Berkeley CSUA MOTD:Entry 41341
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

2006/1/11-13 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:41341 Activity:low
1/11    http://anotherfuckedborrower.blogspot.com
        In case bitter housing guy hasn't seen this --oj
        \_ Wow, there's some interesting stuff in there. Refi junkies
           indeed.
        \_ "This is the part that I have 100% no-doubt-in-my-mind will happen
           in this country. People will take zero responsibility for their
           actions, and look to grab a lawyer to 'save' them from the
           'investment' they were 'cheated' on."
        \_ 100% no-down loans aren't a problem.  The down is so high today
           that having 20% sitting around and then plunking it into a house
           just isn't a wise financial move anymore.  Going underwater isn't
           a problem either if we're talking about people using the home for
           their primary living space.  It could drop to whatever and as long
           as they can still make the monthly payment it doesn't matter.  A
           house is not like a stock option.  Being 'underwater' doesn't mean
           it has no value or you're financially ruined.  The ARMs aren't a
           a problem either.  All it means is they got a loan that can go up
           a fairly large amount in a fairly short period of time *IF* they
           don't refi before then to a longer term locked in rate.  The
           difference in the monthly between their ARM and a 30 year is not
           going to be so much that a lot of people will be unable to pay the
           difference and lose their home.  The problem here is the interest
           only buyers.  No one knows how many of them there are but their
           monthly is going to skyrocket when they refi from ARM to a 30 (or
           whatever more typical) year loan and the difference is going to be
           so large that these people might be unable to pay it or even be
           allowed to refi into a 30 year at all if the lender sees they can't
           pay it.  The interest-only buyers are the ones going to get hurt
           if anyone does.  Never forget that a house is a very different
           investment than a stock or a stock option and different rules
           apply.  The only thing that will truly hurt all these home buyers
           as well as the very few 20% down/30 year home buyers and everyone
           else in the country is massive jobs losses from a deep recession.
           As long as people have the same job they had when they bought the
           house and could theoretically make their monthlies, they will be
           able to continue to do so.  However, if we reach the point that
           massive job losses are causing massive home buyer wipe outs we
           have far far far worse problems on a global economic scale than
           anything going on in the housing market.
2025/05/24 [General] UID:1000 Activity:popular
5/24    

You may also be interested in these entries...
2013/8/1-10/28 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54722 Activity:nil
8/1     Suppose your house is already paid off and you retire at 65.
        How much expense does one expect to spend a year, in the Bay
        Area? Property tax will be about $10K/year for a modest $850K
        home. What about other stuff?
        \_ I think at age 65, health insurance is the next biggest expense.
        \_ I am thinking that we can have a nice middle class
	...
2013/7/31-9/16 [Reference/RealEstate, Finance/Investment] UID:54720 Activity:nil
7[31    Suppose you have a few hundred thousand dollars in the bank earning
        minimum interest rate and you're not sure whether you're going to
        buy a house in 1-5 years. Should one put that money in a more
        risky place like Vanguard ETFs and index funds, given that the
        horizon is only 1-5 years?
        \_ I have a very similar problem, in that I have a bunch of cash
	...
2013/6/3-7/23 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54685 Activity:nil
6/3     Why are "real estate" and "real property" called so?  Does the part
        "real" mean something like "not fake"?
        \- without going into a long discourse into common law,
           it is to distinguish land/fixed property from intangible
           property [like a patent] and movable, personal property,
           like your car. Real property has historically had special
	...
2013/3/11-4/16 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54622 Activity:nil
3/10    I'm trying to help my parents, in their mortgage there's an
        "escrow" amount. What exactly is this? From reading Google,
        the loan company uses the escrow account to pay for home
        insurance, but they've been paying home insurance themselves.
        I'm really confused on what this fee is.
        \_ Without an escrow account, you write checks to your insurance
	...
2013/2/19-3/26 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:54610 Activity:nil
2/19    I just realized that my real estate broker has a PhD in plant
        molecular cell biology from an Ivy League school in the mid 70s.
        Now she has to deal with a bunch of young dot-comers, and they're
        pain in the ass.                        -Only a BS in EEC$
        \_ My agent used to be a hardware engineer.  He switched to real estate
           when he got laid off during the 80's.  Now he's doing very well.
	...
