Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 48802
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

2007/12/14-20 [Transportation/Car] UID:48802 Activity:nil
12/13   Fake parking tickets story:
        http://www.csua.org/u/k8u (SF Gate)
        \_ Wasn't someone on the motd complaining about a quasi legal parking
           ticket?  Here's more:
           http://www.marinij.com/ci_7706352
           \_ This is actually more relevant to that Regional Parking Inc.
              thing than I previously thought. Thank you; I'm definitely _not_
              paying them now.
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2012/7/29-9/24 [Transportation/Car, Transportation/Car/RoadHogs] UID:54446 Activity:nil
7/29    Is it really true that we subsidize auto driving to the tune of
        $5k/yr? Shit I could probably hire a private driver for less...
        http://tinyurl.com/cars-suck-ass
        \_ You might have missed the point.  Hiring a chauffeur to drive your
           private vehicle won't change the amount of gasoline your private
           vehicle use or the amount of real estate it uses on freeways and
	...
2012/7/9-8/19 [Transportation/Car] UID:54433 Activity:nil
7/9     http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2012/07/nice-guys-finish-last.html
        A study at the Berkeley Marina intersection shows that people
        with nice asshole-cars break the law more frequently.
        \_ Alpha animals.
            \_ sense of entitlement coupled with willingness to pay fines.
               One of the better Freakonomics chapters was about a study
	...
2011/12/5-2012/1/10 [Transportation/Car/Hybrid] UID:54250 Activity:nil
12/5    "Eight Ferraris wrecked in million-dollar pileup"
        http://www.csua.org/u/uw3 (autos.yahoo.com)
        "Police and video reports say the wreck began when a 60-year-old
        businessman from Fukushima driving a Ferrari F430 attempted to pass a
        Toyota Prius, but instead hit the guardrail.  That set off a chain
        reaction among the cars driving in a tight formation behind the lead
	...
2011/7/10-8/2 [Transportation/Car/Hybrid] UID:54141 Activity:nil
7/8     Is there some reason we can't have mass market nat gas cars?
        \_ Not enough infrastructure for refuing.  Chicken and egg.
        \_ Not enough infrastructure for refueling.  Chicken and egg.
        \_ It has less than half the energy density of gasoline.  -tom
           \_ So you have to compress it, which results in huge explosions
              during a crash. Same for flywheel tech.
	...
2010/8/23-9/7 [Transportation/Car] UID:53931 Activity:nil
8/23    "China's nine-day traffic jam stretches 100km"
        http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100823/sc_afp/chinaroadtraffic
        "... the jam between Beijing and Jining city had given birth to a
        mini-economy ..."
        And we think traffic in L.A. is bad.
        \_ Actually those of us who have travelled don't.
	...
2010/8/4-25 [Transportation/Car] UID:53909 Activity:nil
8/4     "China Plans Huge Buses That Can DRIVE OVER Cars (PHOTOS)"
        http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/669166
        WTF!?
	...
2010/2/10-3/9 [Transportation/Car] UID:53699 Activity:low
2/10    About the Lexus that crashed because of (supposedly) a stuck
        accelerator padel, why didn't the driver simply put the transmission
        in Neutral?  If the cop passenger had time to press at least one
        button to dial 911, wait for the call to be picked up, and had a
        10-second-plus conversation with the operator (which was played back
        in media reports), wasn't there much more than enough time to tell the
	...
2010/1/8-29 [Transportation/Bicycle] UID:53617 Activity:nil
12/8    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/01/cyclist-sentenced.html
        Car driver gets 5 years for assualting bicylists with car.
        \_ How many years do cyclists get when they run red lights?  I almost
           hit one last week when a cyclist ran a red light in front of me
           while I was about to start moving on my green light in Fremont.
           \_ How many years do motorists get when they run red lights? I
	...
