1/18 Hey tom, you seem to know a lot about startups. How many companies
have you founded? Have you worked at a lot of early phaase
companies?
\_ What gives you that impression, anonymous coward? -tom
\_ I don't know about the op, but that's one way to interpret your
snipe at me on wall yesterday. op's question aside, I'd be
curious to hear your opinion regarding Slide in light of the
smack you've talked in the past, and the round we just did.
-dans
P.S. Are you always this overtly hostile toward people when
people inquire into your background?
\_ My comment on wall was in response to your categorization
of LBL and Berkeley as "ivory towers." As if cratering
a startup consitutes "the real world." Here's a hint:
People do important things at Berkeley and LBL. People
don't do important things at Slide. -tom
\_ Heh. Profs and researchers do important things. I don't
think either you or psb do those things. And, just
curious, how is growing the economy and creating jobs
unimportant? Or do people not do important things at
Yahoo and Google? What you fail to understand is that, if
not for an environment where people could take risks, the
spectacular growth engine that is Silicon Valley would not
exist. Most startups fail. You have a symbiotic
relationship with Berkeley and the academic world it
exists in, and I find nothing wrong with that. What I
take issue with is that you presume to berate people
regarding areas you manifestly know little or nothing
about. By doing so you discourage people from taking
risks, which is reasonable if you're trying to ensure that
a network or server stays up, but, in many other domains
is lame. -dans
\_ Growing the economy and creating jobs is not meaningful
in and of itself. And there is plenty of evidence that
we're past the point of diminishing returns on growing
the economy. And boy, if not for an environment where
people can take risks, we might not have a vitally
important tool like FunWall! The world might come
crashing down! And of course there are no risks in
academia!
I'm berating you for being an idiot, not for taking
risks. -tom
\_ Creating jobs is not meaningful? Past the point
of diminishing returns on growing the economy? So
now you're an economist? Your statements boggle the
mind. You berate people because you are unwilling to
allow for the possibility that your base of knowledge
may have a priori flaws, be incomplete, or flawed in
its application. This is why many people think
you're an overbearing asshole. -dans
\_ What do you think "a priori" means?
\_ Why do many people think you're an idiot? -tom
\_ Because they never met me in person, and
listen to third-hand reports from assholes
like you? -dans
\_ Occam's Razor disagrees. -tom
\_ bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha -dans
\_ I've met you and I think you are an idiot.
-- ilyas
\- i have not met you (or at least if i have
\- i have not met yoyu, or at least if i have
did make an impression, positive or neg,
didnt make an impression, positive or neg),
but *multiple* people have mailed me to ask
in almost these exact words "do you know
this dans@sloda dood? is he as much of a
pud as he appears to be on first impres-
sion?" --psb
this dans@sloda dood? i was looking at a
job at slide and was wondering if he is as
of a pud/prick as he comes off" --psb
\_ 'dood'. What word choice. -dans
\- it's an irish word. i am half irish.
\_ I've met you and you seem like a perfectly
reasonable fellow to me. -ausman
\_ PS you're so hot, I want your
ass now!!! -!ausman
\_ Not funny to sign my name to things
I didn't write. -ausman
\_ Over 20 million people use FunWall, and that's
just one Slide application. But, hey, you work in
a role that supports researchers and academics so
you must know more than all those foolish plebes!
At one point, people thought email was frivilous.
\_ frivolous.
moron.
----------------------------------/
\_ Ah yes. Clearly typos and minor spelling
errors are a good metric for evaluating
intelligence and clue. -dans
Not so much anymore. At one point people thought
that the web was a toy. Not so much anymore. Philo
Farnsworth, the inventor of TV, wanted it to be a
tool to educate and inform the masses. It didn't
work out that way. I don't presume to claim
FunWall will someday be a valuable medium for
artistic expression or information distribution, I
merely allow for the possibility. You presume to
write it off, and your knowledge of the domain is
guaranteed to be worse than mine. Who's the idiot
here? -dans
\_ dans? is that you? |