Cache (8192 bytes)
anotherfuckedborrower.blogspot.com
Free Foreclosure Listings Tuesday, January 10, 2006 FB's and comments/feedback I got busy working on a few things tonight, so I don't have the time to hammer out a long post. but since I know everybody loves a good FB story, I have a few quickies to share. Primary borrower has credit in the mid 600's and the co-bwr has credit in the high 500's. The LTV was less in the 70% range and they had a BK almost a decade ago. They were trying to go full doc, but looking at the income they had (about 5k a month between them), they were probably going to come up short on the 400k loan amount. and the Notice of Default (NOD) was sent a little while ago. Sooooo, needless to say, I can't do much of anything once the NOD has been launched and the foreclosure process starts in a week. But besides that, I don't think there would have been a way for the borrowers to afford the payments either. especially with those fico scores and mortgage lates (prior to the foreclosure). I looked at another loan where the borrower was going stated with a Fico in the high 500's. The only problem was that they wanted a loan to 98% LTV. Might as well take it to 100%, no sense in refinancing to leave a few measly grand on the table. but the 550k loan amount helped to put another nail in the coffin. I looked at a few other 'ugly' loans, but nothing that really put the borrower in an FB type position. Anybody on laptops or smaller screens that are having problems? The article investigates situations where borrowers refinance one interest-only (I/O) loan for another when the interest only period stops. There appreared to be some sighs of despair as people thought "oh no, this thing is never going to end if people can keep refi'ing into another I/O loan". There are quite a few obsticles in the way of simply refinaning again to another I/O ARM. Note: I'm looking at several rate sheets and using rates that are typical of what is being seen in the market. Not only do the payments adjust, but you have to start paying the PRINCIPLE off as well (unless you refi/sell/foreclose). Let's say the rate jumps to 675% (could be higher, but most have a 15% cap on each adjustment) and NOW you have to amortize over the next 28/27/25/23/20 years because you didn't pay any principle during the initial I/O period. Let's also remember that I'm not even crunching the numbers of how much extra money will be paid in interest over the various periods. That would get really ugly, and besides, most people won't keep these loans that long, or stay with the property that long. Ok, that's nice SoCalMtgGuy, but these people are going to refi before the adjustment hits. Before they can refi, they will need a few things: They will need to have some equity if they plan on refinaning the way they have been the past few years. I'm going to assume they didn't put very much, if any, money down. To show that they have equity, they will need an appraisal. It is "easier" to do that in a market that is trending upwards. If the comps are falling, it is very hard to push the value on an appraisal. Some of you are asking why they need some equity to refi. not the broker, not the title company, not the lender, and not the escrow company. All of those people want, and need to get paid for their services. So unless this borrower (which can't afford a higher monthly payment) has several thousand in savings to pay the fees, they will need to use the equity to pay for the refinance. Let's look at some scenarios that might hurt people's ability to refi into another I/O loan: - property values decline, and they are upside down. and if/when they do refi, they will be at such a high rate because of the LTV and higher rates that they won't be able to afford that either. My lender will not refi an ARM into another ARM until it is adjusting or unless they are lowering payments a few hundred dollars per month or they are taking out enough cash to be at least 2x the cost of the refi. Even if the loan is adjusting, there can be times when there isn't a benefit to spend thousands of dollars to refi to save a few hundred. Higher LTV's will mean higher rates, and harder times for the borrowers. It seems that many people like to buy furniture/stereo/other goods on credit when they buy a new home. but if you can't pay for those things in a timely manner, it WILL ding your credit score, and that will affect the rate you can get when you look to refi again. But let's get back to our scenario, and assume that our borrower can get a 725% I/O loan on $300,000 and let's assume they paid cash for the refinance. The best case scenario for this borrower is to have enough equity so that they can refinance. Notice that I was kind, and did not add the cost of the refinance to the 300k loan balance. Now that we have looked at the math, let me tell you what I see in the real world. These are the people who habitually refinance as many as 2-3 times in a year. That would make 6 refinances in about a 4 year time period. But THIS time they were really going to pay off all their debt and not get into more debt. If you just assume the standard 6 months interest that is charged as a pre-pay penalty, these borrowers wasted a good 60-80k in pre-pay penalties as they jumped from loan to loan. Their LTV was too high, debt level too high, loan amount too high, and credit score too low to do a loan that would make sense for these borrowers. but I have no idea if they really changed their ways or not. Many of you reading this blog are probably scratching your heads in amazement. I have touched on it before, and I will touch again on HOW many of these ARM's are sold. The brokers sell the loan like this: "just get in the market. Get a low payment now, and when it adjusts, you will have equity, so just refinance into another ARM" It is stated so plainly that property will appreciate and refinancing will "automatically" bring lower payments like it has the past 5 years. The broker get an "annuity" from people coming back to them every 2-3 years to refinance. There are lots of good brokers that are professionals and will recommend what is best for the borrower, not their own personal pocketbook. There are also lots of brokers that love to churn the loans and make the easy money. It isn't something you just jump head first into with some broker over the phone. There better be some homework done before you make a financial decision with hundreds of thousands of dollars. Just take what you learn here, crunch the numbers, and make a decision for yourself. Don't be afraid to ask questions you already know the answer to. This way you will find out if they have integrity and/or are just an idiot. All and all, on paper it looks like there is going to be a massive refi-boom coming again in 2007 for sure. The problem is that many of those borrowers don't intent to refi, they intend to sell. but they wanted to make the money on appreciation, and then cash out. Even if only 15-20% of the people had that idea, that is still a ton of inventory that will be dumped on the market. as there is no precedent for the way money has been lent out these past few years. On a side note, I made some changes to the blog over the past few days. At the request of several people who have been reading this blog for a while and who I have been helping over e-mail, I added a 'donate' button. It takes a lot of time to write the posts and reply to each of the hundreds of e-mails I have received. I don't usually repost articles because I know that many of you have made the rounds on the "bubble blog circuit" and seen them elsewhere. There are some articles though that deserve to be posted, and expounded upon. A Home Boom Busts - Shanghai's hot housing market has fizzled after a run-up fed by speculators, threatening a significant part of China's economy. Since it appears they are currently experiening a housing bust, let's look at some of the signals that are now so "obvious" to them, and see if there are any similarities to the United States "frothy" regions. Let's start here with these 3 points: "Shanghai's housing bust comes after a doubling of prices in the previous three years, a run-up fueled by massiv...