Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 52575
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/04/05 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/5     

2009/2/14-18 [Reference/Tax] UID:52575 Activity:moderate
2/14    GOP votes against biggest tax cut in history, after voting repeatedly
        for Bush's tax cuts for the rich.  The campaign ads really write
        themselves.
        http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_02/016863.php
        \_ but welfare is Communism!                    -conservative
        \_ These "Tax cuts" were bundled with over $500B in spending, and
           they aren't tax cuts they are payments. Getting the payment has
           nothing to do with paying taxes.  You can pay negative taxes
           and still get a payment.  Let's just be honest.
           \_ Does anyone actually pay negative taxes, including payroll
              and sales tax? Let's just be honest.
              \_ I believe so, I have a brother in law that makes ~22k,
                 had 2100 and change withheld and is getting back 7400 and
                 change. 7.650% SSI + medicare is 1683. 7400 - 3783 = 3617.
                 So yes people pay negative tax, but I can't tell you how
                 many.
                 \_ Wait, getting your withholding back counts as negative
                    taxes?
                    \_ Math is hard.
                       \_ So are details, apparently. Has your b-i-l received
                          a check on this? Who's paying him, the IRS? Is he
                          getting a deduction or a check?
        \_ I think the current tax system is way to complicated, and full
           of social engineering.  However, would it make sense to give a
           tax cut by say raising the brackets for 2008?  That seems like
           a tax cut than giving everyone $600 or whatever it is.
2025/04/05 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/5     

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/9/2-11/7 [Reference/Tax] UID:54736 Activity:nil
9/2     I'm young, and stupid. Does the IRS want reporting on 401K, IRA,
        Roth 401k/IRA? I am decades from retiring, and no plan to withdraw
        anything. But, I just realized that I haven't reported any of my
        retirement plans to IRS for several years, now wondering if I'm
        in big shit...
        \_ The account custodian (bank/brokerage/mutual fund) reports it to
	...
2012/11/5-12/4 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Reference/Tax] UID:54521 Activity:nil
11/5    "Tax Policy Center in Spotlight for Its Romney Study":
        http://www.csua.org/u/y7m (finance.yahoo.com)
        'A small nonpartisan research center operated by professed "geeks" ...
        found, in short, that Mr. Romney could not keep all of the promises he
        had made on individual tax reform ....  It concluded that Mr. Romney's
        plan, on its face, would cut taxes for rich families and raise them
	...
2012/3/5-26 [Reference/Tax] UID:54327 Activity:nil
3/5     My dad is retired and has no income. My income tax bracket is
        pretty high. If I open up a joint high interest CD account with
        him and the INT-1099 comes, is it possible to file it under him
        100% to take advantage of the lower tax?
        \_ IRS says the interest is allocated according to who allocated
           the assets. Do you think it will generate enough interest to
	...
2012/3/7-26 [Reference/Tax] UID:54331 Activity:nil
3/7     "Michigan woman still collecting food stamps after winning $1 million
        lottery"
        http://www.csua.org/u/vp3 (news.yahoo.com)
        `"I feel that it's OK because I mean, I have no income and I have
        bills to pay," she said. "I have two houses."'
        \_ My first reaction was pretty hostile to her, but then, I
	...
2011/4/17-7/30 [Politics/Domestic/California, Reference/Tax] UID:54087 Activity:nil
4/17    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_no_taxes
        "The super rich pay a lot less taxes than they did a couple of decades
        ago, and nearly half of U.S. households pay no income taxes at all."
        And people are still complaining about taxes being too high.
        \_ yeah but only 3 out of the 5 people who aren't rich but complain
           are actually counted.
	...
