Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 48608
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

2007/11/12-16 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:48608 Activity:nil
11/12   How many people actually like Firefox 2.0 new tabs where there's
        a close button on every tab, and that you have to scroll left/right
        when you have too many tabs?
        \_ Fix it in about:config
           http://csua.com/?entry=45520
        \_ I like the tabs in Fx, but I usually use Ctrl-W to close and
           Ctrl-TAB to switch.
        \_ There's a dropdown tab selector thing. I hate the close button on
           tab deal, but that's easy to fix in about:config.
           What I really wish FF had was if you drag a tab off the window it
           becomes a new window with that tab. I think Safari and Opera
           do that now. FF creates a shortcut if you do that, how stupid.
        \_ The about:config for FF allows you to modify that behavior.  Look up
           browser.tabs.closeButtons (0 is close button only for current tab, 1
           is default, and 2 is no close buttons)
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2012/5/18-7/20 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:54392 Activity:nil
5/18    On my Win7 machine, I've been using a PuTTY ssh session to soda as a
        proxy for my FireFox to bypass my company's OpenDNS when I visit
        http://tv.yahoo.com and so on.  It has been working fine for a long while.
        However, in the past couple weeks or so, my FireFox would either take
        several minutes to load the page, or failes to load it after several
        minutes.  I haven't changed any settings on my Win7 machine.  Rebooting
	...
2012/4/23-6/1 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:54360 Activity:nil
4/19    My Firefox 3.6.28 pops up a Software Update box that reads "Your
        version of Firefox will soon be vulnerable to online attacks."  Are
        they planning to turn off some security feature in my version of
        Firefox?
        \_ Not as such, no, but they're no longer developing this version,
           so if a 3.6.x-targeted hack shows up, you're not going to get
	...
2012/2/5-3/26 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:54300 Activity:nil
2/5     How is Firefox on version 10, while I still have 3.6 installed.
        I wait for the X.1 versions and they never come out.
        \_ I'm also on 3.6.26.  It claims that versions 4 - 10 are all faster
           than 3.6.x, but do they use more memory?  Thx.
           \_ Newer Firefox versions use less memory too:
              http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/mozillas_memshrink_program_brings_big_memory_savings_firefox_7
	...
2010/2/18-3/9 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:53713 Activity:nil
2/18    Why is there now Firefox 3.5.8 when there was already 3.6 a month ago?
        \_ Why is there Windows XP SP3 when there was already Vista?
           Generally companies manage patches for at least two levels of
           product.  -tom
           \_ I see.  So Fx 3.6 is more like a new version than an update to
              3.5.x.  --- OP
	...
2010/2/8-18 [Computer/SW/Apps/Media, Computer/SW/Apps] UID:53695 Activity:kinda low
2/5     I like Adobe Flash. When written correctly, it scales along
        with your browser size. It looks consistent on every single
        browser. It is predictable. On the other hand, I'm not a big
        fan of CSS/HTML, which for the most part, look wildly different
        between browsers, and don't even work consistently or
        correctly at times. So why do so many people (like Steve Jobs)
	...
2010/1/11-25 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:53625 Activity:nil
12/9    Does anyone know when Firefox will support Win7?  I can't find a
        roadmap page on http://mozilla.org.  Thx.
	...
2009/12/13-2010/1/13 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:53593 Activity:nil
12/12   http://www.axiis.org/examples/BrowserMarketShare.html#
        An unusual visualization of browser market share from 2002-now
        \_ 1. Is it coincidence that it looks so much like the Firefox logo?
           2. Is Chrome eating away Firefox's share?
           \_ Chrome's user base is pretty much the same user base
              as Firefox user base, and to some extent, Safari. The
	...
2009/12/2-9 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:53556 Activity:nil
12/2    IE usage down but still kicking the majority ass. Chrome is also
        rising up high, almost at the Safari level. Firefox isn't
        doing badly either. Sorry Opera, you had your chance.
        http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/12/november-2009-browser-stats-ie8-passes-ie7.ars
        \_ As long  as Opera is the only browser you can use on your Wii,
           I see a fine long life ahead of it.
	...
2009/11/27-12/6 [Computer/SW/OS/OsX] UID:53546 Activity:low
11/27   What did you guys buy on Black Friday?
