Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 52772
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

2009/3/30-4/3 [Computer/HW/Memory, Computer/HW/Drives] UID:52772 Activity:nil
3/30    CF/SD Disk database:
        http://robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2012/12/18-2013/1/24 [Computer/SW/Languages/Perl] UID:54561 Activity:nil
12/18   Happy 25th birthday Perl, and FUCK YOU Larry Wall for fucking up
        the computer science formalism that sets back compilers development
        back for at least a decade:
        http://techcrunch.com/2012/12/18/print-happy-25th-birthday-perl
        \_ I tried to learn Perl but was scared away by it.  Maybe scripting
           lanauages have to be like that in order to work well?
	...
2012/2/5-3/26 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:54300 Activity:nil
2/5     How is Firefox on version 10, while I still have 3.6 installed.
        I wait for the X.1 versions and they never come out.
        \_ I'm also on 3.6.26.  It claims that versions 4 - 10 are all faster
           than 3.6.x, but do they use more memory?  Thx.
           \_ Newer Firefox versions use less memory too:
              http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/mozillas_memshrink_program_brings_big_memory_savings_firefox_7
	...
2011/6/5-8/27 [Computer/HW/Memory] UID:54127 Activity:nil
6/5     In an effort to stabilize our services, we'll be rebuilding parts of
        the CSUA infrastructure over the course of this summer.  To give us
        some wiggle room, I've temporarily decreased soda's allocated RAM from
        8GB to 2GB.  If you need to run something that requires large amounts
        of memory, please send mail to root@csua.org and we'll try to
        accommodate your request.  --jordan
	...
2011/3/26-4/20 [Computer/HW/Memory] UID:54062 Activity:nil
3/19    When you're explaining the stack to people do you draw it with the
        highest addresses at the top or at the bottom?
        \_ When I explain any memory layout including stacks, I draw with the
           highest addresses at the bottom.  But I've seen people doing the
           other way.  -- yuen
           \_ do you by any chance have seen or have a jpg of the full memory
	...
2010/7/25-8/25 [Computer/SW/Graphics] UID:53897 Activity:nil
7/25    What's up with that moving bit pattern that Win7 displays when it
        boots up?  (It's the one that's like in the Apple II days when you
        use the graphics memory for code or data while it's still in HGR
        mode.)  Is there a way to disable that?  It slows things down a lot
        every time I reboot my Win7 VM on my office machine if I RDP to the
        machine via DSL.  Thanks in advance.
	...
2010/5/26-6/30 [Computer/SW/Unix/WindowManager, Computer/SW/OS/OsX] UID:53844 Activity:nil
5/26    anyone use lxde?  supposedly it is less stupid than xfce and
        less bloated than gnome.  thoughts?
        \_ lol, does anyone still use desktop linux?  Get with the times
           buy a mac.  Now.  DO IT.  Go NOW.
           \_ but we prefer herring to Kool-Aid
              \_ "you have to yell, he's hard of herring"
	...
2010/6/4-30 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus] UID:53849 Activity:nil
6/4     Is this valid C++ code?
        std::string getStr(void) {
            std::string str("foo");
            return str;
        }
        void foo(char *s);
	...
2009/12/7-2010/1/3 [Computer/HW/Memory, Computer/HW] UID:53574 Activity:nil
12/7    How many TCP retransmits are too many? Here is what I get:
            3594143433 segments received
            3760174421 segments send out
            3801829561 segments retransmited
        \_ rephrase. you can never have too much money. or too little.
           what is, is.
	...
2009/10/27-11/3 [Computer/HW/Drives] UID:53474 Activity:nil
10/27   I just read an article that Facebook had moved their database
        to all SSD to speed throughput, but now I can't find it. Has
        anyone else seen this? Any experience with doing this? -ausman
        \_ I hope you're not running mission critical data:
           http://ask.slashdot.org/story/09/10/27/1559248/Reliability-of-PC-Flash-SSDs?from=rss
        \_ Do you have any idea how much storage space is used by Facebook,
	...
2009/7/21-24 [Computer/SW/Languages/Java] UID:53168 Activity:moderate
7/20    For those who care btw, it looks like eclipse is now A Standard Tool
        at UCB ugrad cs, probably replaced emacs.  Furthermore, people get
        angry at seeing Makefiles, (since eclispe takes care of that).  I
        guess it's just a sign of the times.
        \_ The more people at my work use eclipse the less the code is
           managable in emacs.  I'm not sure which application's fault
	...
2012/1/4-2/6 [Computer/HW/Drives] UID:54281 Activity:nil
1/4     I want to test how my servers behave during a disk failure and
        a RAID reconstruction so I want to simulate a hardware failure.
        How can I do this in Linux without having to physically pull
        a drive? These disks are behind a RAID card and run Linux. -ausman
        \_ According to the Linux RAID wiki, you might be able to use mdadm
           to do this with something like the following:
	...
