Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 47405
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

2007/7/24-27 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:47405 Activity:nil
7/24    Hillary prefers "Progressive".  Hmm...
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Era
        Progressives ... tended to assume that opponents were motivated by
        ignorance or corruption
        \_ what is wrong about the above statement?
        \_ "In the United States, the Progressive Era was a period of reform
            which lasted from the 1890s through the 1920s."
           Hell, if you're going to go that far back, why not call Giuliani
           a Whig?
           \_ Hillary specifically referred to Progressive as an early 20th
              century movement.
              \_ Would it kill you to type out the quote?
                 \_ "I prefer the word "progressive," which has a real American
                    meaning, going back to the progressive era at the beginning
                    of the 20th century."
                    http://csua.org/u/j7m
                    \_ Thank you! Wow, now I'm actually excited to vote for
                       her.
                       \_ Huh? Why?
                          \_ Reform or bust, baby!
                    \_ Oho, you sneaky out-of-context quoter! From the next
                       line of the article:
                       "I consider myself a modern progressive, someone who
                        believes strongly in individual rights and freedoms,
                        who believes that we are better as a society when we'
                        re working together and when we find ways to help
                        those who may not have all the advantages in life get
                        the tools they need to lead a more productive life for
                        themselves and their families. So I consider myself a
                        proud modern American progressive, and I think that's
                        the kind of philosophy and practice that we need to
                        bring back to American politics."
                       Yup, looks good to me.
                       \_ You sneaky out-of-context replier!  Does she disclaim
                          any of the principles?  No, she specifically included
                          the early 20th century and she agrees with the
                          principles of that movement.  And my reply was to the
                          person criticizing my reference to the early 20th
                          century movement.
                          \_ So, the word "modern" in no way modifies the
                             views espoused in the early 20th century?
                             \_ I didn't say it "in no way modifies" anything.
                                \_ Soooo, if one of the principles of the
                                   early 20th century Progressives was
                                   that all of their opponents were corrupt or
                                   ignorant, which they generally were, is it
                                   reasonable that a modern Progressive, faced
                                   with a different political climate, might
                                   not view her opposition with such contempt?
                                   \_ That is one of the aspects of early
                                      Progressives which I see as relatively
                                      the same as modern liberals (or modern
                                      Progressives).
                                      \_ BushCo invites oil execs to a secret
                                         meeting to determine America's energy
                                         policy, and you don't see corruption?
                                         If there's contempt for a corrupt GOP,
                                         it's hard to pretend the GOP hasn't
                                         earned it.
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2012/10/22-12/4 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:54511 Activity:nil
10/22   "Romney Family Investment Ties To Voting Machine Company That Could
        Decide The Election Causing Concern"
        http://www.csua.org/u/y1y (news.yahoo.com)
        "There have already been complaints that broken machines were not
        being quickly replaced in precincts that tend to lean Democratic and
        now, word is coming in that there may be some software issues."
	...
2012/11/2-12/4 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:54520 Activity:nil
11/2    Do the Native Americans in Indian reservations (nations) get to vote
        in the US presidential election?
        \_ http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Do+the+Native+Americans+in+Indian+reservations+(nations)+get+to+vote+in+the+US+presidential+election
	...
2012/10/7-11/7 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:54494 Activity:nil
10/7    In practice, how long are HIGH SCHOOL transcript kept? I'm asking
        because I'm wondering if people can dig up my shady past.
        I was a bad kid.
        \_ I would doubt that they are ever destroyed. What would you
           do about it in any case? Try not to worry too much about
           things you have no control over.
	...
2011/5/19-7/21 [Politics/Domestic/California/Arnold] UID:54109 Activity:nil
5/19    Mildred Patricia Baena looked ugly even for her age.  Why would Arnold
        have fallen for her??
        \_ yawn arnpolitik
        \_ is he running for pres yet
           \_ Nobody would vote for a pres candidate with such a bad taste.
              She looks worse than Monica Lewinsky.
	...
2010/11/2-2011/1/13 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/President/Reagan] UID:54001 Activity:nil
11/2    California Uber Alles is such a great song
        \_ Yes, and it was written about Jerry Brown. I was thinking this
           as I cast my vote for Meg Whitman. I am independent, but I
           typically vote Democrat (e.g., I voted for Boxer). However, I
           can't believe we elected this retread.
           \_ You voted for the billionaire that ran HP into the ground
	...
2010/6/9-30 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:53857 Activity:nil
6/8     I cannot believe Carly Fiorina is a legitimate candidate. I would
        sooooooo love to vote out Boxer, but Carly completely ruined HP.
