12/2 Would people be in favor/opposed to a Web interface to MOTD in
the hope that it might allow more new people to use it? It
would be authenticated against Soda but anonymized (to prevent
spam). Thoughts? --steven
\_ I think its a good idea and one I've wanted to look into for a
long time but what I think makes the motd so ... interesting.. is
the anonymity aspect to it. I think that having webforums that
aren't anonymous and moderated would be of great benefit (job
postings don't need anonymity), but you need to have that
no-holds-barred, big-breast-loving, mormon-antagonizing ability
that anonymity provides somewhere. It sounds like a fun project.
Lets build it over winter. ;) -mrauser
\_ Just build it and see how much traffic you get. dbushong's
http://csua.org (different than http://csua.com) is a shot at it.
See how popular it is.
\_ lol spam. A web interface would have to authenticate with soda
somehow, and there's no guarantee that that will stay unlogged
(or indeed, that it could be forced by the powers that be to
be logged). /paranoia
\_ We could just as easily track changes to this motd with some
kernel hacks or just filesystem notifications or a million
other ways. There's at least some trust involved already, and
anything I set up would be as anonymous as possible. --steven
other ways. There's at least some trust involved already,
and anything I set up would be as anonymous as possible.
--steven
\_ Personally, this libertarian style motd that's been running
for 2 decades or so have proved to be... interesting. I'll
be equally interesting when we move to a socialist monitored
motd where "the man", errr, steven tells us what we can and
cannot say. ASSASSINATION! NEGROS! <insert offensive stuff here>
\_ I have no intentions of changing or moderating in any way the
MOTD itself. --steven
\_ Are you going to track editors? What happens if someone
starts a death threat? What happens if someone dies from
using motd? Are you going to be liable for monitoring or
not monitoring the motd?
\_ Same as it works now. Use at your own risk / bring thick skin
--steven
\_ Clarification - different from http://csua.com in that it is more
aligned towards active reading / posting rather than archival
\- why dont you create this "web based forum" and then
"let the market decide". i think this is pointless.
its like saying "how about replacing wall with
something like a "wall client" so people dont need
to log into soda ... if only there were such a thing.
\_ I only asked because I'm a newcomer and I value your
guys' opinions. Of course I could just go do it, but I
wanted to ask advice first. --steven
\_ edit motd with vi like a real man
\_ real men use emacs: http://xkcd.com/378
\_ I am in favor of it. You should be aware that the motd, being
a mostly anonymous free speech zone, can be controversial. It has
been complained about in the past. -ausman
\_ I (think I) understand that :) --steven
\_ you need to explain what you mean. there is a "web interface to
motd browsing" at http://csua.com. my inclination is: if you can leave
everything as is but add something, then do whateever you want.
but if you are going to change it to web only, that is a giant lose.
web browsers are not editing environments. on the other hand
it is reasonable to be able to read the motd via the web [and this
already exists]. and frankly it's not reasonable to claim this
will be anonymous. regardless of what you say, when you make it
trackable to IPs, anonymity is gone [unless you takes the
obvious cumbersome steps to soem how edit via TOR while not using
that connection for logins etc]. put be down for "opposed"/
"it already exists".
that connection for logins etc]. put me down for "opposed"/
"it already exists". --psb
\_ I don't see how anonymity provides a benefit to the CSUA, and if
"leaving everything as-is" means that the half-dozen long-gone
alumni can troll stupidly and argue about how to indent the text,
I don't see how that provides a benefit to the CSUA, either.
-tom
\_ Utility has very little to do with the MOTD. Organic processes
like this sometimes provide good food for thought, but this is
a side-effect, not their purpose. Still, as far as labs for
thought go, I think it "works." --erikred
\_ It works for undergrads more than grads. Grads donate
money and give advice on dating and offer jobs.
Undergrads on the other hand don't offer much to grads.
Actually they're worth about $2000/head, that's how
much bonus I get for referals.
\_ It works for who? 10 people who haven't set foot in
Soda Hall in 5+ years? For it to work it has to
work for the CSUA's primary constituency, which is
current undergraduates. -tom
\_ UG get something from the connection to the alumni.
If nothing else, donations for machine upgrades. Also,
job offers and company presentations. -ausman
\_ That's my point--there's no connection to the alumni
in a forum that undergrads don't use. -tom
\_ Except I have foot in Soda Hall. In fact, I think
that is the reason we are seeing some UG
involvement on the motd. If it weren't for the
motd I would have stopped logging into soda a
long time ago. So the connection, while indirect,
does exist. -ausman
\_ I don't think a web interface to MOTD makes sense. I think you
should probably just kill MOTD and replace it with a web-based
forum. Its time has passed. -tom
\_ Agreed. I've setup http://groups.yahoo.com/BerkeleyCSUA
\_ http://community.livejournal.com/ucberkeley/3185418.html
Let's all join this group. Har har har.
\_ I don't like killing things people use actively
\_ I'm against it. http://csua.com is good enough for motd IMO and I don't
share Steven's weird dislike of web forums. I love 'em. motd isn't
going away, in any case. motd already works, and there's absolutely
no need (IMO) to effect any sort of change to it. --toulouse
\_ I have a feeling if we tried to go to a forum, the crew here
would stay here. I'm trying to have some connection between
alums/neophytes.
\_ Basically no undergrads lurk here, to my knowledge. It's taken
me two years to look into motd; the interest (in motd, not in
connecting with alumni) IMO does not have inertia to sustain
itself. Perhaps an alternative is to introduce people to motd
at GM3, and again during future GM1s? I should put a link to
http://csua.com on the site. Pardon me while I do so... --toulouse
\_ Coexisting doesn't seem like a bad option to me.
\_ Except that part of the idea should be to create a shared
undergrad/alumni community. If the alumni really care
about wall/MOTD, they certainly have the resources to
set them up on their own. -tom |