Entry 52642 (Berkeley CSUA MOTD)

Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 52642

WIKI \| FAQ \| Tech FAQ
`http://csua.com/feed/`

2024/11/26 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular

11/26

2009/2/26-3/3 [Uncategorized] UID:52642 Activity:nil

2/26    Conservative magazines not for liberty:
        http://swopec.hhs.se/ratioi/abs/ratioi0131.htm
        \_ I'm shocked, shocked.
           \_ Enh, what are you going to do with liberty? hoard it? how's
              that going to help get us over  the Fiancial End Times?

Cache (1130 bytes)

swopec.hhs.se/ratioi/abs/ratioi0131.htmRatioinstitutet - The Ratio Institute Ratio Working Papers No 131: Conservative Magazines and the Presumption of Liberty: A Content Analysis on Sex, Gambling, and Drugs Daniel Klein () and Jason Briggeman () Abstract: Conservatives say they are for small government and individual liberty, but a content analysis of leading conservative magazines shows that most have preponderantly failed to take pro-liberty positions on sex, gambling, and drugs. Besides many anti-liberty commissions, the magazines may be criticized for anti-liberty omissionthat is, failing to oppose anti-liberty policies. Magazines investigated include National Review, The Weekly Standard, The American Enterprise, and The American Spectator. We find that National Review has had the strongest record on liberty on the issues treated, while the others have preponderantly failed to be pro-liberty or have even been anti-liberty. Ordering Working Papers Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Niclas Berggren () Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson () or Helena Lundin ().