        \_ The Republican party shall rise again!
        \_ Much as the left has realized that, in the realm of pundrity, they
         can field loud, ignorant, blowhards just as well as the right, so
         has the right evidently realized that they too can field an
	...
2009/1/27-2/1 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton] UID:52478 Activity:nil
1/27    http://www.realnews.org/index.php-option=com_content&task=view&id=59&Itemid=189.htm
        [Title: Hilary's Bush Connection. Summary: Ties to Alan Quasha.]
        \_ I knew hillary was evil!
        \- in case you are interested, the old white guy to the right of
           the clinton-bushco picture [chalmers johnson] is a former ucb
           prof who sort of went nuts.
	...
2008/11/11-26 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:51915 Activity:nil
11/11   Classy Republicans:
        http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_10955325?source=rss
        \_ election is over dude, you won.
           \_ angry sysadmin says
              chance of Obama doing the right thing:  10%
              chance of McCain doing the right thing:  0%
	...
2008/10/13 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush, Politics/Domestic/President] UID:51494 Activity:nil 63%like:51495
10/13   I just want to crow for a moment:
        http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2008
        *Boredcast Message from 'psb': Tue Oct  7 13:13:54 2008
        || i wonder if the nobel people will give PKRUGMAN the econ prize
        || as a way of sticking it to BUSHCO
        || well the econ nobel people
	...
2008/9/9-14 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:51113 Activity:nil
9/9     I am a democrat but my prediction is Obama will lose.  He's a
        better speech giver, but what exactly has he done? He can talk
        the talk but there's no proof that he has what it takes do to
        the job. He had a golden opportunity to pick Hillary as the VP
        to form the dream ticket. It would've shown to the outside
        world that he will unite force with competitors for the common
	...
2008/8/11-18 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:50847 Activity:nil
8/11    Analysis: roots of conflict between Georgia and Russia
        http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4498709.ece
        \_ This is an excellent insight. Thank you.
        \_ this is pretty straightforward actually:
           - s. ossetia is de facto independent and allied with Russia
           - georgia takes s. ossetia by force, pokes Russian Bear in eye
	...
2008/6/24-27 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush, Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:50355 Activity:moderate 92%like:50333
6/23    Passing out "homemade" signs at Obama rally
        http://preview.tinyurl.com/67xltd [theunfocused.blogspot.com]
        \_ this is about the level of me seeing a pro mccain poster on
           the bulletin board at work.  big whoop-dee-do.  stop
           blogging about your toast being burnt.
        \_ Wow, look at all that FURIOUS ANGER in the comments.  This is
	...
2008/6/13-17 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:50249 Activity:high
6/13    McCain flip-flops again, this time on Social Security:
        http://preview.tinyurl.com/5tg6m6
        \_ Finally a genuine criticism.  Yep, it looks like ol' McCain doesn't
           have any grounding philosophy on this.  You can probably parse the
           statements to make them consistent (using partial vs full
           privatization), but looks like a flip-flop to me.  (Unless the full
	...
2008/5/31-6/5 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:50103 Activity:kinda low
5/30    Clinton is winning Puerto Rico.  YES.
        \- i wouldnt dismisss the PA results but the PR results are
           totally meaningless ... Clinton is basically the Senator
           from Puerto Rico:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rican_migration_to_New_York#Currently
           Either you are being sarcastic or ...
	...
2008/5/29-6/1 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:50088 Activity:nil
5/29    Look at that.  McClellan's hit piece is published by Soros
        http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/30118_The_Soros-McClellan_Connection
        \_ Go to Barnes and Noble.  Notice the shelves of really not very interesting
           conservative tomes from agit prop national right wing figures. I'll
           list a few later if you want.  Notice they're almost all published
           by the Newsmax guys.  I just can't imagine anyone buying that stuff,
	...
