[Fri Aug 19 16:53:18 2022] index.cgi: CGI::param called in list context from /home/kevin/sites/csua.com/PRODUCTION/index.cgi line 78, this can lead to vulnerabilities. See the warning in "Fetching the value or values of a single named parameter" at /usr/share/perl5/CGI.pm line 415. Entry 54685 (Berkeley CSUA MOTD)
Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 54685
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
2022/08/19 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular

2013/6/3-7/23 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54685 Activity:nil
6/3     Why are "real estate" and "real property" called so?  Does the part
        "real" mean something like "not fake"?
        \- without going into a long discourse into common law,
           it is to distinguish land/fixed property from intangible
           property [like a patent] and movable, personal property,
           like your car. Real property has historically had special
           rules, like needed written contract to sell/xfer.
           Somewhat curiously, tangible/"movable" property
           is also called "chattels", however you may get some
           odd looks if you use that word ... but that word doesnt
           just apply to cows. There is a lot of detail in this
           book, ... like "what is the difference between disseisin
           and novel disseisin" ... however it may be OOP:
           See also "actual malice".
           \- BTW, one of the primary reason for the distinction between
              real/personal property, is that until the mid-16th cent, real
              property *could not be handed down in a will*, while
              personal property could be. This was partially solved
              by something called "livery of seisin", which had it's own
              problems, until eventually addressed by the Statue of Wills
              under Henry VIII ... something you probably didnt learn
              watching THE TUDORS. (again, I'm speaking of england, which
              is most relevant to the US. And the only area I am familiar
          \_ Is your wife still considered chattel property?
             \_ Not in California.
                \_ How about in Texas?
2022/08/19 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/8/1-10/28 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54722 Activity:nil
8/1     Suppose your house is already paid off and you retire at 65.
        How much expense does one expect to spend a year, in the Bay
        Area? Property tax will be about $10K/year for a modest $850K
        home. What about other stuff?
        \_ I think at age 65, health insurance is the next biggest expense.
        \_ I am thinking that we can have a nice middle class
2013/3/11-4/16 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54622 Activity:nil
3/10    I'm trying to help my parents, in their mortgage there's an
        "escrow" amount. What exactly is this? From reading Google,
        the loan company uses the escrow account to pay for home
        insurance, but they've been paying home insurance themselves.
        I'm really confused on what this fee is.
        \_ Without an escrow account, you write checks to your insurance
2011/12/15-2012/2/6 [Reference/RealEstate, Industry/Jobs] UID:54260 Activity:nil
12/15   Does anyone have experience investing in apartment buildings
        I'm not really looking to invest, but I want an apartment
        to live in, and I'm not happy with the leases I'm encountering
        for instance one requires 2 years of tax returns with the
        application. I'm in a position to buy a building, but I've
        got no experience with this, and I don't want to learn that
2011/10/10-25 [Reference/Tax] UID:54192 Activity:nil
10/10   My property tax breakdown is this in the LA county, how about yours?
        General tax levy all agencies: 1.000000
        City-Los Angeles                .038895
        Metro water dist:               .003700
        Commnty college:                .040310
        Unified schools:                .186954
2010/8/23-9/7 [Reference/Tax, Politics/Domestic/California/Prop] UID:53934 Activity:nil
9/19    http://www.latimes.com/news/local/bell/la-me-city-property-tax-table,0,5895218.htmlstory
        Poor cities pay more % of prop tax than wealthy cities.
        Compton pays 1.5% prop tax.
        \_ poor people also pay more for groceries. and taxes and in general
           everything.  It's why rich people stay rich.  I love $2 country
           club burgers!
Cache (3425 bytes)
edu Format:Paperback Mr Rembar has created, if you can believe it, an engaging history of the Anglo-American legal system. He has done a superlative job of making the development of writs and other legal tools of the legal system we know today into a highly readable text which will appeal to those outside of the profession, as well as to practitioners. Using the last known duel to occur in the United States, Mr Rembar develops the concept of trial by battle into an explication of how our legal system came to be as it is. He shows how and why this archaic legal concept has fallen into disfavor and explains why the paradigm shifts have occured. His use of the reign of Henry II of England as an exemplar of legal innovation is entralling and gives a new insight into the lives and processes that stood at the inception of our law courts and all their minions. This book is currently my top recommendation to anyone who reads history for pleasure. Former Rater Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase Attorney Rembar is the counsel who successfully defended (mildly erotic by today's standards) literature before the Supreme Court. This work is a fascinating study of the history of law and a fine advocate's perspective of the western legal tradition from its British origins through modern statutory and regulatory systems. Rembar then uses a Zen-like analysis of the man and tiger as the introduction to his unique perspective on the evolution and application of the law. A fine, fine effort from the author of The Death of Obscenity. Acute Observer Format:Paperback Charles Rembar is the lawyer who successfully defended the publication of books that had been called obscene. He later wrote a book on these trials which won acclaim in New York and London. This book traces the growth of our legal system since Medieval times and contrasts it to the Civil Law used in Europe and other countries. The jury trial and cross-examination of witnesses are the prime differences of our Common Law. This book is divided into subjects, it does not proceed in historical order. It can be entertaining and educational, but often seems tedious. Rembar points out how the legal system has evolved over the centuries, things that are taken for granted today may only be one or two centuries old. Surely the Black Death of the 14th century must have had an effect on the laws? Before the Civil War only those corporations that served a public utility (water supplies, canals, and railroads) were given the privilege of limited liability. Afterwards this privilege was extended to companies and damaged many small businesses. Gerry Spence has pointed out how a trial lawyer is the common person's sole champion against the injuries of corporations. The corporate media attacks lawyers with stories designed to demean and deride lawyers (but not the corporate lawyers). One such attack is to argue against contingency fees, which would prevent many people from recovering damages for any personal injury. You can't depend on good will or laws unless someone has an interest in enforcing the laws (class action suits). The chapters on "Evidence" and "The Rights of the Accused" seem like the most relevant to a general audience. It basically forbids torture to get a suspect to confess. The Third Amendment prevents political oppression by any invasion of privacy. The 'Acknowledgment' lists the works of legal history found notable.