| WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ | |
 http://csua.com/feed/ | |
| ||||||
| 5/25 |
| 2005/12/15-16 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers, Uncategorized/Profanity] UID:41027 Activity:moderate |
12/14 Panexa is the right choice, the safe choice. The only choice.
http://www.panexa.com -John
\_ http://blog.stayfreemagazine.org/2005/11/cafepress_copyr.html
\_ Fuck Cafepress. I've been censored there with no warning
or explanation also, and I would not give them my business
again even for something that would clearly not be censored.
Fuck them straight in the ear.
\_ Get a life. -tom
\_ Get a life. -motd
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ Get a life.
\_ DAMN!
Get a life. _/
Get a life. _/ |
| 5/25 |
|
| www.panexa.com No matter what you do or where you go, you're always going to be yourself. Your lifestyle is one of the biggest factors in choosing how to live. Panexa is proven to provide more medication to those who take it than any other comparable solution. IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION PLEASE READ THIS SUMMARY CAREFULLY, THEN ASK YOUR DOCTOR ABOUT PANEXA AND HOW TO PROVIDE YOU WITH LARGE QUANTITIES. THIS ADVERTISEMENT DOES NOT T AKE THE PLACE OF ADVICE FROM YOUR DOCTOR; RATHER, IT PROVIDES YOU WITH N EW INFORMATION ABOUT NEW DRUGS YOU COULD BE USING. PANEXA is a prescription drug that should only be taken by patients exper iencing one of the following disorders: metabolism, binocular vision, di gestion (solid and liquid), circulation, menstruation, cognition, oscula tion, extremes of emotion. For patients with coronary heart condition (C HC) or two separate feet (2SF), the dosage of PANEXA should be doubled t o ensure that twice the number of pills are being consumed. PANEXA can a lso be utilized to decrease the risk of death caused by not taking PANEX A, being beaten to death by oscelots, or death relating from complicatio ns arising from seeing too much of the color lavender. Epileptic patient s should take care to ensure tight, careful grips on containers of PANEX A, in order to secure their contents in the event of a seizure, caused b y PANEXA or otherwise. WHEN PANEXA SHOULD NOT BE USED There are no known medical circumstances (based on extensive internal tes ting) in which PANEXA cannot be used. However, PANEXA is not quite as ag gressively recommended in the following circumstances: * PANEXA should not be used as a physical aid to set a broken bone, as in the case of a splint; WARNINGS Muscle: In a small number of tested cases (84%) PANEXAwas found to cause abdominal wall muscle breakdown coupled with spasmodic activity in lower back/spinal muscles, resulting in most patients violently bending forwa rd like a book slamming shut. While some other drugs promote similar res ponses (gemifbrozil, fresh cherries, nicitonic acid, cyclosporine, musta rd gas, and acetomenaphin) PANEXA's reactions are over 48X as powerful a nd take place with a great deal more panache and flash. Also, PANEXA can contribute to developing inhumanly powerful tongue muscles, capable of licking through steel. Lymphatic System: If, after taking PANEXA for a p eriod of four to six weeks, you still have any functioning lymph nodes r emaining, double the dosage every two weeks until they are all gone. IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR WOMEN Pregnant women, or women who plan to become pregnant, should avoid taking PANEXAor handling broken tablets. Women considering some day becoming pregnant, who have ever been pregnant, who have had a pregnant friend or pet, or who have seen other pregnant women, naked or otherwise, should also follow these precautions:Do not handle PANEXA tab lets, containers, or related literature. If a PANEXA product nears your field of vision, avert your eyes. If y ou do happen to pronounce the syllables, spit thrice and soak your hands in iodine. If you hear the words spoken, live or via recorded medium, c over your ears and immediately see a specialist to try and staunch the b leeding. Drop this magazine immediately, and get the hell out of here as fast as you fucking can. If you should be aware of a pregnant woman who has handled PANEXA, attemp t to warn the peoples of earth of the mind-numbing horror that is about to unfold. If you are a squirrel, and suspect you may be su ffering from EFTS, immediately call the Hotline at 1-800-867-5309. Pediatric use: Expired PANEXA may be disposed of by feeding to