Cache (3863 bytes)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Era
Progressives assumed that anything old was encrusted with inefficient and useless practices. A scientific study of the problem would enable experts to discover the "one best solution." Progressives strongly opposed waste and corruption, and they tended to assume that opponents were motivated by ignorance or corruption. They sought change in all policies at all levels of society, economy and government. Initially the movement was successful at local level, and then it progressed to state and gradually national. The reformers (and their opponents) were predominantly members of the middle class. Women came to the forefront in the Progressive era and proved their value as social workers. The Progressives pushed for social justice, general equality and public safety, but there were contradictions within the movement, especially regarding race. The Catholics had their own version of the movement which they applied to their schools, colleges, and hospitals. Almost all major politicians declared their adherence to some progressive measures. Progressives shared a common belief in the ability of science, technology and disinterested expertise to identify all problems and come up with the one best solution. Progressives moved to enable the citizenry to rule more directly and circumvent political bosses; "Democracy, Republicanism and Efficiency: The Values of American Politics, 1885-1930," in Byron Shafer and Anthony Badger, eds, Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775-2000 (U of Kansas Press, 2001) pp 149-180; The Era of Theodore Roosevelt and the Birth of Modern America, 1900-1912. "The Twenties: A New Historiographical Frontier," The Journal of American History, Vol. The Progressive Years: The Spirit and Achievement of American Reform (1962), primary documents * Thelen, David P "Social Tensions and the Origins of Progressivism," Journal of American History 56 (1969), 323-341 online at JSTOR * Wiebe, Robert. edit National politics * Beale Howard K Theodore Roosevelt and the Rise of America to World Power. Series of essays that examine how TR did politics * Brands, HW Theodore Roosevelt (2001) * Clements, Kendrick A The Presidency of Woodrow Wilson (1992) * Coletta, Paolo. The Presidency of William Howard Taft (1990) * Cooper, John Milton The Warrior and the Priest: Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt. Congress, Progressive Reform, and the New American State (2004) * Hofstadter, Richard. Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers and the American State, 1877-1917 (1999) * Wiebe, Robert H Businessmen and Reform: A Study of the Progressive Movement (1968) * Joan Hoff Wilson. Herbert Hoover, Forgotten Progressive (1965) * Pestritto, RJ "Woodrow Wilson and the Roots of Modern Liberalism." edit State, local, ethnic, gender, business, labor * Abell, Aaron I American Catholicism and Social Action: A Search for Social Justice, 1865-1950 (1960), * Kyle Bruce and Chris Nyland; "Scientific Management, Institutionalism, and Business Stabilization: 1903-1923" Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. Gender, Class, Race, and Reform in the Progressive Era (1991). A Nation under Our Feet: Black Political Struggles in the Rural South from Slavery to the Great Migration (2003). emphasized urban, ethnic, working class support for reform * Link, William A The Paradox of Southern Progressivism, 1880-1930 (1997). The Chicago Pragmatists and American Progressivism (1993). The Progressives and the Slums: Tenement House Reform in New York City, 1890-1917 Greenwood Press: 1974. Reinventing 'The People': The Progressive Movement, the Class Problem, and the Origins of Modern Liberalism, University of Illinois Press, 2006. The New Citizenship, Origins of Progressivism in Wisconsin, 1885-1900 (1972). "Business Disunity and the Progressive Movement, 1901-1914," The Mississippi Valley Historical Review, Vol.
Cache (8192 bytes)
csua.org/u/j7m -> www.nytimes.com/2007/07/24/us/politics/24transcript.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By July 24, 2007 Transcript Fourth Democratic Debate The eight candidates vying to be the Democratic nominee for president in the 2008 elections answered questions submitted by CNN and YouTube users in a debate. Bill Richardson (D-NM) Moderator: Anderson Cooper, CNN host. Location: the Citadel, Charleston, SC Monday, July 23, 2007. Here is a full transcript of the event, from CNN: MR COOPER: Our first question tonight is from Zack Kempf in Provo, Utah. So my question is, we have a bunch of leaders who cant seem to do their job. And when we pick people based on the issues that they represent, but then when they get in power and they dont do anything about it anyway. If youre going to spend this whole night talking about your views on issues, but the issues dont matter if when you get in power, nothings going to get done. We have Congress and the president with, like, a 30 percent approval rating, so clearly we dont think theyre doing a good job. Whats going to make you any more effectual, beyond all the platitudes and the stuff were used to hearing? I mean, be honest with us: How are you going to be any different? MR COOPER: Senator Dodd, youve been in Congress more than 30 years. First of all, thank you for inviting us here to the Citadel. Its great to be here at this wonderful college, university. Certainly I think its a very important question one ought to be asking, because while hope and confidence and optimism are clearly very important, I think experience matters a great deal -- the experience people bring to their candidacy, the ideas, the bold ideas that theyve championed over the years, whether or not they were successful in advancing those ideas and able to bring people together. Im very proud of the fact that over my 26 years in the Senate, Ive offered landmark legislation; the Family and Medical Leave Act, child care legislation, reform of financial institutions. Republicans as well as Democrats together around those issues. Thats whats missing more than anything else, I think, right now