Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 47523
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/23 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/23    

2007/8/3-22 [Politics/Domestic/911, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:47523 Activity:low
8/3     http://zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1343
        Survey shows just 3% of Americans approve of how Congress is handling
        the war in Iraq; 24% say the same for the President
        \_ The Republicans support the war and the Democrats do not. That is
           not really news.
           \_ "This lack of confidence in Congress cuts across all ideologies.
              Democrats--some of whom had hoped the now Democrat-led Congress
              would bring an end to the war in Iraq--expressed overwhelming
              displeasure with how Congress has handled the war, with 94%
              giving Congress a negative rating in its handling specifically of
              that issue."
              \_ So we agree. The Democrats are upset at Congress for not
                 taking stronger action against the war and the Republicans
                 are upset at Congress for taking action against the war.
                 \_ How many are upset that the Democrats ran on a platform of
                    cleaning up corruption in DC and not only did nothing to
                    clean it up but went out of their way to make it worse?
                    \_ Show me how it's worse. Then show me how the Dems made
                       it so.
                       \_ Because they're doing the exact same thing with
                          earmarks but are also hypocritical liars about it.
                          \_http://www.commonblog.com/story/2007/2/2/155119/1962
                    \_ What do you have against the Ethics Reform Bill? At
                       least it is a step in the right direction.
                       \_ Nothing except the fact they left so many holes in
                          it they shouldn't have bothered.  With control of
                          Congress and a President who will sign it, they
                          could have done a real reform bill but they're all
                          so addicted to giving away other people's money to
                          buy campaign funds they'll never do real reform.
                          It is just a PR bill so in 2008 they can say they
                          cleaned up DC like they promised, meanwhile having
                          filled their pockets with your cash.
                          \_ Bush would never sign real campaign finance
                             reform. The GOP sucks at the teat of big money.
                             \_ Of course he wouldn't.  It was never sent to
                                his desk, duh.  Of course the GOP requires
                                big money.  Hint: so do the Dems.  I find this
                                whole "my guys are angels and your guys are
                                devils" line of non-reasoning both amusing and
                                somewhat sad at the same time.  Try some
                                critical reasoning skills before posting in
                                the future.
                                \_ Are you the same guy who said "did nothing
                                   to make it better but went out of the way
                                   to make it worse." If so, you are a
                                   hypocrite. If not, no one was talking to you.
                                   \_ There is absolutely nothing hypocritical
                                      about saying the Dems are hypocrites on
                                      the issue.  I've always been very
                                      consistent on the motd: both parties
                                      suck equally.  Party politics sucks.
                                      Your pet party is no better than the
                                      opposition party.  Deal.
                                      \_ Nope. The GOP has been more corrupt
                                         this last six years than the Democrats
                                         have ever been. The two parties are
                                         not exactly the same and you are just
                                         a cynic with no idea or hope to
                                         improve things. It is very easy to
                                         sit on the sidelines and whine. Learn
                                         to make some positive change and maybe
                                         someone will pay attention to you.
                                         \_ You're either ignorant or blind.
                                            Both parties have been corrupt,
                                            robbing the tax payers, stealing
                                            elections, and serving themselves
                                            first and foremost for far longer
                                            than anyone here has been alive.
                                            I'm not here to 'make positive
                                            change' nor am I 'sitting on the
                                            sidelines'.  I reject your
                                            ridiculous and damaging two party
                                            scam system.  It is not a mindless
                                            "our guy" or "your guy" choice.
                                            So tell me oh great bringer of
                                            justice and wisdom, what have you
                                            done to make positive change?
                                            \_ For one thing, I was one of the
                                               people that circulated petitions
                                               and then got endorsements from
                                               the Democrats, Republicans and
                                               Greens for a campaign finance
                                               reform initiative on the SF
                                               city ballot, one that passed by
                                               80%+ of the vote.
                                               http://www.csua.org/u/jak
                                               More recently, I have joined
                                               Common Cause. And if you are who
                                               I am pretty sure you are, it is
                                               kind of amusing your sudden
                                               conversion to independent.
                                               Weren't you posting pro-war
                                               Freeper links not that long ago?
                                               \_ I not only have never posted
                                                  freeper links, I think the
                                                  freepers are just as stupid
                                                  as their counterparts at
                                                  dailykos.  So, no.
        \_ This Dem is angry at the Dems for not killing the Farm Bill. I'm
           angry with the vetoing President and the filibustering Republicans
           for everything else.
