Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 42185
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/04/04 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/4     

2006/3/10 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton] UID:42185 Activity:nil
3/10    The Clinton National Security Scandal and Coverup
        by Sen. James N. Inhofe - Senate Floor Statement
        June 23, 1999
        http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1580901/posts?page=39#39
2025/04/04 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
4/4     

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/2/10-3/19 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush, Uncategorized/Profanity] UID:54603 Activity:nil
2/10    I like Woz, and I like iWoz, but let me tell ya, no one worships
        him because he has the charisma of an highly functioning
        Autistic person. Meanwhile, everyone worships Jobs because
        he's better looking and does an amazing job promoting himself
        as God. I guess this is not the first time in history. Case in
        point, Caesar, Napolean, GWB, etc. Why is it that people
	...
2010/11/2-2011/1/13 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/President/Reagan] UID:54001 Activity:nil
11/2    California Uber Alles is such a great song
        \_ Yes, and it was written about Jerry Brown. I was thinking this
           as I cast my vote for Meg Whitman. I am independent, but I
           typically vote Democrat (e.g., I voted for Boxer). However, I
           can't believe we elected this retread.
           \_ You voted for the billionaire that ran HP into the ground
	...
2010/2/22-3/30 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:53722 Activity:nil
2/20    Ok serious question, NOT political.  This is straight up procedural.
        Has it been declared that we didn't find WMD in iraq? (think so).
        So why did we go into iraq (what was the gain), and if nobody really
        knows, why is nobody looking for the reason?
        \_ Political stability, military strategy (Iran), and to prevent
           Saddam from financing terrorism.
	...
2009/8/5-13 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:53241 Activity:kinda low
8/5     Regarding NKorea relesing the journalists, here's what I think the
        actual deal between Kim and Obama is:
        - Both agree that Kim needs to save, or gain, face to pave the way for
          his son's succession and for NK's stability.
        - Both agree that Obama doesn't like losing face by publicly
          apologizing.
	...
2009/4/27-5/4 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton] UID:52914 Activity:low
4/27    "Obama the first Asian-American president?"
        http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090427/pl_afp/uspoliticsobama100daysasia
        Just like the way Clinton was the first African-American president.
        \_ Two wars, a banking, housing, and general economic crisis, a truly
           massive deficit, and now, Swine Flu.  Has any president except for
           Lincoln and Roosevelt faced worse?
	...
2009/4/16-20 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:52855 Activity:nil
4/16    The Obama couple had an AGI of $2.6M in 2008 and $4.2M in 2007!
        http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzzlog/92476/?fp=1
        How much did the Dubyas and the Clintons make?
        \_ Obama wrote two bestselling books right around that time.
           \_ But Obama wasn't that famous before the presidental election
              campaign in 2008.
	...
2009/3/13-19 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton] UID:52710 Activity:nil
3/13    So Bill Clinton doesn't know what an embryo is?
        \_ obCigarJoke
	...
2009/2/27-3/6 [Politics/Domestic/California, Reference/Tax] UID:52655 Activity:low
2/27    CA unemployment increases from 9.3% to 10.1% for Jan
        \_ Good thing the legislature passed the biggest tax increase in
           history!  That should solve it.
           \_ because cutting taxes has done such a great job so far!
                \_ it has.. giving mortgages to poor folks did us in
                   \_ 100% horseshit.
	...
2009/2/4-9 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton] UID:52511 Activity:kinda low
2/3     Well said: "What gets people upset are executives being rewarded for
        failure. Especially when those rewards are subsidized by US taxpayers."
        \_ Turns out, he gets it.
           \_ Talk is cheap.
              \_ Freedom is strength.
        \_ Isn't this something like FDR might have said?
	...
2009/2/2-8 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:52497 Activity:nil
2/1     Pres. Obama keeps rendition
        http://www.latimes.com/news/la-na-rendition1-2009feb01,0,7548176,full.story
        \_ This does not mean what you (or the LA Times) think it means.
        \_ More on how this article does not mean what you (or the idiotic
           LA times) think it means:
           http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/02/02/renditions
	...
