| ||||||
| 5/17 |
| 2011/10/12-11/30 [Computer/SW/Languages/Tcl] UID:54195 Activity:nil |
10/12 Going to Ousterhout's RAMCloud talk at LinkedIn, are there any
other CSUA'ers going? -ausman
\_ has he done anything interesting since Tcl/Tk? |
| 5/17 |
| 2000/10/25-26 [Computer/SW/Languages/Tcl] UID:19559 Activity:kinda low |
10/24 We just bought John Ousterhout's dig, Ajuba Solutions. Wonder if
that's a good thing or a bad thing...?
\_ We just bought a Thai hookah. Wonder if that's a good thing
or a bad thing...?
\_ seano is that you?
\_ I like hookah's. -curtis-e-bear
\_ smoking bad
\_ According to the Ajuba site, you're killing all their products
so what the hell is the point?
\_ Ousterhout is the Tcl guy, right? Sooner dead the better.
\_ Tickle's weak...but I mean, it's basically BASIC, and BASIC
kicks ass. So what went so horribly wrong?
\_ No, only M$ Visual Basic kicks ass. TCL would kick ass
if it was M$ Visual TCL.
\_ #F, original BASIC has no procedures, local variables,
variable declaration, pass by value, pass by reference,
and a data structure. TCL has all of the above and more.
The syntax of TCL is horrible, the runtime is weak due
to the limitation of the data structure, but other than
that it has all the basic elements of a sound programming
language. Of course nowadays a good programming language
is defined by how fast you can learn it and how easy you
can build applications with it.
\_ How can you have "local" variables with no proceedures
(and presumably no separate source files)
\_ Don't forget OO with OTcl and there's also Tcl/Cl. |
| 2000/8/18-19 [Computer/SW/Languages/Java, Computer/SW/Languages/Tcl] UID:19032 Activity:moderate |
8/17 http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/DailyNews/arsdigita000818.html \_ They pay you $100k straight out of school to write Tcl server code. No thanks. \_ Hell yeah man, Tcl is so lame, I wouldn't even code that shit if someone paid me 300K !! F those lusers DOOD! \_ If you want to make $100k+, Tcl isn't the way to go. Just start doing Java consulting at $75+/hr straight out of school. \_ I don't know... I like working there. It is much better than Vignette or one of the *ients. I started there straight out of school and am in the group that is porting the ACS (ArsDigita Community System) to Java. What's your point? That making 100K is money-grubbing and if you want to do it, you might as well totally sell-out and do Java consulting? -- Ars Digita employee \_ But don't you also have to put up with Phil's ego? -muchandr |
| 1998/6/30-7/2 [Computer/SW/Languages/Tcl] UID:14272 Activity:high |
6/30 I want to do some unix GUI programming. What's the difference
between Xlib and Motif windows programming? Is one easier
than the other and is one more commonly used?
\_ Didn't Sun put in millions of $$$ promoting Java???
No one even suggest it?
\_ Motif is cooler looking and the "standard", but non-free, so
most hobbiests stick to Xlib
\_ How about the MIT Athena toolkit?
\_ there's plenty of X toolkits you can use: gtk, Xaw, Xaw3d and
so on. You learn more about X with Xlib . Is this a learning
project or an effert to get working code?
\_ Use tk, it's much easier than either, and runs on Mac/Win as well.
\_ gtk! http://www.gimp.org/gtk http://www.gnome.org -mogul
\_ Is gtk like tk? Does gtk interface to tcl? What are
the benefits of using gtk instead of tcl? I checked teh
gtk FAQ, but apparently these questions are not frequently
asked. Thanks. -emin
\_ yes gtk is just like tk. in fact the 'g' in gtk simply
means 'graphical'.
\_ What do you mean? Tk is a graphical toolkit. How
is gtk different, and what advantages does it have
over tk? I think tk is pretty cool and unless there
is an advantage in using gtk I would rather stick
with a tested, trusted, well-supported package like tk.
--emin
\_ YOU SHOULD USE GTK INSTEAD OF TK BECAUSE GTK IS WAY KEWL
AND IT USES THE GNU PUBLIC LICENSE SO ITS REALLY FREE,
FREE, FREE SOFTWARE THE WAY THAT LINUS AND RMS AND GOD
INTENDED, NOT LIKE TK THAT USES THE EVIL BEREKELEY-STYLE
LICENSE THAT WOULD LET PEOPLE WRITE SOFTWARE IN TCL AND
THEN SELL IT FOR MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!1 FREE FREE FREE
SOFTWARE RULES, DOWN WITH ALL NOT-COMPLETELY-FREE SOFTWARE
CONSPIRACIES. THANK YOU.
\_ YEA! FUK ENE1 THT WANTZ 2 MAIK MUNEY FRUM THEYRE
WERK!!@!!!11
\_ I thought the GPL only requires source release. It
doesn't forbid commercial use, per se. Just that the
bastard capitalist coders can't tolerate having
the public see how bad their code really is.
\_ Xlib is lower-level, and would require more work to get anything
good-looking or useful. If you're the type that would write
something in assembly for performance, then program away in Xlib!
If you want ease of coding, use a toolkit library.
\_ I tried to get an O'Rielly book but I'm not sure which one
to start out with. There's a whole series of X books.
\_ "O'Reilly". (if you can't remember that, just say "ORA") |
| 1998/6/5 [Computer/SW/Languages/Tcl] UID:14179 Activity:nil |
6/5 Do GUIs made with Tcl/Tk stand alone or do they use an
interpreter? Thanks.
\_ Yes. (You can compile them into standalone binaries or run
them as scripts via an interpreter, depending on whether
or not you care about portability.) |
| 1995/3/4 [Computer/SW/Languages/Tcl] UID:31779 Activity:nil |
3/5 For those of you who went to the Tcl/Tk help session on
Wednesday and who like scheme, I translated the demo Tcl
script Sam wrote into STk and placed it in ~josh/xrl.stk
STk is a scheme interpreter with a string-based (and a
not-so-complete object-based) interface to Tk. -josh |
| 1993/10/11 [Computer/SW/Languages/Tcl] UID:31422 Activity:nil |
10/8 waaaaaah! ouster is leaving! *sniff!*
\_ complete details posted to ucb.cs.grads
\_ One of the few great professors I've run into at Berkeley. I
for one will regard this as a loss...sigh.
\_ hey! why don't da CSUA organize a wake/roast/goodbye-party
for the great Ousterhout?
\_ So what will happen to Tcl/Tk??? - achoi
\_ Microsoft will buy it and hack to shreds and sell it
as "Visual TCL" for an exorbiant amount of money. |
| 5/17 |