| WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ | |
 http://csua.com/feed/ | |
| ||||||
| 5/17 |
| 2006/10/9-10 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/Korea] UID:44736 Activity:kinda low |
10/9 BBC radio just now said the NK nuke was estimated to be 1Kt and may
have been conventional or a failed nuke.
\_ Russia is saying the blast is between 5 and 15 kilotons, and it
has a border with N Korea and helped them build the plant used to
produce plutonium.
\_ Since when did Russia share a border with North Korea? I thought
China was to the north of North Korea, and South Korea was to the
south of North Korea. The rest of North Korea is surrounded by
\_ Um, moron, look at a world map or atlas. Russia does not share
a border with North Korea. China shares a border with the north
side of North Korea. South Korea shares a border on the southern
side of North Korea. The rest of North Korea is surrounded by
water.
\_ NK shares a small part of its far NE border with Russia.
\_ Uh, SK has a border with NK too. So? And what's it matter who
built the plant that produced the plutonium unless they were
involved in building the bomb or testing it? I don't get what
you're trying to say.
\_ Russian nuclear expertise, duh
\_ "duh"? You have no in way explained how the Russian claim
of 5-15Kt is more reliable than the other reports of 1Kt.
"Russian nuclear expertise" left hanging by itself is no
answer to anything. They let you into college?
\_ use your brain, don't make ppl spoonfeed it to you
\_ So you've got nothing. Thanks for not participating.
I believe this is where I say "duh" in response and
the whole thing disolves into purely personal attack.
\_ Korea has nukes? Great. Now we wait for the red dot on the ground.
"Nuclear launch detected"
\_ There's never an Observer around when you need one.
\_ And China's trying to blind our comsats!
\_ Don't worry, Bush, our benevolent Overlord has Vision[tm]! |
| 5/17 |
|