children i n a bowl with milk. SIDE EFFECTS Most patients (2%) tolerate treatment with PANEXA well, especially when c ompared with prisoners of war of comparable size and weight. However, li ke all drugs, PANEXA can produce some notable side effects, all of which are probably really, really terrific and nothing that anyone should be concerned about, let alone notify any medical regulatory commission abou t Most side effects of PANEXA, or their sufferers, are usually short-li ved, and are rarely so fatal that the remains can no longer be identifie d, provided good dental records are available. Some known side effects a re: Respiratory system: Shortness of breath, longness of breath, kinetic ball oon-like lung expansion, really geeky laughs Digestive system: explosive diaherrea, upset stomach; bitter, withdrawn s tomach, prehensile colon, achy butt; shiny, valuable feces composed of a luminum and studded with diamonds and sapphire Eyes/senses: everything you think you see becomes a Tootsie Roll to you, night vision, taste hallucinations (where everything tastes 'gamey' or ' oakey'), inability to distinguish the colors 'taupe' and 'putty'; sudden enjoyment of really bad music, like Kenny G or some crap; thinking ever ything is so damn funny all the time Muscular/Skeletal: PANEXAcan cause a real live skeleton to be walking aro und inside you, buttock muscles to mirror the actions of the jaw muscles , magnetization of the ribcage, and musical spine disorder (MSD) Skin: M ight turn blue, wither, and fall off. Or just get really thick and spong y (muppet-like) Other: Loss of sexual desire and/or desirability; susceptibility to wedgies, no rhythm, dresses fo r shit, and can't hold a job to save your life; and the compulsion to address everyone nearby as "Cap'n." PANEXA is a registered trademark of MERD Pharmeceutical Group. |
| blog.stayfreemagazine.org/2005/11/cafepress_copyr.html Cafep ress in the past but this time they are out of control. After a reader sent me a note wondering what happened to our Panexa merch andise, I noticed that Cafepress has removed it due to copyright and tra demark infringement! I sent Cafepres s an email about this and am awaiting a response. What I find galling is that Cafepress doesn't even give you a chance to c onsult an attorney! The company makes an arbitrary decision on its own a nd then it's up to you to argue them out of it. Bush - American Idl e Note that it is not "Idol" They sent me an email that it had been removed. After a couple more email exchanges I called and made my case. The next day I got an email saying it had been restored. They were pretty nice about it, actually, and they did end up seeing it m y way. Kevin Cannon | Nov 3, 2005 6:45:22 AM I have to agree they are quick to take down all sorts of "infringing" mat erial, but so far, they've also been nice enough to reply quickly when I complained. Eg I once made a Firefox logo t-shirt, they took it down, and then I send them a page where it said people can promote Firefox us ing the logo, and then they send me back a page which said "... only for non-commercial/ personal reasons" -- so in the end they were right, but they still offered me to put the Firefox shirt live again for me to mak e personal orders only. Once, I made a black pie with missing piece on a yellow shirt... gif Apparently, this infringes on Pac-man copyrights, but hey... what's the w orld coming to if you can't draw a pie anymore? I think they must defend themselves from copyright infringements, they co uld be made responsible too. So when they take something down quickly an d force you to "opt-in" again by emailing them, maybe it's their only pr agmatic choice. What do you think are the chances of emailing 10,000 use rs per day telling them "can you please review this shirt and elaborate to us the copyright details"... The Panexa case stated here was an incrtedibly stupid mistake, of course, and they shouldn't repeat such things too often. Philipp Lenssen | Nov 3, 2005 8:32:50 AM Thanks for all the comments and traffic. Our data has shown that r emoving and reinstating sells more merchandise. Please contact us if you want any other products to be removed from the l isting. Western Infidels | Nov 3, 2005 12:53:41 PM They give you a chance to find an attorney: After they have removed thems elves from a possibly problematic situation. Instead of pissing and moaning about it like it's an enormous affront to civilization, why don't you consider what