           \_ Bush has barely vetoed or even threatened to veto much of
              anything compared to most Presidents.  Both parties have
              abused the Senate rules to make almost every vote require 60
              votes to pass anything.  This is all pot, kettle, black.
              \_ Bush's own party had controlled both houses for the majority
                 of his time in office.  I have no actual numbers, but I'd bet
                 that his veto/threat pace this session outstrips many other
                 presidents.
                 http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-08-05-vetoes_N.htm
                 There's some numbers.  Fuck off with your kettles.
                 \_ "Fuck off"?  Childish.  Ok, so where in this article does
                    it say Bush vetoed or even threatened to veto more bills
                    than any other President or even any particular President?
                    You've added absolutely nothing to this but you have shown
                    you're immature and not too bright.  I also see you
                    entirely ignored my point about abuse of Senate rules
                    by both parties which is what PKB was a reference to.
                    Have a nice evening.
2025/05/23 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/23    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2012/11/18-12/18 [Recreation/Celebrity, Politics/Domestic/911, Computer/SW/Apps/Media] UID:54537 Activity:nil
11/16   Anonymous responds to be labeled a "terrorist" by Isreali media:
        http://t.co/0lIgC166
	...
2012/5/9-6/4 [Politics/Domestic/911] UID:54384 Activity:nil
5/9     If U.S. doesn't do assissination, then what do you call
        Operation Neptune Spear aka "Mission Kill Bin Laden"?
        \_ I think theoretically the difference is that the goal of one is
           "kill him/her", while the goal of the other is "capture him/her,
           and don't hestitate to shoot with the possibly of killing if he/she
           and don't hesitate to shoot with the possibly of killing if he/she
	...
2011/5/5-7/30 [Politics/Domestic/911, Politics/Domestic/RepublicanMedia] UID:54104 Activity:nil
5/4     So, Bin Laden, star of Fox News, dies at 51.  But really the
        question is, when are we declaring war on pakistan for
        1. harboring a known terrorist
        2. taking our money ($ billions) for "antiterror" operations?
        Clearly we got scammed here.
	...
2010/1/4-19 [Politics/Domestic/911] UID:53611 Activity:moderate
1/4     Why the fascination with blowing up airplanes? Airports have tight
        security. It doesn't seem worth it. It's far easier to derail a
        train or set off explosives in a crowded place like a theater or
        sporting event. As many or more people will be killed and it will
        still make the news. I don't get why all of our security, and
        apprently much of the terrorist's resources, is focused on airplanes.
	...
2009/12/5-26 [Politics/Domestic/911, Recreation/Humor] UID:53568 Activity:nil
12/4    you know the 1999 ending of ST:DS9 shows the protagonists working
        as terrorists, and all worried about a police state coming for the
        federation.  Funny timing, no?
        \_ At that point in time there was a bit of sympathy people were
           starting to extend to "freedom fighters"; vis a vis all the
           popular support many pro-palestine movements were going on -
	...
2009/8/12-9/1 [Politics/Domestic/California/Arnold, Politics/Domestic/California/Prop] UID:53268 Activity:moderate
8/12    Thanks for destroying the world's finest public University!
        http://tinyurl.com/kr92ob (The Economist)
        \_ Why not raise tuition? At private universities, students generate
           revenue. Students should not be seen as an expense. UC has
           been a tremendous bargain for most of its existence. It's time
           to raise tuition to match the perceived quality of the
	...
2009/5/31-6/5 [Politics/Domestic/Abortion] UID:53062 Activity:nil
5/31    Tiller terrorist was a classic right wing nut - "sovereign citizen,"
        tax protester, Operation Rescue member... I wonder if he had a freep
        account.
        http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/5/31/737357/--Suspect-Identified-in-Tiller-Assassination
        \_ Operation Rescue is the definition of domestic terrorism.
        \_ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2262376/posts
	...
2009/5/18-26 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:53007 Activity:kinda low
5/18    how come we interfere with Bosnia civil war, yet we don't even
        bother to raise complains about Sri Lankans' genocide toward
        their Tamili minorities?
        \_ it's a protest against recording artist M.I.A.
        \_ because our military capacity is overtaxed based on our
           insane implementation of PNAC's ridiculous vision of a
	...
2012/12/18-2013/1/24 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:54559 Activity:nil
12/18   Bush kills. Bushmaster kills.
        \_ Sandy Huricane kills. Sandy Hook kills.
