|
11/22 |
2008/3/11-13 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:49424 Activity:nil |
3/11 Daylight Savings Time doesn't save energy. http://tech.yahoo.com/blog/null/83073 \_ But it saves awesomeness. |
11/22 |
|
tech.yahoo.com/blog/null/83073 Designed (and recently extended) as a measure to save energy in a period of inflated electricity prices, an in-depth University of California study has now shown that DST doesn't save anyone any money at all. The study was made possible because of the peculiarities of the state of Indiana, which was only partially on DST until 2006. When the whole state finally went DST (to sync with the national business day), some comparisons vs. Shouldn't they be, well, saving daylight -- and burning fewer light bulbs? But while lighting bills were reduced, air-conditioning units had to run more often, because people were home on hot afternoons when they'd otherwise be still at the office. Heaters had to be run on cool mornings, too, when people got up and it was still dark outside. Professor Matthew Kotchen, who pioneered the study, noted, "I've never had a paper with such a clear and unambiguous finding as this." This isn't the first time the energy-saving rationale of Daylight Saving Time has been attacked. The first was in 1976, when the National Bureau of Standards found that there was no significant energy savings after the switch. This stuff comees directly from the politicians who actually put this stuff into law. It isn't the fault of the government workers (bureaucrats), but the politicians like to blame them because they aren't able to defend themseelves. Smarter, honest politicians are the answer and if they don't produce, kick 'em out! Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content. |