Cache (8192 bytes)
www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_02/016863.php
bigger than the tax cuts offered by Reagan, Kennedy or others. Now, perhaps some new analysis will show that the tax cuts end up not quite being the largest in history by this measure or that. I'm ducking the debate on whether this is economically a good or bad -- but surely it ought to be a big story. Waldman also notes that this is also an example of a liberal Democrat delivering early on a tax cut he promised during the campaign, a pledge "few Republican thought he'd keep." What's more, let's also not forget that Obama's tax-cut plan in the recovery package is not only arguably bigger than previous cuts, but also better targeted. George W Bush's tax cuts were long-term income-tax rate cuts, which amounted to a generous break for those at the top, since the wealthy pay most income taxes. Obama's tax cuts, meanwhile, are short-term refunds paid directly to working and middle class families (some of which Republicans have denounced as "welfare"). As such, GOP lawmakers are going to reject one of the largest, if not the largest, tax cut ever proposed by a president -- which just so happens to be targeted at the working and middle class families Obama vowed to look out for. When the economy recovers, I suspect many on the right will argue, "Obama's policy only worked because he passed a quarter-trillion dollars in tax breaks." But how will those same conservatives respond when it's noted that Republicans stood up to oppose one of the biggest tax-cut plans in American history? President Obama waxing philosophical in his recent press conference: I suppose what I could have done is started off with no tax cuts, knowing that I was going to want some, and then let them take credit for all of them. PERMALINK What makes you think anyone will remember or believe that Republicans opposed this tax cut? They will revise history, deny and accuse anyone who says otherwise of lying - same old, same old - some things never change, even if we Dems want to believe in CHANGE. PERMALINK Remember how the money wasn't going to create any jobs? Jeff Sessions has just discovered that the construction spending in the bill will create 1-2 million jobs. Because with construction jobs there is the potential of hiring illegal aliens. He makes the admission of jobs because he wants to force a provision that employers use e-check, which verifies SSN. PERMALINK I suppose what I could have done is started off with no tax cuts, knowing that I was going to want some, and then let them take credit for all of them. Surely he knew Republicans would have never pushed for the same tax cuts. In fact a few minutes ago, someone from Cato Institute was on MSNBC saying the only tax cuts that will stimulate the economy are marginal tax cuts. PERMALINK The points you make are linked together, you know. The reason the Republicans don't like these tax cuts is *because* they are targetted at middle-to-low class people. Republicans only get excited over tax cuts for the *rich*. Silly because you seem to think that the voters remember things like "voted for" or "voted against" in detail. Furthermore, the Republicans will simply say that *every body knows that Republicans are for lower taxes but these weren't really lower taxes* or, alternatively, that these "lower taxes" were going to happen anyway but are horrendously offset with the higher deficit spending. There's no single, linear, narrative that the Republicans have to hew to on this one. And, as has been amply demonstrated over the last eight years, the high brand definition of the Republican party generally allows them to skate right past little inconsistencies. This is the same thing that allows them to claim George Bush as a conservative when it seems good to them (and vote for his deficit spending) and then disavow him as "n ot really a conservative" when deficits become a rhetorical and political problem for them. PERMALINK George W Bush's tax cuts were long-term income-tax rate cuts, which amounted to a generous break for those at the top, since the wealthy pay most income taxes. Obama's tax cuts, meanwhile, are short-term refunds paid directly to working and middle class families (some of which Republicans have denounced as "welfare"). Everything I've read says short-term refunds are just used to pay down debt, not inject money into the economy, and are therefore poor stimulus. Obama should have split the difference and offered long term rate cuts to working and middle class. PERMALINK Voters will forget, but they can be reminded again by negative campaign ads when the time comes. "Out of one side of his mouth Senator Scheisskopf SAYS he's for cutting your taxes. PERMALINK So, Republicans are opposing the largest tax cut in history, which happens to go much more to middle class families than any of Bush's tax cuts ever did. If they're not, as many claim, the party of tax cuts for the wealthy, then why did they oppose the largest tax cuts in history that happened to go mostly to the middle class? PERMALINK Republicans tend to only vote for tax cuts for the very wealthy because that is consistent with the "trickle-down" economic policy that is fundamental to their party. Of course, it has never worked, but they keep hoping it will. PERMALINK What makes you think anyone will remember or believe that Republicans opposed this tax cut? Posted by: withay Gosh---I don't know---maybe because Dems will beat the GOPer constituency over the head with it for the next 21 months? They can ram the message home on the Sunday talk-shows, too. They can beat up Bill Orifice and Hand-job-itty over at FauxNoise, too. It is so-ooo time to make the GOPer tribe bleed on this one; to force them to fall on their own swords, and to politically devour each other in the scramble to climb into the rigging, as the good ship Reaganomics founders and sinks in its own vacuous excrement.... PERMALINK Mitch McConnell is poo-pooing the bill because "middle-class workers will end up getting less than $8 a week in tax relief." Or approximately the size of the tax relief Dear Leader Bush provided. Where is the recognition that any economy fundamentally dependent on cheap, abundant oil and ever-rising debt, tax revenues and consumer spending is mortally wounded? PERMALINK You progressive pinheads again miss the point! Everyone knows that the rich create the jobs in our country. Everyone knows that the only problem with our economy is that the rich do not have enough money. Everyone knows that the real reason that our economy is not in good shape is that the Obama administration has caused a downturn in the economy - just like FDR caused the Great Depression. The problem with our economy is not the past 30 years of cutting taxes for the wealthy and trickle down economics; the real problem is that we did not cut taxes enough on the wealthy. All good Americans understand that the solution is to cut corporate & top tax rates & raise payroll taxes! PERMALINK Well, I guess this tax cut isn't going to help *me* any, since I'm just above the income level cut-off point. On the other hand, I know many people that will be getting a benefit from it, and I'm glad that it'll help some of my friends. Nevertheless, I wish I could use my money to help them directly, rather than be forced to do so by the government. In my opinion, that's really the key point: people should control where their money goes, not some bureaucrat. PERMALINK I'm reminded of when I worked for a restaurant with a large European clientele. To keep the waitstaff from getting inadvertently stiffed, the tip was added to the bill. Some would come up to my hostess station, huffing and puffing, claiming they usually tipped much larger than that, but because we went ahead and put it on the bill, they weren't going to tip at all! The same notice, in large letters, that explained the tip also explained they could simply request a bill without the tip. PERMALINK >>What makes you think anyone will remember or believe that Republicans opposed this tax cut? Except for three electred representatives, EVERY MEMBER of the GOP voted against the largest middle class tax cut in American history. PERMALINK I live in a rusting t...