heil Tom!
\_ I don't know tom or his personality, but I think his
idea above is good.
\_ Sure, until someone decides *your* traffic isn't a priority
and you should be charge or 'managed'.
\_ and just how do you plan to put a stop to Kazaa users when the
Kazaa topology is dynamic?
\- you can because the "protocol isnt dynamic"
\_ I don't think you can "put a stop" to peer-to-peer file
sharing; certainly not by technical means, on a campus like
Berkeley. But the effects of KaZaa can be measured, and
the people using KaZaa can be managed. (As in, "stop doing
that"). Remember, we're talking about on-campus machines,
not the dorms (which have their own separate cap). Note
that the problem with KaZaa on campus is files being
downloaded by people from off-campus; campus people
using KaZaa to download files don't contribute to the
problem due to the current algorithm for bandwidth
charging. -tom
\_ stopping p2p pirary on college campuses is VERY easy.
All you need to do is to adopt a new university policy
that sez if you're caught pirating stuff you'll be
expelled. No appeals. then you start the random search
in the dorms and start expelling some of the incoming
freshman. You'll see the p2p traffic drop to NIL once
the pictures of expelled freshmen gets on Daily Cal.
Remember the naked guy? After the law against nudity
at Berkeley and on campuses, and he got expelled, nobody
dared to show up naked. Enforcement is the key. Expell
the little fuckers without due process and you'll see
\_ Or as they say, "try and then execute them!"
everybody marching in line.
\- stopping kaza, gnutella, napster and a couple of other
p2p piracy programs is solved problem technically.
it is fairly strightforward to detect them in real time
and blast them with RST packets. it is an open question
what the policy should be and it is slightly involved
attempting to "whitelist" some users who are allegedly
using it for "real work". the "dynamic topology" and
configurable ports dont matter. of course there are
more involved ways to hide, but 99% of the users at
the moment dont do that ... although the number of
evaders may increase *some* if the "kazka obliterator"
code were deployed. ok tnx.
\- actually to do this 100% on a large scale isnt
that simple technically, but it is pretty simple
to deploy something that fucks up enough
p2p programs so that it is effectively unusable.
and this is a case where you dont need 100%
coverage to change behavior.
\_ The problem is, the more you fuck it up, the
more incentive you provide to find ways
around the blocks. It will always be easier
to hide file sharing than to block it.
\- thus far, untrue. or only true with
very sophisticated users and very
unsophisticated detectors ... but not
inherently true. --psb
But certainly there are measures which could
be taken which would make an impact, if it's
decided that it's a good idea to take such
measures. (The other problem is, once you
make people hide their P2P usage, you have
a harder time finding them to rap their
knuckles). -tom
\-as i said above, most attempts to hide
do not work against a good detection
system. if you are doing something stupid
like looking for a static port or a
list of src/dst addresses like in the
case of the napster "metaservers" it is
easy to get around by just punching in a
different number somewhere ... but at this
point setting up a fancy proxy or encrypted
tunnel is beyond the ken of most of the
community ... perhaps something canned will
emerge soon that gets around the current
generation of our detectors, but at the moment
this is not a technical but a political/
resource allocation problem. this is based
on many months of experience at a decent
sized institution with a fair number of
sophisticated users. --psb
\_ Is this the point where we start talking
about The Tragedy Of The Commons? I miss
those threads.... |
| 2002/8/21-22 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:25636 Activity:insanely high |
8/21 What p2p software do sodans use?
Soulseek: .
MLDonkey: .
Gnucleus: .
Kazaa: .
Kazaa Lite: ..
WinMX: .
/csua/tmp/: .
/etc/motd.public: .
smbclient to your windows box: .
\_ Kazaa Lite = Kazaa - Spyware |
| 2002/4/4-5 [Computer/SW/P2P, Consumer/Audio, Computer/SW/Virus] UID:24327 Activity:very high |
4/4 What's the mp3 finder of choice now aside from kazaa?
