www.csua.org/u/h0p -> www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-military25sep25,0,5555967.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Large Text Size Large Text Size Change text size Army Warns Rumsfeld It's Billions Short An extraordinary action by the chief of staff sends a message: The Pentagon must increase the budget or reduce commitments in Iraq and elsewhere. By Peter Spiegel, Times Staff Writer September 25, 2006 WASHINGTON -- The Army's top officer withheld a required 2008 budget plan from Pentagon leaders last month after protesting to Defense Secretary Donald H Rumsfeld that the service could not maintain its current level of activity in Iraq plus its other global commitments without billions in additional funding. Peter J Schoomaker, the Army's chief of staff, is believed to be unprecedented and signals a widespread belief within the Army that in the absence of significant troop withdrawals from Iraq, funding assumptions must be completely reworked, say current and former Pentagon officials. ADVERTISEMENT "This is unusual, but hell, we're in unusual times," said a senior Pentagon official involved in the budget discussions. The protest followed a series of cuts in the service's funding requests by both the White House and Congress over the last four months. "It's incredibly huge," said the Army official, who, like others, spoke on condition of anonymity when commenting on internal deliberations. Most funding for the fighting in Iraq has come from annual emergency spending bills, with the regular defense budget going to normal personnel, procurement and operational expenses, such as salaries and new weapons systems. About $400 billion has been appropriated for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars through emergency funding measures since Sept. But in recent budget negotiations, Army officials argued that the service's expanding global role in the US-declared war on terrorism -- outlined in strategic plans issued this year -- as well as fast-growing personnel and equipment costs tied to the Iraq war, have put intense pressure on its normal budget. "It's kind of like the old rancher saying: 'I'm going to size the herd to the amount of hay that I have,' " said Lt.
can't size the herd to the size of the amount of hay that he has because he's got to maintain the herd to meet the current operating environment." The Army, with an active-duty force of 504,000, has been stretched by the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. About 400,000 have done at least one tour of combat duty, and more than a third of those have been deployed twice. Commanders have increasingly complained of the strain, saying last week that sustaining current levels will require more help from the National Guard and Reserve or an increase in the active-duty force. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in June after he received new Army budget outlines from Rumsfeld's office. Those outlines called for an Army budget of about $114 billion, a $2-billion cut from previous guidelines. The cuts would grow to $7 billion a year after six years, the senior Army official said. After Schoomaker confronted Rumsfeld with the Army's own estimates for maintaining the current size and commitments -- and the steps that would have to be taken to meet the lower figure, which included cutting four combat brigades and an entire division headquarters unit -- Rumsfeld agreed to set up a task force to investigate Army funding. Although no formal notification is required, Army Secretary Francis J Harvey, who has backed Schoomaker in his push for additional funding, wrote to Rumsfeld early last month to inform him that the Army would miss the Aug. Harvey said the delay in submitting the plan, formally called a Program Objective Memorandum, was the result of the extended review by the task force. The study group -- which included three-star officers from the Army and Rumsfeld's office -- has since agreed with the Army's initial assessment. Officials say negotiations have moved to higher levels of the Bush administration, involving top aides to Rumsfeld and White House Budget Director Rob Portman. Pressure on the Army budget has been growing since late May, when the House and Senate appropriations committees proposed defense spending for 2007 of $4 billion to $9 billion below the White House's original request. Funding was further complicated this summer, when rising sectarian violence in Baghdad forced the Pentagon to shelve plans to gradually reduce troops in Iraq. Because of those pressures, the Army in July announced it was freezing civilian hiring and new weapons contract awards and was scaling back on personnel travel restrictions, among other cost cuts. Schoomaker has been vocal in recent months about a need to expand war funding legislation to pay for repair of hundreds of tanks and armored fighting vehicles after heavy use in Iraq.
|
http://csua.com/feed/