11/11 Why is Cal trying to lose the game? Red zone, three downs, can't
TD, why does it feel like the '90s again.
\_ This game left a bad taste in my mouth. Cal didn't play well,
but the Hughes interception overturned and Hawkins' ability to
turn 2 TDs into FGs really hurt. Cal should have won this game,
despite Longshore playing like dookie. So if Cal beats USC
and Stanford, we can still go to the Rose Bowl, right? Same as
\_ we? you're on the team? cool!
it was before this game happened. BTW, I thought Cal should
have gone for it on 4th and goal. What good does the FG do
unless you're worried AZ is going to kick one, too? Cal needed
the TD. Stupid Hawkins.
\_ We needed two scores to win. If Jackson's foot lands one inch
\_ You're on the team, too? That's awesome. I had no idea so
many soda geeks played football for Cal on the side. Way to
go sodans!
\_ you're a moron. -tom
\_ *laugh* one day 'we' hope to be smart like you.
differently, we would have won the game because we kicked a
field goal on the previous posession. -tom
\_ Yes, but even without it Cal would have tied. The way
it worked out Cal lost. Counting on a miracle drive to
win is risky. I'd have rather gone for the TD. It's
a lot easier to gain 3 yards than 88 yards.
\_ We had just lost yardage on two consecutive plays,
then almost had a pass picked off. Our chance of
converting on fourth down was likely less than 50%,
and there was plenty of time left on the clock (over
7 minutes). And in fact, we did get the ball back and
we did have a really good chance to score. It didn't
work out. Sometimes that happens. -tom
work out. Sometimes that happens. -tom, bear apologist
\_ Probably, but what are the chances of converting on
an 88 yard drive when we hadn't gone on a drive all
game? If AZ had made one more first down Cal
wouldn't have even gotten the ball back. |