\_ AudioGalaxy
\_ you know, this trojans your browser
\_ probably, but a fun way to run audiogalaxy is on a linux
box somewhere, and to do searches with your web browser
\_ gnucleus... Open-source gnutella client :)
on the computer of your choice, so there's no way you
can be trojaned.
\_ I use Grokster with all the spyware chopped out by AdAware.
\_ You think so.... |
| 2002/3/7-8 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/Unix] UID:24060 Activity:nil |
3/7 Can someone provide a ref to what the fasttrack network is? Does
it feature the same sort of "can't be shut down" features that
Gnutella does? Or is it more napster/centralized?
\_ They claim it can't be, RIAA/etc claim it can. That they killed
Morpheus (who used their software but didnt pay their bills)
instantly says they have some sort of control but it sounds like
an _intentional_ hole they put in the clients, not a central server
napster style event. They are keeping secret the technical details
of how their network works. |
| 2002/2/20 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/Security] UID:23921 Activity:high |
2/19 Tom posts an intelligent comment on usenet:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=a4u5df%241uvv%241%40agate.berkeley.edu
\_ Charging is one possibility except then you get into the problem
of exactly who to charge. Do you charge the student assigned to a
workstation? Ok, another user logs in from another local machine
and uses the other student's machine for external access. Do you
charge the whole department or sub-unit and "let God sort it out"?
That just means rich departments stay on the net and poorer ones
take the net away from most of their users. You can't charge by
IP address because IP != unique user and packets don't have user
names on them. There's still no answer short of simply cutting off
a lot of people from external net access and I don't think anyone
wants that.
\_ "tragedy of the commons" problems usually have no easy solution.
The issue of access to national parks is a good example; you
can't restrict access to Yosemite Valley in a way that's
pleasing and fair, but you have to restrict access if you want
Yosemite Valley to retain its value. At some point you have
to make some decisions about tradeoffs. A campus phone isn't
equivalent to a unique user, either, but we manage to bill
people for phone service. -tom
\_ I don't have a problem with the basic concept of billing for
usage but it isn't the same as phones. Most people aren't on
the phone all day. Most aren't making LD calls. And it is a
bit difficult to login to your phone from my desk without your
knowledge and rack up a huge bill to 976-hotsex. $300 in
calls on my phone to my office mate's mother in Tokyo is easy
to track down and bill properly. With the technology at hand
I only see raising bandwidth or cutting a lot of people off
from the public net. I don't see the latter as a good choice
for a research/educational institution. It also wouldn't fly
politically.
\- i think this is naive.
\_ How are you planning to pay for this increased bandwidth?
\_ I don't think anyone wants to cut people off the net,
but providing a certain amount of "free" service, and
charging if you go over a certain amount of traffic, is
probably a tenable model. Buying bandwidth indefinitely
so kids can fill it up with more kazaa is untenable. -tom
\_Just raise tuiton. Make net access a line item that
people can elect not to pay for if they don't need it.
\_ "Every complex problem has a solution that's
simple, elegant, and won't work." -tom
\_ isn that ken lindahl's or msinatra's quote?
\- Why doesnt "disallow P2P except on certain
subnets/via prior arragement" [say for people
using gnutella for collaboration or maybe some-
body in cs doing something researchy] solve the
problem as long as someone in the dorms can
get their own isp access [i am not sure if this
is possible]. are students on the dormnet
allowed to run WEEB servers? yes, a lot of the
http is garbage but you have to attack what is
viable and cost-effective. the comment about
running the p2p server on port 80 to "hide" is
not a real issue. at least with napster,
gnutella, kazza, we can detect it on any port
[although not in real time, although that doesnt
seem important]. Also, the TotC comparison isnt
quite right since the Commons is a natural
endowment while bandwidth is sort of a "weakly-
rival" good paid for by somebody. Say I build a
lighthouse for my shipping company along my
shipping lane. I dont care if some people use
my lighthouses, however if this makes for "my
shipping lanes" too crowded for me to use,
well, i'd be better off switching technologies.
it seems like if you throttled the dormnet
traffic onto the routed internet but allowed
significant bandwidth to campus, people could
do their school work. [i assume most of the
p2p sharing isnt local]. --psb
[the lighthouse example is a little off because
it is not a divisible but a binary good but that
wasnt the point i was getting at. someone does
own the bandwidth].