Cache (8192 bytes)
209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1580901/posts?page=39#39
Sic Luceat Lux At approximately 4:05 pm EST today, Sean Hannity's screener allowed me to be the second caller to pose a question to Sean Hannity on air. When I heard my name and city announced and Sean said hello, I said good afternoon and stated "Sean, this will be the toughest question you've ever had to answer" and Sean said "have at it." "Sean, over the past many years, I've not heard you once, not one time - direct your listeners to go to our U S Congressional Record for the date of June 23, 1999. This date is the date of U S Senator Inhofe's Chinagate speech. Why haven't you been directing folks to this all-important Chinagate speech?" and I don't know why we have not followed up on this subject." "I don't know why we have not followed up on this subject." all of our nuclear secrets are gone and to quote from Inhofe's speech: "Next, we move to the other eight major technology breaches revealed in the Cox Report. All of these were not only discovered during the Clinton administration, they also happened during the Clinton administration." I was hoping to conclude my call by asking Sean if he would start mentioning -during his radio program- that folks should read this Inhofe Chinagate speech and Sean could simply say for folks to go to our U S Congressional Record for the date of June 23, 1999. com | May 25, 2004 As the 9/11 Commission tries to uncover what kept intelligence agencies from preventing September 11, it has overlooked two vital factors: Jamie Gorelick and Bill Clinton. Gorelick, who has browbeaten the current administration, helped erect the walls between the FBI, CIA and local investigators that made 9/11 inevitable. However, she was merely expanding the policy Bill Clinton established with Presidential Decision Directive 24. What has been little underreported is why the policy came about: to thwart investigations into the Chinese funding of Clinton's re-election campaign, and the favors he bestowed on them in return. View Replies To: Alamo-Girl Alamo-Girl, may I ask you please, do you have any clue as to why none of our conservative radio talk show hosts never mention Chinagate? And with Hillary possibly making a run in '08, (and if she wins - another White House over-flowing again ---with Communist Chinese agents) why isn't Chinagate the topic of everyday discussion? View Replies To: Sic Luceat Lux Probably fear of the Clintons kept Sean from discussing Chinagate. Remember when he did that interview with the author of the book that revealed all about Hillary. He very promptly backed away from that issue as did the rest of the media. com/focus/f-news/1141698/posts How Chinagate Led to 9/11 It's a story the 9/11 Commission may not want to hear, and one that Gorelick - now incredibly a member of that commission - has so far refused to tell. But it is perhaps the most crucial one to understanding the intentional breakdown of intelligence that led to the September 11 disaster. View Replies To: Sic Luceat Lux I heard your call today and found it sad that Sean, in his usual "I can only speak the phrases that have been programmed in me and they yank my cord" way, he avoided it completely. haha I also found it very similiar to when he claims a statement a caller has as if it were his own. For instance, he will have Ann Coulter, or Michael Reagan on with a "big lib" (I can't stand to hear him do that childish crap) and they will comment on something and then he will declare it to the 'big lib', as if he researched it and has something on them. I guess it's to get SOME conservative information, and the only other alternative in Atlanta on the way home is the Kimmer. Of course that Denny Schafer guy in the morning isn't much better. View Replies To: silvermace Chinagate was so collosal a scandal and betrayal that the average person simply can't believe it could have happened or that such a thing is possible. Exactly and all the more reason for more Americans to at least -at the very least- be directed to the speech and read it. View Replies To: Sic Luceat Lux Trying to get the talkers to do the right thing can be a frustrating event. Many of them will hardly tackle a topic unless they are sure it's timely, in the news and bound to attract lots of audience attention. Stuff that they have to carry on their own is always risky and even the ones that can carry topics like that such as Rush or Savage or a few others don't always do it. Plus you have the ego factor, if they don't think of it themselves than sometimes it doesn't exist, but you do have a truly important topic and don't let anyone here turn you off. The clintonistas giving away our nuclear secrets to the chinese will haunt this country forever and if we don't pursue their punishment, who will. View Replies To: Sic Luceat Lux Dude, when a radio guy says "WE" he means HIMSELF. It is an old radio affectation to say we all the time when he really means himself. Because, in most of radio, a discjockey is not speaking by himself, but representing the radio station. View Replies To: Northeast Northeast, not singling you out, but do we really want all of the following of Hillary's pals to be riding rough-shod through our White House again? Wang Mei Trie, John Huang, Johnny Chung, Liu Tai-ying, Bin Liu, Irene Wu, Nora Lum, Shi-Zeng Chen, General Ding Henggao, Lt. View Replies To: Sic Luceat Lux China Gate could take on new life if Hillary runs for President. Swift Vets style attacks, website, volunteers, information, and interviews on fox news. View Replies To: Sic Luceat Lux "Chinagate was so collosal a scandal and betrayal that the average person simply can't believe it could have happened" Same goes for "Mexicogate" under Bush (my term for refusing to protect our border). We've been betrayed by both parties IMHO Seeing Bush senior and Bill Clinton smiling together is most disturbing. View Replies To: Sic Luceat Lux The reason we do not hear of this ghastly betrayal is again, nothing that comes from the Bush administration is taken at face value, these have to come bubbling up though the non msm media to even see the light of day. View Replies To: Sic Luceat Lux There are too may Repubs who also profited in some way by Chinagate. Hillabat still has copies of the FBI files and the derog info from both would quickly be spread over a willing media about evil Republicans and their sins and ties to illicit Chinese contributions. Look the Republican party was AWOL for 8 years on issues of defense spending and how US forces were being used. It wasn't just Slickest who was doing a Monica on the armed forces the Republicans were just as happy as the Dems to gut defense budgets and watch the effect of 'paying the deficit down' on the stock market. When Chinagate surfaced it was treated with much less than eager delight by most of the Repub leadership for reasons stated in paragraph one. Combined with the sorry record the party had in doing effectively nothing with the mangling of the armed forces that was underway the GOP has a lot to be modest about for the Clinton years. So no matter how big the secrets Clinton gave to the chinks the truth would never get past the msm. All they would concentrate on is what happened under gop administrations, rats always get a pass with the msm. well that just doesn't happen at the presidential level too often. All "I can only speak the phrases that have been programmed in me and they yank my cord" way, he avoided it completely. It would be so simple a task -for Hannity -even just once or twice a week, to simply mention to his listeners to go to their computers, pull up our Congressional Record for the date of June 23, 1999 and read Senator Inhofe's Chinagate speech. View Replies To: Sic Luceat Lux Why haven't you been directing folks to this all-important Chinagate speech?" A retired President has more than enough pull to yank Hannity out of his soft seat and end his career in broadcasting. View Replies To: Sic Luceat Lux Well here is the famous speech that Hannity the Empty headed was caught flatfoot on: The Clinton National Security Scandal and Coverup by Sen. James N Inhofe Senate Floor Statement | June 23, 1999 MR PRESIDENT, I want you to liste...