Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 42595
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/25    

2006/3/31-4/3 [Recreation/Media] UID:42595 Activity:nil
3/31    Awesome Ebert review of "Basic Instinct 2":
        http://csua.org/u/fec
        "My 1-1/2-star rating is like a cold shower, designed to take my mind
        away from giving it four stars."
        \_ We care why?
        \_ Other than really good movies, this is the kind of unpretentious
           movies I like.  Good review.
2025/05/25 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/25    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/1/26-2/19 [Politics, Recreation/Media] UID:54590 Activity:nil
1/26    Wozniak says the the Steve Jobs movie clip is historically inaccurate,
        that Jobs was not so much a visionaire that Jobs claimed to be, as Jobs
        was just looking to make a few quick bucks. Why should we trust
        Woz's words over Jobs'?
        \_ Seriously? Read both the Steve Jobs biography and Woz's autobiography.
           Nobody contests that Jobs was a scumbag. Also: the lounge in Soda Hall.
	...
2012/12/6-18 [Recreation/Dating, Recreation/Media] UID:54549 Activity:nil
12/6    Lesson learned: don't talk about Monty Python on a date. Women just
        don't seem to get it.
        \_ You are dating the wrong women (for you) then. My sister-in-law
           loves it and yet I don't find it all that funny. It's not a
           gender thing.
           \_ is she a nerd? does she laugh funny? is she actually decent looking?
	...
2012/10/17-12/4 [Recreation/Media] UID:54504 Activity:nil
10/17   Cloud Atlas Shrugged.
        \_ How is this movie? Did you see it?
           \_ Cloud Atlas is a movie. Atlas Shrugged is a movie.
              Cloud Atlas Shrugged is a made-up name.
              \_ How was Cloud Atlas?
	...
2012/7/3-8/19 [Recreation/Media] UID:54430 Activity:nil
7/3     Just found a great new movie on cable last night:
        "Blame it on Rio"
        http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086973
        In it, a middle aged guy gets seduced by his friends
        teen daughter:
        http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001400
	...
Cache (4409 bytes)
csua.org/u/fec -> rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060330/REVIEWS/60323008
E-mail this to a friend >> "Basic Instinct 2" resembles its heroine: It gets off by living dangerously. Here is a movie so outrageous and preposterous it is either suicidal or throbbing with a horrible fascination. What kind of reason is that for staying away from a movie? I have here an e-mail from Adam Burke, a reader who says, "I'm tired of reading your reviews where you give a movie three stars but make sure we know it isn't a great movie. You always seem to want to cover your ass, making sure we know you're smarter than the movie." Of course I am smarter than most movies, but so are you. What Burke doesn't mention is my other maddening tendency, which is to give a movie 1-1/2 stars and then hint that it's really better than that. Which brings us full circle to "Basic Instinct 2" It has an audacious plot that depends on a psychopathic serial killer being able to manipulate everyone in her life, or a woman who uncannily seems to be a psychopathic serial killer, while there is an alternative explanation for everything. True, , or are equally impossible, but they're the only possibilities, I think. That leaves us feeling screwed at the end, which is how everyone in the film feels, so we cross the finish line together. She may get some of the worst reviews in years, but she delivers the goods. Playing Catherine Tramell, a trashy novelist who toys with life, death and sex while doing "research" for her next best seller, Stone brings a hypnotic fascination to her performance. You don't believe it, but you can't tear your eyes away. She can spend hours working her way through "every position in Masters and Johnson," she sighs wistfully, and forget all about it in a week, "but I'd remember it if a man died while having sex with me." She says this, and lots of other things, to a shrink named Dr. He's appointed by the courts to evaluate her sanity after the car she is driving goes off a bridge at 110 mph and her passenger, a soccer star, drowns. In court, we learn she has a "risk addiction" so severe that "the only limit for her would be her own death." Back on the street after unlikely legal technicalities, she comes salivating after Dr. David Thewlis) who sniffs around the case like a dog convinced that if liverwurst is not in the room at this moment, it was here not very long ago. Some of these people die unpleasantly during the course of the film, possibly giving Tramell something to remember. What matters are the long scenes of dialogue in which Tramell mind-whacks Dr. Glass with speculations so detailed they rival the limerick about who did what, and with which, and to whom. Michael Caton-Jones, alternates smoldering closeups with towering dominatrix poses, and there's an extended Jacuzzi sequence in which we get the much-advertised full frontal nudity -- which does not, somehow, manage to be full, frontal and nude all at the same time. First a little nude, then a little full, then a little frontal, driving us crazy trying to load her simultaneously onto our hard drive. David Morrissey as a subdued, repressed basket case who listens to Tramell with a stony expression on his face. This is because he is either suppressing his desire to ravage her in lustful abandon, or suppressing delirious laughter. I'll bet there are outtakes of Stone and Morrissey cracking up. How else to respond to dialogue such as, "Don't take it so hard -- even Oedipus didn't see his mother coming." "Basic Instinct 2" is not good in any rational or defensible way, but not bad in irrational and indefensible ways. I savored the icy abstraction of the modern architecture, which made the people look like they came with the building. I grinned at that absurd phallic skyscraper that really does exist in London. I liked the recklessness of the sex-and-speed sequence that opens the movie (and, curiously, looks to have been shot in Chicago). I could appreciate the plot once I accepted that it was simply jerking my chain. Speaking of wallowing in the plot, I am reminded of another of today's e-mails, from Coralyn Sheridan, who tells me that in Parma, they say, "The music of Verdi is like a pig: Nothing goes to waste." Sharon Stone, what can I say except that there is within most men a private place that responds to an aggressive sexual challenge, especially when it's delivered like a lurid torch song, and Stone plays those notes like she worked out her own fingering.