2011/9/14-10/25 [Computer/HW/Drives] UID:54173 Activity:nil
9/13    Thanks to Jordan, our disk server is no longer virtualized. Our long
        nightmare of poor IO performance should hopefully be over. Prepare for
        another long nightmare of poor hardware reliability!
        ...
        Just kidding! (I hope)
        In any case, this means that cooler was taken out back and shot, and
	...
2011/2/14-4/20 [Computer/SW/Unix] UID:54039 Activity:nil
2/14    You sure soda isn't running windows in disguise?  It would explain the
        uptimes.
        \_ hardly, My winbox stays up longer.
        \_ Nobody cares about uptime anymore brother, that's what web2.0 has
           taught us.  Everything is "stateless".
           \_ You;d think gamers would care more about uptime.
	...
2010/7/22-8/9 [Computer/SW/OS/FreeBSD, Computer/HW/Drives] UID:53893 Activity:nil
7/22    Playing with dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/<disk> on linux and bsd:
        2 questions, on linux when <disk>==hda it always gives me this off
        by one report i.e. Records out == records in-1 and says there is an
        error. Has anyone else seen this?  Second, when trying to repeat this
        on bsd, <disk>==rwd0 now, to my surprise, using the install disk and
        selecting (S)hell, when I try to dd a 40 gig disk it says "409 records
	...
2009/8/4-13 [Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:53239 Activity:kinda low
8/3     VMWare + Windows XP + Validation question. I need to test stuff with
        Service Pack 3 installed. I have a valid key that I own (yeah yeah I
        actually *bought* a copy, please don't flame me for supporting evil
        M$). Is it possible to register the key once, and then duplicate it
        for testing purposes?  Will Windows or Microsoft detect copies and
        disable the rest the copies?
	...
2009/7/28-8/6 [Computer/HW/Drives] UID:53216 Activity:nil
7/28    Does it make sense to defragment disks on VMWare? My 80GB disk
        on VMWare isn't really using 80GB, it just uses what it needs.
        Will defragment do anything to it?
        \_ If you want to speed up disk operation in your VM, it's best to
           defragment the disks in your VM, then defragment the disk on your
           host machine where the VM files are.
	...
2009/7/24-27 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers, Computer/SW/OS/OsX] UID:53191 Activity:kinda low
7/24    Firefox 3.5.1 on MacOS is a piece of crap. It crashes ALL THE TIME.
        It has crashed 3 or 4 times on me in the last hour, and not on
        the same pages either. The new Yahoo! home page also sucks ass.
        \_ os x keeps trashing my raid disk: '11 hours to rebuild. have fun
           with the kernel IO subsystem running like shit until then".
           Worthless piece of shit.
	...
2009/7/17-24 [Computer/SW/OS/OsX] UID:53156 Activity:kinda low
7/17    -rw-r--r--@
        What does the "at sign" mean? This is on Mac OS. VMWare disk file.
        \_ The file has metadata attributes
           \_ How do I add/delete attributes to files? What about
              -rw-r--r--+ <-- what is the "+" sign? Also how do you make
              tar preserve these attributes?
	...
Cache (8192 bytes)
robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007
The CF/SD Performance Database is a regularly-updated compilation of write and read speed test results designed to aid the serious and professional photographer in selecting camera storage media for a Canon or Nikon digital SLR. Write speed test results for each of the digital SLR models actively being tested, as well as card-to-computer transfer rates, can be accessed from the popup menu above. Defining performance A memory card is a critical component in the professional photographer's digital system. We hope that the CF/SD Performance Database will, first and foremost, enable you to determine which cards offer the speed your workflow requires. But we encourage you to look at card performance holistically. While speed is important, so is the warranty, tech support and reputation of the company whose name is on the label. Though you may have come to this database to see how CompactFlash and SD/SDHC cards perform in your camera, we think it's equally important these days to consider card-to-computer transfer rates. That's because in our own workflow, the time it takes for photos to transfer to the computer is often a bigger bottleneck that in-camera write speed. As both cards and card readers get faster, we expect that card-to-computer transfer speed will become even more significant a factor in the card selection process. An introduction to CompactFlash and SD/SDHC technology There are two sizes of CompactFlash. CompactFlash Type I (right) All of the CompactFlash-capable cameras in the database accept both CFI and CFII. SD is short for Secure Digital, and there are two variants of it on the market: SD and SDHC (Secure Digital High Capacity). The differences between the two are on the inside, as they are the same physical size and have the same connector arrangement. SD cards are limited to a maximum capacity of 2GB (there are a handful of 4GB SD cards out there, but they don't work in all cameras and card readers), while SDHC cards, as defined in the current specification, top out at 32GB (the maximum theoretical limit is 2048GB). Older SD-capable cameras and card readers that shipped before the advent of SDHC will not be compatible with SDHC, unless the manufacturer released a firmware update to introduce SDHC compatibility. Newer gear that supports SDHC is backwards-compatible with SD. The Nikon D50 is the only SD-capable camera in the database that isn't compatible with SDHC. Though