Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 46441
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/27 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/27    

2007/4/24-27 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:46441 Activity:low
4/24    Dianne Feinstein comes down squarely on the RIAA's side on the
        Copyright Royalty Board ruling.  Please write her snail mail, or
        phone her office, to tell her how wrong she is!
        http://somafm.com/blogs/rusty/2007/04/senator-dianne-feinstein-has-wrong.html
        \_ DiFi is a sell-out, and has been a sell-out on this particular
           issue for many years.  -tom
           \_ Was it Pelosi or Diane who has the concealed carry permit issued
              in SF?
              \_ That's Feinstein.  Don Perata (the California State Senator
                 who writes most of California's state-level gun ban
                 legislation) also has one.             --alawrenc
2025/05/27 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/27    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/11/25-2014/2/5 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:54754 Activity:nil
11/25   California, model for The Nation:
        http://tinyurl.com/k6crazn
        \_ 'And maybe the transaction would have proceeded faster if Mr.
           Boehner's office hadn't, according to the D.C. exchange, put its
           agent - who was calling to help finish the enrollment - on hold for
           35 minutes, listening to "lots of patriotic hold music."'
	...
2012/11/6-12/18 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:54524 Activity:nil
11/6    Four more years!
        \_ Yay! I look forward to 4 more years of doing absolutely nothing.
           It's a much better outcome than the alternative, which is 4 years
           of regress.
           \_ Can't argue with that.
        \_ Massachusetts went for Obama even though Mitt Romney was its
	...
2012/11/28-12/18 [Politics/Domestic/Crime, Academia/UCLA] UID:54539 Activity:nil
11/28   http://www.businessinsider.com/most-dangerous-colleges-in-america-2012-11#3-university-of-california--berkeley-23
        We are #3! We are #3! Go beah!!!
	...
2012/5/16-7/20 [Politics/Foreign/Europe] UID:54390 Activity:nil
5/16    Can anyone tell me what Greece is hoping for by rejecting austerity?
        From here it seems like the austerity is a pretty generous attempt
        to keep Greece from imploding entirely.   Are they hoping the
        Germans will put them on eternal state welfare, or what?
        Also, why would an outright default mean they must leave the Euro?
        Is it just that they won't be able to pay basic gvmt services
	...
2010/11/15-2011/1/13 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/Immigration] UID:53992 Activity:nil
11/15   "CA Supreme Court ...... ruled that illegal immigrants are entitled to
        the same tuition breaks offered to in-state high school students to
        attend public colleges and universities."
        http://www.csua.org/u/s0a
        Not only do illigal immigrants enjoy the same benefits as citizens
        (not to mention legal immigrants), they can actually enjoy more
	...
2010/11/2-2011/1/13 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/President/Reagan] UID:54001 Activity:nil
11/2    California Uber Alles is such a great song
        \_ Yes, and it was written about Jerry Brown. I was thinking this
           as I cast my vote for Meg Whitman. I am independent, but I
           typically vote Democrat (e.g., I voted for Boxer). However, I
           can't believe we elected this retread.
           \_ You voted for the billionaire that ran HP into the ground
	...
2010/8/29-9/30 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/Immigration] UID:53942 Activity:kinda low
8/29    OC turning liberal, maybe there is hope for CA afterall:
        http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/30/us/politics/30orange.html
        \_ and the state is slowly turning conservative. Meg 2010!
           \_ We will see. Seems unlikely.
        \_ Yeah, because CA sure has a problem with not enough dems in power!
           If only dems had been running the state for the last 40 years!
	...
2010/7/15-8/11 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:53885 Activity:nil
7/15    "Mom jailed over sex with 14-year-old son"
        http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38217476/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts
        \_ I just bought a hot homeless teen runaway lunch.
           Am i going to jail?
           \_ Was she 18?
        \_ FYI people "MILF" doesn't always mean what you think it means.
	...
Cache (3227 bytes)
somafm.com/blogs/rusty/2007/04/senator-dianne-feinstein-has-wrong.html
Rusty on Radio Rusty Hodge, General Manager of SomaFM discusses the issues that affect internet radio. Monday, April 23, 2007 Senator Dianne Feinstein has the wrong numbers Senator Dianne Feinstein is sending letters to people who have written to her asking her Under the Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2004, Congress - at the behest of webcasters - created the Copyright Royalty Board which consists of three judges. By law, the judges are a venue of last resort and are required to periodically set rates for various statutory copyright licenses in the event that webcasters and copyright owners are unable to reach voluntary agreements. In the absence of an agreement, the judges set a rate designed to approximate the fair-market value that webcasters should pay to artists and performers for streaming their music for the years 2006-2010. The new rate that was established is less than a 5 percent increase of the rate in effect from 1998-2005. While it is true that for large webcasters who were had too large of revenues or otherwise chose not to work under the percentage of revenue deal in the Small Webcasters Amendment, the rates per song per listener increased only 5% from 2005 to 2006, they go up 38% from 2006 to 2007. And more each year, until finally in 2010, they are 150% more than they were in 2005. Year Rate Year to Year Increase Increase since 2005 2005 0000762 2006 00008 5% 5% 2007 00011 38% 44% 2008 00014 27% 84% 2009 00018 29% 136% 2010 00019 6% 149% The other thing she doesn't take into consideration is that the fact that small webcasters pay royalties based on a percentage of revenue, not per song per listener, but are no longer allowed to pay based on a percentage of revenue. These small webcasters (like us) are facing royalty payments that are several times our annual gross revenues! She goes on to say: Although a few webcasters have recently claimed that the process was unfair, it was not arbitrary and allowed representatives from all sides to make their cases. The judges began the proceedings in 2005, and heard testimony from dozens of witnesses and conducted a comprehensive review of tens of thousands of pages of evidence submitted by all interested parties over an 18-month period. Unfortunately, the hearings were largely in secret, and the " tens of thousands of pages of evidence" were not released. We have been told from parties to the negotiations that many of these pages of evidence included numbers from music download services, on demand streaming services, and other non-radio music services. Since radio is completely different than these on-demand and download stores, why should those numbers be used to set the rates for webcasters? This is just more of the Bush administration "pruning the buds, so the American Beauty Rose can bloom." This has been their goal since the first age of the robber barons. JD Rockefeller made it a point to concentrate all wealth in America in the hands of a few giant corporations who were smarter and better suited to run things because they were rich. With Karl Rove working day and night to keep our elections from being legitimate, I don't know that there is much hope for America any more as a free country.