        \_ cold medicine
           \_ me too!
        \_ Nothing.
        \_ I bought a Mac Air for my wife when Mac Mall announced their
           "Black Friday sale" on Wednesday. But that was technically not
	...
2009/10/1-21 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:53417 Activity:moderate
10/1    I am thinking of installing firefox on soda under my home directory.
        Will this make me a hozer?
        \_ Possibly. I wonder if we should have another VM for that...btw,
           I remember someone saying they're glad we're not on FreeBSD
           anymore, but last I checked, a bunch of our stuff is on FreeBSD,
           but our login server is not.
	...
Cache (4483 bytes)
csua.com/?entry=45520
closeButtons, and set it to 2 (no close buttons) or 3 (a single close button on the right of the tabs, like in previous Firefoxes - though, again, middle-click makes it useless). html \_ The hypocrisy of Google, combined with the fact that Google ... net/2006/11/02/fixing-tab-annoyances-in-firefox-20 Firefox 20 has been out for a while, and the response to it has been mostly positive. However, there were a couple of changes to how tabs work, and I, for one, didn't like them at all. Looking around, I found the solution to one of them, and the other one was pretty easy to figure out. Here's the changes, and how to "undo" them: 1- "X" close button on every tab This one, to me, qualifies for the "What were they thinking?" Not to mention that the "X" button is both harder to click on than the entire tab, and makes it easy to close tabs by mistake, when you just wanted to select it? In other words, there's already an easy way, and they add a more difficult way, which, besides, can easy lead to mistakes? closeButtons, and set it to 2 (no close buttons) or 3 (a single close button on the right of the tabs, like in previous Firefoxes - though, again, middle-click makes it useless). In Firefox 1x, the tabs would get as small as they needed to be, to fit in the window. Now, they don't get smaller than a certain size, and force the user to scroll. I haven't found an option to completely disable this behavior, but I can make it virtually go away by reducing the minimum tab width to a much smaller value. Obviously everyone *knew* that triple-click-control-middle-abcde-enter-enter-space with your leg above your back would close a tab. If Apple has close buttons on each tab, and not a single close at the right side, nor no-buttons at all, what do you think is the best user experience? did you know that most computer-savy users *still* don't know about the right mouse button? For me, middle click will paste the content of the clipboard and try to open it either on the current tab, or the tab where it was middle-clicked on. And TabX was always one of the first extensions I'd install, so for me this new behaviour is as it should have always been. So I would not call it "what were they thinking", I'd actually call it sane. As for the tabs not going below a certain width, I say that's a good thing too. It always annoyed me to no end that the tabs would get so small you couldn't figure out what they actually were. It could be better, of course, if instead of having the user scroll the tab bar to find the tab he's looking for, it'd wrap them onto the next row. Most of the time, I click on one (or middle-click, to open it in a new tab)... And I find the thought of NOT seeing all my tabs at once (even if I cannot read the text in each one) unacceptable. Horizontal scrolling - whenever in a page, or in a tab list - is the work of the devil. But, hey, the Firefox developers seem to agree with you... Now anyone has a choice: leave it as it is, or change it. By the way, I wouldn't like more than one tab row, as it might cause the main window to move down when opening a new tab, then up when you close a tab, then down again... Quote To my taste TAB functionality in 20 became worse in certain aspects. I am using the tabmix plus extension to set features to my liking and I am glad, that it still works in firefox 2 With tab mix plus I can set the behaviour of the middle click as well as having a close button on every tab (left or right justified) and also have another close button on the tab bar (in fact I am using both depending on the situation). Quote add on: As I suffer lightly with RSI symptoms I am always looking for solutions with minimal clicks, keystrokes or pointer movements. Sometimes I would wish developers had the same problems so that they are more likely to come up with more ergonomic solutions or offer customization options. I have replaced my mouse with a pen tablet but unfortunately I have no middle click button on the pen. So I am using the close button on every tab, but when I want to close many tabs it is much more convenient to use a general close as I do not have to move the pointer between clicks. Quote "Don't people know that you can close any tab simply by middle-clicking on it?" Especially since the middle button could be set to do other things. Following your logic, maybe there should be no close button on the corners of windows. I think it is more consistent UI behavior to have them on each tab, as well.