[Fri Aug 19 18:00:08 2022] index.cgi: CGI::param called in list context from /home/kevin/sites/csua.com/PRODUCTION/index.cgi line 78, this can lead to vulnerabilities. See the warning in "Fetching the value or values of a single named parameter" at /usr/share/perl5/CGI.pm line 415. Entry 53845 (Berkeley CSUA MOTD)
Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 53845
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
2022/08/19 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular

2010/5/26-6/30 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China] UID:53845 Activity:nil
5/26    "China could join moves to sanction North Korea"
        How did Hillary manage to do that when we're also asking China to
        concede on the economic front at the same time?
         \_ China doesn't want NK to implode. NK is a buffer between SK and
            China, or in other words a large buffer between a strong US ally and
            China. As a matter of national security, they don't want to see
            Korea's unification happen, because it would put them in a situation
            where US troops would be stationed at the border with China.
            Furthermore, the occupation of NK by SK would likely result in a
            large number of NK refugees in China, which, as an ally of NK, they
            would be obligated to host, but which would cause socioeconomic
            problems. It's in their interest for NK to remain as it is, a buffer
            state between SK and China, even if that means cooperating with the
            US for now; it serves their needs. The real danger is the
            possibility of NK's internal power structure destabilizing and
            causing unpredictable behavior. Until now, NK has managed to survive
            by predictably backing off its threats when the US pays it money to
            stop being a pain in the ass.  Obama has broken this cycle of paying
            off NK, which may be causing internal turmoil.
            \_ Actually, SK has usually been the one paying off NK, not the US.
               So, I would say Prez. Lee had more to do with this than Obama.
               Especially since Bush was really the one that broke the cycle
               by insisting on the 6-party talks.  Bush wussed out a bit near
               the end because he was desperate for a diplomatic victory. I'm
               glad Obama has turned the pressure back up, but credit where
               credit is due.
        \_ It is called diplomacy. I know it has been a long time since we
           had anything other than a bully and a moron as President, but
           other tactics work better.
           \_ facepalm.
              \_ http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Mission_Accomplished
2022/08/19 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular

You may also be interested in these entries...
2014/1/2-2/5 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China, Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:54761 Activity:nil
1/2     "What would a U.S.-China war look like?"
        http://www.csua.org/u/122i (theweek.com)
2014/1/7-2/5 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China, Reference/Religion] UID:54762 Activity:nil
1/7     Are you from a family of Mormons, Cuban exiles, Nigerian Americans,
        Indian Americans, Chinese Americans, American Jews, Iranian Americans
        or Lebanese Americans?
        http://www.csua.org/u/123d (shine.yahoo.com)
        \_ Somehow she misssed WASP Episcopalians.
2013/3/13-5/10 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China] UID:54625 Activity:nil
3/13    "China's Drone Swarms Rise to Challenge US Power"
        http://www.csua.org/u/zgz (news.yahoo.com)
        Before our drones dominate the sky, we are already losing dominance.
2013/3/28-5/10 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China, Computer/Rants] UID:54641 Activity:nil
3/28    "Horrifying Video From China Shows Just How Suddenly A Sinkhole Can
        Appear"  http://www.csua.org/u/znh (http://www.businessinsider.com
2013/2/5-3/4 [Politics/Domestic/Immigration] UID:54598 Activity:nil
2/5     http://www.csua.org/u/z5u (news.yahoo.com)
        "I hope no one uses the term 'illegal immigrants' here today," said
        Committee Ranking Member John Conyers of Michigan. "Our citizens are
        not illeg -- the people in this country are not illegal. They are out
        of status."
        How did this guy get himself on the House Judiciary Committee?  Is it
2012/12/5-18 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:54548 Activity:nil
12/5    Romney is right after all -- our military does need more horses and
        bayonets!  http://www.csua.org/u/y3j  Romney for 2012!
        \_ I'd never considered Romney's campaign as an ad for Revolution,
           but I guess that makes as much sense anything else.
        \_ The tax cut removal is ill timed.
        \_ holy crap. This is scary. US troops are most vulnerable as it is
2012/7/25-10/17 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/Japan, Reference/History/WW2/Japan] UID:54444 Activity:nil
7/25    http://www.quora.com/Japan/What-facts-about-Japan-do-foreigners-not-believe-until-they-come-to-Japan
        Japan rules!
        \_ Fifteen years ago I worked there for seven months.  I miss Japan!
           (I'm Chinese immigrant.)  More facts:
           - Besides cold drinks, vending machines also carry hot drinks like
             hot tea and corn soup.  And they are actually hot instead of warm.
2012/3/2-26 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China] UID:54325 Activity:nil
3/2     I just came back from Asia and I'm completely convinced that
        it is where economic boom will really happen in the next decade.
        What's a good web site to learn Chinese?
2011/12/2-2012/2/6 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China] UID:54247 Activity:nil
12/2    "Students Uncover China Nuke Tunnels"
        http://www.csua.org/u/uv7 (news.yahoo.com)
        ~3000 miles of tunnel network.
        \_ WaPo article on same:
2011/12/20-2012/2/6 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China, Computer/Rants] UID:54268 Activity:nil
12/20   A higher percentage of people in China than in Pakintan have an
        unfavorable view of China:
        Go figure.
        \_ damn these self critical liberals!