\_ dorm traffic is already handled under
a separate cap. You can do things to
discourage P2P sharing, but that only
solves 25% of your problem, and the
more you discourage it, the more incentive
there is to find ways around it. -tom
\_ MOTD WANKERY! None of you people are in position to do anything.
\_ actually, I am. -tom
\_ A chill falls across the room...
\_ wanking is precisely what they are in the position to do. |
| 2002/1/22-23 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers, Computer/SW/P2P] UID:23634 Activity:moderate |
1/22 The problems with the Cory/Soda networks seems to be pretty
widespread throughout campus. Is the routing being handled by
monkeys or something? It's soooooooooooooo slooooooooooooooooooow.
\_ Since about a week-and-a-half ago, the campus has been hitting
its bandwidth cap on its link to the commodity Internet
(70 megabits/sec). About half of the traffic is kazaa/gnutella.
CNS and the chancellors are trying to decide what to do about it.
-tom
\_ So when did this bandwidth cap start, and why didn't CNS
announce it in http://ucb.net.announce like they do all other service
interruptions? This reminds me of when then initiated the
cap on the dorms and wouldn't tell Residential Computing what
the "problem" was for 2 days. -mikeh
\_ The bandwidth cap has been in place since our OC12 was
installed--it's only recently been hit. 70 megabits/sec
is all the campus is paying for. "bandwidth cap" is
somewhat misleading; we're talking about the size of
our pipe. It wouldn't be any different than if we had
a 70 megabit/sec pipe. Our current hardware connection,
if we let traffic run up to it, would give us about another
15 megabits, at a cost of $4500/month. -tom
\_ That's easy. Cut off the fucking dorms from anything but a web
proxy/cache and locally hosted email.
\_ "Every problem has a solution that's simple, elegant, and
won't work." The dorms are already limited to a separate
40-megabit cap. -tom
\_ So total campus bandwidth is 110? Ok, ban it and start
executing p2p users. It's all theft anyway.
\_ Bandwidth to the commodity net. Internet 2 traffic
is not capped, or tapped out at this point. (I think
our pipe is something like 650 megabits). -tom
\_ just cut off their mouse hand.
\_ And in other news, masturbation drops 80% on
campus, survey says.
\_ 70mb/sec =~ 8.7MB/sec?
\_ So the 400ms+ ping roundtrip times are the result of a
bandwidth cap?
\_ they are the result of us hitting the limit of the bandwidth
we are paying for, yes. -tom
\_ I suggest taking this to http://ucb.net.discussion |
| 2002/1/13-14 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/Security] UID:23552 Activity:very high |
1/13 http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/13/edlife/13BAND.html?pagewanted=print The article mentions 'Direct Connect.' What other file sharing programs are in use these days besides this and Morpheus and other FastTrack variants. Any CSUA members in the dorms or otherwise with big pipes care to comment? \_ irc \_ yeah, I've got a big pipe for ya \_ http://vadim.berkeley.edu \_ hi paolo! \_ nice going vadim, taking scheme.xcf.berkeley and changing it to vadim.berkeley. fucking tactless egomaniac. \_ I thought the useless xcf was shut down years ago? -alum \_ It was. It has become... the Vadim Computing Facility. \_ This is probably funny but I don't know who Vadim is or the current xcf situation. Is it dead or what? \_ Not dead. There's one member. \_ Just using your powers of deduction, see if you can infer what that one member's name is. \_ check http://zeropaid.com for an extensive listing of file sharing prorams. -- jj \_ the Dec207 warez club! \_ The dorms don't have a big pipe anymore. They're collectively limited to ~20Mbit. That's 4,000+ hosts. UCB dorm net is pretty much useless these days. Residents keep trying to get DSL installed because it's faster. \_ Buncha whiners. I felt lucky to have 14.4 access after I got access to the staff/professor modem bank and off the busy and broken 1200-9600 student bank. Doing classwork on campus was better anyway. Easily block remote connections to your workstation and keep all those other pesky students dialing in at 2400 on some other machine. \_ in my day, we used smoke signals. on a clear day with a small enough wind