           \_ bitch
	...
2011/5/1-7/30 [Politics/Domestic/911] UID:54102 Activity:nil
5/1     Osama bin Ladin is dead.
        \_ So is the CSUA.
           \_ Nope, it's actually really active.
              \_ Are there finally girls in the csua?
              \_ Is there a projects page?
              \_ Funneling slaves -> stanford based corps != "active"
	...
2010/11/8-2011/1/13 [Politics/Domestic/Abortion] UID:53998 Activity:nil
11/8    Have you read how Bush says his pro-life stance was influenced
        by his mother keeping one of her miscarriages in a jar, and showing
        it to him?  These are headlines The Onion never dreamed of
	...
2010/11/2-2011/1/13 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/President/Reagan] UID:54001 Activity:nil
11/2    California Uber Alles is such a great song
        \_ Yes, and it was written about Jerry Brown. I was thinking this
           as I cast my vote for Meg Whitman. I am independent, but I
           typically vote Democrat (e.g., I voted for Boxer). However, I
           can't believe we elected this retread.
           \_ You voted for the billionaire that ran HP into the ground
	...
2010/5/26-6/30 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China] UID:53845 Activity:nil
5/26    "China could join moves to sanction North Korea"
        http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100526/ap_on_re_as/as_clinton_south_korea
        How did Hillary manage to do that when we're also asking China to
        concede on the economic front at the same time?
         \_ China doesn't want NK to implode. NK is a buffer between SK and
            China, or in other words a large buffer between a strong US ally and
	...
2010/4/28-5/10 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:53808 Activity:nil
4/28    Laura Bush ran a stop sign and killed someone in 1963:
        http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/28/books/28laura.html?no_interstitial
        How come she didn't go to jail?
        \_ Car drivers rarely go to jail for killing people.  -tom
        \_ Ted Kennedy killed a girl. Dick Cheney shot a man.
        \_ Ted Kennedy killed a girl. Hillary and Dick Cheney both shot a man.
	...
2010/2/21-3/9 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:53717 Activity:nil
2/18    If not 0 then 1 - wasn't that the basis of the logic of the bush
        administration on torture?  If we do it, it's legal, and since
        torture is illegal, therefore we don't torture?
        \_ Bush is a great computer scientist.
           \_ He must be, given that he defeated the inventor of the Internet
              and AlGorithm.
	...
2009/12/25-2010/1/19 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:53603 Activity:nil
12/24   Why San Francisco and union and government suck:
        http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/12/unions-graft-stunning-incompetence-make.html
        \_ http://www.burbed.com/2010/01/03/san-francisco-richer-and-richer-and-richer
           San Francisco to become richer and richer and richer. It's
           Disneyland for adults! YAY!!!
        \_ No doubt that there is plenty of corruption in San Francisco that
	...
Cache (5288 bytes)
zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1343
Released: August 01, 2007 UPI/Zogby Poll: 54% Lack Confidence in Bush's Ability As Commander in Chief Survey shows just 3% of Americans approve of how Congress is handling the war in Iraq; A majority (60%) said they do not trust the president's judgment when it comes to the war, while 38% say they have faith in his military decisions. Just 24% give the president favorable ratings of his performance in handling the war in Iraq, but confidence in Congress is significantly worse - only 3% give Congress positive marks for how it has handled the war. This lack of confidence in Congress cuts across all ideologies. Democrats - some of whom had hoped the now Democrat-led Congress would bring an end to the war in Iraq - expressed overwhelming displeasure with how Congress has handled the war, with 94% giving Congress a negative rating in its handling specifically of that issue. The online survey was conducted July 13-16, 2007, and included 7,590 respondents. It carries a margin of error of +/- 11 percentage points. To best show support for the troops, 42% believe Congress should fully fund the war in Iraq to maintain current troop levels, while 34% would favor attaching requirements for phased withdrawal to Iraq war funding. Just 18% said cutting all funding for the war in Iraq to bring troops home would be the best showing of Congressional support. Congress has proposed a bill continuing