7/26 motd: I'm back. what did i miss?
\_ Not much, how long were you gone?
\_ over the last ~7 years I've gone from checking many times
a day to checking once per year. where are the following
people? tom, psb, danh, kchang, mconst, jon, alexf, dbushong,
sky, kinney, ranga, paolo
\_ Who is this? I know where some of these people are, some
even still use soda occasionally. -ausman
\_ soo, people don't use motd tracking scripts anymore
to identify post authors? dang
\_ Hello. I'm the author of http://csua.com archiver. I haven't
used motd as my primary form of Q-and-A for many years because
I see social networking alternatives (e.g. Quora, Google Circle)
as [more refined] superset of motd. They are missing threading
and anon posting, but other than that, I don't see how motd
can be sustainable given the sharp decline of shell users. In
a way, motd is dead, but the spirit of motd lives on forever
in the form of social networking. -kchang
\_ but motd had value beyond and in a different way than, say,
google+ or other "social networking". we have to bring it
back from the dead. how?
\_ we "have to"? we "must"? why? -kchang
\_ because motd is unique and valuable and awesome and
it shouldn't die
\_ because the motd is (was) awesome
\_ How did it arise in the first place? If you can get users
to provide compelling content and then invite more people,
then you can get it going again. I find the motd to be a
useful diversion, the quality of the posts is pretty high
for a anonymous system and it is very easy to use from work.
So go invite some of the old users to come back again, do
you need help tracking them down?
\_ yes. bring them back. maybe we could try by insulting
tom or psb and bringing them back. although I
a problem i suspect is that the system seems pretty
slow and maybe not capable of handling many
simultaneous users or something?
\_ worksforme
\_ who is deleting this thread and why? |