6/4 Obama promises to eliminate Iran
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSWAT00959220080604
Nevermind, Obama is ok with me now. -motd ex-Obama hater
\_ Where in the article does it mention eliminating Iran?
\_ "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be
to eliminate this threat"
\_ Eliminating the threat, not eliminating the country.
\_ So, he's just going to eliminate all their military
capabilities?
\_ Eliminating a threat does not always mean bombing
back to the stone age. In fact, bombing back to the
stone age often doesn't eliminate a threat, see Iraq.
\_ So, he's going to give them WTO membership and
they'll learn to love the Jews and stop promising
to "wipe them off the map"?
\_ I didn't realize that was the only other choice.
Silly me.
\_ It is this kind of binary thinking that got us
into the mess we are in in the first place.
\_ Exactly! We should just talk with them. Use
the power of diplomacy and negotiate. The pen
is mightier than the sword. After Obama has a
chance to talk with Iran's leadership, they'll
come around and see this was all just a big
misunderstanding and it'll be just like Nixon
going to China. We don't need binary
thinking. We need Obama's fuzzy thinking.
\_ The world is more complex than you are
capable of imagining.
\_ I'm capable of quite a lot, thanks. Are
you saying we should not talk to anyone?
It is hard to tell what you're trying to
say since you said so little.
\_ Your snarkiness does not really
indicate a desire for a serious reply.
If you are actually interested in a
serious conversation about how
International Diplomacy works (when
not run by arrogant boobs, like the
current Admin) I will be happy to
have one with you. But you might be
better off picking up a copy of
Foreign Affairs first.
\_ My snarkiness? I made a statement.
Your only replies were to insult
me. You have still added nothing
to this thread. Why did you even
bother to post if you had nothing
to add?
\_ "We need Obama's fuzzy thinking"
is a statement? Do you really
believe that?
is a non-snarky statement?
Do you really believe that? The
whole paragraph was snarky.
\_ "Obama also vowed to vigorously support Israel's right to defend
itself ......". See, I told you, Obama is not black. Only a day
after he secured the Democratic nomination using support from black
people, he's already letting out his 50% whiteness.
\_ Black people hate Israel? I didn't know that sterotype.
\_ Yeah, and Latinos hating blacks is just another stereotype,
too. Yeah, really.
\_ And a politician *never* goes back on his promises, right?
\_ If we're going to go with this assumption, then I'm voting for
Obama because I like him better, no other reason.
\_ You are insane aren't you?
\_ Didn't Hillary dominate the Hispainc vote because of
racial tension between Lations and blacks?
\_ In this country, you cannot win the presidency if you
don't support the Jews. It's as simple as that.
\_ Or any other group with more that accounts for 5% or more of
the people. I'm sure you didn't intend to sound racist when
you said that.
\_ The GOP routinely wins office with less than 10% support
from Blacks, a voting block much larger than 5% of the
population. Not to detract from your main point though.
\_ This has been based, traditionally, on voter apathy
among blacks. See if this changes this year.
\_ Hello mr. clueless! |