we could get ten bits per minutes, and we were damn pleased with that. \_ They allowed you to have smoke? And you knew what the sun looked like? And wind? You had wind?? You must be new around here.... \_ Petition them to increase the size of the big pipe. This is not 1991 anymore, when I spent big bucks to upgrade to a 9600 modem. \_ The problem with the dorms is that they'll use (for napster clones, mostly) all the bandwidth you'll give them, and the campus pays for bandwidth used to the commodity net. Dorm traffic isn't limited if it goes over Internet 2. -tom \_ Cool. Now they just need a multi-campus I2 p2p thing going and they're set. I've got this idea for a business model... I just need $325m in funding now.... \_ Two words: traffic shaping. Eliminate this bandwidth cap bullshit, and use traffic shaping to limit obscene traffic caused by p2p filesharing apps. Dorm net becomes useable again. \_ A few more words: apathy, money, unimportant. It isn't worth anyone's time to fix the dorm net situation. Who cares? Let them eat cake! Is there a minimum bandwidth promised or an SLA in the current dorm contract? Do people *really* choose the dorms because they have net? Was the <DEAD>dorm.net<DEAD> the deciding factor for anyone's living arrangement? If so they need to get over it. \_ Clearly, that's the way campus wants to go, but it's rather difficult in our environment. -tom \_ that's 20Mbit to off campus. |
| 2002/1/4 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:23452 Activity:nil |
1/3 http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/23532.html is something you want to read if you're a grokster/kazaa/whatever user. |
| 2001/12/27-28 [Computer/SW/P2P, Computer/SW/Security] UID:23378 Activity:very high |
12/30 is it just me, or is kazaa empty right now? did those busts actually
kill it?
\_ or maybe it's because most college kids are at home during winter
break?
\_ Those busts have nothing to do with the gutter-warez you find on
Kazaa. They busted a wholly higher-class of warez-hosers.
\_ DoD hadn't put out anything of note in 18 months. They didn't
bust anyone important to the scene.
\_ They will never bust the most cruical warez ring and that
is the casual copier. They can never stop someone from copying
office from work or giving a copy of the latest game to thier
pals so that they can have a lan party.
visiting a warez page be illegal? conspiracy charges?
please.
\_ Is it illegal to visit warez web sites?
\_ why would it be?
\_ because warez is illegal?
own use and linking to computers software will be
\_ downloading or distributing warez is illegal. why would
visiting a warez page be? conspiracy charges? please.
original. - Bill G.
\_ that's surfing with intent to download! Better
plead no contest and ask for leniency from the
judge.
\_ How do you legally distinguish mere surfing and
downloading? Afterall all these packets of warez
coming to your computer is an act by another computer
while surfing and clicking on links is your action.
\_ yeah... that's just stupid.. i mean, next thing you
know, making copies of stuff you already own for your
own use and linking to computer software will be
illegal...
\_ You shouldn't make copies, you should buy a spare
original. Kids these days with thier Linux/Open
Sources/Free Software. They make me sick. - Bill G.
\_ YEAH! FUCK FAIR USE. FUCKING CONSTITUTION!
FUCKING US CODE!! - Mini-Bill-Me
\_ You napster, gnutella, audio galaxy and kaaza
junkies don't know what "fair use" means.
Fair use means that you have the right to
listen to your original cd in your stereo
and your car. It doesn't mean you can make a
copy for your friends and it certainly doesn't
mean that you can make a near-perfect digital
copy that can be re-distribute illegally to
strangers via the internet. Now you kids need
to stop illegally copying music, movies and
software and start buying it. Otherwise all
the poor artists will have to go back to a
career in food service and start suffering
for thier art and we won't be able to make
the kind of money that is necessary in order
to maintain our land rovers, our pacific
palasides bungalows and our all armani,
versace and bally wardrobes. - RIAA
\_ Start paying the artists instead of
keeping all the money yourself and
I'll consider it.
