5/29 "Marriage is thus something more than a civil contract subject to
regulation by the state; it is a fundamental right of free men."
Perez v. Sharp, 32 Cal.2d 711
\_ I'd hate to raise my kids in an environment where he's
brainwashed to believe that a marriage between a human and
a monkey is OK.
\_ is a monkey a free man?
\_ It is indeed. Now tell me where the government needs to be involved
other than protecting the right to marry.
\_ that's a big "other than." -tom
\_ Marriage is a social construct arising from biological imperative.
There is a reason *every* culture on the planet has the man/woman
marriage concept enshrined in various rites and rituals. We our
are genes.
\_ How to deconstruct this nonsense? Sentence by sentence:
1) Marriage as a social construct arose as a means of
solidifying alliances between families. It had nothing to do
with procreation or biology; non-propertied people throughout
the world have not, historically, had formal marriages,
despite having numerous children. Cf. "romantic love" and
the troubadours of Medieval France.
\_ Non-propertied people didn't marry, historically, through-
out the world? How about backing that up with something
more than a single minor reference from a single time in a
single place?
\_ Add pre-Meiji Japan to this list.
\_ I've gotta agree with that for the majority of human
history, marriage was a convenient mechanism to consolidate
political and economic power. This whole American/
Euro mode of marrying only someone you fall in love with
is rather new. I know an American born Indian male
with several graduate degrees from Georgetown who
had his mom find him a wife through a marriage broker
in the homeland. He seems happy.
2) Not "every" culture on the planet has the marriage concept,
let alone enshrines man/woman as better than any other
coupling (or grouping).
\_ I knew some pedantic twit would comment on that. Name
the cultures that don't have the concept of marriage.
\_ The Na of Yunnan Province in China. Countdown to you
now retorting with "one culture? are you kidding me?"
or something similar now begins.
3) We are our genes _plus_ our environments _plus_ whatever
tools we build to overcome our genes. Any human being who is
merely an expression of genes is missing out on the best part
of being human: using that huge brain to adapt.
\_ Nothing to do with anything on this topic. I was hoping
someone intelligent might reply but that's asking too
much on a Friday. You've deconstructed nothing. Go have
another bong hit.
\_ Your brain has been characterized as small, and you
have been deemed unfit for reproduction. Please report
to recycling plant. Goodbye.
\_ Are you including polyagamy in that grouping? Because
polygamy was exceedingly common in ancient times...
\_ This is why RADICAL ISLAM MAN will win. RADICAL ISLAM MAN
has several wifes, and each of those wives has 4+ children.
Good Christian male just can't compete with those kinds
of numbers.
\_ Luckily, we have the FLDS on our side. |