6/11 Mid-range Unix/Linux sysadmin job available on campus, working with
the Math, Physics, and other scientific departments within L&S.
Apply through the crappy campus jobs system
http://jobs.berkeley.edu, job #006645. -tom
\_ What is the salary range? What would it be for a senior?
\_ It's a PA III job; realistic starting salary
(up to mid-point of PA III range) is $58-$82K. A senior
sysadmin would be PA IV, starting at $70-$100K. -tom
\_ $85k mid point for a senior sysadmin? What real senior or
even most mid level unix people would take that job?
Seriously, those are the rates? Wow....
\_ No, $100K is the midpoint, but at the university it's
hard to get hired above the midpoint, so I avoid listing
the entire salary range for the position. -tom
\_ No, $100K is the midpoint of PA IV, but at the university
it's hard to get hired above the midpoint, so I avoid
listing the entire salary range for the position. -tom
\_ $100k for a senior unix person is still really low.
Is there some other non-obvious benefit to working
there?
\_ Why do you say $100K is really low? Most salary
calculators have $100K as about right, even for
SFBA. What do you think it should pay in order
to be competitive? $180K?
\_ The calculators always come in low. If your
salary is spot on with a calculator you're
underpaid.
\_ That has not been my experience and I have
supervised people, so I have knowledge of
dozens of peoples real salaries over the
last five years. What industry are you in?
\_ Tech industry. Maybe your company just
pays low. Do you target "the 50% mark" for
hires? You'll get "50% quality" people.
\_ In my experience, the best quality
people aren't the ones primarily
motivated by high salaries. -tom
\_ Your experience seems limited to a
place where all salaries are low so
of course you don't meet quality
people who can command a higher
salary. They never applied. If you
can truly get quality people with low
salary offers then more power to you
but from your comment about how it
would be better if it was easier to
get rid of the dead weight that does
not seem to be the case.
\_ I worked in the industry for
over 8 years, so no, my experience
is not limited to UC. And the
issues of hiring new good people
and getting rid of old dead weight
are completely separate. -tom
\_ There are really awesome retirement benefits.
So good that you don't need to contribute to
a 401k, so that is worth another 15% or so.
\_ I don't think this is true. The mandatory
contribution is not enough especially with the
recent performance since they outsourced the
fund management. While if you work at UC for
a really long time you do get a pension-like
compensation, "long time" is the key phrase.
In addition to the generally higher salary,
other companies often provide 401k-matching
and whatnot. I think the advantage is the
campus culture/environment. Most of my
coworkers can take a day off or work from home
on short notices when their child is sick and
such.
\_ It is the pension that really rocks. It is
worth quite a bit, if you do the math, but
yes, you have to plan to be at the UC for
most of your career for it to make sense.
At least 20 years. As for taking a day off
when your child is sick, isn't that true for
most employers?
\_ Okay, a sick child may be a bad example.
But in general, the flexibility of a
university job is superior to most US
businesses. While pension for a lifer
is certainly a good chunk of money one
can depend on, the higher earning while
working at non-UC can be well-invested
to close this gap. Oh, and I guess job
security can also be considered an
advantage.
\_ Also: Generally UC jobs are 40 hours
per week or thereabouts. Plus you're
working for an institution with a
meaningful mission, and you're not
going to get outsourced to Bangalore.
\_Bengaluru
Make sure you're comparing apples to
apples. -tom
\_ No one has ever been laid off from
UC?
\_ Layoffs are exceedingly rare. -tom
\_ Much to the dismay of the
taxpayers :-)
\_ Frankly, I think the
organization would be better
off if staff had less
"tenure," but I don't see
it changing any time soon.
-tom
\_ Are we distinguishing between
layoffs and firings? I knew a
woman at UC that was being fired.
She had over a year notice. Not
only that, but she had access to
employee records, including her
own! When someone went to retrieve
it from her, she went into a room
with her own file relatively full,
closed the door, then later came
out with the file, no longer as
full. Obviously, something is
broken, but without a central
campus-wide HR, that's not gonna
happen anytime soon.
\_ Stripped her own file? Cool.
Anyone actually do anything
about that or is that the one
year notice thing?
\_ I think there will be a lot more
outsourcing, even of gov't jobs,
in the form of contracts to
provide services (e.g. storage,
CPU, web hosting, etc.). IT
managers want you to buy services
off of a menu and the fact that
people in Bangalore are 90% of
\-Bengaluru
the operations providing the
service is not relevant. The only
safe gov't jobs are DOD and DOE
jobs. I wouldn't lump UC in with
those.
\_ No, DoD jobs are not safe
either. I know >3 DoD
people who have got booted,
and my acquaitence base is
not very wide.
\_ Fired for sucking or their
division laid off?
\_ DoD jobs are safe from
*outsourcing*. It's
possible the work can go
away entirely, but that's
something else. Any jobs
that require security
clearances are safe for now
as far as outsourcing. That
does not include most of UC. |