\_ Strange thing is that all my artist friends
are already on the verge of waiting tables
although in terms of art it is the likes
of Britney who should be in the personal
service business. |
| 2001/10/12-14 [Reference/Law/Court, Computer/SW/P2P] UID:22706 Activity:kinda low |
10/11 http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7479309.html?tag=mn_hd it is so obvious what the media-content industry is trying to do now. \_ It is? What? |
| 2001/8/30-31 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:22289 Activity:high |
8/29 How much bandwidth do the units/ckc/foothill get to campus?
\_ use bing
\_ very inaccurate.
\_ In 1998 the network in the dorms was 10Mbit/shared, though, the
aggregate pipe to the campus net could have been faster than that.
Still, I felt like it was faster than I needed. I loved it.
\_ My brother was telling me that the dorms now have switched 100Mbit
in every room and that the outbound traffic is rate-limited to
30 MBit (2/3 of a T3).
\- didnt they rate limit napster and seti when they were the top two
things coming into berkeley? i think the "solved" the napster
problem by rate limiting the dorm connection and "solved" the seti
problem by geeting ona diff net in the long term. you can probably
measure this quite accurately if you have an account in http://berkeley.edu
and some knowledge of a reasonable host in the dormnet with
pathchar. <much technical disclaimers and discussion and bagging
on half-assed bw measurement tools deleted> --psb
\_ pathchar: icmp socket: Operation not permitted
\- well obviously like ping, suid. |
| 2001/7/24 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:21927 Activity:nil 75%like:21923 |
7/23 Where do you get your mp3s/warez/p0rn?
napster
morpheus .
kazaa
gnutella
limewire .
bearshare
usenet
tom's mom .
edonkey2000
audiogalaxy
\_ maybe if they clean up their navigation..
(other) |
| 2001/7/24 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:21923 Activity:nil 75%like:21927 |
7/23 Where do you get your mp3s/warez/p0rn?
napster
morpheus .
kazaa
gnutella
limewire
bearshare
usenet
(other) |
| 2001/7/12-13 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:21782 Activity:nil |
7/12 I'm curious about this latest Napster shindig. How is Napster's
situation so different from webspace providers? You can find copyrighted
material on those personal web page sites often, although the provider
generally cancels their account (i presume once someone notifies them
of the breach of TOS). Similarly with the myspace/idrive/freedrive
places that all went broke. So why can't Napster just require an
email address for ID like the other things, and if you have copyrighted
stuff then your account is cancelled? |
| 2001/2/13 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:20574 Activity:nil |
2/12 Napster opinion posted here:
http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~reeser/napster.html
(reserved for educational purposes only) |
| 2001/2/12-13 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:20568 Activity:high |
2/12 If any of you are worried about a Napster blackout, checkout
imesh at http://www.imesh.com/download !
\_ The judge ruled against them? I didn't see that anywhere.
\_ boycott metallica. They are the cause and the cry babies.
make em poor.
\_ What I don't understand about this whole napster business
is that closing down napster just makes it harder for
people sharing completely legal (or at least copyright
expired material).
\_ Do you have a point or are you just an idiot?
\_ Bow to leper messiah. |
| 2000/7/27-28 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:18788 Activity:high 54%like:18782 |
7/26 Judge shuts down napster THIS FRIDAY:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/437532.asp
\_ BoyCott Riaa. http://www.boycottriaa.com
\_ FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lars Ulrich, you are a dead man.....
\_ Napster bad!
\_ Bread good!
\_ Beer foamy!
\_ Lars Ulrich, after listening to a bunch of
executives, CEO of napster, president of America online,
and many lawyers at the Napster hearing, "Uhh, i dont know
what these guys are talking about, but all I can say is that
because of Napster, my wallet is thinner." lars ulrich,
youre a fag.
