7/28 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,251-2290713,00.html
Security Council agrees on UN resolution that gives Iran until end of
next month to halt enrichment, and if they don't, they'll get another
chance to comply, and if they don't, there may be sanctions ... or not
(which, if actually implemented, will probably hurt the U.S and help
China and Russia anyway). Morons. We need a new, robust NPT that
restricts peaceful enrichment to select sites and makes guarantees on
availability to those who aren't enriching. At least we're not
bombing - our troops will be the first to pay in case that happens.
\_ A new, robust NPT that will exempt the U.S., you mean.
\_ what part of "makes guarantees on availability to those who
aren't enriching" is hard to understand?
\_ err... US is a violator of NPT, right? and you know Iran can
\_ since when?
easily withdraw from NPT and everything will be legal, right?
\_ true.
do you know US already have an economic sanction in place against
\_ true.
Iran so any UN sanction is not going to hurt US, while UN sanction
\_ true.
is going to hurt Russia/China and rest of the world who has huge
bilateral ecnomic tie to Iran, right?
\_ true but how smart is it to let a country like
iran have nukes? Russia and China both have serious
problems with Muslim terrorists. Maybe next time
it won't be a Russian movie theatre but the whole
city. Not now. Not in five years. But ten? What
about 20 years from now? 30?
\_ do you know what "sloppy sanctions" are? China and Russia
won't give in to real sanctions. Trust me, any sanctions
Iranian oil will get out in one way or the other.
\_ Trust me, with "sanctions" applied, Iranian oil will get out
in one way or the other. Let's say the oil isn't available
to Western markets. Let's say China and Iran are getting all
to Western markets. Let's say China and Russia are getting all
the oil then. Then who is hurt MORE by UN sanctions on Iran? |