7/25 Yay! CA has banned trans-fat! Now if only the legislature could make
all of my decisions. Oh, and pass a budget that spends less than it
takes in. Thanks progressives for the new prohibition, 100 years after
the last one.
\_ Schwarzenegger is a progressive? -tom
\_ The legislature is--the girly-man Gov. just wants to be liked.
\_ did they include a budget for enforcement? How did they think they
would implement this.
\_ I wouldn't think it would require much money for enforcement.
It's just another box for the health inspector to check.
\_ Is it just restaurants or also packaged food in stores?
\_ "a ban on trans fats in restaurants and retail baked goods"
Both of which are already check for lots of stuff, so,
while I think it's silly, I don't think it's going to
cost much to the gvt.
\_ Does that include twinkies or not?
\_ Right now you can't add rat poison to baked goods either. Not
even if you put "tasty tasty rat poison" in the list of
ingredients. How much do you think that costs to enforce?
There is not going to be a transfat division added to police
forces across the state. Instead it's one more thing that
it is illegal to add to food. If a company does and labels it
as transfat gee, that will be pretty obvious SO THEY WON'T.
If a company does and doesn't label it they will be breaking
labeling laws (which are pretty harsh) SO THEY WON'T. Small
bakers may get away with using transfats for a while but
1. that's not a big deal state healthwise and 2. over time
bakeries will stop, because it's not worth the trouble.
\_ Why don't they ban something that actually affects other
people like SMOKING and let people eat whatever the hell
they want to eat?
\_ Bill Gates is working on that. I wonder if humanity
suffers more from diseases caused by years of eating
trans fats, or from smoking? hard to say.
\_ I don't really care to protect humanity from itself. I
just don't want to choke on other people's smoke.
\_ You can continue to eat all the transfats you want. You
just won't get them in mass-produced food items. Your
choice to kill yourself with transfats has not been
impinged; the option to soak other people in them
without their consent has. Opt-in fat good.
\_ My choice to use whatever ingredients I want in my
food (as a manufacturer) has been impinged. There is no
evidence transfats are intrinsically bad for your
health. If you eat too many of them and exercise too
little they aren't good for you but neither are sugar,
beer, and coffee. You can overdose on water even.
This is selectively discriminating against an ingredient
for arbitrary reasons.
\_ Your "rights" as a manufacturer are already subject
to regulation (cf "rat poison" above). If your
argument is with the arbitrary nature of the ban,
that's different from "let[ting] people eat
whatever the hell they want to ear."
\_ Rat poison is hardly the same thing as transfats.
\_ "There is no evidence that transfats are
intrinsically bad for your health"??? You should
educate yourself on the topic, the AMA and NAS
disagree with you on this.
\_ What is the health risk of eating transfats? None
at all. Did we ban saturated fats? Should we
ban baking with butter, too? Eat too much of
them and exercise too little and you will get
sick. However, a healthy person can eat a
transfat-laden muffin with no ill effects.
Maybe we should ban steak. It's laden with
saturated fats *and* unlabeled as such! I
never knew!
\_ "from a nutritional standpoint, the consumption
of trans fatty acids results in considerable
potential harm but no apparent benefit."
-New England Journal of Medicine
"...any incremental increase in trans fat
intake increases the risk of heart disease."
-NAS Dietary Reference
Should I take the advice of these two peer
reviewed experts or anonymous motd hozer?
Hmmm...
\_ "from a nutritional standpoint, the
consumption of vodka results in
considerable potential harm but no
apparent benefit."
"...any incremental increase in cheesesteaks
intake increases the risk of heart
disease."
Clearly we need to ban cheesesteaks and
vodka.
\_ And yet we don't let people sell
rubbing alcohol as a cheap vodka
substitute.
\_ Weak.
\_ Actually, there are numerous studies
indicating that moderate alchohol
consumption is salubrious. And cheese
steaks in moderation are good for you,
too. I agree with your main point, that
people should be allowed to poison
themselves, but you are not arguing from
the facts here. Transfat is worse for
you than white sugar, even.
\_ Transfat is, arguably, no worse for
you than saturated fat. In fact,
many studies have credited transfats
for lowering risk of heart disease as
substitutes for saturated fats. Sure,
some studies say saturated fats are
worse, which is why I use the term
"arguably". Certainly saturated fats
are very unhealthy and there is no
cry to ban them. Transfats have
become the boogeymen du jour. BTW, I
seriously doubt vodka has any positive
benefits. Wine, sure. Vodka, I doubt.
Maybe as a blood thinner if that's a
positive thing for you. |