it's like (just for a second, honest) to run a business like theirs? com and had a customer too impatie nt and lacking in perspective to give me a bit to re-review the content before spewing all over a blog, I'd say "Fuck you" and switch focus to t he stream of new customers already at my door. Spell Nazi | Nov 3, 2005 3:11:39 PM Jeff, If I wanted to post an mp3 on this blog but Typepad forbade me from doing so because many mp3s are copyrighted, you could say they were playing i t safe... but you could also say that such a policy would be unreasonabl e.. and I'd argue that such is the case with Cafepress's guilty-until-p resumed-innocent censors. On what basis could Cafepress possibly justify removing the Panexa stuff? If they had a question a bout its origin, they could have easily emailed me... they should at the very least give me a chance to respond before taking the stuff down. Cafepress has removed one of my shirts before -- a parody of the Virgin l ogo that says "whore." When I contacted them and argued them out of it, they removed the hold on the shirt. But then a month or two later, they took it down AGAIN.... so, what, I'm supposed to call them every couple of months and remind them? I gave up on arguing about the Virgin shirt because I don't care much eit her way about that one. But it's ridiculous that I have to waste my time proving that something we created is in fact ours. Wal-Mart and other c ompanies have similar policies for photo developing... and the only thin g standing in the way of more of these kinds of limits on media use is p ublic criticism. carrie | Nov 3, 2005 4:30:40 PM I had a big fight with Cafepress over a few removed items, and I was able to expose them as phonies whose trademark concerns are mostly one-sided . t=309 They restored the items eventually but I'm moving to an alternative site to sell T-Shirts anyway. Red Square | Nov 3, 2005 4:31:27 PM Ah, so there's more to this fury than this one instance. That makes my ta ke on all of it quite a bit different on the receiving end, Carrie. I don't necessarily agree with you that it's ridiculous that you should h ave to prove something is yours when it happens to be flagged by reviewe rs trying to keep sanity to their business. I have to believe that if you'd received a "You have 7 days to contact us , please, or we'll temporarily disable your product page." notice, your feelings about the whole situation would be different. That says to me t hat it's not so insane a concept, but the execution with cafepress is so rely lacking. For what it's worth, I had a product page removed (with notice) from cafe press two years ago. It was an image (all text) I had scanned from a Sub aru owner's manual. When notified weeks later that the content was flagg ed, I rightfully conceded and was actually rather pleased to find that t hey were keeping watch on this sort of thing. Pe rsonally, in those circumstances, I feel an obligation as a consumer to contact the appropriate department to address the situation as a last st and, let them know exactly what they're doing wrong, and what I intend t o do unless it's resolved. Your point about the mp3 file is interesting to consider, although it doe sn't sit fully right with me as a good example. If you were in the *busi ness* of burning CDs of submitted content, for the world to purchase, I have to think you'd be reviewing the content for copyright infringement. I'm sure I am far from as clueful as you are regardi ng the laws about this sort of thing (business owner responsibility/reac h), but they sure seem like very different scenarios. Jeff | Nov 3, 2005 7:13:05 PM If they've got enough time to consider the image and decide it may be inf ringing, they've certainly got enough time to do the barest of research (ie google the name "panexa") and see for themselves. I've had similar experiences with CP myself - and now I'd rather use thos e crappy inkjet t-shirt transfers than do any business with them again. They are free to run their ship the way they see fit, but don't be upset when people start finding other boats. rp | Nov 4, 2005 2:06:10 AM It's nice to see that your unfortunate dealings with CP haven't affected your own standards. If you had gone an unilaterally criticized them with out consultating them first, in the same way they took down your site wi thout contacting you, I would have been disappointed. Maybe you can exto ll that virtue when your birth announcement gets in the Observer. |