preview.tinyurl.com/6hq4cj -> news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080612/pl_bloomberg/anxynpmlvax0;_ylt=Aggf9CULdxPs5xauhTHXoaWs0NUE
com Guantanamo Inmates May Seek Release, High Court Says Greg Stohr Thu Jun 12, 10:30 AM ET June 12 (Bloomberg) -- Guantanamo Bay inmates have constitutional rights and may seek release in federal court, the US Supreme Court ruled in a rebuke to the Bush administration and Congress on their handling of accused terrorists.
WnmfDxJJQCpg9IF/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1213305504/L=pOyvIUWTVvr83xETQI4Vvx IxRTfow0hRdoAADb9c/B=fSc1GtGDJHg-/J=1213298304914221/A=4919452/R=0/* The justices, voting 5-4, said a 2006 law unconstitutionally stripped Guantanamo prisoners of the right to file so-called habeas corpus petitions. The majority rejected arguments that a system of limited judicial review set up by Congress was adequate to protect inmate rights. The costs of delay can no longer be borne by those who are held in custody,'' Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority. More broadly, the decision may mean a more powerful wartime role for the judiciary. Justices John Paul Stevens, Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter joined Kennedy's opinion. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented. Scalia took the unusual step of reading a summary of his dissent from the bench. The nation will live to regret what the court has done today,'' Scalia said in his written opinion. Habeas corpus is a legal device that dates back to 14th-century England and lets inmates claim they are being wrongfully held. None of those inmates have been criminally charged, although today's ruling may affect those who have been. The military plans on prosecuting about 80 inmates, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. Prosecution efforts have stalled in recent months, and at most a handful of trials are likely to go forward this year. Combat Status Review All Guantanamo inmates appear before a Combatant Status Review Tribunal, or CSRT, a military panel that decides whether the men are enemy combatants'' who should remain in detention. A 2005 law gives inmates only a limited right to appeal that conclusion to a federal court in Washington. Lawyers for the prisoners say those procedures are a poor substitute for habeas rights. During CSRT hearings, shackled inmates appear before a panel of three officers. The inmates can't have a lawyer present, are barred from seeing much of the evidence against them and in most circumstances can't call witnesses in their defense. In a number of cases, a second CSRT was convened after the first panel concluded an inmate wasn't an enemy combatant. Officials at Guantanamo say the CSRTs have led to the release of more than three dozen prisoners. The cases are Boumediene v Bush, 06-1195, and Al Odah v United States, 06-1196.
|
http://csua.com/feed/