MR COOPER: But SEN. DODD: is the ability to bring people together to get the job done. MR COOPER: But if someone really wants a change, are you the guy to get it done? You all look back -- I think, you know, speeches are easy to make and rhetoric is easy to expose here, but I think the idea of looking back and saying, what have you done -- if you want to get a good idea of where someone is going to lead or how theyre going to lead, I think its very appropriate to say, what have you done? Show me, demonstrate to me the ability to get these things done that you cant get done in the past. MR COOPER: Senator Obama, your supporters say you are different. Your critics say youre inexperienced, youre a first-term senator. OBAMA: Well, I think the questioner hit the nail on the head. As I travel around the country, people have an urgent desire for change in Washington. And we are not going to fix health care, we are not going to fix energy, we are not going to do anything about our education system unless we change how business is done in Washington. Now, part of that is bringing people together, as Chris said, but part of it is also overcoming special interests and lobbyists who are writing legislation thats critical to the American people. And one of the things I bring is a perspective as a community organizer, as a state legislator, as well as a US senator, that says Washington has to change. MR COOPER: A lot of people say -- Congressman Kucinich, your supporters certainly say you are different. After watching the first several debates, which seemed more like conversations than actual debates, were all clear out here that you Democrats are united. But we have a very important decision to make coming up very soon, and Americans desperate for a change need to know, Congressman Kucinich, how would America be better off with you as president than we would be if either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama became president? MR COOPER: What do you have that Senator Clinton and Senator Obama do not have? KUCINICH: Well, first of all, a clear record as having not only opposed the war from the very beginning -- the only one on this stage who actually voted against the war and also the only one on the stage who voted against funding the war a hundred percent of the time. I want the people of the Citadel to know that I mourn the passing of those people who gave their lives, but I also would not hesitate to call upon you to defend this country. But Ill never send you in pursuit of a political agenda or a lie. Just like my father before me and like my -- who served in the Marines and my brother who served in the Marines in Vietnam and my nephew who served in Iraq, I believed in duty and honor, and I think its important to have those commitments to this country. Thats the new doctrine that Im going to promote throughout this campaign, that we use the science of human relations and diplomacy, that we pursue an approach which says that you can use international agreements and treaties and that you can work to settle your differences without committing the young men and women to war unless its absolutely necessary. MR COOPER: Senator Clinton, you were involved in that question. CLINTON: Well, I think the Democrats are united, as Davis said, and we are united for change. We cannot take another four or eight years of Republican leadership that has been so disastrous for our country. I have 35 years of being an instrument, an agent of change, before I was ever a public official. And during the time that Ive been privileged to serve as first lady and now as senator, Ive worked to bring people together, to find common ground where we can and then to stand our ground where we cant. Senator Obama, you were involved in the question, as well. OBAMA: Well, look, I dont think this is just a Republican problem. And we dont just need a change in political parties in Washington. Weve got to have a change in attitudes of those who are representing the people of America. Part of the reason I dont take PAC money, I dont take federal lobbyist money is because weve got to get the national interests up front as opposed to the special interests, and that is something that Ive got a track record doing, and I think that is what the American people are looking for in this election, people of both parties as well as independents. CLINTON: You know, Rob -- (laughter) -- you know, it is a word that originally meant that you were for freedom, that you were for the freedom to achieve, that you were willing to stand against big power and on behalf of the individual. Unfortunately, in the last 30, 40 years, it has been turned up on its head, and its been made to seem as though it is a word that describes big government, totally contrary to what its meaning was in the 19th and early 20th century. I prefer the word "progressive," which has a real American meaning, going back to the progressive era at the beginning of the 20th century. I consider myself a modern progressive, someone who believes strongly in individual rights and freedoms, who believes that we are better as a society when were working together and when we find ways to help those who may not have all the advantages in life get the tools they need to lead a more productive life for themselves and their families. So I consider myself a proud modern American progressive, and I think thats the kind of philosophy and practice that we need to bring back to American politics. Youre not going to see any change when these people get elected. And I want to take on Barack Obama for a minute, who said he doesnt take money from lobbyists. And besides that, he has received money from a Robert Wolf, the head of the USB Bank (sic; UBS Bank) in the United States, who raised $195,000 from this bank COOPER: Your time is up. COOPER: Senator Obama, Im going to have to let you respond. Well, the fact is I dont take PAC money and I dont take lobbyists money. And the bundlers -- the reason you know who is raising money for me, Mike, is because I have pushed through a law this past session to disclose that. And thats the kind ...