there are a myriad of brands on the market, most larger-capacity CompactFlash and Secure Digital flash memory cards contain controllers from SanDisk, Lexar and a number of lesser known electronics companies: Hyperstone, KTC, Skymedi and SMI, to name a few. Flash memory cards contain, in addition to a controller, several flash memory chips. Toshiba, SanDisk and Samsung are among the biggest flash memory chip suppliers (Toshiba and SanDisk are also partners in the manufacture of flash memory). Almost all the companies included in the database purchase flash from one or more of these companies (or use their own if they're an industry heavyweight like SanDisk), for inclusion in their products. The controller and the flash memory together determine the raw performance of the card. In 2008, the NAND-type flash memory used in CompactFlash and SD/SDHC is fast, really fast; it's the controller currently that has the biggest impact on card throughput. We compete with semiconductor companies that manufacture and sell flash memory chips or flash memory cards. These include Hynix, Infineon, Micron, Renesas, Samsung, SanDisk, ST Micro and Toshiba. Micron and Intel have recently formed a joint venture known as Intel Micron Flash Technologies. SanDisk and Toshiba jointly develop and manufacture both low-cost and high-performance flash memory through their Flash Vision joint venture. We also face significant competition from manufacturers or card assemblers and resellers that either resell flash cards purchased from others or assemble cards from controllers and flash memory chips purchased from companies such as Renesas, Samsung or Toshiba, into flash cards. These companies include Crucial, Dane-Elec, Delkin Devices, Feiya, Fuji, Hagiwara, Hama, Hewlett Packard, Data I/O, Infineon, Kingston, Kodak, M-Systems, Matsushita, Memorex, Memory Plus, Micron, PNY, PQI, Pretec, Ritek, Samsung, SanDisk, Silicon Storage Technology, SimpleTech, SMART Modular Technologies, Sony, TDK, Transcend, Viking InterWorks and many others. In addition, an increasing number of companies are manufacturing their own controllers, including Genesys, Hyperstone, Prolific, SanDisk, Sigmatel, Silicon Storage Technology, SMI, Solid State System, Sony and Zoran. Such companies either combine their controllers with flash memory from third parties to manufacture their own flash cards or sell their controllers to third parties who use them to assemble flash cards. Additionally, major semiconductor companies such as Infineon, Micron, Renesas, Samsung and Toshiba have also developed or are currently developing their own controllers that will likely compete with our controller and/or card sales. We also face competition from some manufacturers of traditional film products. Kodak and Fuji are the largest and best-known manufacturers of traditional film products. Fuji has entered the flash card market, but does not yet manufacture its own flash cards. In 2004, we entered into an agreement with Kodak to sell flash cards under the Kodak brand on a worldwide basis. Several companies, such as Cornice, IBM, and Matrix Semiconductor, which was acquired by SanDisk in 2005, have introduced competing technologies for use in digital cameras. These include products such as Digital Capture Technology and the MicroDrive. Technical background If a CompactFlash card is designed to hold data, then it's either a miniature hard drive or flash memory inside. Miniature hard drive cards have been around for a long time, at least in computer years: early digital field photographers (ie: those who were shooting digital in the early 90s) will remember the 85MB Maxtor PC Card hard drive as being THE card to get. Miniature hard drives operate much like their larger counterparts: to write a photo, a tiny arm swings over a rotating platter, encoding small areas on the platter with zeros and ones as it goes. Today, there are a handful of miniature hard drives in CompactFlash form, including the Hitachi Microdrive and Seagate's Photo Hard Drive, but they have now been surpassed in capacity, performance and price/GB by flash memory-based CompactFlash. Zeros and ones are stored in memory cells, instead of on a rotating platter. There is a key difference, however, between computer RAM and the memory chips used in digital camera cards: digital camera cards contain non-volatile RAM. That means photos aren't purged when the card is removed from the camera. Instead, memory cells remember if they contain zeros or ones until told otherwise. The greater the number of memory chips, and the more densely packed each memory chip, the greater the capacity of the card. Card capacities have been increasing as flash memory manufacturers have devised new ways to shrink memory chips. As of early 2008, 32GB CompactFlash cards were shipping, with SDHC cards of the same capacity expected to be released in the next few months. Both flash memory and rotating hard drive cards contain a controller. The controller determines how data is to be written to and read from the memory on the card. Whether a flash memory card or a card like the Hitachi Microdrive will be speedy or not with a given camera is determined as much as anything by the controller architecture. A card that is fastest with one camera isn't necessarily fastest with another, because of how the controller interacts with and exchanges data with the camera. The flash memory itself determines the maximum speed of flash memory cards, since no matter how efficient the camera-controller communication, data can't be transferred to the card any faster than the flash memory is capable of receiving it. Part of the price premium charged for certain fast flash memory cards reflects the extra cost of using the fastes...