Cache (1738 bytes)
www.csua.org/u/k8u -> www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/12/14/BA5TTTMI3.DTL
Georgia (default) Verdana Times New Roman Arial (12-13) 08:34 PST SAN RAFAEL -- A private parking company that left official-looking but fake citations on cars parked in free lots in the Bay Area will have to reimburse people who paid the tickets, according to the Marin County district attorney's office. Under terms of a settlement reached with Parking Control Service Inc. The company will also pay $100,000 in civil penalties and $30,000 to Marin and Sonoma counties for the cost of their two-year investigation into PCS' practices. According to Marin County District Attorney Edward Berberian, PCS monitors free public and private parking lots at shopping centers and other places in Marin, Sonoma, Alameda, San Francisco and San Mateo counties. From 2003 to this month, employees of the company would leave written notices that looked like government-issued tickets on cars that allegedly violated the posted parking rules or state laws, Berberian said Wednesday. The notices demanded that the drivers pay a fine and threatened to have their car towed or immobilized if the parking charges were not paid, he said. "Consumers complained they were deceived into paying these charges believing PCS was a government entity based on the appearance and wording of the parking notices," Berberian said. In addition to requiring the reimbursements, the settlement prohibits the company from threatening any actions involving vehicles unless state law allows that. The agreement also requires PCS to make "conspicuous disclosures" on future parking notices that it is not a government agency. To receive a refund, victims must send proof of payment to the Parking Control Service Settlement Refund, PO Box 231, South San Francisco, CA 94083.
Cache (2968 bytes)
www.marinij.com/ci_7706352
Nancy Isles Nation Article Launched: 12/12/2007 11:08:14 PM PST A San Francisco parking service agreed to pay $130,000 in fees and legal costs and will refund consumers who paid illegal tickets it issued as the result of a settlement finalized Wednesday in Marin Superior Court. The company is authorized to arrange for towing of illegally parked vehicles, but is not permitted to issue citations. The company monitored parking lots in Marin, including at Montecito Shopping Center, the French Quarter, Courthouse Square, Harbor Center and Safeway in San Rafael as well as the Safeway in Mill Valley and other lots. "We had numerous complaints from consumers about whether these were government tickets that they were issued and wanted to know what their obligations were to pay them," said Andres Perez, a Marin deputy district attorney. "They looked very official and it was confusing to understand who was giving the ticket." The Marin County District Attorney's Office monitored the public parking lots from 2003 to 2007 and observed Parking Advertisement Control employees leaving notices on vehicles that were allegedly violating the rules of the state vehicle code. "They were concerned about the threat of getting cars towed or booted - some thought it would affect their registration." One of the biggest problems was for people who shopped at Trader Joe's at Montecito, who, perhaps, took a stroll to stores across Third Street and found a citation when they returned for parking in a spot designated for the popular food store, or for parking longer than the time posted, Perez said. The tickets generally were set at $40 but increased in 30-day increments like official parking citations. Parking Control Service is not authorized to immobilize vehicles with "boots" or other devices. The Marin DA's office has been working with the Sonoma County District Attorney's Office in its investigation on behalf of the two counties and Alameda, San Francisco and San Mateo counties. Under terms of the settlement, signed by Judge Kelly Simmons, Parking Control must pay refunds to all consumers who paid charges from March 2003 through Wednesday. It also must pay $100,000 in civil penalties and $30,000 to reimburse the cost of the two-year investigation. Anyone who believes they paid an illegal ticket should submit a claim by sending proof of a payment to Parking Control Service Settlement Refund, PO Box 231, San Francisco 94083. If no proof of payment is available, consumers can call 877-563-9444 and provide the license plate number of the tagged vehicle. After verification, the consumer will be required to send Parking Control a copy of documentation verifying ownership. The consumer is not required to currently own the vehicle. "We strongly encourage them to file a claim and we tried to make the process as simple and streamlined as possible," Perez said. Parking Control Services referred a reporter to its attorney, Mark Posard of San Francisco.