Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 50309
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2024/11/22 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
11/22   

2008/6/19-23 [Science/Disaster, Science/GlobalWarming] UID:50309 Activity:low
6/19    CBS and MSNBC talk to a PhD about global warming causing more energetic
        earthquakes.  Only problem is that he's not a PhD, he's a crackpot.
        http://www.sanspretense.com/2008/06/18/78
        \_ Which obviously means that all white things are ducks.
           \_ Not the conclusion I was drawing.  The mainstream media is so
              enamored with global warming they'll take anyone to link anything
              to it, so they're worthless as a watchdog on the creeping
              socialism of global warming.  Either that or they're completely
              incompetent, in which case they're equally worthless. -op
              \_ Worse than worthless.  In cases of fear mongering, whether
                 of terrorist threat, or AGW, or any other boogeymen (real or
                 imagined), the press is a mostly unquestioning ampliphier
                 imagined), the press is a mostly unquestioning amplifier
                 of the self-serving line of hyperbole and nonsense coming
                 from those who wish to rule. -crebbs
                 \_ I wish to rule.  They're not amping *my* message!
2024/11/22 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
11/22   

You may also be interested in these entries...
2011/10/20-11/8 [Science/Disaster] UID:54199 Activity:nil
10/20  Earthquake!
       http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Quakes/nc71667366.html
       \_ It's funny that the Great California ShakeOut earthquake drill just
          took place this morning.  It'd be even more funny if the quake hit
          during the drill.
	...
2009/12/2-26 [Science/Disaster] UID:53559 Activity:low
12/2    So I am trying to convince my company to take disaster planning
        more seriously. Does anyone have any hard numbers on how often
        data centers fail? I mean blow up, burn down, flood, etc, with
        total loss of all services for an extended period of time.
        \_ hard numbers tend to be SEKRET.  But check out Yahoo's recent
           outage and UltraDNS' outage.  Those were both pretty bad.
	...
2008/7/29-8/3 [Science/Disaster] UID:50722 Activity:nil
7/29    5.8 quake in LA
        \_ Felt exactly like Whittier quake, so it's not surprising it's
           roughly the same size. A whole lotta shaking, though.
        \_ Chino Hills is NOT Los Angeles. Los Angeles is in-between
           the 110 the 10 and the 5. Chino Hills is far away from
           Los Angeles. Fucking ignorant northerners. To be precise,
	...
2008/5/19-23 [Science/Disaster] UID:50007 Activity:nil
5/19    Picture of China earthquake site.
        http://tinyurl.com/65lr67 (news.yahoo.com)
        I don't know what to say.  It's good if the China earthquake victims
        are drawing inspiration and encouragement from the Sep 11 victims.  I
        just hope that the flag wasn't planted by the Reuters journalist
        himself trying to get a Pulitzer Prize.
	...
2007/10/30-11/2 [Science/Disaster] UID:48491 Activity:nil
10/30   Whoo big earthquake
        \_ Was it just me, or did this quake feel very different than the other
           ones I went through?  In all the other ones I went through (San Jose
           during Loma Prieta quake in '89, Irvine during Northridge quake in
           '94, and a few smaller ones), the buildings swung or shook.
           However, last night my house in Fremont literally vibrated
	...
2014/1/24-2/5 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54765 Activity:nil
1/24    "Jimmy Carter's 1977 Unpleasant Energy Talk, No Longer Unpleasant"
        link:www.csua.org/u/128q (http://www.linkedin.com
	...
2012/12/7-18 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54550 Activity:nil
12/7    Even oil exporters like UAE and Saudi Arabia are embracing solar
        energy: http://www.csua.org/u/ylq
        We are so behind.
	...
2012/6/22-7/20 [Politics/Domestic/California, Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54420 Activity:nil
6/22    "Study: The U.S. could be powered by 80% green energy in 2050"
        http://www.csua.org/u/wtz  (news.yahoo.com)
        \_ How many Republicans does it take to make green energy?
           -150,000,000! Ding ding ding!
           \_ Because having control of the White House and both houses of
              Congress wasn't enough (ie, the do nothing and blame the
	...
2012/6/26-7/20 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54422 Activity:nil
6/26    WW2 brought us antibiotics, syringe, production capacity,
        excessive petroleum, radar, television, atomic energy,
        rocketry (HEIL VON BRAUN), synthetic rubber, microwave,
        computers (GAY TURING), jets.