funding the war in Iraq, but that would require the withdrawal of the majority of troops there by Spring of 2008 - a plan favored by 49% of Americans. Slightly more than half (54%) believe the US should set a timeline for the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, and 55% believe the US should begin the phased withdrawal of US troops from Iraq by the end of this year. President Bush has threatened to veto any bill that funds the war in Iraq that also sets a date to begin withdrawing US troops, but 52% would disagree with a presidential veto, while 44% would approve. More than half (55%) believe if the US withdraws from Iraq that it will be considered a defeat, while 41% disagree. Half of Americans (51%) believe the presence of US troops in Iraq incites anti-US sentiment and creates a greater likelihood of a terrorist attack within the United States. But 44% believe the US troops in Iraq are fighting terrorists within Iraq so that the US does not have to fight terrorists here at home. Overall, slightly more than half (55%) said they oppose the war while 44% say they support it. While the vast majority of Democrats are in opposition to the war (93%), slightly more than half of independents (55%) and just 14% of Republicans take the same stance. Self-described conservatives (87%) and very conservatives (93%) show strong support for the war, but support among moderates (25%) is significantly less. Dissatisfaction with how the war in Iraq is being handled is also considerable among past or current members of the military and their families - nearly three in four (71%) give the president negative ratings on his handling of the war and than half (54%) said they don't trust the President's judgment when it comes to the Iraq war. Nearly half (47%) say they lack confidence in Bush's ability as Commander in Chief - 41% said they have no confidence in him at all. The vast majority (96%) also have a negative view of how Congress has handled the war, but there is disagreement about what Congress should do to support the troops. While half said Congress should fully fund the war in Iraq to maintain current troop levels, 29% would favor attaching requirements for phased withdrawal to Iraq war funding and 16% believe Congress should cut all funding for the war in Iraq and bring the troops home. Those with military ties are split over setting a timeline for withdrawal - 48% would favor withdrawal but 50% would oppose such a plan. There is a similar split when asked if the US should begin the phased withdrawal of US troops from Iraq by the end of the year - 50% agree while 46% disagree. Slightly more than half (57%) believe withdrawal from Iraq would be considered a defeat, but 38% disagree with that perspective. Two in five (40%) favor a proposal by Congress to continue finding the war in Iraq, but that would require the withdrawal of the majority of troops by the spring of 2008. Half (51%) would support a Presidential veto of a bill that funds the war by sets a timeline for withdrawing US troops, although nearly as many (46%) would oppose a veto. Those with military ties mirror the feelings of Americans overall. While half (51%) believe US troops in Iraq are fighting terrorists within Iraq so that the US does not have to fight the terrorists domestically, nearly as many (45%) believe the presence of US troops in Iraq incites anti-US sentiment and creates a greater likelihood of a terrorist attack here at home. Bush also gets low ratings in dealing with veterans - two-thirds (67%) give Bush negative ratings for his performance in providing adequate health care for the veterans who have returned home from the ward in Afghanistan and Iraq. Among those who have or are currently serving in the military and their families, nearly as many agree (62%), while just 30% believe Bush has done a favorable job of providing health care for veterans.
Cache (737 bytes)
www.commonblog.com/story/2007/2/2/155119/1962
the $463 billion spending measure the House passed 286 to 140 last Wednesday. Leaders from both parties courageously agreed to remove all earmarks! Earmarks, or special provisions that set aside money for specific purposes, have been used in recent years to funnel billions of tax dollars toward pet projects and special interests. This measure replaces the temporary budget that had been in place since last year, when Congress failed to pass 9 out of the 11 necessary budget bills. DS This year, many new congressmen came to office promising to control earmarks and special interest giveaways, and it is very encouraging to see them sticking to their word. We hope the Senate follows suit when it votes on the bill in the coming weeks.
