Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 46039
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2024/11/23 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
11/23   

2007/3/21-26 [Reference/Law/Court, Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:46039 Activity:nil
3/21    One of the fired US Attorney's tells his side of the story:
        http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/21/opinion/21iglesias.html
2024/11/23 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
11/23   

You may also be interested in these entries...
2012/3/27-6/1 [Politics/Domestic/911, Reference/Law/Court] UID:54349 Activity:nil
3/27    Trayvon Martin case:
        http://www.csua.org/u/vw7 (http://www.dailymail.co.uk
        Is this truth, or false rumor spread by critics?
        \_ Does it make any difference?
           \_ I guess since there probably won't be solid evidence on either
              side of the story (no witness, no surveillence tape, ...), this
	...
2010/4/12-5/10 [Reference/Tax] UID:53782 Activity:moderate
4/12    My gf did her taxes. She was unemployed most of last year and only
        paid about $500 in federal tax. She is getting a refund of $1300.
        We are both rather annoyed at this. How can you get a refund of
        more than you paid in?! (This is a rhetorical question. I know
        how.) Another acquaintance of mine makes less than half of what I
        do, but her take home is only 20% less. Even though I put money into
	...
2009/11/11-24 [Reference/Law/Court] UID:53519 Activity:nil
11/11   The DC sniper Muhammad was executed 7yrs after his crime.  Don't denth
        penalty convicts usually spend much longer time on death roll?  What
        put him in the express line?
        \_ Even the supreme court said they should have had 2 weeks to
           consider commuting his sentence to life.  anyway troll boy,
           perhaps the mountain of evidence against the guy, the confession
	...
2009/5/6-9 [Reference/Law/Court, Politics/Domestic/Crime] UID:52959 Activity:nil
5/6     "Wal-Mart pays $2M to avoid charges in death probe"
        http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090506/ap_on_bi_ge/us_wal_mart_death
        "Nassau County District Attorney ... said that if she had brought
        criminal charges against the retailer for negligence in the worker's
        death, the company would have been subject to only a $10,000 fine if
        convicted."
	...
Cache (4363 bytes)
www.nytimes.com/2007/03/21/opinion/21iglesias.html
Article Tools Sponsored By By DAVID C IGLESIAS Published: March 21, 2007 Albuquerque WITH this weeks release of more than 3,000 Justice Department e-mail messages about the dismissal of eight federal prosecutors, it seems clear that politics played a role in the ousters. Of course, as one of the eight, Ive felt this way for some time. But now that the record is out there in black and white for the rest of the country to see, the argument that we were fired for performance related reasons (in the words of Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty) is starting to look more than a little wobbly. United States attorneys have a long history of being insulated from politics. Although we receive our appointments through the political process (I am a Republican who was recommended by Senator Pete Domenici), we are expected to be apolitical once we are in office. I will never forget John Ashcroft, then the attorney general, telling me during the summer of 2001 that politics should play no role during my tenure. Little did I know that I could be fired for not being political. Politics entered my life with two phone calls that I received last fall, just before the November election. One came from Representative Heather Wilson and the other from Senator Domenici, both Republicans from my state, New Mexico. Ms Wilson asked me about sealed indictments pertaining to a politically charged corruption case widely reported in the news media involving local Democrats. Prosecutors may not legally talk about indictments, so I was evasive. Shortly after speaking to Ms Wilson, I received a call from Senator Domenici at my home. The senator wanted to know whether I was going to file corruption charges the cases Ms Wilson had been asking about before November. When I told him that I didnt think so, he said, I am very sorry to hear that, and the line went dead. A few weeks after those phone calls, my name was added to a list of United States attorneys who would be asked to resign even though I had excellent office evaluations, the biggest political corruption prosecutions in New Mexico history, a record number of overall prosecutions and a 95 percent conviction rate. Not only had we not been insulated from politics, we had apparently been singled out for political reasons. Without the benefit of reviewing evidence gleaned from FBI investigative reports, party officials in my state have said that I should have begun a prosecution. What the critics, who dont have any experience as prosecutors, have asserted is reprehensible namely that I should have proceeded without having proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The public has a right to believe that prosecution decisions are made on legal, not political, grounds. Whats more, their narrative has largely ignored that I was one of just two United States attorneys in the country to create a voter-fraud task force in 2004. Mine was bipartisan, and it included state and local law enforcement and election officials. After reviewing more than 100 complaints of voter fraud, I felt there was one possible case that should be prosecuted federally. I worked with the FBI and the Justice Departments public integrity section. As much as I wanted to prosecute the case, I could not overcome evidentiary problems. The Justice Department and the FBI did not disagree with my decision in the end not to prosecute. Yesterday, the Senate voted to overturn a 2006 provision in the Patriot Act that allows the attorney general to appoint indefinite interim United States attorneys. The attorney generals chief of staff has resigned and been replaced by a respected career federal prosecutor, Chuck Rosenberg. The president and attorney general have admitted that mistakes were made, and Mr Domenici and Ms Wilson have publicly acknowledged calling me. I appreciate his gratitude for my service this marks the first time I have been thanked. But only a written retraction by the Justice Department setting the record straight regarding my performance would settle the issue for me. David C Iglesias was United States attorney for the District of New Mexico from October 2001 through last month. Next Article in Opinion (7 of 12) Tips To find reference information about the words used in this article, double-click on any word, phrase or name. A new window will open with a dictionary definition or encyclopedia entry.