        What did the Iraq war bring us?
        \_ HMMWV -> Hummer H1 the gas guzzler.
	...
2011/2/1-19 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China, Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54022 Activity:nil
2/1     10 Industries in Which the U.S. Is No Longer No.1"
        http://www.csua.org/u/sgw (finance.yahoo.com)
        China betas us in 7 out of 10 categories, including high-tech exports
        category.
        \_ So, only 3 more to go until we declare war?
        \_ Some of those positions are simply determined by
	...
Cache (4664 bytes)
www.sanspretense.com/2008/06/18/78 -> www.sanspretense.com/2008/06/18/78/
MSNBC version of the story since I don't see an AP tag on them (though it appears almost identical): MT BEST, AUSTRALIA - New research compiled by Australian scientist Dr Tom Chalko shows that global seismic activity on Earth is now five times more energetic than it was just 20 years ago. The research proves that destructive ability of earthquakes on Earth increases alarmingly fast and that this trend is set to continue, unless the problem of "global warming" is comprehensively and urgently addressed. The article goes on to explain how if we don't get global warming under control the Earth is going to shake us all to death, or something (paraphrasing), quoting solely Chalko and his work. I'll leave the part where I explain why physically this is crackpot science and focus on the great journalism aspects of the article. At NO POINT does it say in the CBS article where Chalko is employed or what field he's in or where his work was published. So I googled Tom Chalko and got links to several sites with his name on them, but I thought it surely had to be a different Chalko (because it's SUCH a common name). Then I found the MSNBC article, which did a better job than the AP/CBS article in explaining at the end of the article: For further information please read Dr Chalko's scientific article published at NU Journal of Discovery. pdf Dr Tom Chalko, MSc, PhD, former Melbourne University academic (between 1982-2001) is Head of Geophysics Division at Scientific Engineering Research, Mt Best, Australia. attachid=782087 Contact: Dr Tom Chalko Scientific Engineering Research ph (+61 3) 5681 6361 email Email Contact MarketWire 2008 Some things stand out. So I click on the PDF and it's obviously not a professionally made journal article, and hacking the URL shows that NU Journal has a lot of publications from only one author: Dr. Chalko, who also happens to be one of the editors of the "journal." Natural University, which is NOT a real university, and shares the same logo as the journal. The logo, by the way, appears to have some physics equations that look similar to Maxwell Equations, but with some extra terms that I don't recognize. However, the speed of light equals infinity on top and zero on bottom with the Earth inbetween is a clear indicator of crackpot science. Scanning the titles of Chalko's work shows that the crackpot part is definitely true. Second red flag: He's no longer associated with Melbourne University as of 2001. Scientific Engineering Research" (website found via a google search). Now going to the website shows that it is definitely HIS website/company. Again, I'm not going to address why his work is crackpot science (Auras? If you'd like me to, please leave a comment), I'm just pointing out the lack of journalistic oversight. And by the way, my initial google search with all the sites that I dismissed as another Chalko? He's certainly not a reputable scientist that ANY mainstream journalist or news site should EVER quote, link to, or take seriously. Somebody, and probably more than one, needs to be fired for not doing their jobs. Has their desperation for news stories really gone that far? More than likely, I think, someone's left-leaning, evironmentalism got the better of them and they took this doomsday idiot's word that he was a reputable scientist and quoted him because he said what they wanted to hear. Global Warming theory (whether you believe it or not) states that more heat is getting trapped between the ground and the upper atmosphere due to green house gases. The model predicts a rise in temperature of the air of around 1 degree (give or take). At no point, does it predict a significant increase in the core temperature of the much more massive (compared to the atmosphere) Earth. Yea, surface temperatures rise, but not enough to trickle down and cause a significant increase in earthquake energy. There's just not enough energy being absorbed and trapped for us to significanly raise the the temperature of the inner Earth. Someone with half a brain should've questioned the source, but someone should've asked for a second opinion. I wonder if Chalko wrote the article and sent it to someone who was foolish enough to post it? And get this: in 2001, Chalko wrote an article theorizing that the "greenhouse effect" can actually cause a "meltdown condition" due to the nuclear reactions heating the inside of the earth. LOT warmer in the past than it is today and didn't explode - at least as far as I can tell, but what do I know? It offends my scientific sensibilities to the deepest levels, but as a somewhat intelligent and informed reader of the news, it's quite an insult.