\_ Bands signed to the major labels make most of their
money from touring anyway, so when are they going
to come to the realization that the RIAA is only in
it for themselves?
\_ this is complete bullshit. -tom
\_Hello!! Once an artist signs to a label,
the label owns all of the work done for
that contract, and until recently the
artist had to wait 25+ years to buy
the rights back to their own songs.
\_ uh, yes, so? Almost no one makes money
touring; there are maybe 10 acts who draw
enough to make significant money. The
label PAYS the artist for their rights.
-tom
\_ He's smart enough to see the writting on the wall.
MP3 is forcing him to get a real job and he doesn't
want to go back to food service.
\_ I read tha the used to be a "junior tennis
hotshot." Maybe he can go and coach at some
shitty high school or something.
\_ Umm, you are a moron. Lars was one of the few people
who actually made sense, with the very simple (even you
should be able to understand) "It's mine i should be
allowed to say how it is DISTRIBUTED" Everyone else
(on both sides of this issue) is proving themselves
to be complete idiots.
\_ either you are a bitch, or a pussy-dickless man
\_ Information (all kinds) wants to be free!
\_ What about fair use? If I bought the tape, can I
download the song? What if bought the cd and
it got stolen, under fair use I could still listen
to a copy of the cd. The same is true for copies
that you listen to in your car. You don't have to
buy one for home and one for your car. Well, how is
mp3 different? If I purchased the song in some format,
I should be able to use it any format.
\_ boy, this is what i mean about everyone being stupid
1.) yes, if you bought the tape you MAY download
the song. You man NOT *SHARE* it by running
a SERVER (which napster IS) on your computer
which is effectively redistributing it against
any reasonable interp. of intellect. prop. laws
2.) I am (i don't know why) surprised that anyone
here is SO FUCKING STUPID as to think the
"tape copy" analogy is valid or in any way relates to this issue. That
moron from napster tried to say the same thing. Nobody is trying to say
MP3's should be illegal or that you shouldn't be able to port them
around. It is the DISTIBUTION (i capitalize the word AGAIN for those of
you who are comprehesion impaired) that is the issue.
3.) Let me help you children out, since you and
(i repeat myself) everyone who talks about this can't seem to make a
reasonable arguement: Napster is doing nothing illegal and should be left
alone because all they are doing is providing a tool and information. They
are not doing the broadcasting or the illegal downloading. You people (and,
of course, me) are. Why can't you just steal and live with it instead of
trying to convince yourself that it isn't stealing because "information
wants to be free man" or some other bullshit. -bitch
\_ Is this the first step in the RIAA's plan to ban MP3s? Well, if MP3s
are outlawed then onwly outlaws will have MP3s and they will share
them using strong encryption.
\_ fuck all of them : <DEAD>www.napigator.com<DEAD>
and opensource napster : http://opennap.sourceforge.net
\_ FIGHT THE POWER!!! CRITICAL MASS TOMORROW!!!!!
\_ despite your sarcasm, yes fight the power |
| 2000/7/27 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:18782 Activity:high 54%like:18788 |
7/26 Judge shutdowns napster: http://www.msnbc.com/news/437532.asp \_ Napster bad! |
| 2000/7/3-4 [Computer/SW/P2P] UID:18577 Activity:high |
7/3 motd vaporized
\_ You bit buster, you.
\_ Reduce, reuse, recycle
\_ Hey baby, I'll show you my bits if you show me yours.
\_ I saw yours in kindergarten. Wasn't that big a deal.
\_ Is bit-sharing safe?
\_ If done correctly it can be safer. Bit sharing is never
100% safe.
\_ if your bit is private, then it is 100% safe.
But if it is protected then it is only 98% safe.
Public bit not safe at all.
\_ Byte my bits. |
| 2000/5/26-27 [Computer/SW/P2P, Science] UID:18345 Activity:high |
5/25 set lARS Ulrich on Napster fire.
http://slashdot.org/interviews/00/05/26/1251220.shtml
\_ English speak go need you to school good yes?