Cache (3068 bytes)
www.csua.org/u/jak -> www.consumerwatchdog.org/advocacy/fs/?postId=3530&pageTitle=Taxpayer+Protection+Amendment
Taxpayer Protection Amendment What It Is The Taxpayer Protection Amendment (TPA) prevents a conflict of interest between public officials and those with whom these officials do business. Specifically, the TPA prohibits a public official from receiving campaign donations, gifts or employment from anyone benefiting from the official's discretionary actions (ie awarding public funds or assets such as a city contract, special tax break, or land zoning change). The TPA forces a public official to represent the interests of the public and not the special interests of a potential contributor. When and Where the TPA was on the ballot The TPA passed overwhelmingly in Santa Monica with 58% of the vote, 59% in Vista and 82% in San Francisco in November 2000. Voters in Pasadena and Claremont approved the measure with 60% and 55% of the vote, respectively, in March 2001. The TPA does not prohibit the giving of donations or other favors. It prohibits an official from taking money, gifts or jobs from anybody that the official has voted to give one of the above benefits. The prohibition on who the official cannot take money from extends to major stockholders and owners of companies or organizations that the official votes to give one of the above benefits. The measure is in force even if the individual or group does not ultimately gain the contract or special benefit. A "public official" is any elected or appointed public official acting in an official capacity . It also applies to an official of a redevelopment agency, or any other public agency, whether within or without the territorial jurisdiction of the City and County either as a representative or appointee of the City and County. Our law covers only those officials who make a discretionary decision to award one of the above benefits to an individual or group. How long does the prohibition on accepting contributions last? The prohibition begins on the date that the official votes to approve the public benefit and ends no later than 1 one year after the expiration of the term of office that the official is serving at the time the official approves or votes to approve the public benefit; The City and County shall provide any person applying or competing for a benefit (as listed above) with written notice of the provisions of this measure and the future limitations it imposes. Any knowing and willful violation of this measure by a public official constitutes a criminal misdemeanor offense. A finding of liability shall subject the public official to the following civil remedies: 1 restitution of any money or thing of value received; A civil action may be brought by any resident of the City and County. Several individuals and organizations including Ralph Nader, the Sierra Club and the good government group California Common Cause. The TPA is sponsored by the Oaks Project, an all-volunteer citizens group trained in practical political skills. These volunteers gathered 100% of the over 67,000 signatures needed to place this measure on the ballot in five cities across California.
Cache (3857 bytes)
www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-08-05-vetoes_N.htm
Print | By David Jackson, USA TODAY WASHINGTON -- President Bush, who has vetoed only three bills, has made twice as many veto threats in 2007 than in any other year of his presidency. Facing a Democratic-controlled Congress for the first time, Bush or his aides threatened 48 vetoes through Friday compared with a previous high of 22 bills for all of 2003, according to statements of administration policy submitted by the Office of Management and Budget. Bush or his advisers have threatened to veto nine of 12 appropriations bills approved in the House of Representatives. White House officials say the increased number of veto threats is because of irresponsible legislation coming from the Democrats. "We have to be a check on bad policies coming out of Congress," White House spokesman Tony Fratto said. Some conservatives have questioned Bush's commitment to fiscal discipline, noting -- as the Heritage Foundation did in a March report -- that federal spending increased 23% after inflation from 2001 to 2006. Bush did not veto any appropriations bills passed by Republican Congresses, which included hikes for defense, homeland security, entitlements, education and thousands of special-interest items called earmarks that are tacked onto spending bills at lawmakers' requests. Renault in Casablanca, who feigns shock that there is gambling in Rick's Cafe, said Bruce Bartlett, a conservative economist and author of Impostor: How George W Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy. "He's suddenly 'shocked, shocked' to find out there's all this pork-barrel spending in these bills," Bartlett said. Bush's veto strategy "is the only card they've really got to play if they are indeed interested in restraining government spending," says Stephen Slivinski, director of budget studies at the libertarian Cato Institute. That has been "an open question" in the past, he added, but now the threats are aimed at "Democratic bills." "He dislikes Democrats more than he likes big government," Slivinski said. Bush has made no secret of his desire to curb spending in Democratic bills. "The bunch now running Congress wants to return to the tax-and-spend policies of the past," Bush told the American Legislative Exchange Council last month. "That's why I plan on using my veto to keep your taxes low." Bush vetoed his first spending bill May 1, not because of spending levels but because the supplemental budget bill contained a timeline for withdrawing US troops from Iraq. Democrats removed that provision, and Bush signed the bill. That, Fratto said, shows the effectiveness of a presidential veto. The two other vetoes of Bush's presidency dealt with proposals to expand federal research of embryonic stem cells. Democrats called the veto strategy needlessly confrontational. "I'm not sure if the president is trying to change the subject from Iraq or just spoiling for a fight to score political points with his (political) base," said Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. Dealing with a Democratic Congress is "a new experience for him," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. "This is all about negotiation," she says, noting that Democrats and the White House are only 07% apart when it comes to spending. Democrats, she says, want more for education, border security and veterans' health benefits. That less-than-1% difference is a huge number, Fratto says, and covers programs that will grow bigger. He also disputes conservatives who say Bush spent too much, attributing higher spending to the needs of homeland security and national defense after 9/11. Include name, phone number, city and state for verification. Conversation guidelines: USA TODAY welcomes your thoughts, stories and information related to this article. Keep the conversation appropriate for interested readers across the map.