Cache (6439 bytes)
Hillary Rodham Clinton AP - US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks during a press conference with South Korean Foreign ... By MATTHEW LEE, Associated Press Writer Matthew Lee, Associated Press Writer - 44 mins ago ELMENDORF AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska - China has signaled it could soon join the US and its allies in blaming North Korea in the sinking of a South Korean warship, senior American officials said Wednesday. Speaking after strategic talks this week in Beijing, the US officials said China indicated it is prepared to hold North Korea accountable for the March 26 torpedo attack and could join in some kind of formal rebuke by the UN Security Council. The move would represent a breakthrough for the White House, because so far China has resisted condemning North Korea for the incident, which cost the lives of 46 South Korean sailors. China has long been North Korea's patron and ally, propping up Pyongyang's Stalinist-style regime with financial and military aid as well as diplomatic support. On a visit to South Korea this weekend, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao is likely to express regret for the deaths and hint that China will accept the results of an international investigation blaming North Korea, the US officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the discussions with China. Wen is also expected to leave open the possibility of backing action against Pyongyang at the UN Security Council, although it's not clear how far Beijing is prepared to go in rebuking its historic ally. In Seoul earlier Wednesday, US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the world must respond to the "unacceptable provocation" represented by the sinking of a South Korean warship, as Pyongyang engaged in blistering rhetoric against Seoul and Washington. Clinton told reporters after talks with South Korean leaders that "the international community has a responsibility and a duty to respond" to the sinking, which "requires a strong but measured response." She spoke at a joint news conference with South Korean Foreign Minister Yu Myung-hwan. Clinton did not say what that response should be, but two US officials said the UN could take a variety of actions, ranging from tightening sanctions to a statement rebuking Pyongyang. As one of five permanent members of the Security Council with veto authority, China can block any measure the UN tries to take. Clinton spent hours discussing the sinking with top Chinese leaders during strategic and economic talks in Beijing on Sunday, Monday and Tuesday, before spending a few hours in Seoul Wednesday. "I believe that the Chinese understand the seriousness of this issue and are willing to listen to the concerns expressed by both South Korea and the United States," she said in South Korea. "We expect to be working with China as we move forward in fashioning a response." Tensions on the divided Korean peninsula have risen sharply since international investigators issued a report last week saying a North Korean submarine was likely responsible for the sinking of the Cheonan, a corvette patrolling the Yellow Sea. South Korea began implementing a package of punitive measures against the North on Tuesday -- ranging from slashing trade, resuming propaganda warfare and barring the North's cargo ships. After meeting with South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, Clinton endorsed the moves. "We're very confident in the South Korean leadership, and their decision about how and when to move forward is one that we respect and will support," she said. She praised the investigation of the sinking as "very thorough, highly professional" and "very convincing." She said both the United States and South Korea had offered China "additional information and briefings about the underlying facts of that event." "We hope that China will take us up on our offer to really understand the details of what happened and the objectivity of the investigation that led to the conclusions," she said. China is not the only potential roadblock the US and its allies face when it comes to pushing a tough response through the UN Security Council. Russia is another of the veto-holding permanent council members and must also be persuaded to take action. The Kremlin said in a statement Wednesday that President Dmitry Medvedev has sent a group of experts to Seoul to study the international investigation's findings. "Medvedev considers it a matter of principle to establish the reason for the sinking of the ship," the statement said. South Korea's Yu, asked about the possibility of China or Russia blocking action by the UN Security Council, said they "will take time, I'm sure, but they will not be able to deny the facts." Report Abuse Armed conflict is so likely it's incredible. SKorea isn't going to roll over this time, NKorea is going to shoot the propaganda speakers that SKorea is putting up, and when that turns into a firefight NKorea will use it as an excuse to mount their full scale war which, according to previous NKorean statements from January last year and in 2003, means nukes. NKorea is getting its military ready and is spewing the most specific threats they've made in a while (a sign that they will be fulfilled). Armed conflict won't be pretty, unless you like blinding fireballs. Their missiles designed to hit the United States will be armed and ready and we'll be seeing massive casualties in SKorea, Japan, Hawaii, and Western United States. Both sides are ready, and there's nothing to stop them from starting a full-scale war other than the tiny chance that one side will roll over in subservience to the other. Report Abuse Seriously, if the world has to act on every military conflict near the border, the US should now be sanctioned at least a dozen times...... all the "friendly fires" on the Canadian troops, "accident" about bombing the Chinese embassy, more accidents on the reporter in the hotel of Iraq, the recent video-game style shooting of civilians from the helicopter..... the list is pretty long IMHO Comment hidden due to low rating. They will tell North Korea that the UN is very angry with them, in fact, they will be so pissed off that they will write a angry letter to Kim Jong il and tell him how angry they are with him. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.
Cache (1427 bytes)
It was the first time a sitting president arrived on the deck of an aircraft carrier by plane. Once on board, Bush made a prime time address from the flight deck, surrounded by hundreds of sailors and backed by a banner reading "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED". He then delivered a short speech, saying: "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed. After service in the Afghan--and Iraqi theaters of war--after 100,000 miles, on the longest carrier deployment in recent history, you are homeward bound." photo opportunity designed to benefit his political campaign; the banner was made by a private vendor at the request of the White House, and put up on the Abraham Lincoln's tower by the crew. The White House, after coming under mounting criticism, blamed the message on the sailors, saying they had created the banner, and it was several months before the White House admitted it had the banner made and offered it to the Abraham Lincoln. As combat in Iraq continued and insurgent attacks rose, the banner came to be an embarrassment for Bush. In addition to the banner, use of a jet rather than a helicopter was the subject of controversy. Although the original rationale offered up by the White House for using the jet was that Abraham Lincoln would be too far offshore for the usual helicopter arrival, the ship was well within range by the day of the event.