\_ which part of his simple sentence confused your
fancy book-learned little head?
\_ i think what he means is that guy just sounds dumb. he starts
off ok but then starts rambling a bit in fragments, and starting
one sentence and then jumping to another. DUHeeeeeeerrrrr!:
Lars trying to speak (typical sentence):
I mean, I can just barely ...
I know how to get onto AOL, and I will say
that I have used AOL a couple of times to check some hockey scores.
Lars trying to speak again
And I believe, and the people that we talk to about this, we believe,
that the minute some of these companies become active,
when they basically come to a point that they become fully
funcitonal, we believe that there will be technology and a
way to go after them in the way they can invent this technology
and make it untraceable. We believe that as quickly as
they can make it untraceable And I believe, and the people that
we believe that you can find a way to fuck with it, and we
have already heard about different ways of doing that.
So I think it's clear that there is nothing that
people can talk about for the future that becomes bulletproof.
I can see what he's trying, but man, it's damn ugly grammatically...
\_ People, give Lars a break. Drug induced coma in which he likely
spends most of his time aside, most people don't speak in complete
grammatical sentences in everyday speech, and this interview is
an unedited transcript of a phone interview. -- ilyas
\_ Tell us of the stars....
\_ Yeah, he's lucky he can use a phone. Imagine if he had
tried to type this up on his AOL account. And uhm, no, I
don't really understand where he's trying to go when he
talks about the future and untraceable technology. I'm
not sufficiently drugged to enter his zone of understanding.
LARS IS A DRUMMER. Other than dpetrou, how many rock drummers
do you know who have any brains?
\_ Hi, Paolo |
| 2000/4/28-29 [Recreation/Music, Computer/SW/P2P] UID:18136 Activity:high |
4/27 What is Gnutella?
\_ One of several open source napster clones. I believe it also
doesn't rely on a central set of servers (like Napster) to archive
information about what's where. -John
\_ It's not exactly a napster clone in that it doesn't use the
same protocol as Napster and it's not just for trading
mp3s; but the idea is similar.
It was created by some people at Nullsoft (the WinAmp people),
but when they released a public beta and their new bosses
at AOL/TimeWarner found out, they told them to shut it
down. Last I checked, the "official" Gnutella site is still
out of commission. Try: http://www.gnutella.co.uk
\_ Gnu's implementation of Nutella
\_ Random musing - does Napster keep any log of connections? When
then get shut down some day, will the music industry be able to
get a lot of all the music I've grabbed through them? Will the
volume be too high in general for individuals to get busted?
\_ Why don't you just pay for your damn music? - musician
\_ Because of inadequate purchasing options - if I was
allowed to easily evaluate music before purchasing,
and able to buy on a basis of exactly what I wanted to
buy (i.e. song-by-song basis), I would be *happy* to
support the musicians. I am not willing to support the
leech of the music industry, however. Same goes for the
film industry, once bandwidth is sufficient to pirate
movies. Why can BMG sell discs so cheaply? Why are
CDs more expensive than the more-expensive-to-make audio
cassettes? The industry sucks.
\_ uh, it's called "supply and demand".
Rationalize all you want, but if it becomes
impossible to make money selling CD's/movies,
people will stop doing it. -tom
\_ I trust in human ingenuity. People will
adapt to another model in which they can
still make money and music/art.
\_ uh, it's hard to make money when everyone
steals your product, you selfish moron. -tom
\_ What about concerts? Playing in clubs?
\_ A typical band playing in a typical club
will cover the cost of their dinner and not
much more. The only thing that brings performers
into big arenas to make big money is MASSIVE
RECORD COMPANY PROMOTION. Self-promoted bands
do not make money touring. -tom
\_ In general, the volume will be too high to bust individuals.
However, in your case, they will somehow get back to you at
which point you will get arrested and have to call sky to
bust you out.
\_ Lately, running BSD nap on soda, I always get error connecting
socket. Is this purposeful on soda/berkeley's part, or is this
some temporary snafu, or what? |
| 5/16 |