1/7 So I don't get it. San Francisco is listed as a major world city,
but San Jose is not even listed! What is wrong with these idiots,
don't they realize that San Francisco is just a suburb to the mighty,
much more important metropolis of San Jose???
http://www.csua.org/u/ken
\_ http://appleorangescale.com/?wd0=san%20francisco&wd1=san%20jose
Indisputable Google proof that San Francisco >>>>> San Jose.
Accept this as fact! -urbanite
\_ San Jose is a dump! Los Angeles is a world class city and is
way better than San Jose. -suburb lover w an Accord hybrid
\_ ObSanFranciscoSucksLess
\_ I know this is a troll, but ... Let's compare the number of truly
exceptional restaurants, buildings, museums, schools, etc., in
San Francisco vs. San Jose.
\_ Plus size of downtown, GG bridge. And the San Jose
\_ Plus size of downtown, GG Bridge. And the San Jose
Int'l Airport didn't actually have international flights until a
few years ago.
\_ What does the GG bridge have to do with anything?
\_ GG Bridge is a tourist attraction. People usually
associate it with SF not SJ.
\_ So what? Mount Rushmore is associated with South
Dakota. Disnleyland is associated with Anaheim. I don't
Dakota. Disneyland is associated with Anaheim. I don't
follow here.
\_ I don't know about Mount Rushmore. Yes Disneyland is
in Anaheim, but to the international tourists it is
associated with LA instead of some place called
in Anaheim not LA, but to the international tourists
it is associated with LA instead of some place called
Anaheim.
\_ Point is that landmarks are landmarks and can
be in a major city, a suburb, or the boonies.
\_ Point is that it's not about where the
landmarks are, but about what their perceived
associations are. Disneyland is mistakenly
associated with LA, which, among other ways,
boosted LA's status.
Number of Google search results:
"Disneyland LA": 667000
"Disneyland Los Angeles": 557000
"Disneyland Anaheim": 211000
\_ Just because people are uninformed
doesn't mean anything. You missed my
point entirely, which is that the
presence of absence of a landmark makes
presence or absence of a landmark makes
no commentary on the surrounding area.
As an example consider Mt. Rushmore.
\_ Ancient history. SF was the most important city in CA in the
late 1800s. It's hard for people to let go. It won't happen
overnight. SF is living on reputation, but the reality is that
over the last 30 years San Jose has contributed as much or more
to SF's reputation as SF itself. The number of people who fly
into SJ for business who never even see SF is growing. SF will
of course always be a tourist destination because it's scenic.
\_ San Jose has no view. It's far more entertaining to drive
your relatives around in San Francisco than it is in San
Jose. You get the Golden Gate Bridge, the bay, pier 39,
etc. What do you get in San Jose? Office buildings.
Enlighten me, really, because if there's something
interesting besides night life, I am all ears. Me and my
wife could use some local sight seeing.
\_ We're not talking about the place with the best view or best
tourist spot. I love driving around San Simeon for the
views, but that doesn't mean anything.
\_ San Jose has night life?
\_ What, you've never heard of a LAN party? -!pp
\_ Lots of hiphop clubs. Los Gatos has a good bar scene.
\_ Sure. There are plenty of liquor stores with porn, and
lots of places to rent video games. It's paradise. |