Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 49173
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2024/11/22 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
11/22   

2008/2/17-21 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:49173 Activity:kinda low
2/16    A Solar Grand Plan: Converting the US to 65% solar power in 40 years.
        Would cost less over 40 years than the war in Iraq has cost us in 6.
        http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan&page=1
        \_ The projections for the war were a lot lower than the reality.
           \_ No the projections by the liars who were trying to pull a fast
              one on the American people were lower than the reality. Plenty
              of us said that it would be a costly, drawn-out, indecisive
              affair.
              \_ We must immediately announce the Solar Grand Plan to the
                 People as Another Great Success in a long line of Greatly
                 Successful Five Year Plans.  No large engineering project has
                 ever had a cost over-run or major delay especially when the
                 government is involved.  Comrade, we must proceed with the
                 Grand Solar Plan!
                 \_ Did you vote for Bush?
                    \_ No.  My candidates never win.  Did you vote for Gore?
                       \_ Nope, Nader.
2024/11/22 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
11/22   

You may also be interested in these entries...
2014/1/24-2/5 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54765 Activity:nil
1/24    "Jimmy Carter's 1977 Unpleasant Energy Talk, No Longer Unpleasant"
        link:www.csua.org/u/128q (http://www.linkedin.com
	...
2012/12/7-18 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54550 Activity:nil
12/7    Even oil exporters like UAE and Saudi Arabia are embracing solar
        energy: http://www.csua.org/u/ylq
        We are so behind.
	...
2012/6/22-7/20 [Politics/Domestic/California, Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54420 Activity:nil
6/22    "Study: The U.S. could be powered by 80% green energy in 2050"
        http://www.csua.org/u/wtz  (news.yahoo.com)
        \_ How many Republicans does it take to make green energy?
           -150,000,000! Ding ding ding!
           \_ Because having control of the White House and both houses of
              Congress wasn't enough (ie, the do nothing and blame the
	...
2012/6/26-7/20 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54422 Activity:nil
6/26    WW2 brought us antibiotics, syringe, production capacity,
        excessive petroleum, radar, television, atomic energy,
        rocketry (HEIL VON BRAUN), synthetic rubber, microwave,
        computers (GAY TURING), jets.
        What did the Iraq war bring us?
        \_ HMMWV -> Hummer H1 the gas guzzler.
	...
2011/2/1-19 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China, Science/GlobalWarming] UID:54022 Activity:nil
2/1     10 Industries in Which the U.S. Is No Longer No.1"
        http://www.csua.org/u/sgw (finance.yahoo.com)
        China betas us in 7 out of 10 categories, including high-tech exports
        category.
        \_ So, only 3 more to go until we declare war?
        \_ Some of those positions are simply determined by
	...
Cache (4346 bytes)
www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan&page=1
Back Schott AG/Commercial Handout/EPA/Corbis Graphic - Key Concepts * A massive switch from coal, oil, natural gas and nuclear power plants to solar power plants could supply 69 percent of the US's electricity and 35 percent of its total energy by 2050. Excess daytime energy would be stored as compressed air in underground caverns to be tapped during nighttime hours. The US is at war in the Middle East at least in part to protect its foreign oil interests. And as China, India and other nations rapidly increase their demand for fossil fuels, future fighting over energy looms large. In the meantime, power plants that burn coal, oil and natural gas, as well as vehicles everywhere, continue to pour millions of tons of pollutants and greenhouse gases into the atmosphere annually, threatening the planet. Well-meaning scientists, engineers, economists and politicians have proposed various steps that could slightly reduce fossil-fuel use and emissions. The US needs a bold plan to free itself from fossil fuels. Our analysis convinces us that a massive switch to solar power is the logical answer. The energy in sunlight striking the earth for 40 minutes is equivalent to global energy consumption for a year. at least 250,000 square miles of land in the Southwest alone are suitable for constructing solar power plants, and that land receives more than 4,500 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu) of solar radiation a year. Converting only 25 percent of that radiation into electricity would match the nation's total energy consumption in 2006. To convert the country to solar power, huge tracts of land would have to be covered with photovoltaic panels and solar heating troughs. A direct-current (DC) transmission backbone would also have to be erected to send that energy efficiently across the nation. On the following pages we present a grand plan that could provide 69 percent of the US's electricity and 35 percent of its total energy (which includes transportation) with solar power by 2050. We project that this energy could be sold to consumers at rates equivalent to today's rates for conventional power sources, about five cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh). If wind, biomass and geothermal sources were also developed, renewable energy could provide 100 percent of the nation's electricity and 90 percent of its energy by 2100. Chart: US Annual Fuel Consumption The federal government would have to invest more than $400 billion over the next 40 years to complete the 2050 plan. That investment is substantial, but the payoff is greater. Solar plants consume little or no fuel, saving billions of dollars year after year. The infrastructure would displace 300 large coal-fired power plants and 300 more large natural gas plants and all the fuels they consume. The plan would effectively eliminate all imported oil, fundamentally cutting US trade deficits and easing political tension in the Middle East and elsewhere. Because solar technologies are almost pollution-free, the plan would also reduce greenhouse gas emissions from power plants by 17 billion tons a year, and another 19 billion tons from gasoline vehicles would be displaced by plug-in hybrids refueled by the solar power grid. In 2050 US carbon dioxide emissions would be 62 percent below 2005 levels, putting a major brake on global warming. Photovoltaic Farms In the past few years the cost to produce photovoltaic cells and modules has dropped significantly, opening the way for large-scale deployment. Various cell types exist, but the least expensive modules today are thin films made of cadmium telluride. Current modules have 10 percent efficiency and an installed system cost of about $4 per watt. Progress is clearly needed, but the technology is advancing quickly; commercial efficiencies have risen from 9 to 10 percent in the past 12 months. It is worth noting, too, that as modules improve, rooftop photovoltaics will become more cost-competitive for homeowners, reducing daytime electricity demand. Albert * "I think the better idea is to put all those PV panels on all new and existing homes in the US and then allow those home owners the option of selling... Order Back Issues Scientific American Newsletters Get the latest science news delivered to your inbox in a few easy steps. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.